|
bigredhoss
|
05-04-2006, 10:00 PM
Post subject: 100nl 6max: 62s getting tricky
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 127
|
|
no real reads except that the table in general seemed fairly week (which is why i chose to play 62s in the first place)
most good players frown upon minraises and i generally agree, but i think it had some merit here. or maybe im a monkey, who knows.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)
SB ($39.50)
BB ($126.50)
UTG ($27.05)
Hero ($146.50)
CO ($54.35)
Button ($162.10)
Preflop: Hero is MP with 6 , 2 .
1 fold, Hero raises to $4, 1 fold, Button calls $4, 2 folds.
Flop: ($9.50) 9 , 9 , A (2 players)
Hero bets $5, Button calls $5.
Turn: ($19.50) 8 (2 players)
Hero checks, Button checks.
River: ($19.50) T (2 players)
Hero checks, Button bets $12, Hero raises to $24, Button folds.
Final Pot: $55.50
Results in white below:
Hero has 6s 2s (one pair, nines).
Outcome: Hero wins $55.50.
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Lodogg
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Stealing your C-bet
Posts: 199
|
|
I'm not a 6max player so this is probably not even valid but why would you raise with that shitty of a hand into 2 players who have position? Maybe its a 6 handed thing?
|
|
|
|
bigredhoss
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 127
|
|
pf obviously isn't standard, but like i said i thought the table was pretty weak/passive, i'm very likely to take it down with a c-bet regardless. either way it's not bad to play hands like these once in a great while imo..
|
|
|
|
Lodogg
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Stealing your C-bet
Posts: 199
|
|
I think your opponent had a flush draw as well by the way he checked it down on the turn. I think he tried to steal it on the river. In most hands I think you just threw away another $12 IMO.
|
|
|
|
bigredhoss
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 127
|
|
i dont get what you mean by "most hands" since the play was made 100% based on the context of this hand.
|
|
|
|
theDEEPdish
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: in a van by the river
Posts: 236
|
|
i think the check raise on the river should be more like 30-35 unless your very confident that he will fold to that
|
|
|
|
bair
|
|
Full House
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 953
|
|
looks pretty dumb to me, i think the only hand that really folds here is a draw
|
|
|
|
bigredhoss
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 127
|
|
ok here is my reasoning:
what hand calls flop, checks behind turn and bets river after I check? either he flopped a monster or he's on a draw, the draw being much more likely (only exception being QJs). also if he flopped a monster i would highly expect him to at the very least throw out some kind of teaser "call-me" bet on the turn.
i realize check-miniraising as a bluff is normally dumb because any marginal hand will call you due to pot size, but because of the board I felt there was no middleground really.
thedeepish: given the way the hand was played what hand do you think he's calling my mini-checkraise that he would fold to a 30-35 checkraise?
bair: that's the idea.
i thought against his range of hands my FE with a miniraise would be identical to a bigger one.
|
|
|