Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

$10NL-

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
tom
Old 04-08-2008, 01:05 AM     Post subject: $10NL- #1 (permalink)  
tom's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: May 2005
Location: ATX
Posts: 158
tom
Send a message via AIM to tom
I'm posting this hand for clarification on a couple things- this might go in the beginners forum, but well...I don't necessarily feel like a 'beginner' soo I'm not gonna just for that reason

First, this, like most $10NL tables I've played at are just super passive...preflop, postflop, midflop, ETC... as such I end up trying to limp stuff like this from a lot of different positions, end up staying in on a draw that seems to never come, even with (I think) correct pot odds to call(and EV..I THINK...). Is this a bad idea in general for these tables? I feel like I use up an increasing amount of money calling little shitty bets and never turn a profit on them...

so, if you would let me know is the correct way to play a hand like this, and I'm ok with you saying fold preflop if you give me some justification given the table circumstances.
Thanks




PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (8 handed) Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

saw flop|saw showdown

MP2 ($9.35)
CO ($10)
Button ($6.95)
SB ($6.85)
BB ($4.15)
UTG ($1.95)
Hero ($16.50)
MP1 ($7.10)

Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with J, T.
1 fold, Hero calls $0.10, MP1 calls $0.10, 1 fold, CO calls $0.10, 1 fold, BB checks.

Flop: ($0.45) 3, 6, 2 (5 players)
BB bets $0.1, Hero calls $0.10, MP1 calls $0.10, CO calls $0.10, BB calls $0.40, Hero calls $0.40, MP1 folds, CO folds.

Turn: ($1.65) 4 (3 players)
BB checks, Hero checks, Pp(AUT) checks.

River: ($1.65) T (3 players)
BB bets $1, Hero folds, Pp(AUT) folds.

Final Pot: $1.65
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
martindcx1e
Old 04-08-2008, 07:13 AM #2 (permalink)  
martindcx1e's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
martindcx1e
You should fold preflop. You are out of position and have no initiative. Flushes are really obvious, and you aren't going to make a ton of money in a limped pot with a J-high flush normally.
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
 
Reply With Quote
daven
Old 04-08-2008, 10:17 AM     Post subject: Re: $10NL- #3 (permalink)  
Straight Flush

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,805
daven will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom

Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with J, T.
1 fold, Hero folds (maybe call or even raise from CO or button) - cos you'd be folding if someone raises behind, MP1 calls $0.10, 1 fold, CO calls $0.10, 1 fold, BB checks.
 
Reply With Quote
swiggidy
Old 04-08-2008, 10:59 PM #4 (permalink)  
swiggidy's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Waiting in the shadows ...
Posts: 3,777
swiggidy will become famous soon enough
People call too much and don't adjust. You don't need to add suited connectors to your repertoire.

There is no hand/position combo you should be open limping at 10NL. If you don't want to raise fold. JTs, 9Ts look pretty, but you'll get more value from KQo at microstakes.
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
 
Reply With Quote
frosst
Old 04-08-2008, 11:55 PM #5 (permalink)  
frosst's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: count-n mah monies stewie-style
Posts: 220
frosst
Send a message via AIM to frosst
and just because everyone else is limping doesnt mean you should. there's a reason they're playing 10nl.

 
Reply With Quote
mrhappy333
Old 04-09-2008, 12:27 AM #6 (permalink)  
mrhappy333's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,078
mrhappy333 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to mrhappy333
If you are at a super passive table you need to start raising everything untill your opponents adjust. Then you readjust, play your good hands and you will get alot mor action when you raise your premo's and they hit.

TJs UTG = fold preflop for me usually.
3 3 3 I'm only half evil.
 
Reply With Quote
tom
Old 04-09-2008, 03:47 AM #7 (permalink)  
tom's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: May 2005
Location: ATX
Posts: 158
tom
Send a message via AIM to tom
I guess I do end up raising quite a bit, most of the time it gets folded around. And typically I get a loooooooot of "tom wins pot of $.25". Even when I get 1 or 2 callers, rarely do I get anybody to call a cbet, which is sweet, I guess, but when my cbets are ~3/4 pot size(after raising pf) and somebody actually has a hand, I end up losing more money on that one hand than I make from all the damn blinds and cbets I take down (of course no always, but way to often it seems like)

which is when I end up saying fuck it and start limping stuff like this looking for an 'un-obvious' hand to make some good profit off of...

I keep seeing people averaging 3-10 BB/100hands, and I feel like if I kept tight and just took down the blinds, etc, I'd probably be doing this... so maybe it's just the limit I'm at? looking at my $ with just .30 cents added to my stack per 100 hands and being excited just seems silly, but am I interpreting this right? If so I guess it's just more reason to chill out and grind till I get the BR to move up.

edit: got off on a tangent, but....really? not get into a pot unless you raise? this seems excessive to me.
Reply With Quote
d0zer
Old 04-09-2008, 04:04 AM #8 (permalink)  
d0zer's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,521
d0zer is a jewel in the roughd0zer is a jewel in the roughd0zer is a jewel in the roughd0zer is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom
....really? not get into a pot unless you raise? this seems excessive to me.
It, combined with c-betting is actually quite profitable long term, especially if you play proper positional poker (loosening up closer to the button).

There's a lot of good reasons for it, but one of my favorite is that it throws some players totally off when you only ever open raise, and they start to not take anything you do seriously and will look you up with junk when you've actually got a premium hand. Loose passives usually consider "playing back at you" to be just calling your preflop raises, which is great when you've got AQ and they're holding QT & the flop comes Q24.

C-betting a lot accomplishes this also, so while you may only be winning smaller pots, it sets you up for bigger ones later. For c-betting to be profitable in a HU situation, it only needs to work 25%-50% of the time (depending on the size of your average c-bet), and with position I find it works far more often than that.

Many seasoned veterans here suggest getting your preflop raise% up to the point where you're only limping maybe 2-3% of hands, and raising the other 10-12%. I'm closer to that than when I started, but still have a bit of a weakness for limping with a lot of limpers behind, and SB completion which is keeping my limp closer to 4% of hands.
Reply With Quote
Erpel
Old 04-09-2008, 11:55 AM #9 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 605
Erpel
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom
I guess I do end up raising quite a bit, most of the time it gets folded around. And typically I get a loooooooot of "tom wins pot of $.25". Even when I get 1 or 2 callers, rarely do I get anybody to call a cbet, which is sweet, I guess, but when my cbets are ~3/4 pot size(after raising pf) and somebody actually has a hand, I end up losing more money on that one hand than I make from all the damn blinds and cbets I take down (of course no always, but way to often it seems like)

which is when I end up saying fuck it and start limping stuff like this looking for an 'un-obvious' hand to make some good profit off of...

I keep seeing people averaging 3-10 BB/100hands, and I feel like if I kept tight and just took down the blinds, etc, I'd probably be doing this... so maybe it's just the limit I'm at? looking at my $ with just .30 cents added to my stack per 100 hands and being excited just seems silly, but am I interpreting this right? If so I guess it's just more reason to chill out and grind till I get the BR to move up.

edit: got off on a tangent, but....really? not get into a pot unless you raise? this seems excessive to me.
I sometimes see the world the same way - then I try to fix my thinking.

Speaking of blinds. Let's assume you can steal blinds from 3 positions (SB, BTN, CO), the table is weak/tight and you manage to steal blinds once per orbit on average. This gives you 1.5bb profit per 10 hands - that's 15 big blinds profit per 100 hands from stealing alone! (I think PT lists big bets rather than big blinds so it's listed as 7.5BB/100).

If we agree that 3-10BB/100 is solid winning poker it is worth considering how big a part of it stealing can be.

To follow on to the previous respondent - when I play super tight and not positionally aware I play so few hands that everyone knows I have something when I play and they don't play back at me. I never get paid off. When I play super tight but try to steal with air when I'm in position I play enough hands, and enough questionable hands that people will play back at me - then I fold air and collect with my big hands.

Another thing to consider is that if you don't raise a hand you have no idea what the villain has. He might be a weak player who limps AA and 76s equally. If you put in healthy raises he'll fold a lot of crap and you can develop a realistic expectation of what he might be holding and determine with some chance of success whether the flop helped him or not.

When I play a table full of super tight people I tend to steal even in the position before CO. It's shocking how often it actually works. In extreme cases I can have %attempt to steal above 60. (it counts only SB, BTN and CO positions for this stat)
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:31 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.