|
euphoricism
|
06-03-2006, 11:10 PM
Post subject: Help Eupho with a semi-simple algebra problem.
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
Math is not my strong suit..
8x+22y=40,000
x=? y=?
Round to nearest whole number
Code:
8x+22y=40,000
-22y -22y
8x = 40,000 - 22y
x = (40,000 - 22y)/8
Replace back to main problem.. and I'm lost.
8((40000-22y)/8) = 40,000
----- -----------
8 8
(40000-22y) /8 = 5000
multiply by 8 again..
40000-22y = 400000
-22y = 0
y = 0
So, thats not right. Help?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
I seem to recall it has something to do with a parabola.. maybe a circle..
I can't remember.
|
|
|
|
Nehmer
|
06-03-2006, 11:19 PM
Post subject: Re: Help Eupho with a semi-simple algebra problem.
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Decatur, IL
Posts: 666
|
|
2 variables needs 2 equations to solve... If you just need any solution then, how bout y = 1, x = 4997.25
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
But no, there is a way to do this.
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
ooh. Youre right. I missed half the equation.
Lets try this again:
8x+22y=40,000
x+y = 31
Does that make a difference?
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
fuck me. = 30
x+y=30
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
8x+22y-40,000 = 0
then factor it out. If nobody's done it by the time i'm done eating this sushi, I will.
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
Bah I give up. thats not right either.
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
Here's what I'm trying to do, maybe you guys can help me there. Might be my methedology that is off.
There are 30 days in june, I want to play 40,000 hands of poker. This is 1333.33 hands per day. However, I will play shorter sessions on saturday and sunday.
Let x = hands played on weekends
y = hands played on weekdays
so I get 8 weekends + 22 weekdays = 40,000 total hands
8x + 22y = 40000
I also get that x+y = 30, but also that 2x+5y=7.
I'm trying to find the "ideal" numbers.
edit.. ahh x+y != 30. Thats silly. 2x+5y != 7 either.
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
ahhh but 2x+5y DOES equal 10,000. Four weeks in a month, 4*10,000
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
The automated solver is giving me just to play 5000 hands every weekend. Well, that makes it simple.
Atleast I got the equation right.
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
I think nehmer is close. I could just use a very long list of numbers that fit the equation and grab the one I feel is best.
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
Nehmer wins. Its just a line.
y = 1/22 (40000-8x)
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
If you're trying to find optimums, you were right in using just one equation.
You would have to graph it as a line and try to find the point that you like the most.
Now, if you thought "I think I'd like to play 2000 hands every weekday, how many do i have to hit on the weekend" then this is an easy problem.
But if you want to know some "optimum" without any conditions like "I can hand B hrs every weekday easily playing C number of tables, what are my weekends gonna look like? If I bump that number down by an hour, what now?" then i cant help you.
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
Now whats the easiest way to look at a whole table of values for that line...
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by euphoricism
Now whats the easiest way to look at a whole table of values for that line...
|
excel
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
how would I do that with excel?
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
how about this (ballparked)
1000 hands on weekends, 1500 hands on weekdays
8000 + 33000 = 41,000
subtract 1,000 for times you'd rather watch porn
=
40,000
algebra problem solved
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
Yeah those are the numbers I got when I ballparked. 1000 on weekends, 1500 on weekdays. Its pretty close to what I want. Just wanted to know what exact numbers should be.
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
euph,
to be honest, it's very difficult and certainly not efficient to always play a preset number of hands. There will be times when you are just lethargic, you don't feel like playing, playing poorly, etc., where you shouldn't play as many hands as you'd like. And there are other times when you have nothing better to do, you're running hot, you're confident, playing well, etc., where there's no reason to quit playing.
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
To an extent, you are correct. To an extent, you are far from correct.
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
Your point is valid, however, NOT playing poker costs a lot of money. I'm not playing tonight, simply because I'm just too fucking tired. Long day, ya know?
But its going to cost me. I'm essentially paying $250 to take the night off. Opportunity costs ain't cheap.
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by euphoricism
Your point is valid, however, NOT playing poker costs a lot of money. I'm not playing tonight, simply because I'm just too fucking tired. Long day, ya know?
But its going to cost me. I'm essentially paying $250 to take the night off. Opportunity costs ain't cheap.
|
meh, depends. Sometimes I think it's -ev for me to play. If I'm tired, steaming, and the games aren't good, it's undoubtedly -ev for me to play. See where I'm going?
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
Yar. Definitely no argument that you shouldn't play when tired, stressed, steaming, as you're likely to lose money.
But you are also losing money by not playing. Guess it's a matter of the greater of two evils.
In any case, cheers.
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lukie
8x+22y-40,000 = 0
then factor it out. If nobody's done it by the time i'm done eating this sushi, I will.
|
this is wrong, but I'll try to figure this out anyway to the best of my ability. But it's been like 2 years since I've done anything like this.
(solve for x)
8x+22y-40,000 = 0.
8x+22y=40,000
8x = -22y+40,000
goddamnit i lost my fucking graphing calculator. windows calculator -ev.
*x= -22/8y + 5,000*
(solve for Y)
8x+22y=40,000
22y = -8x +40,000
*y = -8/22x + 1818.18*
(plug x value back into original equation)
8 (-22/8y + 5,000) + 22y = 40,000
-22y + 40,000 + 22y = 40,000
40,000 = 40,000
no shit asshole
ALRIGHT LETS TRY PLUGGING Y INTO THE ORIGINAL EQUATION. GRAPHING CALCULATOR = MUCH BETTER.
y = -8/22x + 1818.18
8x + 22 (-8/22x + 1818.18) = 40,000
8x + -8x + 40,000 = 40,000
40,000 = 40,000
omg so fucking rigg3d
ALRIGHT LETS TRY PLUGGING THE X FORUMLA INTO THE Y FORUMLA, BOTH OF WHICH I SOLVED FOR
x= -22/8y + 5,000
y = -8/22x + 1818.18
x = -22/8(-8/22x + 1818.18) + 5000
x = x - 5000 + 5000
x=x (as an aside, this is always, 100% true, so you can't say I'm wrong.)
jesus christ, this was so easy for me back in the day....
anyway I'm sure I made an error somewhere along the way and I'm gonna come here tomorrow and correct it. Seriously. Too tired now.
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
I don't think you made an error, those are the same results I got.
Its a methodology thing. Since, as nehmer pointed out, there is no correct answer. It is a line, and all points on that line satisfy the equation.
We solve for y, and graph it.
It can be graphed using y = -8/22x + 1818.18, as you solved.
Then its a simple matter of finding a data point within acceptable reasonable ranges. This can easily be done on any graphing calculator, but apparently nothing on the internets can do it. We can also "brute force" it.
Say we wanted to play 1000 hands on the weekends, exactly how many hands do we need to play on weekdays?
well, x=1000.
8x+22y=40000
8000+22y=40000
y=1454.54
so the point 1000,1454.54 satisfys the equation.
FWIW, I think these are the exact ranges I want, but lets experiment.
let y=1400 -- 1400 hands during weekdays
8x+22(1400)=40000
solve for x, x=1150 hands during weekends.
Actually, those might be the ideal numbers. Guess I might as well try y=1300.
8x+22(1300)=40000
x=1425 ... but if one of our requirements be x<y -- we're playing less hands on weekends than weekdays -- this has to be ignored
Alright one last equation, y=1500
8x+22(1500)=40000
x=875
Looks like the ideal is one of these three:
(1150,1400), (1000,1454), or (875,1500)
Well. Guess I figured out my own answer(s). Now it doesn't matter which one of these I use, and in fact I can substitute one for the other on a weekly basis. One week I can do 1150 hands on the weekends and 1400 hands on weekdays, and one week I can do 875 hands on the weekends and 1500 hands during the week. All depends on my forseeable availability.
Actually, thats incredibly useful. If I think I'll be very busy next weekend, I know exactly how much during the week I need to compensate.
|
|
|
|
givememyleg
|
|
WHO YA GONNA CALL?!??
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ISHPERMING MISHIGEN
Posts: 5,042
|
|
I would rather watch beastiality than read this thread.
But I could say that for a lot of things.
|

Get your own badge! Click profile at the top and FTR Badge from the left nav.
"The Dragon in My Garage" by Carl Sagan
I say onto you, I've felt the dragon! I felt the touch of his tail, the breath of his fire, and I know without a shadow of a doubt that the dragon exists!
|
|
midas06
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,196
|
|
Wouldn't you want to play longer sessions on Saturday to take advantage of the drunks?
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by midas06
Wouldn't you want to play longer sessions on Saturday to take advantage of the drunks?
|
Yes, in reality I'll be moving the 'weekend days' to sunday and monday, when the poker isn't usually as good. This leaves saturday as a weekday.
|
|
|
|
mb2447
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 122
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lukie
anyway I'm sure I made an error somewhere along the way and I'm gonna come here tomorrow and correct it. Seriously. Too tired now.
|
The only error is (as said earlier) in the assumption that this equation is solvable for a unique (x,y). It is not.
Period.
|
|
AWOL.
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
LOL at both of you solving one equation with two variables.
Someone already pointed this problem out to you, then I explained that with the given data you can only make a line and have no way to glean any unique points from it without other info.
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
LOL at both of you solving one equation with two variables.
Someone already pointed this problem out to you, then I explained that with the given data you can only make a line and have no way to glean any unique points from it without other info.
|
I think we already came to that conclusion there ol' buddy.
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lukie
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
LOL at both of you solving one equation with two variables.
Someone already pointed this problem out to you, then I explained that with the given data you can only make a line and have no way to glean any unique points from it without other info.
|
I think we already came to that conclusion there ol' buddy.
|
There's no way for you to save face after this thread, shoulda just not posted to let it die faster.
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lukie
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
LOL at both of you solving one equation with two variables.
Someone already pointed this problem out to you, then I explained that with the given data you can only make a line and have no way to glean any unique points from it without other info.
|
I think we already came to that conclusion there ol' buddy.
|
There's no way for you to save face after this thread, shoulda just not posted to let it die faster.
|
rilla i have more street-cred on this block then anyone you could ever imagine, don't worry about me.
|
|
|