Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Calling Math guys for a BJ Standard Deviation Question

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
rubixstreub
Old 12-04-2005, 01:47 AM     Post subject: Calling Math guys for a BJ Standard Deviation Question #1 (permalink)  
rubixstreub's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 887
rubixstreub
$6 bets playing one hand at a time
or
$2 bets playing 3 hands at a time

Is there a difference? I would think your standard deviation is going to be lower playing more hands for less money but it might not matter. I figure it's like the coin flipping question, each hand is independant, meaning $2 bets you risk far smaller standard deviation, despite betting the same amount of money each deal.
 
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
eeeee
Old 12-04-2005, 02:53 AM #2 (permalink)  
eeeee's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 906
eeeee
Variance is lower with the 3-$2 hands. Many, many rounds you will lose $2 or win $2, or some other possible option.
With the $6 hand, you can only lose it all, tie, or win -- there is no half wins or 1/2 losses.

It does not affect EV. Variance is swings, risk.
I'm a know-it-all.




No, really.
 
Reply With Quote
Demiparadigm
Old 12-06-2005, 05:49 AM #3 (permalink)  
Demiparadigm's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Party 6 max
Posts: 1,602
Demiparadigm
Realize that the $2 bets are not independant.
Since all 3 are played against the same dealer hand, you will often win all 3 or lose all 3. For example when the dealer busts or has blackjack.
Nonetheless, your standard deviation will be lower with 3 $2 bets, but not as low as if you made single $2 bets per hand.
To win in poker you only need to be one step ahead of your opponents. Two steps may be detrimental.
 
Reply With Quote
swiggidy
Old 01-06-2006, 12:32 AM #4 (permalink)  
swiggidy's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Waiting in the shadows ...
Posts: 3,777
swiggidy will become famous soon enough
Are you talking betting $6? or betting $600?

From Demi's point it sounds like playing 3 - $2 hands at one time against the same dealer would be worse eV than playing one $6 hand, which is way more important than variance.
Reply With Quote
Aces
Old 01-06-2006, 02:10 PM #5 (permalink)  
Aces's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 832
Aces
Quote:
Originally Posted by swiggidy
Are you talking betting $6? or betting $600?

From Demi's point it sounds like playing 3 - $2 hands at one time against the same dealer would be worse eV than playing one $6 hand, which is way more important than variance.
Shouldn't EV be the same regardless of bet size? It's just the variance that changes?
Reply With Quote
eeeee
Old 01-06-2006, 07:05 PM #6 (permalink)  
eeeee's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 906
eeeee
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aces
Quote:
Originally Posted by swiggidy
Are you talking betting $6? or betting $600?

From Demi's point it sounds like playing 3 - $2 hands at one time against the same dealer would be worse eV than playing one $6 hand, which is way more important than variance.
Shouldn't EV be the same regardless of bet size? It's just the variance that changes?
Yes. EV is the same.
What some people don't grasp is the role of Variance. Bet size in relation to the WR and bonus and weighted results (like video poker paying big for RF) both affect variance significantly. Increased variance increases "poor me" stories and "look at me" stories. Example -- check recent threads about Golden Palace ... "I won $300!" ... "I lost it all in 7 bets!". Increased betsize.
I'm a know-it-all.




No, really.
 
Reply With Quote
swiggidy
Old 01-06-2006, 08:01 PM #7 (permalink)  
swiggidy's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Waiting in the shadows ...
Posts: 3,777
swiggidy will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aces
Shouldn't EV be the same regardless of bet size? It's just the variance that changes?
Yes, if you care comparing playing one $6 hand vs. 3 - $2 hands, consecutively.

But, if you're playing 3 hands simultaneously against one dealer then I believe eV is different. If the dealer busts, then you win 3 hands (same as one bet), but if the dealer doesn't bust then each of your 3 hands has to beat his. All 3 won't beat the dealer every time, which would lower eV, making this betting scheme less profitable (actually more lossy).

I was trying to ask a question and make an unrelated point. I asked about the $6 vs $600 because I wondered why rubixstreub was pondering variance (i.e. What if I only had $6? Should I make 3 bets, or 1? If I have $600 what should I expect playing $6 vs $2).
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:44 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.