Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Another calc prob if you don't mind

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
martindcx1e
Old 10-19-2007, 07:06 AM     Post subject: Another calc prob if you don't mind #1 (permalink)  
martindcx1e's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
martindcx1e
Alright here's one more for yall. I don't even know where to start on this kind of problem. Help plz?

Show that the equation x^101 + x^51 + x - 1 = 0 has exactly one real root.
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
 
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
mcatdog
Old 10-19-2007, 07:11 AM #2 (permalink)  
mcatdog's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 3,654
mcatdog
hint #1: graph its derivative
hint #2: evaluate f(0) and f(1)
Reply With Quote
martindcx1e
Old 10-19-2007, 07:15 AM #3 (permalink)  
martindcx1e's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
martindcx1e
what if i'm supposed to do it without graphing? also, i'd like the most general method of showing this so i can do it for different equations too.
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
 
Reply With Quote
mcatdog
Old 10-19-2007, 07:26 AM #4 (permalink)  
mcatdog's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 3,654
mcatdog
I'm trying to let you figure it out without giving it away

just take the derivative and see if you can figure out any properties that it might have, if not then try to graph it
Reply With Quote
spoonitnow
Old 10-20-2007, 01:30 PM #5 (permalink)  
spoonitnow's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
spoonitnow is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to spoonitnow Send a message via MSN to spoonitnow Send a message via Yahoo to spoonitnow Send a message via Skype™ to spoonitnow
OP, You're seriously overthinking this imo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.

Rule # 1: don't ask questions

Rule # 2: don't ask questions

I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
 
Reply With Quote
Miffed22001
Old 10-20-2007, 03:44 PM #6 (permalink)  
Miffed22001's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
Miffed22001 is on a distinguished road
ill be damned if i know the answer
Reply With Quote
gabe
Old 10-20-2007, 05:30 PM #7 (permalink)  
gabe's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: trying to live
Posts: 7,964
gabe is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to gabe
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcatdog
I'm trying to let you figure it out without giving it away
lame!!!
Reply With Quote
spoonitnow
Old 10-20-2007, 10:21 PM #8 (permalink)  
spoonitnow's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
spoonitnow is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to spoonitnow Send a message via MSN to spoonitnow Send a message via Yahoo to spoonitnow Send a message via Skype™ to spoonitnow
This is how bored I am.

Let f(x) = x^101 + x^51 + x − 1.

First we prove existence of some number of roots: Since the limit as x approaches -infinity is -infinity and the limit as x approaches infinity is infinity, there has to be at least one root on (-infinity, infinity).

Now we narrow it down: When we take the derivative, we get f'(x) = 101x^100 + 51x^50 + 1. We note that f'(x) > 0 for all x (all powers are even, all coefficients are positive, and the constant term is positive). Now if there was more than one root, then by Rolle's Theorem, there would be a c such that f'(c) = 0. However, f'(c) is always positive, so there is only one root.

Hit me back in this thread or a PM if you don't get it. Applied Math major ftw.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.

Rule # 1: don't ask questions

Rule # 2: don't ask questions

I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
 
Reply With Quote
Miffed22001
Old 10-20-2007, 10:31 PM #9 (permalink)  
Miffed22001's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
Miffed22001 is on a distinguished road
im still stuggling with E=mc2 ffs.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:38 AM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.