I'd recommend you rethink your bankroll plan imo!
|
02-04-2011 10:25 PM
#1
| |
![]()
|
|
|
02-05-2011 01:20 AM
#2
| |
I'd recommend you rethink your bankroll plan imo! | |
|
| |
|
02-05-2011 08:13 AM
#3
| |
yea seriously there has to be something where you arent getting raked 20% of your buyin | |
|
02-05-2011 12:33 PM
#4
| |
![]()
|
what changes suggest you? thats why im asking, this is a rough idea, i need to get places, figured up some short term goals. for this month. |
|
02-05-2011 05:14 PM
#5
| |
deposit more money and play $3.30s or something? | |
|
| |
|
02-05-2011 05:19 PM
#6
| |
![]()
|
Grinding $1 + .20 SNGs is nothing short of |
|
| |
|
02-07-2011 06:46 AM
#7
| |
![]()
|
yeah i would deposit more, but i cant from this state. plus, im flat broke. |
|
02-07-2011 01:39 PM
#8
| |
![]()
|
Just sayin because I speak from experience. My first ever deposit was $50 on Cake where I played the $1+.20 SNGs. I hated it and I remember thinking there's got to be a better way to build my bankroll. Once I was up to around $120ish, I moved over to cash and never looked back. I've probably played less than 20 tourneys since. Anyway, yeah the 20% rake sucks horse cock but if you've got limited funds then there's not much you can do. GL and don't donk the roll! |
|
| |
|
02-07-2011 10:58 PM
#9
| |
![]()
|
yeah i hate these 1+.20 SnGs. if i can just grind it out and get my roll up just a bit im gettin away from them. higher SnGs will be a lot more profitable because there will HOPEFULLY be less fish. im tired of sitting at a table with 5 fish thatll suck out on me. 1-2 fish at a table would be so much better. |
|
02-08-2011 12:50 AM
#10
| |
![]()
|
Slight revision to the goals. at $30 i plan on going up to $2 1table SnGs rather then at $50. i think 15 BIs would be good enough, and hopefully will encounter somewhat better players and not deal with as many fish. if this is true, i should get rollin pretty quick. but i had a bad run for a few and im at about $5 now... got sucked out on in 3 tourneys in a row by people that should NOT have been anywhere near the hands. my KK got beat by 10 3os, my QQ got beat by A7os cause he hit a A-5 straight..., and then my AA got beat by 83os... this is crazy. |
|
02-08-2011 11:39 PM
#11
| |
![]()
|
Okay, so a new update for this. A person i have played poker with is thinking of staking me at $50 on FTP. if he agrees to it, the structure would be 20 $5 1 table SnGs on FTP with a split on winnings of 50/50 or 55/45 in his favor. i have never really played SnGs on FTP, or anything besides freerolls for that matter. in your guys opinion, which is a better place to play on those stakes? FTP or PS? im used to PS cause thats what ive been playing for a bit now. but if he is only willing to do it through FTP, im guessing i would be going to that. thought i would ask to see what you guys thought. and also, this is my first real stake, is that structured pretty well? |
|
02-14-2011 07:24 PM
#12
| |
If its on ftp make sure you have rakeback btw. | |
| |
|
02-15-2011 02:26 AM
#13
| |
![]()
|
and how do i go about settin up rakeback on ftp? |
|
All content © 2003 - 2013 FlopTurnRiver.com |
Advertising |
Partners |
Testimonials |
T & C |
Contact Us |
FTR News & Press |
Site Map |
Search FTR
|
![]() |
| This is not a gambling website. |