Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,291,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Blogs and Operations

Baudib blog: Live poker/return to online in 2014?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 75 of 133
  1. #1

    Default Baudib blog: Live poker/return to online in 2014?

    Hi all:
    I decided I'm going to try to keep a blog/journal on my poker sessions. I used to do this on another site, but frankly, there were few good players there, so I don't feel like it really helped me much. I feel like, at this point in my poker "career," I need feedback from better players who will call me on bullshit or tell me how I butchered hands.

    Background: I've been on FTR forever -- since 2005. I'm probably the worst player who's been around this site for that long! My story is probably pretty typical: I started playing MTTs and SNGs. I read a few books, then discovered FTR. My early results in small BI MTTs were fairly spectacular, which was probably bad because it made me think I was way better than I was, and it's hard to improve if you think you know everything. Any early success I had, I probably owe to people like drmcboy and chardrian and the other great players that posted regularly on this site back then.

    After the inevitable downswing, I got really burned out on MTTs. I tried playing other forms of poker...I got into PLO, HORSE, 8-Game. I became a moderately winning player, and started playing live poker regularly in 2007. Since then, I've never had a losing year at live poker. In the months leading up to Black Friday, I started slowly getting into MTTs again. I started playing 6-max microstakes online, and was a breakeven/slight loser at NL25 6-max on Full Tilt. But in late 2010/early 2011, I felt I was making large improvements.

    Improving: I had several light-bulb/ah ha moments during that time. Again, a lot of it was from reading stuff on FTR from people like ISF, Renton, nutsinho and Sauce, some of it stuff that had been posted years earlier. I find that very often, there are tiny moments where a good player says something that crystallizes a key concept in a simple way. One example: ISF's post about bet-folding. Another: Something Jungleman said on 2+2 about "thinking what hands your opponent can be bluffing with."

    Black Friday was devastating to me, because I was really focused and felt I was making major strides. I actually had a couple of moderate cashes in MTTs the week before BF.

    The layers upon layers of learning needed to become just competent in this game is staggering. Compared to the vast majority of live players, I feel I am very advanced. But really, I'm just a fish in a small pond. Playing against good players is fun sometimes, and challenging, but I know that almost all of my profits come from bad players.

    I'm realistic about my future in poker. I'm pretty damn old for someone who is still basically a small stakes player, and I know that I'll never play poker full time. I'm fortunate that I don't need to, as I have a pretty good job. I go to the Borgata in AC for the various opens every few months, and I've met a lot of the tournament grinders. I don't envy their lifestyle at all -- it's a brutal grind.

    I talked to Jay Rosenkrantz a few months ago, when "Bet Raise Fold" came out. I explained to him my situation, that I realize there's a ceiling on how good I can get, that I have a full-time job I can't walk away from. He told me that I should try to play better each session than the last, and to try to learn every time you play. Again, something really simple, but good advice.

    Anyway, enough b.s., I'll get to some sessions now.
    Last edited by baudib; 12-29-2013 at 07:36 AM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  2. #2
    Prior to last night, I had had a couple of bad sessions...overplaying good hands, making terrible calldowns. I've been reading Matthew Janda's book, and have talked to Griffey and some others about it. In my games, there's really never a reason to not play exploitatively, but all of Griffey's talk about having strong c/c ranges and putting good hands in unexpected spots has me intrigued. I regularly 3-bet/4-bet way way wider than anyone in my games (my image is pretty maniacal) and I've realized that this has made my range in certain spots extremely weak.

    So let's experiment with having some strong hands in my flatting range.

    Hands of note:
    1. I flat QQ on BTN vs. a decentish LAG player who opened to $15 in EP. He has about $300 and I have him covered. Flop is T-high with 2 spades (I have Qs), he c-bets I call. Turn gives me a gutshot, he barrels and I call. River is brick, he checks, I bet 1/2 pot (to get value from midpairs, JJ), I show, he flips AA and rages at me for not 3-betting pre. Not really happy with how I played the hand, but I could have lost more.

    2. I win a decent pot where I flat pre from BB in multiway pot with KJss, flop top pair and backdoor a flush.

    3. Flat JJ pre (6-handed) from SB vs. a pretty TAG Btn open. Flop: . I c/c, turn , I c/c. I feel pretty sure I'm good here, and my plan is to donk river big on a brick. River is (Bink!), I bet $135 into $165, he tanks and calls. He says I was good the whole way.

    4. Vs. Villain from Hand 1....3 limps...I have AKo in SB and make it $17....1 call, villain (who had overlimped) makes it $55. Folds to me. Pretty bizarre limp-reraise! I think a minute and make it $135 (effective stacks $400ish). He tanks and folds QQ face up, I show the He says since I hadn't been 3-betting much, he had to give me credit for the nuts there.

    Results: Played 7 hours, bought in for $300, cashed out $715 thanks to a couple of nice rivers. +$415.
    Last edited by baudib; 12-29-2013 at 07:40 AM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  3. #3
    P.S. I encourage anyone reading this to ask questions or start discussions on anything really...don't be afraid to derail.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  4. #4
    Friend who read this but isn't a member here messaged me some questions on JJ hand. His complaints are fair criticism:

    why not go for river x/r when you boat up w/ JJ ?
    and why is your plan to donk big on brick rivers? (worry)
    baudib1: good qs
    baudib1: 1. I think he is going to check back a lot of medium-strength hands, not really the type to go for thin value.
    (note: think he has a lot of 77-88, 9x type hands that is trying to get some value from my perceived draw-heavy range, rather than QQ+, based on betsizing)
    baudib1: 2. I think I have a hand that is way better than he thinks I can have here, perceives me as bluffy, and I can rep a lot of busted draws
    Last edited by baudib; 12-29-2013 at 09:25 AM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  5. #5
    Excited for a new blog thread, nice. Good luck man!

    I feel like these hands aren't in line with your previous statement that you're maniacal. The QQ hand I can see, just based on positions, but if you're playing aggro I can't imagine not 3b the JJ hand pre? Especially 6 handed. What are effective stacks.

    Also yah the whole c/c c/c, donk river line isn't really a great line or an easy line to balance with. Are you c/c turn with FD's that have no SD value? (This board kind of sucks for giving an example, since all low FD's have gutters etc). I do see live players taking this line a fair bit, and yah I guess when flush bricks it does get calls.

    but yah like the post above, I would almost always go for a river c/bomb if I played it this way.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by baudib View Post
    Background: I've been on FTR forever -- since 2005. I'm probably the worst player who's been around this site for that long!
    I'll take your bet. That said, great to see you starting a blog. I saw some of those cash's you were posting in the winner thread and it looked like you did have a break through.

    Good luck
  7. #7
    I feel like these hands aren't in line with your previous statement that you're maniacal.
    At a guess, I prob run something like 40/30/10 or even 45/35/10 at this particular game (1-2, low rake, super soft) even when it's 9-10 handed. I think I can tighten up quite a bit and still be the most LAG player at the table almost all the time. Generally I have been auto 3-betting JJ+/AQ+ vs. almost anyone except the most passive nits, and certainly many worse hands, and for sure I'm the only player in this game who even has a 4-bet bluffing range. This particular session, I didn't really out of line often, and only 3-bet twice in 7 hours (AK, AQ) and one 4-bet (the AK hand posted above).

    yah the whole c/c c/c, donk river line isn't really a great line or an easy line to balance with.
    For sure, I agree. Yeah I guess I am messing up the whole idea of protecting c/c ranges if I'm donking river. And yes, I'm asking to be tripled by anyone paying attention when I check rivers. I guess if people adjust I'm going to have to really go the distance and c/c or c/r more rivers with big hands. But I guess to me it seems like the proper application is to A. simply protect my flatting range when I call OOP and B. just getting to rivers with overpairs with surprising lines once in a while is good for my overall range.

    In the QQ/JJ hands above, it was quite obvious both villains were shocked to see me have overpairs. More importantly, I think, when draws brick my perceived range has a lot of bluffs, so even if I'm not actually balancing my range, I can get heroed by worse hands if they think I am polarized.

    I appreciate the feedback though, really. I don't want to try to justify my plays, because I want serious critiques. Just explaining my thought process -- correct where I'm wrong.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  8. #8
    Griffey:
    I should post a couple hands from the session previous to the most recent one. I don't really love either one.

    Hand 1
    Decent player opens to $12 from CO, folds to me, I'm in SB with Effective stacks are around 200 BBs ($400), and I make it $32 to go. BB folds and CO calls.

    Flop:
    I check, he bets $40, I call

    Turn:
    I check, he bets $75, I call

    River:
    I check, he bets $115. I thought fairly seriously about folding here, but I called.

    Hand 2:
    2 limps, pretty tight player (Internet player, seems competent, may have just been card dead) raises to $20 from BTN, he has $300 to start hand. I call in BB with 1 limper calls

    Flop (3 players)

    I check, limp-caller checks, BTN bets $35, I call, 1 fold

    Turn

    I check, BTN bets $70. I call

    River

    I check, he checks.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  9. #9
    So on AQ hand, I was thinking that it would be a good spot to C/C down, although being a 3-bet pot maybe changes the dynamic. In the end I wasn't happy with it, and wished that I had just played it straightforward and bet flop.

    KQ hand -- I was kinda hating life because I felt A. my range is so capped and face-up B. I had no freaking idea what to do if he shoved river...am I calling because I'm at the top of my preflop flatting range? It made me start to think it might be good to occasionally have AK/AA in this spot.

    He ended up checking back QQ, which perhaps demonstrates that people just aren't tripling without having it, even when my range is capped.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  10. #10
    1) AQ hand - River is a snap c/c if you're playing it this way. not even close imo.

    2) KQ hand - I'd probably call river barrel depending on sizing, since this is the top of our range. It's probably not a horrible spot for an exploitable c/f if he makes it really big.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by jyms View Post
    I'll take your bet. That said, great to see you starting a blog. I saw some of those cash's you were posting in the winner thread and it looked like you did have a break through.

    Good luck
    Thanks jyms!
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  12. #12
    So I mentioned online poker in the title but didn't talk about it much. Since BF, I've played very little online. I put $200, intending to basically treat it as play money, on Lock and ran it up to $2,000. The tournaments on Lock were pretty good, and the PLO games super juicy. I managed to make one small withdraw, then people started having serious problems getting money off. I got really annoyed and basically just punted the rest off on roulette and blackjack.

    Since then, I've decided I'm not going to try to play online until it's actually legal (the stories of super soft games on Bovada have me tempted though). I've joined a few games that are run by locals on Stars' Home Games but the rake on play money games is absurd. I got crushed playing 1-2 PLO in May, losing about $3,000, stopped playing it, and came back in the fall and won $6,000 in September/October/November (haven't played since November). I'm going to have a few PLO posts in this blog, but I've only played 1 session (live) since November; I have a love-hate relationship with it.

    With online poker legal in NJ, I'm trying to figure out scenarios in which I can get to NJ and at least play the weekly tournaments on Party Poker.

    For one thing, I need a new laptop, and probably a new subscription to Poker Tracker 4. Will probably look into that in the next week or so. I have friends who live in New Jersey, so I should be able to arrange something.
    Last edited by baudib; 12-30-2013 at 03:17 PM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  13. #13
    I also questioned why you checked AQ on that board in a 3-bet pot. Reminds me of a hand that NeverScaredB posted with almost the exact situation and leveled the crap out of himself.
  14. #14
    Hey CheckCall:
    Do I know you? Thanks for commenting.

    On AQo hand, I think my preflop sizing is too small. Other than that, I don't mind it too much in retrospect, I was being results-oriented before.

    As for checking, if the flop were Q9x or QTx or QJx, it'd be a different story, but on this particular texture, my range is very weak. Q-high flops tend to favor the range that people flat 3-bets with. So much of my range just can't continue as I'm C/f or bet/folding or betting flop and c/f turn so often. AK alone makes 16 combos, and you can add in 12 more combos of TT/JJ. I can slowplay QQ but that's only 3 combos, and only 12 combos of overpairs, and almost all of my bluffs have missed this board. I might need to add some Qx hands to my 3-betting range here as my entire preflop bluffing range has bricked. I have no real draws to defend by c/c or c/r.

    So if I'm always betting AQ+ my checking range is going to be extremely weak/easily exploitable.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  15. #15
    Wouldn't a lead look very nutty with the board texture? Unless i have glaucoma it's a fairly dry board, and not many hands would continue.
  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by CheckCall34 View Post
    Wouldn't a lead look very nutty with the board texture? Unless i have glaucoma it's a fairly dry board, and not many hands would continue.
    Yeah, I agree, which is why I thought it'd be a good spot to c/c down with AQ in order to protect my checking range. I think it'd be better to lead on a board with more broadway draws.

    Here's an example of a similar board texture in a 3-bet pot that a friend played. I think he may read this, so you should just register and post!

    5-handed

    Co ($250) Opens to $20
    BTN ($500ish) flats
    SB HERO ($450) raises to $100
    BB folds
    Co folds
    BTN calls

    Flop ($222)
    Hero checks, BTN bets $100, Hero calls

    Turn ($450)
    Hero checks, BTN goes all in $300, Hero tank calls $250


    Hero is good TAG, mostly plays straightforward, especially in this game. BTN isn't a great player, way too loose pre, definitely overplays some hands, but can do basic hand-reading. He bluffs, but generally not for huge amounts.

    It was pretty apparent to me as an observer that SB has a very marginal hand. BTN knows SB never has a good hand when he checks this board, and is probably shoving a marginal hand himself. As mentioned, this board is generally terrible for 3-bettor's range, and much favors the flatter's range.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  17. #17
    So it's a New Year and this is a new blog. Let's start out with some goals for 2014:

    1. Be disciplined in tracking, analyzing/studying live sessions.
    2. Get back online, at least to play Sunday tournaments once or twice a month
    3. Study more GTO. As mentioned, I think it's more important for me to study GTO simply to have a foundation for some basic spots. I've never really spent the time to construct specific ranges in various spots, such as flatting BB vs. BTN, or facing a 3-bet. It's always been sort of off-the-cuff calculations based on vague assumptions ("this guy is aggro so I can flat AJs here") and I want to change that. Of course, adjustments will always have to be made, but having an understanding of what your range is at all times is crucial.
    4. Don't have any real specific goals as in volume or winnings, but aiming to bink a $300+ live tournament.
    5. Get out to Vegas at least once (never been there), hopefully for the WSOP.

    That's it for now...Plenty of other aspects of poker I want to work on, but I'll write about them as situations come up.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up
    Quote Originally Posted by baudib View Post
    So it's a New Year and this is a new blog. Let's start out with some goals for 2014:

    1. Be disciplined in tracking, analyzing/studying live sessions.
    2. Get back online, at least to play Sunday tournaments once or twice a month
    3. Study more GTO. As mentioned, I think it's more important for me to study GTO simply to have a foundation for some basic spots. I've never really spent the time to construct specific ranges in various spots, such as flatting BB vs. BTN, or facing a 3-bet. It's always been sort of off-the-cuff calculations based on vague assumptions ("this guy is aggro so I can flat AJs here") and I want to change that. Of course, adjustments will always have to be made, but having an understanding of what your range is at all times is crucial.
    4. Don't have any real specific goals as in volume or winnings, but aiming to bink a $300+ live tournament.
    5. Get out to Vegas at least once (never been there), hopefully for the WSOP.

    That's it for now...Plenty of other aspects of poker I want to work on, but I'll write about them as situations come up.
    have fun and get it done! hope 2014 treats ya well
  19. #19
    Took a trip to Borgata on New Year's. Was mostly boring/disappointing as i was card-dead and was tired. That said the games were soft. Had one 2-hour session where i won $100 and later played 8 hours where i managed to avoid stacking off to a good 5/10 reg i know from various forums, and finished down $10 -- +$90 combined for 10 hours, there are worse nights, especially when i didn't really play well and had nothing in the way of big pairs.

    Net: 10 hours +$90
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  20. #20
    frustrating, but better than being stuck
  21. #21
    frustrating, but better than being stuck
  22. #22
    woohoo got first big loss of 2014 out of the way

    -- waited 2 hours to get into juicy game
    -- lose with trips vs. backdoor flush for decent pot
    -- stackoff bad vs. turn checkraise with big draw and miss
    -- set no good in big 3-way pot
    -- top pair and turn NFD no good in 3-way pot
    -- 2 pair loses to flopped straight vs. most aggro player at the table

    Think half of those were just coolers, other half i could have played better for sure. Didn't really win any big pots and didn't really have any other hands that were noteworthy or well played.

    Net: 3 hours, -$900
    Total (from start of blog): 20 hours, -$395
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  23. #23
    Yes always good to get run bad over with!

    Definitely sounds like cooler central, lame.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  24. #24
    Played a bit online today thru home games with a local group. It's NL200 and PLO200 but plays very soft. The play is somewhere between live 1-2 and NL10 online...preflop sizing is more normal/online-like and people fold to 3-bets on occasion but the play is still way looser than most online games...it's FR and you get 5-way flops sometimes. Didn't have a HUD but was 1-tabling the whole way.

    I mostly played solidish I think, mostly TAG. I did have a major suckout with A6ss vs. AT on AT6 with 1 spade...check-raised the PFR and got shoved on by flatter...made backdoor flush. Yay for 13.7%ers. Lost a big hand with AA vs. AJo in 4-bet pot where he floated flop and backdoored the nut flush. Lost some absurd hands in PLO but that's par for the course. I think I played well in PLO and that game is absurdly soft, maybe 1 competent player out of 7.

    No other hands of note really. I flatted a 3-bet with JJ OOP in a spot vs. someone I know well live, he's very aggro and I could easily get it in good against him in a lot of spots, but I had ISOed an UTG limper from MP and he was in CO, so I thought his range was pretty strong. Flop was horrifying, he c-bet and I snapfolded.

    Since these sessions are a lot closer to live play than a real online grind, I'll include it in my results here. If I get online I'm sure it will mostly be MTTs, so those will be totaled separately.

    3 hours of NLHE for +$270
    2 hours of PLO for +$100
    Net: 5 hours for +$370

    Total: 25 hours for -$25
    Last edited by baudib; 01-06-2014 at 02:32 AM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  25. #25
    I want to talk about some of my traits as a player. I think I have several strengths but I have a lot of weaknesses I need to work on.

    Strengths
    1. I guess there are a lot of reasons for this, but by far the greatest strength I have is that I absolutely destroy terrible players. Generally speaking, if it's something like me, 5 meh regs, 1 good player and 2 whales, I'm going to stack the whales far more often than the other players. I seem to be able to get into the mindset of a terrible player (maybe because I know what it's like!) and figure out what they're doing...if they're bluffing in dumb spots or overvaluing certain hands or calling down way too light.
    2. Related to 1, I generally am able to put myself into good equity spots with marginal hands by finding good squeeze spots and generally putting pressure on people who have capped ranges.
    3. I think I am also good at understanding flop textures that hit various ranges and have a decent idea of when to pot control vs. when to push people off their equity.

    Weaknesses
    1. I still overplay far too many hands, and find myself in no-man's land in some spots.
    2. I think I have serious problems with decent TAGs whose ranges are always going to be stronger than mine.
    3. I pay off far too often if I think people are capable of having an occasional bluff.
    4. Think I've been missing far too many spots to bluff rivers, although if I start doing this it may be a huge leak because a lot of people already slowplay big hands against me and bluff-raising rivers is always going to be dicey in my games where people are so depolarized.

    I think these problems are mostly easily fixable. I want to post more hands that illustrate these spots as they come up.

    One problem I had was gambling far too much with dumb hands vs. shortstacks...I think I have fixed this, and reading Jared Tendler helped. The way that Tendler categorizes the various types of tilt is brilliant. When I started reading the book, I was somewhat skeptical, as I felt I had always had a decent handle on tilt, which I felt was simply reacting badly to losing. But I realized I was definitely suffering from a form of "optimistic" tilt and have avoided anything amazingly spazzy for the past several months.
    Last edited by baudib; 01-06-2014 at 02:56 AM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  26. #26
    I think your strength point 1 and weakness point 3 are probably related somewhat.

    In that you say you understand whales cause you can get into their head, and you are making solid assumptions on what/why/how they are playing. This helps you beat the whales. At the same time, you are associating TAGs to yourself. You're assigning them bluffs that you know you would have in a certain spot, and getting in your own head to assign them these ranges.

    In general I don't think this is bad, but I think if you're possibly more on the bluffy side you'll be way over-estimating ppl's bluff ranges.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  27. #27
    For sure, I think that people often level themselves when they say, "I would play this this way, so I assume this villain will as well."

    Played 3 hours of PLO on home games tonight, won $50 lol.
    Mostly boring/standard spots. I was reading HS thread where jungleman said NLHE is far more complex than PLO. That doesn't seem to make sense but who am I to question him; his reasoning was pretty sound. Many many hands just play themselves. That's going to be especially true vs. bad players with depolarized ranges who rarely bluff.

    1. I was making some exploitable folds early on to this guy who was barreling way too much, then I decided to flat him UTG+1 with a bad AAxx hand. One of the blinds 3-bet and he 4-bet so it was an easy GII pre. Held up 3 ways.
    2. Lost 230 BB pot with top set vs. NFD/OESD
    3. Lost 100 BBs in a gamb00l spot when i flatted a 4-bet 3-ways with KJ98ss...get it in vs. AAxx and AKKx on T8x but lost.
    4. Got another double up with AAQ9ds aipf, made nut flush.
    5. I did manage to pull off a major bluff to pick up 66 BBs. Raised on BTN over limpers with T976cc. I checked back a flop of 872hh to avoid getting C-R by heart combo draws. Bombed Qd turn to get 1 caller, and made 90% PSB on Ks river to TID.

    3 hours of PLO for $50
    Total: 28 hours +25 (sick win rate)
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  28. #28
    So I've been working on some preflop ranges for my live games. Kind of ridiculous that I've never done this. What I've found is that I'm opening way too loose from everywhere! I was probably opening 30% UTG at FR, which, even in a passive 1-2 game where you rarely see 3-bets, is just way too loose when I'm gonna get flatted by 4-5-6- people so often.

    So I'm going to tighten up considerably, especially in EP. I took a reaonable/nitty RFI range for UTG and added a bunch of Axs and all pocket pairs. At tougher tables I'll probably drop some of the Axs. From here I'll work on my 3-bet defend ranges. It's not going to be a GTO thing but I'll build them to fit 2 common profile types. Thing is it's going to be weird in live games because so often 3-bets will get flatted MW. But at least I'll have something to work off instead of randomly calling too much or spazzing.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  29. #29
    30% UTG full ring?? lol omg. What the heck is your button open?

    I think my UTG 6-max online is probably around 14-15%. So full ring it's probably like 10-12% I'd imagine. I'm definitely folding some hands I would otherwise open at 6-max, at times.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  30. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by baudib View Post
    In my games, there's really never a reason to not play exploitatively, but all of Griffey's talk about having strong c/c ranges and putting good hands in unexpected spots has me intrigued. I regularly 3-bet/4-bet way way wider than anyone in my games (my image is pretty maniacal) and I've realized that this has made my range in certain spots extremely weak.

    So let's experiment with having some strong hands in my flatting range.
    This is kinda too general to make too much of, but I think there are a lot more factors to take into account than you seem to be (especially Hand 3). I agree that you can't just be like, "Everyone plays so bad, let's not think about my range formation at all," but just thinking through preflop flat or 3b spots at these games, I can't think of a ton of situations where it's all that advantageous to take out value 3bs just to make your flatting range stronger. When you're in spots where villain has a wide opening range, then I think you're mostly better off keeping your 3b'ing range as wide as possible (regardless of what the balance of value:bluff is) and only flatting when you have a clear advantage. Are you finding that there are certain players who are getting away with barreling you off of 87s a ton or something?

    I actually started to write about how it won't generally be good against villains who open a tight opening range, but I think I changed my mind on this one. If you're facing someone who 1) opens only for value, and it's a tight range (TT+ (sometimes 88/99), AQ+ (sometimes AJ), (sometimes KQs)), 2) they pretty much don't fold to 3bs and their 4b'ing range is too tight to continue against without KK+, 3) they play much more sheepishly in 3b pots than in single raised ones, then I think it is probably good to have some strong flatting hands in position against these players. It's always been my standard to value 3b anything that's ahead of their calling range when playing people who 4b too tight, but I think having JJ/QQ in your flatting range can protect your redline against cbets for all those times you set mine/call with SCs. I think you get more in overpair vs overpair coolers (given condition 3), especially if the board is wet enough that you both play fast on the flop and turn (if you 3b preflop and the flop comes 7-high, then he's gonna be scared of overpairs regardless of texture; if, on the other hand, you flat pre and the flop comes 762tt, and you raise his cbet, he's going to have an extremely tough time getting away from 88, and you'll almost definitely get JJ's stack; he's either going to make a mistake against this hand or against our SCs). It also reduces our 3b/folding range, which makes us harder to play against.

    So yeah, I think in that case, both plays are about equally exploitative, and flatting makes you tougher to exploit in several areas, so that's probably a good place to apply this lesson. Unless of course you're at the type of table where you expect everyone left behind you to flat any raise, then that changes everything.

    But again, I would be very wary about over-applying the idea that you need to strengthen your flatting range.

    Hand 1:

    I would usually say this is all about how you think you can play against him in 4bs (if he never really 4bs worse, then 3b'ing is great range manipulation because now you only have to face hands that you're ahead of; if he 4bs wide enough that there's a way to exploit it [either flatting or getting AIPF], then you can obv 3b here; if you're saying "FML I don't know what the hell this LAgg could be doing this with" when he 4bs, then obv 3b'ing is bad), BUT I think this is a bad spot to apply what you said above.

    Decent live LAggs are usually very much of a feel type player, and they're the ones who are most likely to get splashy if they think that you wouldn't usually have JJ+ when you flat preflop. You can tank/call a lot of flops and laugh as he spews into you on the turn and river. If you 3b, you have to play the game where hope that he never 4bs worse (or if he does 4b a lot, then thing really get fun) and then play the thin value extraction game postflop when he calls because he'll probably become cautious once you 3b pre and fire multiple barrels post.

    As played, I don't know why you're kicking yourself over how you played it. Preflop is really the only questionable street for me. As I said earlier, I hope you tanked the flop before calling, and you could probably vbet the river bigger than 1/2 PSB (assuming you're not FML'ing if he shoves the remaining <$100), but you pretty much played the hand exactly as you should.

    Hand 3:

    No notes on villain listed, so you'll have to take what I say with a massive grain of salt, but I hate this hand as an application of strengthening your flatting range. Dependent of BTN and BB, you're often not even really going to have a flatting range, and whatever flatting range you do have is pretty strong anyway, so you don't need to protect it with JJ. I think flatting here's so bad against the vast majority of villains, and every street postflop is tough now. I don't understand c/c flop, c/c turn, lead river. Really the only reason I'm c/c'ing flop and turn (instead of leading or c/r'ing one of those two streets) is because villain is the type of person to hang himself on this sort of board, and if that's the case, then leading the river on a blank is a terrible (though, on this particular card, it might be good to lead if he isn't going to vbet 9x/TT).

    If villain isn't the type to hang himself on this sort of board, then I'm taking the driver seat at some point in this hand. Well, obviously I would because I said we should take it preflop, haha, but you know what I'm saying.

    Hand 4:

    Sure, yeah, 4b, whatever. Overlimping is a weird thing to do with KK+, and we have the nut blocker hand, so I'm not folding. I'm not sure about sizing because I'm not sure what the fuck we're doing with our life if he flats. I probably go this sizing, then go $50 on just about any flop ($50 -> $80 -> shove [is that too thin on a K-high board?] when we hit; if we miss, then a tiny cbet should take it down against weird ass hands that don't hit).
  31. #31
    Surviva: Thanks so much for the feedback!

    Your points are well-taken. I guess I am happy with the result of not stacking off with QQ < AA. Ironically the reason I felt I messed it up was basically I felt like I should be stacking this hand postflop. If I'm going to flat this hand I should probably be raising on this texture.

    it might be good to lead if he isn't going to vbet 9x/TT).
    This is pretty much my feeling. There's been a lot of discussion about this hand, which I feel is interesting because I liked how I played it overall. There are other considerations -- I feel like flatting this hand will make the BB squeeze fairly often because I just generally never have a hand here, and I'd be pretty good about getting it in if he squeezes and BTN flats. But yeah obviously since this is a super-standard 3-bet I can see how flatting in this spot is bad.
    Dependent of BTN and BB, you're often not even really going to have a flatting range
    I'd like to get more into this point. The "community standard" is to basically 3-bet or fold from the SB vs. BTN. I feel like the main thing I've learned from Griffey's discussions and from Janda is that this is going to be a super-exploitable tendency because ultimately it must result in both 3-betting too much AND folding too much.

    And if that is correct and if we all agree that we must have a flatting range then I think we need a couple of strong hands there. If we can have even a handful of combos that beat TT on a 9-high board I think we can valuetown so much of his range that folds to 3-bets and have a merged, strongish value-betting range instead of a polarized one or a range entirely composed of bluffcatchers.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  32. #32
    Had a couple of sessions, pretty meh.

    Played PLO on Wednesday. Got into a retarded spot where I thought I was ISOing pre for $400ish in a $1000 pot with a pretty good hand but ended up 6-ways AIPF. The last guy to overcall had T995ds and made a flush that won on a double-paired board. Made it back to the plus side and then bled off in tons of standard spots where I just got run down and ended up losing $510. Didn't really make any big hands for a long stretch. It was a pretty fun game otherwise as there was tons of action as we played shorthanded for a long time; 4 of the 6 guys were capable of large bluffs, so there were interesting hands. I made 3 pretty big bluffs, 2 of which worked. Of the 2 that worked, I think 1 was pretty standard and easy; the other one, I think was pretty good:

    I straddled ($5) and have .
    4 limps and we check.

    Flop:
    2 checks and I bet $15 into $25, 2 calls, I get raised to $40. I call (not really considering re-raising here as everyone is really deep, and I think continuing ranges are going to be too strong). 2 calls.

    Turn:
    It checks around.
    River:
    1 check and I bet $115 and TID.

    While someone showing up with the is a decent possibility, I'm pretty sure no one flopped a set -- everyone has draws, overpairs or hands like mine (83xx,82xx, 32xx) that got counterfeited, and my bet looks pretty strong.

    Net result: Played 8 hours and lost $510
    Total: 36 hours -$485 (yuck)
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  33. #33
    Y u no not straddle?
  34. #34
    Mandatory.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  35. #35
    I hate to be Ebeneezer Scrooge's Ghost of Christmas Nit, but it seems to be a poor decision to play 1/2NL at a game you're good at, and then play 1-2-5PL of a game you're possibly capable at.

    I only mention it because you said Yuck at your week's losses, all of which are from a 100bbb swing at this game.
  36. #36
    haha

    I like you posting in my blog Surviva.

    But nah it's all good. I actually feel my edge in PLO is going to be bigger than in hold'em, and that people are going to make tragic mistakes when everyone is 600 BBs deep. But I have a love/hate relationship with PLO, and can only take it in small doses.

    I had a small win on Thursday, and had an epic grind on Friday night. I'm going to make a long post, or several long posts, about the Friday session. I'm determined to stay disciplined and keep this udated, but if i'm playing till the wee hours and then working it won't always be immediately.

    For now, I'll just post cliffs:
    1. Russian lady I met at Borgata last summer finally came to my game -- there's a sort of funny story about how I met her.
    2. Made a bad calloff vs. whale's river check-raise.
    3. Came thisclose to folding KK pre vs. the Russian woman with 110 BB effective stacks.
    4. Pulled off a turn check-raise (semi-)bluff.
    5. Came thisclose to making a correct king-high hero call.
    6. Some guy ran the sickest line ever against me.

    More TK.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  37. #37
    Start with No. 6 obviously:
    We are 5-handed and have been for hours because one whale keeps buying back in at $500 a clip.
    Villain is young and Asian. Best way to describe him is a spewy TAG. He's really pretty tight; game is being straddled 4/5 of the time and he's the lone holdout. He had verbalized the obvious: he was only staying because whale was coming back from ATM. He tried to pull off a river-check-raise in a big 4-way pot that checked to the river (3 guys had AK, 1 guy had JT and made a straight on a flush board). He also folds to the straddle the most by far. His view of me is probably bluffy; i've been showing quite a few in the past hour or two.

    I straddled and have
    1 caller. Villain makes it $30 from BB. When whale was in BB or straddle he had been making it $25-$40 regularly, so the sizing isn't abnormal. Effective stacks ~270 bbs.

    I call, 1 fold. HU to flop
    Flop ($66ish)
    Villain checks, Hero bets $25, villain check-raises to $75, Hero raises to $200, villain instajams for $530ish.

    Hero says, "F*#@! OK I call."
    Villain says, "I got nothing."
    He flips
    Last edited by baudib; 01-11-2014 at 06:41 PM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  38. #38
    You're lucky he re-bluffed you imo, given your sizing. That's way too big IP, I'd make it $140-150ish maybe.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  39. #39
    I swear to God when you said, "He's really tight," I thought to myself, I'll believe it when I see it. There's pretty much no way to say this that doesn't sound ignorant, but a villain's cultural asianness directly correlates with the burden of proof it's gonna take for me to start thinking they play standard. The checkraise in spots where there's any reason whatsoever to think that you're weak seems to be the most common theme, and since I'm a habitual cbettor and deadpot scooper, I seem to be a magnet for that type of response.

    Not that there's an abandoned movie theater where Chinese, Vietnamese and Philippine people of all ages go and sit hand-in-hand watching the same poker videos, but I do think culturally asian people do have a fundamentally different approach to the game. I feel like most people's default is to just sit around waiting for a hand; when you get a good one, you either bet or trap; when you have a bad one, you check quickly ready to fold; when you have a decent one, you just check down; when you feel impatient or like your manhood's being tested, then bluff. I just find that's not the default approach with THOSE PEOPLE!
  40. #40
    Not that there's an abandoned movie theater where Chinese, Vietnamese and Philippine people of all ages go and sit hand-in-hand watching the same poker videos
    Damn, our secret is out!

    In my games, there gazillions of Asians. I've run into Asians of all types honestly; there seem to me to be a ton of stereotypical math-nerd/nits; quite a few decent standard TAGs; and ya, a lot of super LAGs. I mean, I think among the low-limit grinders there are as many Johnny Chans as there are wannabe Joseph Cheongs.

    For sure though, many/most Asian cultures have a different view of gambling than Westerners. It might have something to do with Christian/Puritanical roots in the U.S., but South Koreans are almost all Christians. Most of the Asians in my games are Chinese or Korean, and I feel like there are more Chinese nits than any other Asian group. I'd have to admit that among the non-Chinese/Korean Asians, they all seem to be very aggressive.

    As for me, I wasn't raised as a cultural Asian, and when I started playing live games in Brooklyn with crazy Russian/Arab/Israeli degens, I was a super nitfish. If the player pool was, say, 100, I was easily in the top 3 tightest/nittiest players. My game has totally (d)evolved since, and many of those players from that game would not believe how I play today.

    One thing's for sure: Asianness seems to be a strong "poker trait" that transcends age or gender. A 60-year-old Asian guy is going to be way looser than a 60-year-old white guy. I'm pretty sure that, among the solid female players I've run into, close to 90% of them are Asian or Russian. I don't think it's ignorant to say these sorts of things; it's just what I've observed in my experience, albeit through my own filter.
    Last edited by baudib; 01-11-2014 at 10:42 PM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  41. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by griffey24 View Post
    You're lucky he re-bluffed you imo, given your sizing. That's way too big IP, I'd make it $140-150ish maybe.
    Fair point, I honestly don't think I've been in too many spots like this in deep games where I'm getting jammed on with air. My sizing takes pretty much all bluffs out of my range. Felt like this spot is 100% a cooler situation.
    Last edited by baudib; 01-11-2014 at 10:54 PM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  42. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by baudib View Post
    I've run into Asians of all types honestly; there seem to me to be a ton of stereotypical math-nerd/nits; quite a few decent standard TAGs; and ya, a lot of super LAGs. I mean, I think among the low-limit grinders there are as many Johnny Chans as there are wannabe Joseph Cheongs.
    Oh for sure. I don't so much mean a LAgg versus nit thing, as I did that things happen that I don't expect. A guy who plays pretty much mostly TAgg, but I did happen to notice check-raised a river as a bluff once is all the sudden capable of pulling off some insane c/r with air as the PFR. Maybe it's just that changing gears is more of a thing for some of the regs I've happened to play with, whereas white Maryland hicks are just like, "I play the way I play, and at the end of the day, my dick'll be in your butt."

    I have also had to fake-reach for chips and fake-start to fold against a lot of asian regs (I do this against a fair amount of regs, but it does seem like most asian regs I really have to be cognizant with). So again, not so much a maniac versus nit sort of thing, as just noticing different parts of the game that I'm not used to casino regs focusing on; moreso on how strong/weak I am and how strong/weak their image is and less-so about what cards they hold in that particular hand.

    Again, I'm not just like "slanty eyes! brownish skin! Nevermind that he's wearing an Aeropastle shirt and was born in Long Island, that dude's totally gonna c/r bluff me at some point!!!!" I mean like, dudes who pull up in a 20-year-old car, barely speak English and take a smoke break every orbit. These people clearly come from a different world as I do, and I've noticed that I can't project my standard casino reg degen thought process onto them.
  43. #43
    Great stuff, Surviva. Trying to size someone up based on age, gender, nationality, background, how they dress, etc....that's poker. I think it's a crucial part. I think someone's attachment to money plays a crucial part in how they approach the game.

    As for me, I used to try to play up this goofy, crazy random image up (which isn't too hard) and act like I didn't know rules and shit. But I played a tournament once and this guy next to me started tweeting about me and said, "He's trying to play up this Asian gambler stereotype but I'm not falling for his B.S." My whole table image, weird mannerisms and table talk are a HUGE part of my game. Getting recreational players to like me is hugely +EV and tilting the oh-so-serious grinders may be even more so; I think I manage to accomplish both quite often.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  44. #44
    So the Russian woman. Met her at Borgata in June. I noticed this very striking redhead in leather jacket walking through the poker room one afternoon. That night I played in a turbo bounty tournament and she came to my table. She was very quiet but pleasant, and I realized she was Russian right away, so I asked if she was from Brooklyn. And of course she is. I made quads with pocket 4s twice in one orbit.

    She's on her phone texting/writing, and a few minutes later, she turns to me and says, "Are you Chris?" I was dumbfounded and said, "Yeah." She says, "Oh, I heard about you!"

    She had posted something on Facebook about me, I guess something to the effect of "This weird Asian guy just made quads twice in 5 minutes. One of her friends is a reg in my local game and said like, "Oh that's probably Chris, watch out for him, he's crazy."

    Anyway, Friday night was the first time she came to my game. She is pretty good, plays a solid but nitty/TAG style. We had already gotten into a couple of biggish pots that we had split. Then this hand happened:

    MP (Asian villain from Post #37) opens to $10, 1 call, I 3-bet KK on the button. She is SB and cold 4-balls it to $120 and leaves herself less than that behind. It folds to me. Now she doesn't reraise with AK pre. It's close to one of the most certain I've been that I had run KK into AA (I've folded KK pre in live games 4 times). I just started laughing about the absurdity of it. I looked at her stack and was really wishing that she had a bit more....I think just $50 more would have done the trick. I tank for quite a bit, still laughing and muttering to myself. Finally I sigh-jam, she snaps, board runs out 9-high and I know she's good.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  45. #45
    Turn C-R semi-bluff vs. nit's double barrel

    I had a hand a few months ago that totally changed my thinking on certain spots. I had check-raised on flop with a massive draw in a multiway pot, and a pretty good player called, and then called with an extremely marginal hand when I overbet jammed brick. I got there on the river, but he showed me how weak he had called off and it shocked me. He said he knew that I couldn't have an overpair because I'd always squeeze preflop and that I only have draws. I'm not sure I like his calloff, but I realized that he was right and that my range in that spot IS almost all draws. We can try to balance sets with semi-bluffs on certain textures but there aren't many combos of sets so I suppose it is a problem if decent regs know what you're doing.

    This led me to re-examine my C-R ranges on certain boards, as well as donking ranges. Because live games feature so many multiway pots, even 7-9-way raised pots, having well-constructed donking ranges is very important.

    But trying to balance C-R, donking and c/c ranges when we call OOP is extremely difficult, and it led me to almost eliminate a check-raising range in so many spots. Balancing per se isn't really the issue, I think that in games with so many passive players, their betting ranges are so freaking strong that we have more implied odds than fold equity with draws.

    Anyway, I've been putting more check-raises into my flop ranges, but still not enough in my turn range. And almost all of my turn check-raises are for value; against good players, I almost never check-raise the turn, instead preferring to lead more turns. (Somewhere in this time frame, I got into a discussion on here with M2M and Bikes about why raising turns is bad 100 BBs effective, and this influenced a great deal of my thinking as well. M2M and Bikes are brilliant, btw. Love their feedback on all hand analysis. But since then I've been playing deeper much more often, going from buying in for 100-150 BBs to always buying in for 200-250)

    Anyway, I don't check-raise bluff turns very often, but I thought this was a good spot.

    I have from SB in 4-way raised pot. Villain is a non-descript weak-tight reg. Our history is almost non-existent considering how often we play together, which is a result of him being so nitty-passive. He raised to $15 from MP (5-handed) and starts hand with around $350.

    Flop ($60ish):
    Hero checks 1 check, villain bets $40, 1 fold. I tanked a bit here and called, 1 fold.

    Turn ($140):
    Hero checks, villain bets $50, Hero raises to $150, villain folds.

    Despite weak turn bet, I'm 99% certain his range is AQ+ here as he almost never double barrels light and he is folding all of it except sets.

    Thursday session: 6 hours +$130
    Friday session: 12 hours +530

    Total: 54 hours +$175
    Last edited by baudib; 01-12-2014 at 09:35 AM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  46. #46
    So I'll get on to Saturday's session. I showed up late and it was probably the easiest ~80-hand session I've ever played. When I got to the game there was a wait and by time I got in, I ran like God and the game broke after a couple hours. Basically I got QQ/KK/AA/QQ/KK and got paid on all of them, won another big pot with KQ when a guy stacked off with bottom pair to me, and won some medium pots with T7o on BB special, a hand where I 3-bet AJo and got 2 streets of value from 99 or something on an A77 board, and a hand where I raised J7s from MP and flopped a pair and a flush draw.

    I luckboxed the crap out of one KK hand.

    I opened to $15 UTG with and got callers from BTN, SB and BB. I'll post the flop and talk about villain after.

    Flop ($60):
    SB bets $20, BB goes all in for $31, Hero calls, BTN calls, SB calls.

    Villain in SB is a bad LAG. He's generally very easy to read after the flop, but an interesting part of his game is constant donking. He donks a super-wide range that includes top or middle pair, small pocket pairs turned into bluffs, big draws and the nuts. He had around $250 to start the hand.

    I really hate this board considering the 3 very loose villains in hand, but I want to call and re-evaluate.

    Turn:
    SB checks, Hero bets $70, BTN folds, SB tanks a bit and calls.

    River:
    SB checks, Hero shoves, SB tanks, "well if you don't have a full house this is terrible," and he folds.

    BB shows 96cc, SB villain says he flopped a straight.

    I think turn is fairly interesting. I had told myself I was snap-folding if SB led out for any real bet. Facing a check, I decided I needed to bet to get value from the numerous draws, but not so much that their continuing ranges would crush me.

    Saturday session: 3 hours, +$790
    Total: 57 hours, +$965
    Last edited by baudib; 01-12-2014 at 06:43 AM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  47. #47
    Quote Originally Posted by baudib View Post
    So the Russian woman. Met her at Borgata in June. I noticed this very striking redhead in leather jacket walking through the poker room one afternoon. That night I played in a turbo bounty tournament and she came to my table. She was very quiet but pleasant, and I realized she was Russian right away, so I asked if she was from Brooklyn. And of course she is. I made quads with pocket 4s twice in one orbit.

    She's on her phone texting/writing, and a few minutes later, she turns to me and says, "Are you Chris?" I was dumbfounded and said, "Yeah." She says, "Oh, I heard about you!"

    She had posted something on Facebook about me, I guess something to the effect of "This weird Asian guy just made quads twice in 5 minutes. One of her friends is a reg in my local game and said like, "Oh that's probably Chris, watch out for him, he's crazy."

    Anyway, Friday night was the first time she came to my game. She is pretty good, plays a solid but nitty/TAG style. We had already gotten into a couple of biggish pots that we had split. Then this hand happened:

    MP (Asian villain from Post #37) opens to $10, 1 call, I 3-bet KK on the button. She is SB and cold 4-balls it to $120 and leaves herself less than that behind. It folds to me. Now she doesn't reraise with AK pre. It's close to one of the most certain I've been that I had run KK into AA (I've folded KK pre in live games 4 times). I just started laughing about the absurdity of it. I looked at her stack and was really wishing that she had a bit more....I think just $50 more would have done the trick. I tank for quite a bit, still laughing and muttering to myself. Finally I sigh-jam, she snaps, board runs out 9-high and I know she's good.
    Is this the same woman you told me about before?
  48. #48
    Also stereotypes for me used to play into my game a lot. Young asians LAGtards, 40 and older on the tighter side, young with glasses online players and the such. Lately I've played by the saying "Everyone's good at the table until they prove me wrong".
  49. #49
    CC: yes

    Lately I've played by the saying "Everyone's good at the table until they prove me wrong".



    I'd actually assume the opposite: everyone is terrible until they prove me wrong.

    Including me! see next post.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  50. #50
    So I had a rough game the other night. Not so much in terms of loss but in how I played. Should note that the game featured massive whale who was in the game for $3,000, so that changed the dynamic quite a bit. He was extremely loose as you would expect. Naturally I was the guy who ran into the top of his range twice -- once paying off with AQ vs. AK on A-high board and another where I c-shoved TPGK against him when he had KK. The rest of the night he basically called off with any pair or weak draw for 200 BB shoves, so I'm not terribly unhappy with the hands I lost to him.



    The whale straddles for $15 and I make it $40 from MP . Get flatted by CO and whale. CO is TAG is somewhat unknown skill. He is definitely not flatting with speculative hands, think his range is mostly 66-JJ, AQ/KQs type hands. I suppose we should consider the possibility that he'd flat with the nuts to induce the whale to 3-bet, but I mostly think he'd 3-bet QQ+.

    Hero: $430, CO $350, Whale (UTG) $700

    Flop:

    UTG checks, I bet $75, CO flats, UTG folds

    Turn ($195ish):
    I bet $110, CO calls

    River $415):
    Hero checks, villain obviously checks back with his obvious and most likely range because hero sucks bawls.
    Last edited by baudib; 01-15-2014 at 08:34 PM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  51. #51
    Given it's a whale straddling I'm going $50 pre, $100 on flop. I don't hate the river check really, but if he's the type to for sure call twice with AQ/AK then I might bet $95 or something as played.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  52. #52
    ya I can see making it bigger pre. As played I knew instantly that checking river was a mistake. If he jams I'm pretty much forced to call but he's going to check back almost all worse hands. Given preflop action I think TT has to be the nuts here unless he has exactly AJcc or quad 5s. He checked back with 99 and it felt pretty damn stupid.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  53. #53
    Some bookkeeping:

    The session from the last HH was 6 hours -$150
    6 Hours of NLHE/PLO rotation -$725

    and 2 online sessions
    5 hours +$2,550
    8 hours -$1,066

    84 hours, +$1,574
    Last edited by baudib; 01-17-2014 at 11:25 AM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  54. #54
    I hate to be Ebeneezer Scrooge's Ghost of Christmas Nit, but it seems to be a poor decision to play 1/2NL at a game you're good at, and then play 1-2-5PL of a game you're possibly capable at.

    I only mention it because you said Yuck at your week's losses, all of which are from a 100bbb swing at this game.
    I might take a break from PLO, which I often do. I love the game but playing it too often causes mental problems for me I think, lol. I ran well in November and December and took a couple weeks off. Now had a couple of bad sessions this month.

    But really the reason I want to stop playing it for a bit is that trying to study and learn new hold'em concepts while also playing a bit of PLO might be causing me some problems. I'm running into spots where I suffer from PLO nittiness, like checking straights and flushes too much when the board pairs and stuff like that. I've been finding myself in a lot of spots recently where I'm failing to value bet the river, like the TT hand posted earlier, and I think the PLO mindset might have something to do with it.

    Honestly, I haven't been doing enough studying, and probably been playing too much and putting in too many long hours. I need to rest more and reset the poker brain, and spend some more time reading and analyzing stuff.
    Last edited by baudib; 01-18-2014 at 08:05 PM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  55. #55
    played 3 hours Saturday live for +$130

    Total: 87 hours, +$1,704

    Heading to Borgata for a few days, so I'll be grinding some long hours. Will post a bunch when I get back.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  56. #56
    nice man, keep it up!
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  57. #57
    Borgata trip:
    36 hours of cash for +$340
    played 2 tournaments for $800 and lost


    details to come
    Last edited by baudib; 01-23-2014 at 06:44 PM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  58. #58
    so Borgata trip over 3 days was 4 distinct sessions:

    Session 1:
    Started out in fine fashion, was up $300 after a few hours. Then a guy came to the table who was obviously a competent player, and I simultaneously started getting outflopped every hand. Every TT-KK flopped an underpair, and AK/AQ/KQ type hands all whiffed. I was involved in a lot of hands with the guy, and I couldn't do anything to defend against his frequent donks or check-raises because I always found myself with air or 2nd pair.

    This predictably didn't go well, but I racked up tons of what Griffey would refer to as "avoidable losses." I ended up down $1300 on the session after starting so well. It was probably the worst tilt off I've experienced in months, and the first major mental meltdown I've suffered since reading Jared Tendler. Tendler would call it Injustice/Entitlement tilt.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  59. #59
    Session 2 is really 3 parts over 3 tables.
    Started out on a decent table with a huge fish and a bunch of boring players. For a sidenote on how bad this fish was, I bet the river with broadway on a paired, 4-to-straight board (KJT T Q) and the fish raised me, third player raised him. I folded and fish called with 92o.

    Shortstack lecture

    As typically happens, I end up in hands, gambling with shortstacks. I try not to give the uber-nits any action, but the bad players sitting with 40 BBs, I'm looking to stack them all day.
    I open from MP and mega fish flats BTN. I have about $300 and fish has $600. Middle-aged balding guy with glasses 3-bets from SB to $25 and has $80 left. I flat and the fish calls as well.

    Flop ($75):
    SB shoves for $80. I call. The fish reaches for chips but somehow finds a fold.

    Turn:

    I table my hand instantly, river is a brick. SSer sits there not moving an inch. I say, "I have the nuts sir." SSer still not moving, I motion to the dealer, and he says he can't ship the pot until he releases his hand. We wait another 2-3 minutes. Finally, he looks over and says, "Oh, he has a flush? It's good."

    SSer asks me if I know what an ATM is. I say, "Sure!" He says, "You must go there a lot."
    "All the time!"
    "How much do you play? You must lose a lot of money!"
    "Millions!"
    "Really? Millions? How much do you play?"
    "2-3 times a week."
    "It's hard to lose millions playing 2-3 times a week."
    "You should see me play!"
    "I just did!"

    He makes some remark to the guy sitting next to him, and I start laughing hysterically. I can't really help myself.

    He says, "What's so funny? That you lose all that money?"

    I said, "No, it's just that every time I come to the Borgata, I get a lecture after stacking someone sitting with $100!"

    He says, "I wasn't lecturing you, I was berating you."

    I said, "Buy in for $300 and let's play."

    He buys back for $100.

    No more than 4 hands later, there's a raise in EP, he says, "OK, I'm going to play like a retard." He calls.

    Flop:
    EP bets, 1 fold, SS guy says, "Look, I'm going to prove a point." He shoves for $80. EP snap calls.

    SSer says, "Watch, another club won't come. Exact same board"


    Turn:

    River:

    EP says, "I have a boat" and flips JJ. He says, "Oh you're good." He flips
    Last edited by baudib; 01-25-2014 at 03:37 AM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  60. #60
    After that, the table was pretty boring, except for a brief stint by a really sexy NJ girl of Egyptian descent. The whole table of 50-year-old men were gaga over her, and she actually knew how to play. She found the table boring though, and the table basically broke. I moved to another table, which I won't get into too much, but it was the most obnoxious table ever, and a decent LAG was 2 to my left, so I decided to leave after a couple of hours of being basically even.

    I moved to a third table, which was still annoying, but super soft.
    Highlights:
    -- I somehow managed to build a pretty tight image, and somehow managed to bluff the self-appointed table captain and huge station after I 3-bet pre with Q2s. It was 4-ways and flop was A54 and it checked around. When an A hit turn, I bet, 2 folds and table captain calls. River 4, he checks, I bet about $80 into ~$300ish, he thought a while and said, "I don't think you're 3-betting JT suited" and he shows pocket 9s. I show. That got my stack up to around $500, and although I wasn't the beneficiary, that put Mr. Table Captain on mega tilt, and he basically never folded a hand after that until he got stacked.

    -- I begrudgingly got it in pre with KK when a guy limp-reraised to $80 over my raise. I thought about it a bit and jammed on him, effective stacks about $200 to start the hand, he has QQ and I win.

    -- I got my stack up to $1,000 but took a couple of losses. I flopped the nut straight in a hand where 3 people had put money in, a guy who $150 jams a flush draw and gets there. I almost made a hero fold of AQ on Q99r when another SS (QQ guy from before) shoves, but I couldn't get away for $70 more and I lose to 98o.

    -- Pretty decent player comes to my table, we don't get too involved as I think he is avoiding me. He almost managed to make a hero fold of trips in a hand where I made Broadway but he paid off.

    -- Loudmouth kid who was pretty funny stacked off $700 on a flush draw when he jammed over a cbet and old guy behind him (who has him covered) tank calls with top set on 623hh. That kind of killed the table, I ended up the night up only +$400, but I feel I played solidly after the disaster of the night before.
    Last edited by baudib; 01-25-2014 at 09:42 PM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  61. #61
    The Broke Pro and the Whale

    I don't know what the scene is like in Vegas, but in AC, from my experience, there are almost no decent players at any of the off-casinos. The Borgata is THE poker room in the city. For that reason, I think the best games are probably at Caesars or Showboat, where you will literally never find a competent player. The games at Borgata are still basically soft, but you will run into the occasional good player, even at 1-2 tables. This is especially true during the opens; you can talk about tourney donks being bad cash players, but they are better than your average tourist.

    There is a large population of bad regs at Borgata, including a ton of "broke pros." There's like one at every other 1-2 table: "I play (2-5, 5-10) but I'm running bad so I'm playing 1-2."

    This guy was pretty typical of the lot: Middle-age, white guy, beard. Nice enough guy, personable, likes to talk about his reads. Also very easy to read and pretty transparent. His story was something like, "I lost $1,500 today. But I won $2,500 yesterday." Sure. You're up $1,000 at your normal stakes over 2 days but decided to drop down.

    We happened to have a mega whale at the table; a senior woman who just couldn't find a fold button. The Broke Pro was talking to me and the couple next to him about how "you have to play every pot against her."

    That's fine and all, but I was thinking, "I think I want to play a lot of pots against YOU."

    I found, however, there was a way to make her fold. She'd call a standard $10-$15 raise with ATC, but she'd fold a ton to 3-bets. So I was 3-betting or ISOing the Broke Pro, but she would fold. I decided I wanted to keep her in the pot when I had hands with nut possibilities.

    Here was a hand I played that could have gone differently, but I wanted to keep her in the hand:

    3 limps, including Broke Pro in HJ. I make it $12 with
    Fish calls from SB, everyone calls. Pot: $48ish

    flop:
    3 checks, BP bets $20, I call. He says "how can you not raise?", Whale in SB calls, 2 folds.

    Turn:
    1 check, BP bets $30, I call, SB calls.

    River:
    Whale checks and sighs disgustedly, bP checks. I bet $75. Whale folds.

    BP tanks. He calls clock on himself. I tell him I'm sure he'll make the right decision. He says, "I don't think you can even beat a 3." He folds.

    Within an hour, the whale had gotten stacked about 5 times. The table is starting to fill up with young, competent players. The whale apparently has quite a reputation. She was going to move to another table, but I gave her a courtesy double up when she was down to 20 BBs and I flopped top pair from BB with Q7 and ran into her KQ on Qxx. She stayed, reloaded.

    It's an atmosphere bordering on collusion. They are avoiding playing big pots each other. I had a hand HU against one where I opened with 99 in EP, and c/f 3 streets on an AKx T x board. Kid checks back river and says, "Ace." I muck.

    (cont)
    Last edited by baudib; 01-26-2014 at 02:19 AM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  62. #62
    Then this hand comes up:


    2 limps, BP limps. I limp behind in HJ with

    Whale limps button. 6-handed.

    Flop ($12)
    2 checks, UTG bets $7, 1 fold, BP calls, I think a bit and call. Whale calls and BB calls.

    Turn ($40):
    BB ($700 behind) bets $32, Broke Pro raises to $110, he has $350 behind. I take a few seconds and announce all in. Whale is annoyed but calls off for $255. BB folds.

    Broke Pro says, "I really have no idea what to do." I give him a Mentos. He says, "I need a life line. Are we chopping?" I don't say anythng. Finally he calls off with a naked T. Whale has a 5. I winz.

    BP leaves after he ships me his stack. Whale reloads again, and 3 hands later runs AA into quads, and finally leaves. Game breaks.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  63. #63
    Finally, last session at Borgata. After table broke, I was forced to sit with just $600 at a new table. It was mostly old men regs and nits, and wasn't a ton of action. I think I played great over a 6 hour period, and made $50. Not really any exciting hands; won a decent pot when I rivered the nut straight vs. nit's 2 pair, and lost a decent pot calling check-raise shove for 50 BBs with Aks and the nut flush draw.

    At end of Borgata trip
    Totals: 123 hours, +$2,044
    2 MTTs - $800

    Since then I've had 1 live session and 4 online sessions.

    Live session: I lost $1100 in 4 hours and other than one poorly-timed $120 bluff, I played well,., I think. Got 2-outered 4 times, including boat over boat, and AA to QQ and AA to KTo where i flopped the nut flush draw. Also lost with AKo aipf to JJ and Q9.

    Online: 4 sessions, 22 hours: +$2720

    So current totals: 149 hours, +$3,664
    Last edited by baudib; 01-26-2014 at 02:38 AM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  64. #64
    JTo - I'm probably isolating pre instead of limping behind. Hand has good top pair potential and it's not suited or anything, so it's not like it's an amazing hand to go multiway.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  65. #65
    Couple of items of interest:
    I'm on PLO vacation. Haven't been running too well lately in PLO during mixed game sessions, but that's not the real reason I'm on PLO vacation. I'm finding that playing PLO is messing up my hold'em mindset. When I'm playing on HE I feel solid, making good moves and plays generally, feeling into the flow. Playing too much PLO has started to affect me, I think, which is a new thing. I've always played a ton of different games, including a lot of mixed games like HORSE or 8-Game. But lately I've found myself in spots where I'm thinking like a PLO player (i.e. trying to pot control bottom set vs. heavy action, or failing to get max value with flushes on paired boards). I suppose if I were running better in PLO it wouldn't matter, but it may also be that I'm making fundamental mistakes in PLO that is causing runbad and then bleeding into my overall poker mindset.

    Something to examine, for sure, and I may be doing some remedial PLO studying (Jeff Hwang, Quadrophobia) .

    Two live sessions this week:
    6 hours for -$250
    7 hours for +$325
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  66. #66
    Bah haven't posted in a while.
    Finished January +$3,739 in 162

    Haven't played much in February so far, live.
    4 sessions and most of it bad:
    -$462 6 hours
    -$1800 9 hours
    -$100 5 hours
    +$242 3 hours

    Luckily the online games have gone exceptionally well:
    45 hours, +$2950
    So 68 hours, +$830 total

    I was wondering if I should split my online from live winnings, but since it's basically the same stakes against a very similar player base, I guess it works together...it's all poker.

    Haven't had much time to study lately, work has been a bear and I've been lazy. Will get to some new topics soon.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  67. #67
    Good job man, keep it up!
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  68. #68
    2 hands same villain
    Villain is pretty terrible, mostly passive/trappy. We have extensive history and an evolving dynamic. He starts out by thinking I'm an aggrofish who bluffs all the time and my response was to stop bluffing him. When I stopped bluffing him I managed to show him the nuts several times and he'd hero call me a lot when I shove (even 3x potting) the river. He's actually adjusted and started to stop paying me off; thus I've gone back to bluffing him.

    Hand 1:
    I flat turn and lead river to get third guy to put money in with his Ax/4x/draws as I think he's never overcalling river whether I c/c or c/r.
    I thought it was reasonable that both could call river; that said, my sizing might be totally bad. Having led river, can we safely fold to this raise? Checking back a monster on flop and minraising turn reeks of the nuts but our hand is fairly disguised.

    $1/$2 Home Game No Limit Holdem
    6 Players
    Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

    Stacks:
    UTG ($539) 270bb
    UTG+1 ($1,197) 599bb
    CO ($369) 185bb
    BTN ($446) 223bb
    SB ($299) 150bb
    Hero (BB) ($499) 250bb

    Pre-Flop: ($3, 6 players) Hero is BB
    2 folds, CO raises to $7, BTN calls $7, 1 fold, Hero calls $5

    Flop: ($22, 3 players)
    Hero checks, CO checks, BTN checks

    Turn: ($22, 3 players)
    Hero bets $16, CO calls $16, BTN raises to $34, Hero calls $18, CO calls $18

    River: ($124, 3 players)
    Hero bets $88, CO folds, BTN raises to $202


    Hand 2
    I was going to hide hole cards here but I'm sure everyone would guess that it's a low-equity bluff. My plan was to just give up after the flop as I have 0 equity, no blockers of any kind it's great flop for flatting ranges. However, given flop action, I felt the turn was soooooo good for my range and the river is even better. Since all of my value hands are straights+ this seemed like a mandatory bluff with any air I get to on the river as villain's range OTB seems severely capped -- hard for him to even call with Tx here and really he seems capped at KJ/KQ type hands, seems like his calling range should only be QT/JT/KT. What do you think?

    $1/$2 Home Game No Limit Holdem
    PokerStars
    4 Players
    Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

    Stacks:
    CO ($755) 378bb
    BTN ($368) 184bb
    SB ($1,610) 805bb
    Hero (BB) ($560) 280bb

    Pre-Flop: ($3, 4 players) Hero is BB
    CO raises to $5, BTN calls $5, SB calls $4, Hero raises to $24, CO calls $19, BTN calls $19, SB calls $19

    Flop: ($96, 4 players)
    SB checks, Hero checks, CO checks, BTN checks

    Turn: ($96, 4 players)
    SB checks, Hero bets $54, 1 fold, BTN calls $54, SB folds

    River: ($204, 2 players)
    Hero bets $98
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  69. #69
    p.s. 3.5 hours online yesterday for +$520

    71.5 hours for $1,350 in February
    233.5 hours for $5,089 YTD
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  70. #70
    3-hour session this morning for +$286

    Here's a hand inspired by Griffey. Right guy to do it against, constantly tries to FK with me in position.

    $1/$2 Home Game No Limit Holdem
    PokerStars
    6 Players
    Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

    Stacks:
    Hero (UTG) ($419) 210bb
    UTG+1 ($523) 262bb
    CO ($194) 97bb
    BTN ($353) 177bb
    SB ($823) 412bb
    BB ($854) 427bb

    Pre-Flop: ($3, 6 players) Hero is UTG
    Hero raises to $8, 2 folds, BTN raises to $20, 2 folds, Hero calls $12

    Flop: ($43, 2 players)
    Hero checks, BTN bets $36, Hero calls $36

    Turn: ($115, 2 players)
    Hero checks, BTN bets $73, Hero calls $73

    River: ($261, 2 players)
    Hero checks, BTN goes all-in $224, Hero calls $224

    Final Pot: $709
    Hero shows a flush, Ace high

    BTN shows a pair of Deuces


    Hero wins $677 (net +$324)

    BTN lost $353
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  71. #71
    1) 68s hand - REALLLY don't like this. I think he has too many Ax in his range (AJ/AQ/Axdd) and I also doubt he folds 9x to that sizing.

    2) AQss nice! Though he's the aggressor so this is pretty standard. But yah this is the benefit of not raising big draws sometimes. A lot of times A high is good, so no need to turn it into a bluff.

    oh also 33 hand. I would have a hard time folding to that price. Is he the type to flat AA pre? Does he call A4o pre? He has at most 6 combos of A4, and likely just 2 combos. He could even have something really dumb like 25s, or just straight up 4x. Not folding, but not fist pumping.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  72. #72
    I've gotten pretty mixed reaction to the 86s hand. One guy I showed the HH to while hiding hole cards said he liked it and assumed it was a bluff; he said I'm pretty credibly repping my entire value range.

    Should note here that I played 5 HU shootout tournaments in 8-Game, losing 4 for -$90.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  73. #73
    68s hand:

    My assumed range that gets to flop:

    AQs (3)
    AJs (3)
    ATs- would bet flop
    A9s (4)
    A8s (4)
    KQs (3)
    QJs (2)
    QTs (2)
    JTs -would bet flop
    9Ts - would bet flop
    J9s (3)
    99 (6)
    88 fold turn
    77 fold turn
    66 fold turn

    So 35 total combos call turn

    QJs folds riv, KQs folds riv (5)
    J9s/99 - 9 combos- 6 fold riv, 3 call?

    So total 11 of 35 fold river
    -31% folding river

    Betting 98 into 204, needs to work 32.4%
    So the bet is VERY close to break-even, maybe slightly -EV in itself

    BUT this is assuming you river a K. Depending on what you do on other rivers etc, the turn bet could be the bigger problem.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jay-Z
    I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
    I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
  74. #74
    I agree that turn bet is pretty marginal, thanks for doing the math. His range is way wider preflop. At a minimum we should add KT/KJ.

    Had 2 short sessions online. 2 hours for +$291 and 3 hours for +$1258. These are generally 2-tabling sessions, so about 400 hands on each one -- running hot!

    Totals:
    February: 76.5 hours for $2,899
    YTD: 238.5 hours for $6,638
    -------------------------------------
    Live MTTs: 2 for -$800
    HU shootouts: 5 for -$90
    Last edited by baudib; 02-27-2014 at 04:45 AM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.
  75. #75
    Some miscellaneous notes:

    1. I'm reading Art of War by Sun Tzu. I've heard about this book for decades and never got around to reading it until now. I've been fascinated by the idea that war strategy written by an ancient Chinese general could somehow stand the test of time. I figure this must be applicable to poker somehow -- reading good, solid strategic thinking must be a good thing! Obviously in war, real risk-reward decisions are more important than in a silly game, but there must be logic and math behind it.

    some gems:
    Basic deception
    When able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must seem inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.

    Preparation
    Now the general who wins a battle makes many calculations in his temple ere the battle is fought. The general who loses a battle makes but few calculations beforehand. Thus do many calculations lead to victory, and few calculations to defeat: how much more no calculation at all! It is by attention to this point that I can foresee who is likely to win or lose.

    Equity vs. range & game selection
    If equally matched, we can offer battle; if slightly inferior in numbers, we can avoid the enemy; if quite unequal in every way, we can flee from him.

    Analyzing weak points and strong
    The clever combatant imposes his will on the enemy, but does not allow the enemy's will to be imposed on him.

    2. I'm thinking of playing the WSOP this year. I've never been to Vegas, I've never played a $1k+ tournament. I've never had a real yearning to play the ME. But I've talked to enough people who have played it and think I should definitely give it a go. Know a guy who has had 4 significant cashes in live tournaments over the past year, and he's been quite an inspiration. He got a shitton of TV time from the ME, and some cool YouTube clips as well. That part might be fun.

    3. Broke PLO Pro
    This doesn't really have anything to do with me, but illustrates why I wanted to keep this blog. This game constantly humbles you, variance is a mischievous mistress.

    This guy I know considers himself to be a superior PLO player. I think he does ok, knows when to use aggression, and has a good grasp on some advanced concepts. That said, he's a huge ATM who probably gambles too much because he feels lucky. He was on an incredible heater early in the year, and would tell everyone how much he won. He would text pictures of his stack to a friend of mine when he was crushing local games. Of course his heater and $200/hour win rate probably comprised 40 hours or so.

    Hilarious story: He plays occasionally in a low buyin O8 game, but recently told the woman running the game: "I can't come to the game because I've gone pro." Wha? lol

    Couple weeks later, friend who runs local rotation game told me he texted the guy to see if he was coming: "Can't, I'm broke."
    Last edited by baudib; 02-27-2014 at 04:42 AM.
    Playing big pots at small stakes.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •