05-15-2012 04:52 PM
#1
| |
| |
05-15-2012 04:57 PM
#2
| |
BANNED
|
shaw |
05-15-2012 07:32 PM
#3
| |
| |
05-15-2012 09:07 PM
#4
| |
100k is decent, 500k is legit but by then the games evolved quite a bit that you can't be sure anymore. 10k is nothing. | |
| |
05-15-2012 09:41 PM
#5
| |
|
is that for knowing if you're winning/losing or trying to get an accurate idea of your winrate? |
05-17-2012 11:39 PM
#6
| |
i have no proof. but my best guess would be no. if you are still running at 4.8bb over 50k then i'd feel safer about it. | |
05-18-2012 01:45 AM
#7
| |
trolling freetrollers
|
this winrate over this sample means that it is much more likely that you are a winning player than that you are a losing player at these stakes. |
| |
05-18-2012 06:11 AM
#8
| |
| |
05-18-2012 11:02 AM
#9
| |
|
It doesn't mean he's MUCH more likely to be anything. |
Last edited by Icanhastreebet; 05-18-2012 at 02:41 PM. | |
05-18-2012 11:20 AM
#10
| |
At the minstakes, by the time you've got enough hands for a good sample you've probably already moved up. Twice. | |
| |
05-18-2012 12:04 PM
#11
| |
05-18-2012 12:47 PM
#12
| |
| |
05-18-2012 02:42 PM
#13
| |
| |
05-18-2012 02:46 PM
#14
| |
|
The numbers represent what your possible winrate is at 95% confidence, it's really hard to tell your true winrate over ANY sample, let alone one this small. I mean for example over 100k hands at 4.8bb/100 with std deviation 90bb/100 you can be 95% confident your winrate falls between 5.19bb/100 and -0.39bb/100 so even with this winrate over 100k hands you can't REALLY know you are a winner. |
Last edited by Icanhastreebet; 05-21-2012 at 10:49 AM. | |
05-18-2012 05:47 PM
#15
| |