|
tom klarc
|
08-14-2010, 05:17 AM
Post subject: where is the best place to play?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
High Card
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1
|
|
Just thought since I have been a member for like a week now I thought I would make a post that might get some feed back.
Just wondering where everyone plays and why they play there. Is it the promotions or the games or the tournaments.
I have friends telling me where to play but I want a non biased oppinion.
Thanks everyone.
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
chatzilla
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 360
|
|
Welcome, make sure you read all the beginners digest that can be found here:
Beginners Digest: LEARNING STARTS HERE
What game are you playing? what stake? what site are you currently playing?
You can read about poker sites here: Poker Room Reviews | Online Poker Ratings Rankings | Poker Bonus Codes
but ill sum it up basically IMO
POKERSTARS
PROS: Largest site, great interface
CONS: Rakeback isnt too great for mircostakes
FULL TILT
PROS: 2nd largest, better Rakeback for micro stakes make sure you sign up for rakeback BEFORE you make a account for full tilt
CONS: dunno i dont play there
OTHER
PROS: may have weaker players, lots of bonus whoring can be done
CONS: lot less players, may not work with PT3 or HEM
hope that helps
|
|
|
|
rpm
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: learnin'
Posts: 2,041
|
|
i play at pokerstars because it has the largest player pool, the rake is the best i can get seeing as i can't have rakeback on full tilt, the software is good, and it's perhaps the most secure network to do business with. also supports hold'em manager.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chatzilla
OTHER
PROS: may have weaker players, lots of bonus whoring can be done
CONS: lot less players, may not work with PT3 or HEM
hope that helps
|
another con: potentially dubious depending on where you live, how skeptical you are of online gaming sites. i think FT and PS are defnitely the most reliable sites in terms of $$ security, ease of transactions etc.
also i'm not sure about the rake changes at stars, but not long ago i think stars was better than FT for rake at microstakes even with rakeback on FT. may have changed since then. i'm too ignorant to know.
|
|
|
|
daven
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,805
|
|
where do you live, what games do you play, what experience do you have
|
|
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
There's a ton of information that goes into making this decision. If you want to IM me on Yahoo or MSN (I'm jesseeddleman@yahoo.com on both) I'll talk about it with you if you'd like.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|