Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

What's a "normal" downswing for .50/1?

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
WhooFleuryScores
Old 09-10-2005, 07:12 AM     Post subject: What's a "normal" downswing for .50/1? #1 (permalink)  
WhooFleuryScores's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 918
WhooFleuryScores
Send a message via AIM to WhooFleuryScores
Hey guys,been on a bit of a rollercoaster the past couple weeks at .50/1.Yesterday I was up 23BB but tonight I ended up losing that and being down 27BB(some suckouts,some outdraws,perhaps one or two bad calls).My table selection was ok for the most part as a majority of the players were loose/passive or loose/semi-aggressive.The hands I made I did get paid off on,but the hands I lost obviously hurt.Luckily my bankroll management combined with bonus chasing helps offset that a bit.

Anyone know what the accepted downswing is for .50/1?I know my game needs more work but I want to see at what point is a downswing a serious issue.Thanks guys.
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
Greedo017
Old 09-10-2005, 08:11 AM #2 (permalink)  
Greedo017's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
Greedo017 is on a distinguished road
GOOD GOD HUGE!

I have been trying to play a lot of hands 4 tabling .5/1 NL lately. OMFG, today was the worst day ever. i felt like i was swimming upstream. I was even winning some big pots, but I just felt like I could never stop leaking money. I guess i will stop multitabling like that for a while until i get some confidence back. I don't know what the deal is........... I was handling it, and I think playing fine the entire time. Then, i got kk vs aa twice and two set over sets, in that order, losing me 4 whole more buy-ins. Up until that point, it was bad, i was questioning myself, but not so bad. Those 4 buy-ins went in like an hour.... this is the most horrible game ever. I can handle that I guess, but I mean WTF WTF!!!!! WTF! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
i betcha that i got something you ain't got, that's called courage, it don't come from no liquor bottle, it ain't scotch
 
Reply With Quote
DoGGz
Old 09-10-2005, 08:34 AM #3 (permalink)  
Guest

Posts: n/a
25BB up or down isn't exactly huge. Focus more on your play and less about how much you are winning or losing.
Reply With Quote
Greedo017
Old 09-10-2005, 08:48 AM #4 (permalink)  
Greedo017's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
Greedo017 is on a distinguished road
I just realized, you might be talking about limit. 23BB isn't a big swing for limit either. Swings don't even start in limit or no limit until your bb's lost are in the hundreds. even in limit, you can lose 23BB in a couple hands easily.
i betcha that i got something you ain't got, that's called courage, it don't come from no liquor bottle, it ain't scotch
 
Reply With Quote
Greedo017
Old 09-10-2005, 10:11 AM #5 (permalink)  
Greedo017's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
Greedo017 is on a distinguished road
OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why won't it stop. Why! WHY! NO! I AM TRAPPED IN MY OWN PERSONAL HELL YOU SCORPION WOMAN THAT IS POKER!

***** Hand History for Game 2686645169 *****
$100 NL Texas Hold'em - Saturday, September 10, 06:04:29 EDT 2005
Table Table 36602 (Real Money)
Seat 1 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: Rocksolid07 ( $262.32 )
Seat 2: Wahoo2006 ( $105.55 )
Seat 3: Solanthos ( $138.95 )
Seat 5: FendiGal ( $135.50 )
Seat 6: oOoViperoOo ( $106.70 )
Seat 10: McCurtain ( $411.33 )
Seat 8: jeremiah32 ( $52.71 )
Seat 4: mtpigeon ( $15 )
Seat 7: INTJay ( $75 )
Wahoo2006 posts small blind [$0.50].
Solanthos posts big blind [$1].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Wahoo2006 [ Qs Js ]
mtpigeon calls [$1].
FendiGal folds.
Wahoo2006: you fold kings?
oOoViperoOo calls [$1].
INTJay calls [$1].
jeremiah32 folds.
McCurtain calls [$1].
Rocksolid07 calls [$1].
Wahoo2006 calls [$0.50].
backedup1 has joined the table.
Solanthos checks.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 5s, Ts, 2s ]
Wahoo2006 bets [$4].
Solanthos folds.
mtpigeon folds.
oOoViperoOo folds.
Rocksolid07: what did you have intjay
INTJay raises [$20].
INTJay: i think i was behind
Rocksolid07: i know you were
McCurtain calls [$20].
Rocksolid07 folds.
Wahoo2006 raises [$32].
INTJay is all-In [$54]
McCurtain calls [$54].
Wahoo2006 is all-In [$68.55]
McCurtain calls [$30.55].
** Dealing Turn ** [ As ]
** Dealing River ** [ 5c ]
Wahoo2006 shows [ Qs, Js ] a flush, ace high.
INTJay doesn't show [ 8s, 7s ] a flush, ace high.
McCurtain shows [ Ks, 6s ] a flush, ace high.
McCurtain wins $61.10 from side pot #1 with a flush, ace high with king kicker.
McCurtain wins $226 from the main pot with a flush, ace high with king kicker.
oOoViperoOo has left the table.
i betcha that i got something you ain't got, that's called courage, it don't come from no liquor bottle, it ain't scotch
 
Reply With Quote
Greedo017
Old 09-10-2005, 10:15 AM #6 (permalink)  
Greedo017's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
Greedo017 is on a distinguished road
oh yea, sorry to hijack your thread, but i am angry. I am trapped in a glass cage of emotion, if you will. My Baxter has been punted, my veronica has hurled a printer at me. I am rubble. You stay classy.



i betcha that i got something you ain't got, that's called courage, it don't come from no liquor bottle, it ain't scotch
 
Reply With Quote
Shark Bait
Old 09-10-2005, 02:21 PM #7 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 481
Shark Bait
100 BB is common. I lost 25 BB last night playing 1 table. No big deal, it happens.
<a500lbgorilla> Limit is poker with training wheels!
 
Reply With Quote
WhooFleuryScores
Old 09-10-2005, 04:16 PM     Post subject: No prob #8 (permalink)  
WhooFleuryScores's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 918
WhooFleuryScores
Send a message via AIM to WhooFleuryScores
Quote:
oh yea, sorry to hijack your thread, but i am angry.
No prob.That is exactly the reason why I have been avoiding NL ring games;the swings are just insane sometimes.

Quote:
Focus more on your play and less about how much you are winning or losing.
That's been the general plan.Focus on the decisions and the right thing not the results def.
Reply With Quote
satan1974
Old 09-10-2005, 05:13 PM #9 (permalink)  
Straight

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 147
satan1974
I'm playing exclusively NL single table SNG and doing pretty well at the moment. Hadly any swings because you're stake (but obviously winnings) are limited, but I wouldn't dream of trying ring games until I'm making a constant killing on the tournaments.
Reply With Quote
Dislexsik
Old 09-10-2005, 05:22 PM #10 (permalink)  
Dislexsik's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: On the grind
Posts: 832
Dislexsik
Sorry for the noobquestion,but what do u mean with things like 25BB or 100BB?
 
Reply With Quote
Shark Bait
Old 09-10-2005, 05:38 PM #11 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 481
Shark Bait
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dislexsik
Sorry for the noobquestion,but what do u mean with things like 25BB or 100BB?
Big Bets.
<a500lbgorilla> Limit is poker with training wheels!
 
Reply With Quote
Irisheyes
Old 09-10-2005, 07:13 PM #12 (permalink)  
Irisheyes's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: over there
Posts: 3,708
Irisheyes
1 Big Bet = 2 Big Blinds
Reply With Quote
bigredhoss
Old 09-11-2005, 01:29 AM     Post subject: Re: No prob #13 (permalink)  
Straight

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 127
bigredhoss
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhooFleuryScores
Quote:
oh yea, sorry to hijack your thread, but i am angry.
No prob.That is exactly the reason why I have been avoiding NL ring games;the swings are just insane sometimes.

Quote:
Focus more on your play and less about how much you are winning or losing.
That's been the general plan.Focus on the decisions and the right thing not the results def.
compared to what? limit games have have bigger swings than nl unless the nl player is completely clueless, and of course SNGs for both types have bigger swings than the ring games.
Reply With Quote
vqc
Old 09-11-2005, 02:11 AM     Post subject: Re: No prob #14 (permalink)  
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,427
vqc
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigredhoss
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhooFleuryScores
Quote:
oh yea, sorry to hijack your thread, but i am angry.
No prob.That is exactly the reason why I have been avoiding NL ring games;the swings are just insane sometimes.

Quote:
Focus more on your play and less about how much you are winning or losing.
That's been the general plan.Focus on the decisions and the right thing not the results def.
compared to what? limit games have have bigger swings than nl unless the nl player is completely clueless, and of course SNGs for both types have bigger swings than the ring games.
Im not sure that is true.

For me ring games are higher variance than tourneys.

I think that for a player who is equally adept at both ring and SNGs (say the 90th best player in the world for both), SNGs have a lower variance. Howeer, I cannot prove this myself, and I hope that someone will come by and give some evidence.
Reply With Quote
Laeelin
Old 09-11-2005, 04:07 AM     Post subject: Re: No prob #15 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,137
Laeelin
Quote:
Originally Posted by vqchuang
I think that for a player who is equally adept at both ring and SNGs (say the 90th best player in the world for both), SNGs have a lower variance. Howeer, I cannot prove this myself, and I hope that someone will come by and give some evidence.
My gut says that your wrong.

My mind says your right.

Intresting question, or at least something to think about.

Q. Is poker Gambling?
A. Do you use correct bankroll management?
 
Reply With Quote
bigredhoss
Old 09-11-2005, 05:00 AM #16 (permalink)  
Straight

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 127
bigredhoss
hmm, maybe you are right about the SNG thing...The reason I said that is because I've heard about a lot of winning SNG players going on X-teen out of the money streaks, and it seems like not as many winning ring players drop that many buyins (I know it's possible, I just assumed it was less common).
Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2005, 05:20 AM #17 (permalink)  
Guest

Posts: n/a
Regular would be 30BB
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:59 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.