|
L_Clan_Sup3rMaN
|
01-03-2008, 11:41 AM
Post subject: Two questions about rakeback
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 833
|
|
1 - Say the rake of a hand was $2 but you lost the hand, do you still recieve rakeback from that hand? Same with say you limp into a pot and fold on the flop but two ppl go all in and rake was high, are u considered part of that rakeback? This is for UB or AB.
2 - Does the extra rake at the BBJ tables go towards rakeback as well?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
martindcx1e
|
01-03-2008, 06:53 PM
Post subject: Re: Two questions about rakeback
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by L_Clan_Sup3rMaN
1 - Say the rake of a hand was $2 but you lost the hand, do you still recieve rakeback from that hand? Same with say you limp into a pot and fold on the flop but two ppl go all in and rake was high, are u considered part of that rakeback? This is for UB or AB.
2 - Does the extra rake at the BBJ tables go towards rakeback as well?
|
1 - If you contribute to the pot in any way you receive rakeback from that hand. Some sites have a "dealt" method of calculating rakeback which means you only have to be dealt in to receive credit.
2 - I've never seen this question before or an answer to it, but I'm pretty positive that the extra rake would count.
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
jyms
|
|
Tilting Mod
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,836
|
|
BBJ does not count towards RB
|
|
|
|
bode
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2006
Location: slow motion
Posts: 4,270
|
|
god i wish BBJ rake counted.
|
Quote:
|
eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
|
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Trainer_jyms
BBJ does not count towards RB
|
WOW that really sucks
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
biondino
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
Posts: 3,170
|
|
But how could it? The BBJ goes towards the jackpot - if they took 30% off then the jackpot would be 30% lower.
|
|
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
ya i guess i didnt think that through
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by biondino
But how could it? The BBJ goes towards the jackpot - if they took 30% off then the jackpot would be 30% lower.
|
this would not be good.
|
|
|
|
mknickle
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 11
|
|
As long as you were dealt cards and rake was taken on most sites they consider that as you paying rake. Say they took $3 in rake for a full 10 seater table...and everyone was dealt cars...and you folded pre-flop along with 5 other people.
At the end of the hand they take the $3 in rake divided by 10 and treat it like you all paid 30 cents towards rake...therefore you get rakeback on the 30 cents.
|
|
|
|
JL
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,095
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by biondino
But how could it? The BBJ goes towards the jackpot - if they took 30% off then the jackpot would be 30% lower.
|
this would not be good.
|
LOL
...you bastard!
|
|
|