Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

True or False?

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
IOS
Old 11-23-2005, 06:59 PM     Post subject: True or False? #1 (permalink)  

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 100NL 6max
Posts: 84
IOS
I've read somewhere on these forums that 10k hands is considered long term. If you can make it 10k hands and are showing profit, chances are you will are a winning player. Anyone agree with this statement?
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
Cocco_Bill
Old 11-23-2005, 07:08 PM     Post subject: Re: True or False? #2 (permalink)  
Cocco_Bill's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,254
Cocco_Bill
Quote:
Originally Posted by IOS
I've read somewhere on these forums that 10k hands is considered long term. If you can make it 10k hands and are showing profit, chances are you will are a winning player. Anyone agree with this statement?
10k hands will give you an idea where you stand but I wouldn't call it the long term. I would even go as far as to say that any winning player will sooner or later have a 10k hand streak of break even poker.
Reply With Quote
EricE
Old 11-23-2005, 08:15 PM #3 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 894
EricE
10K is the minimum # of hands you want to look at to see if you are profitable v.s. losing. It is by no means long term but can be used as a checkpoint to see how you are doing. More hands is always better to better wash out variance and see the true win rate.
Stakes: Playing $0.10/$0.25 NL
 
Reply With Quote
edudlive
Old 11-23-2005, 09:01 PM #4 (permalink)  
edudlive's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 100NL 6max
Posts: 623
edudlive
10k is a weeks worth of player if you're playing a lot, but it gives you an ok look at how you're doing
(16:02:25) Fleece: u think ur liked now?
(16:02:31) Fleece: that u got real life friends
(16:02:48) Fleece: enjoy ur real life friends
(16:03:08) Fleece: ur e-friends dont wanna knwo about u anymore
 
Reply With Quote
Demiparadigm
Old 11-23-2005, 09:20 PM #5 (permalink)  
Demiparadigm's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Party 6 max
Posts: 1,602
Demiparadigm
I would go so far as to say that given a large enough sample size, any winning player will have a run of 10K hands losing, and 40K is not unheard of.
I did some math earlier to prove that a marginally "losing" player can realistically have a "good" run of over half a million hands.
10K is not long term. It is not close. It will give you a good idea of how you play, but not how you do.
To win in poker you only need to be one step ahead of your opponents. Two steps may be detrimental.
 
Reply With Quote
Demiparadigm
Old 11-23-2005, 09:23 PM #6 (permalink)  
Demiparadigm's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Party 6 max
Posts: 1,602
Demiparadigm
From my Bankroll thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by I
To determine how long it will take for your average win to be 1 standard deviation, divide the square of your standard deviation for 1 hour by the square of your hourly rate.

hours to be ahead 84% of the time = (sigma/ev)^2.
*84% = the 68% of the time you will be +/- 1SD and the 16% you will be up more than 1SD.

This is one way to define the "long run". To find out how long it will take for your hourly rate to equal let's say 1.6 standard deviations, this is simply

hours to at least break even 95% of the time = (1.6*sigma/ev)^2.

At this point you have a 95% probability of being ahead.
To simplify the math lets assume a player with a winrate of 2BB/100hands and a Standard Deviation of 20BB/100hands

to have a 95% confidence of being ahead:
(1.6*20/2)^2 * 100 hands = 25,600 hands

now "ahead" doesn't mean at your true win rate... it just means >$0.
To win in poker you only need to be one step ahead of your opponents. Two steps may be detrimental.
 
Reply With Quote
The_Bankroll
Old 11-24-2005, 06:04 AM #7 (permalink)  
The_Bankroll's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 370
The_Bankroll
Send a message via AIM to The_Bankroll
I agree. 10k is nowhere close. at 10k hands, I thought I was doing really good with a 2.8BB/100 winrate. in 15k hands it was down to 1.9. I heard someone once say that 80k is when you can have a fairly confident idea of your true winrate, but even then it's only like 85-90% accurate.
 
Reply With Quote
midas06
Old 11-24-2005, 08:24 AM #8 (permalink)  
midas06's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,196
midas06
Estrop almost played 10000 hands in one night
Reply With Quote
mouteut
Old 11-24-2005, 05:09 PM #9 (permalink)  
mouteut's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 152
mouteut
WHoa...10K... 20 tabling?
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:28 AM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.