|
martindcx1e
|
05-17-2006, 05:49 AM
Post subject: Thoughts on River Aggression
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
so the river is basically always a WA/WB situation since no can be drawing anymore. so does this mean that the river should usually be the most passively played part of every hand? of course this doesn't apply when you have a monster. am i thinking correctly here?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
really depends on the situation.
Say you have a decent hand, and the other guy's betting range is bigger then their calling range (say they have a busted flush draw), check/call is a good line.
Say you put them on a range where they have a decent made hand, 60% of which you beat, 40% of which you lose to. You know he will check behind the more marginal ones, and agressively value bet the big ones. He will call a bet with the more marginal ones. Betting and folding to a raise is far and away better here.
|
|
|
|
jackvance
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,910
|
|
There is no dire need to bet over half pot anymore (hence blocking bets) but that's about it..
|
|
Sarcasm is your body's natural defense against stupidity
|
|
bdawg56kg
|
|
05-17-2006, 10:48 AM
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on River Aggression
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,201
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by martindcx1e
so the river is basically always a WA/WB situation since no can be drawing anymore.
|
No, the river is either ahead, behind, or split. Because no one is drawing, there is no such thing as wa/wb on the river. I think that's what you meant to say.
|
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
Linear Mode
