|
Off5th
|
03-26-2006, 08:29 AM
Post subject: Thinking of moving to $100 N/L....
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ewa Beach
Posts: 180
|
|
Okay so I got a bundle of cash saved up to move to a higher limit. $3000 would be my bankroll. I'm currently grinding $50 n/l. Now I heard and noticed that $50 n/l is one of the hardest to grind out because of the quality of players, but I've been beating it for a total profit of $500+ the past two weeks on Full Tilt. (give or take a couple or 3 days off). My question is would it be wise for me to move up to $100 N/L? I have the bankroll to do so. Players who play $100 N/L tell me its easier than $50 n/l because a lot of players who play at that level are donkeys who have money to piss because they make like 30 to 40 bones/hr on their dayjob. Any advice on my part??
|
|
"I want to win money so I play the worst. If I could find a group of 2nd graders with $200 bankrolls I would play them."
-Aokrangly
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
midas06
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,196
|
|
Go for it. 100nl isn't all that hard. Good luck sir
|
|
|
|
bigboy5540
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: california
Posts: 253
|
|
go for it bro. if you can win in 50 nl you can win in 100nl as long as you treat the chips as units and don't tilt. more bluffing and mor e aggressive play at 100 nl. but more donks as well.
|
|
im good at poker
|
|
Robert
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kokkedal, Denmark
Posts: 1,109
|
|
NL 100 is the same or worse than NL50. I just moved up to NL 100, and I play a standard TAG game and its going good uptil now. If you beat 50NL then you should move up when you have $2000.
|
|
|