|
azureXsmurF
|
11-29-2005, 10:13 PM
Post subject: Small/Medium PP vs limpers...
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 170
|
|
Okay, so I'm BB with pocket 6s. I get 4 callers, should I raise and try to force people limping with crap hands to fold, or should I check to possibly get a set for free?
EDIT: This was a hand I played early on in a NLHE freeroll on Pokerstars (one of the ones that qualifies you for a prize money tournament), so a lot of fish were still there, two of the callers seemed to be playing pretty well, taking down many pots and whenever it went to a showdown they had a hand.
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Irisheyes
|
11-29-2005, 10:34 PM
Post subject: Re: Small/Medium PP vs limpers...
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: over there
Posts: 3,708
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by azureXsmurF
r should I check to possibly get a set for free?
|
most definitly. You want other people to hit their A or whatever on the flop so you can take chips off them with your well disguised set.
|
|
|
|
azureXsmurF
|
11-29-2005, 11:47 PM
Post subject: Re: Small/Medium PP vs limpers...
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 170
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Irisheyes
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by azureXsmurF
r should I check to possibly get a set for free?
|
most definitly. You want other people to hit their A or whatever on the flop so you can take chips off them with your well disguised set.
|
That's what I figured (and what I ended up doing). The only thing that made me wonder if I should maybe just put a 4BB raise was that it was a pretty loose table, and didn't want anyone to hit a better hand after a ragged flop.
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
always take the free card
Its btter you flop a free monster than try to buy the pot and end up putting chips into a wasted effort especially an mtt.
Of course, you can always gambOOl....
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
easy check
flop em or drop em
no reason to put another chip into the pot unless you spike a 6, or get some other kind of very favorable cards.
|
|
|
|
underminedsk
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Reraising you from the button
Posts: 250
|
|
my favored play in this situation is to raise 1-2xbb (some amount that everyone will most likely to call), to try to get the pot a bit bigger when I do hit my set.
It seems to be working so far, but do people think this is worth it, or will I lose money in the long run by doing this?
|
|
online br: $14,000, @400NL full ring, 100NL 6 max
|
|
AHiltz
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coldbrook, NS
Posts: 1,589
|
|
If you are raising 1-2bb to build a pot, me thinks your postflop skills need work.
|
|
|
|
underminedsk
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Reraising you from the button
Posts: 250
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AHiltz
If you are raising 1-2bb to build a pot, me thinks your postflop skills need work.
|
This was my thinking:
Most of the pot building still comes post flop, but if I can spend 2xbb to pump a 5xbb pot to a 15xbb pot preflop, then I think thats worth it. The guy that flops top pair will have to lead for 10-15xbb to protect his hand, instead of 3, and at that point its going to become pretty hard for him to get away from the hand without losing a large chunk or all of his stack, especially if it goes three-way to the turn. Plus, the dead money from the other callers will help pay for the times that I raise and dont hit my set.
Basically to me it seems like im spending 2xbb to make the final pot 2-3x as big. It seems worth it to me.
Thoughts?
|
|
online br: $14,000, @400NL full ring, 100NL 6 max
|
|
azureXsmurF
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 170
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by underminedsk
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AHiltz
If you are raising 1-2bb to build a pot, me thinks your postflop skills need work.
|
This was my thinking:
Most of the pot building still comes post flop, but if I can spend 2xbb to pump a 5xbb pot to a 15xbb pot preflop, then I think thats worth it. The guy that flops top pair will have to lead for 10-15xbb to protect his hand, instead of 3, and at that point its going to become pretty hard for him to get away from the hand without losing a large chunk or all of his stack, especially if it goes three-way to the turn. Plus, the dead money from the other callers will help pay for the times that I raise and dont hit my set.
Basically to me it seems like im spending 2xbb to make the final pot 2-3x as big. It seems worth it to me.
Thoughts?
|
The only problem would be if you get a run of smaller pps and never hit your set, you lose a lot of money you could use on another pot.
|
|
|
|
BankItDrew
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Losing Prop Bets
Posts: 2,789
|
|
If you raise pre-flop with low pockets and (at 2nd best get 1 caller), you are probably only a coinflip from there, excluding positional power.
Check. If you hit the devil, you'll have 4 others trying to win a pot that you'll probably be ahead in.
|

Girlfriend: Why are the werewolves more important than living life?!
Girlfriend: Are you on the forums doing the werewolves again?
Girlfriend: Soo... you forgot to run that errand, but you had time to werewolf? Wtf?
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BankItPayette
If you raise pre-flop with low pockets and (at 2nd best get 1 caller), you are probably only a coinflip from there, excluding positional power.
|
With lots of money behind, positional power is everything. Quite often the better hand pair has to fold post-flop and the over-cards fold without seeing a turn or river.
|
|
|
|
Irisheyes
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: over there
Posts: 3,708
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by azureXsmurF
The only problem would be if you get a run of smaller pps and never hit your set, you lose a lot of money you could use on another pot.
|
This is a really bad way to think about any poker situation. No decision should be based on getting a 'run' of any sort. Every deal of the cards is a completely independant event. You need to start thinking about the long long term where all 'runs' tend towards an infinite average.
|
|
|
|
ponyboy
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 379
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by azureXsmurF
This is a really bad way to think about any poker situation. No decision should be based on getting a 'run' of any sort. Every deal of the cards is a completely independant event. You need to start thinking about the long long term where all 'runs' tend towards an infinite average.
|
This should be on a sticky note above my computer. Amen.
|
|
|