|
pokerroomace
|
06-04-2006, 10:56 PM
Post subject: Which site is the easiest to play at? Has the most fish?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 783
|
|
I read through some of the reviews and most of them say that at the lower limits, there are a lot of fish and it is very easy.
Which site do you think is esaiest at the lower limits?
Also, which site do you think is esaiest at the higher limits? Or is there are no such thing? All just as hard?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
flomo
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: mashing potatoes
Posts: 878
|
|
party poker
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigred
Protect dog
|
|
|
taipan168
|
|
Administrator
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 10,441
|
|
Playing at a site with lots of fish is not a panacea for bad play. You still need to play a very solid ABC game. It's just that when you do hit your hand, poor players will pay you off whilst good players will know to back off.
|
|
|
|
yorib
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oak Park, IL
Posts: 281
|
|
I really like Paradise Poker. Party kicks you off the micro-stakes after 45 days.
|
|
|
|
Muxy
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canadian LOLUH'S AND AMERICAN LOLUHS
Posts: 1,529
|
|
In General Party Poker
but any site on the iPoker network is bad
Titan
Noble Poker
Cd Poker
|
|
|
|
djzcko
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 285
|
|
I've played at Pokerroom, Pokerstars, Party and Paradise $25NL, full ring. In my opinion, the site with the worst players is Pokerroom, then Party, Stars then Paradise. I didn't play a whole lot on paradise (just enough to clear an easy bonus) so my data on that site is limited. The other nice thing about Pokerroom is that the rake is extremely low. The only downside of Pokerroom is that the customer service is terrible...
|
|
|
|
biondino
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
Posts: 3,170
|
|
Whereas I think that Pokerroom has better players than Party, and their rake at least used to be higher. The site is much nicer, though.
|
|
|
|
pokerroomace
|
|
Full House
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 783
|
|
I found that Paradise has weaker players than PokerRoom. I'm not sure about the level at the ring games, but the level at the SnG's is much, much weaker at Paradise.
|
|
|
|
djzcko
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 285
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by biondino
Whereas I think that Pokerroom has better players than Party, and their rake at least used to be higher. The site is much nicer, though. |
Pokerroom caps their rake at .50 for $25nl. Party will charge you .05 per $1 up to $3. So, the rake up to $10 pots is the same, thereafter, Pokerroom rules. What I hate is getting raked on split pots where you and villain have the same hand and just end up donating $ to the house. PR, you generally still make a small profit on these types of hands because of the low cap on the rake.
|
|
|
|
biondino
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
Posts: 3,170
|
|
Ah that's cool - I know people used to complain about the rake at Proom. Another plus is that it has a java client as well as a downloadable version so you can play immediately from any web-enabled computer, which is handy if you're not at home.
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
personally?
Party
Dise
Pokerroom/I-poker
To be honest if you can play 25nl you probably want to be on party if you arent chasing bonuses.
If your playing <25nl then i think perhaps boss media or maybe prima offer good fairly low variance games. Add dise to that at 10nl too.
As far as i know, I-Poker has some very good higher limit games as does dise.
|
|
|
|
drtofu66
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 595
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Muxy
|
Really? Over on 2p2 there were some posts about how rock-tight Noble and Titan were. The bonuses are tough to clear, except for maybe the Betfred sign-up (a true 10x any non-contributed raked hand bonus up to $250 but you can only earn it at 50NL and above). Is it consistently fishy or do you just happen to play at the most opportune times?
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by drtofu66
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Muxy
|
Really? Over on 2p2 there were some posts about how rock-tight Noble and Titan were. The bonuses are tough to clear, except for maybe the Betfred sign-up (a true 10x any non-contributed raked hand bonus up to $250 but you can only earn it at 50NL and above). Is it consistently fishy or do you just happen to play at the most opportune times? |
i poker has some great ratings for short handed games at anything better than 50NL and lhe games.
|
|
|
|
WhooFleuryScores
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 918
|
|
For me it's:
1) Party/Empire
2)The PR skins
3) Bodog
|
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
Linear Mode
