Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Set under set: any way to avoid?

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
dzeanah
Old 06-15-2006, 06:38 AM     Post subject: Set under set: any way to avoid? #1 (permalink)  
dzeanah's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 95
dzeanah
tinkering with short-handed tables tonight and was surprised at the profitability until this hand. New to the table, didn't have a line on the guy, figured QJ was most likely holding from the betting.

So, is this just the way poker plays back at you sometimes, or did I screw this up?

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (5 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

saw flop|saw showdown

Hero ($9.80)
Button ($1.30)
SB ($9.85)
BB ($11.50)
UTG ($5.30)

Preflop: Hero is MP with 8, 8.
UTG calls $0.10, Hero calls $0.10, Button calls $0.10, SB completes, BB checks.

Flop: ($0.50) 8, J, Q (5 players)
SB checks, BB checks, UTG checks, Hero checks, Button checks.

Turn: ($0.50) 4 (5 players)
SB bets $0.5, BB folds, UTG folds, Hero raises to $1, Button folds, SB raises to $1.5, Hero raises to $5, SB raises to $9.5, Hero raises to $13.7, SB calls $1.20.

River: ($24.90) 2 (2 players)

Final Pot: $24.90

Results in white below:
SB has Jh Jc (three of a kind, jacks).
Hero has 8s 8h (three of a kind, eights).
Outcome: SB wins $24.90.
Poker isn't about making hands, it's about making hands that get paid off. -- Rondavu
 
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
ItDepends
Old 06-15-2006, 06:42 AM #2 (permalink)  
ItDepends's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 142
ItDepends
9t not possible? I'd get the hint after a re-re-reraise

Edit: Bet the flop please....
Reply With Quote
givememyleg
Old 06-15-2006, 07:45 AM #3 (permalink)  
givememyleg's Avatar
WHO YA GONNA CALL?!??
Administrator

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ISHPERMING MISHIGEN
Posts: 5,041
givememyleg is a splendid one to beholdgivememyleg is a splendid one to beholdgivememyleg is a splendid one to beholdgivememyleg is a splendid one to beholdgivememyleg is a splendid one to beholdgivememyleg is a splendid one to beholdgivememyleg is a splendid one to behold
1) I would raise preflop.
2) I would bet that flop.
3) I wouldn't min raise the turn.

T9 is hugely possible in a limped pot like this.... Raise it up preflop. I would definitely be far more concerned about the straight here, I could never put villian on JJ QQ. If villian has T9 here I would much rather be allin on the flop vs the turn as you lose about 15% equity with only 1 card to come. Also, folding bottom set here is pretty much read dependent. This would be a very tough one to fold, and don't think I could do it very often, but if you're in this unraised pot with a NIT nut camper I would be suspicious.

But to answer the question in your post, no. If this had been a flop like 3 8 J, totally unconnected, you SHOULD go broke with 88 v JJ. Set under Set is just teh suck and you should pay it off, esspecially if it is allin on the flop.

Get your own badge! Click profile at the top and FTR Badge from the left nav.


"The Dragon in My Garage" by Carl Sagan
I say onto you, I've felt the dragon! I felt the touch of his tail, the breath of his fire, and I know without a shadow of a doubt that the dragon exists!
 
Reply With Quote
aokrongly
Old 06-15-2006, 03:48 PM #4 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 863
aokrongly
Generally speaking you're going to pay off when you have an underset to an overset. They are really hard to see. In this particular hand, however, when you get into a re-re-reraise-push situation with that flop, I would have put the guy on a lucky flopped straight and slowed down.

You have to ask yourself why this guy is reraising. He either made the straight or has 2 pair. I never put someone on an overset unless there was alot of preflop raising and the flop comes with kq or something like that. Then you have to think "is the guy playing a big pocket pair".

Generally, though, on a 10nl table players only get really involved in raise-re-re-reraise situations with nut hands (or close to them). Otherwise they are either pushing (with a mistake or draw) or they are going to back down and start calling. There are exceptions, but generally speaking 10nl players are passive in the face of strong bets. when they get active you have to think they have something strong. Or they decided to bet it all on their drawing hand.
Reply With Quote
jyms
Old 06-15-2006, 04:02 PM #5 (permalink)  
jyms's Avatar
Tilting Mod

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,836
jyms has a spectacular aura aboutjyms has a spectacular aura aboutjyms has a spectacular aura about
I think checking the flop is where all the problems start. If you bet the flop he will either call or come over the top. Either way it gives you a heads up and gets all the clutter out of there. If you slow play a set like this against 4 callers on a club flush draw someone is going to hit something. Bet the pot and take out the chasers and when the sb comes over the top you'll see the amber light in the distance Also why re-re-re raise. If I like my hand enought to re-raise, I'm either all in to his raise or out.
 
Reply With Quote
dzeanah
Old 06-15-2006, 04:16 PM #6 (permalink)  
dzeanah's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 95
dzeanah
Y'all are right. Looking at it this morning I should have given some thought to the flopped straight, at a minimum.

Thanks, guys.
Poker isn't about making hands, it's about making hands that get paid off. -- Rondavu
 
Reply With Quote
swiggidy
Old 06-15-2006, 04:35 PM #7 (permalink)  
swiggidy's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Waiting in the shadows ...
Posts: 3,777
swiggidy will become famous soon enough
Don't min-raise.

Note: both of his re-raises are min-re-raises. That should also send up a warning flag.
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:04 AM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.