|
RoyalStraight
|
07-10-2006, 10:25 PM
Post subject: Reasons why 2pair should beat 3 of a kind.
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East Rocksbury, South Dakota
Posts: 3
|
|
Throughout my poker career i have often been reminded that three of a kind beats 2pair. But why i ask you? Listed below are the reasons that i believe the rules of the game we love, and the one that i dominate at, poker, should be altered to allow 2pair to beat 3 of a kind.
1. The first and most obvious of reasons is that any given 2 pair is composed of 4 cards where the 3 of a kind is composed of only 3 cards. Therefore if we take that as 3/4=75% which we subtract from 100% and get 25%. Simply put, 2 pair is worth an average of 25% more than 3 of a kind. Therefore it should be ranked higher.
2. The win rate of 2pair over any given 20,000 hands is nearly 16.5% higher than the win rate of 3 of a kind. Far more hands are won with 2 pair than are won with 3 of a kind. If over a 200 hand session you are dealt two pair 3% of the hands and we divide this by its wins rate over 3 of a kind(16.5), we get 0.18181818>. And for the 3 of a kinds we divide the aproximately 1.5% of the time we get 3 of a kind by the same 16.5 difference we get 0.090909>. As you can clearly see, the long run overall worth of 2 pair is more than double that of 3 of a kind! We have been accepting the mathematical error of 3 of a kind beating 2pair for all these years and i am the first to discover it and do the math for myself. If this does not convince you that 2pair should beat 3 of a kind then continue reading my other reasons below.
3. If we were to play every hand to the river, (which I do not recommend but can be used as a profitable strategy in higher stakes games) we would see that we get 2pair nearly 16.5 percent more than 3 of a kind making it that much more valuable and clearly showing why it should be ranked higher than 3 of a kind.
4. This is not as much of a reason as it is making my point. Think of how much we value 3 of a kind. We like it so much we give it additional nick-names such as "trips" or "a set". Now that we all understand why 2pair should beat 3 of a kind, i would like to propose that we hand over those nick-names to 2pair. From now on when we flop 2pair we will say "o good, i flopped a set" and when you river your high-ranked 2pair you can shout out that your "trips" again denied someone with 3 of a kind of a pot.
Any comments or thoughts on my discovery or congradulatory messages are welcomed. I would like to hear your thoughts.
-RoyalStraight
-The highest hand i poker!
|
|
|
|
mb2447
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 122
|
|
are you high? no, seriously, are you?
|
|
AWOL.
|
|
LimpinAintEZ
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: working myself up to FTR fullhouse status while not giving 1 solid piece of advice
Posts: 592
|
|
thats pretty funny - i have to disagree, but you make some interesting arguments...not good, but interesting
|
|
this space intentionally left blank
|
|
BowlinPinTim
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: None
Posts: 51
|
|
wtf?
|
|
|
|
Reidak
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 564
|
|
I think he didnt pass the blunt at lunch, FIEND.
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
INVALID DATA ENTRY
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,180
|
|
i think the merits of straights over flushes should be discussed
|

Yes, I brought a knife to this gunfight,
just the other day I mugged a mountain.
So bring that shit, I've had practice.
|
|
Warpe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,753
|
|
We should have a contest to identify the jokester. My money's on Lukie.
|

"We are gods, 'tis our purpose to set aright the path
of lesser beings."
|
|
Waterdick
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 124
|
|
LOL r u an idiot?
|
|
|
|
johnnyBuz
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly, Pa
Posts: 457
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
i think the merits of straights over flushes should be discussed
|
i agree.
|
|
Whip it real hard, whip it, whip it real hard. - Rick Ross
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,773
|
|
the reason three of a kind is better than two pair: It's less probable. Nuff said.
|
|
|
|
Vrax
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 612
|
|
Queen high should be the best hand.
|
|
"How could I call that bet? How could you MAKE that bet? It's poker not solitaire. " - that Gus Bronson guy
|
|
swiggidy
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Heading to Nebraska...
Posts: 3,602
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
the reason three of a kind is better than two pair: It's less probable. Nuff said.
|
I don't know, his math is pretty convincing...
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mailman
so 1mo relationships are like play money?
|
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
|
|
jyms
|
|
Tilting mod
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,225
|
|
Warpe has the smartest response to this I think. it's a rofliculous statement at the least but the OP could be a friggin genius.
|
|
|
|
BowlinPinTim
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: None
Posts: 51
|
|
a bit off topic but did anyone read his other post where he says, and i quote
"I chose RoyalStraoght for my name becaue it is the highest hand ranking in poker"
|
|
|
|
jyms
|
|
Tilting mod
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,225
|
|
People???? people???? get a sense of humor..... LOOK at the thread. you don't have to be brain surgeon to know when someone is fuckin wit' ya. here's the bets.
1) Lukie... a 2:1 favorite and quite funny in his own right. And loves to be an OP
2) Po$$e$$ed a 25:1 underdog, but possible because he can be funny even without sarcasm.
3) Midas06 a 4:1 possibility if he was drinking that night.
4) Muxy a 3:1 good bet. He gets bored easy and is Canadian. We love humour.
5) BigRed 8:1 a bit of a stretch because bigred's humour is mostly poking back, not the original zings. But some of the funniest one line posts on FTR.
This is your line up, place your bets.........................................
|
|
|
|
BowlinPinTim
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: None
Posts: 51
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Trainer_jyms
People???? people???? get a sense of humor..... LOOK at the thread. you don't have to be brain surgeon to know when someone is fuckin wit' ya. here's the bets.
1) Lukie... a 2:1 favorite and quite funny in his own right.
2) Po$$e$$ed a 25:1 underdog, but possible because he can be funny without sarcasm.
3) Midas06 a 4:1 possibility if he was drinking.
4) Muxy a 3:1 good bet. He gets board easy and is canadian. We love humour.
5) BigRed 8:1 a bit of a stretch because bigred's humour is mostly poking back, not the original zings. But some of the funniest one line posts on FTR.
This is your line up, place your bets.........................................
|
Possesed, dont even know who he is but that 25 to 1 pay off would sure boost the bankroll if it was him
|
|
|
|
swiggidy
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Heading to Nebraska...
Posts: 3,602
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Trainer_jyms
People???? people???? get a sense of humor..... LOOK at the thread. you don't have to be brain surgeon to know when someone is fuckin wit' ya. here's the bets.
1) Lukie... a 2:1 favorite and quite funny in his own right. And loves to be an OP
2) Po$$e$$ed a 25:1 underdog, but possible because he can be funny even without sarcasm.
3) Midas06 a 4:1 possibility if he was drinking that night.
4) Muxy a 3:1 good bet. He gets bored easy and is Canadian. We love humour.
5) BigRed 8:1 a bit of a stretch because bigred's humour is mostly poking back, not the original zings. But some of the funniest one line posts on FTR.
This is your line up, place your bets.........................................
|
1) Lukie - would be risking mod status, even if he did it I don't think we'll find out
2) Po$$e$$ed - I would easily take 25:1 odds. He's random as hell and likes to finger the system from behind. My pick
3) Midas06 - see #1
4) Muxy - Hasn't been making crazy long posts for a long time, long shot
5) BigRed - I agree
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mailman
so 1mo relationships are like play money?
|
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
|
|
jackvance
|
07-11-2006, 03:01 PM
Post subject: Re: Reasons why 2pair should beat 3 of a kind.
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,825
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RoyalStraight
1. The first and most obvious of reasons is that any given 2 pair is composed of 4 cards where the 3 of a kind is composed of only 3 cards. Therefore if we take that as 3/4=75% which we subtract from 100% and get 25%. Simply put, 2 pair is worth an average of 25% more than 3 of a kind. Therefore it should be ranked higher.
|
Yes, but 4/3=133% and if we subtract 100% from that we get 33%. It is clear that this hints that 3 of a kind should be higher.
Quote:
|
2. The win rate of 2pair over any given 20,000 hands is nearly 16.5% higher than the win rate of 3 of a kind. Far more hands are won with 2 pair than are won with 3 of a kind. If over a 200 hand session you are dealt two pair 3% of the hands and we divide this by its wins rate over 3 of a kind(16.5), we get 0.18181818>. And for the 3 of a kinds we divide the aproximately 1.5% of the time we get 3 of a kind by the same 16.5 difference we get 0.090909>. As you can clearly see, the long run overall worth of 2 pair is more than double that of 3 of a kind! We have been accepting the mathematical error of 3 of a kind beating 2pair for all these years and i am the first to discover it and do the math for myself. If this does not convince you that 2pair should beat 3 of a kind then continue reading my other reasons below.
|
The 1.5% and 3% numbers are made up, making any and all conclusions futile.
Quote:
|
3. If we were to play every hand to the river, (which I do not recommend but can be used as a profitable strategy in higher stakes games) we would see that we get 2pair nearly 16.5 percent more than 3 of a kind making it that much more valuable and clearly showing why it should be ranked higher than 3 of a kind.
|
We get 1pair even more.. so 1pair should be the highest paying hand evah?
|
|
"Regrets, I've had a few. Then again, too few to mention" - Frank Sinatra
|
|
WhiteFingers
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 44
|
|
Stupid post.
I dont think it is anyone like Muxy, Po$$ or Lukie. IMHO i think the OP is probably is serious.
|
|
The strong point in poker is never to lose your temper, either with those you are playing with or, more particularly, with the cards. There is no sympathy in poker. Always keep cool. If you lose your head you will lose all your chips.
|
|
jackvance
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,825
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WhiteFingers
IMHO i think the OP is probably is serious.
|
I think it's abundantly clear that he isn't. If you aren't convinced by his "arguments", then read his suggestion #4..
|
|
"Regrets, I've had a few. Then again, too few to mention" - Frank Sinatra
|
|
bode
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2006
Location: slow motion
Posts: 4,257
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jackvance
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WhiteFingers
IMHO i think the OP is probably is serious.
|
I think it's abundantly clear that he isn't. If you aren't convinced by his "arguments", then read his suggestion #4..
|
i think his suggestion #4 just backs up the fact that this is indeed the worst post ever
y/n?
|
Quote:
|
eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
|
|
|
bigred
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nest of Douchebags
Posts: 1,729
|
|
Posting under alternate accounts isn't really my style. More like 1000 to 1 for me. I'd just post this under my name with a LOLOL!!!! at the end.
Good post though, I got a good laugh.
Another reason is that it's in the beginner's circle. I rarely venture out of my community forum and only do when the community forum is low on activity.
|
|
LOL OPERATIONS
|
|
jyms
|
|
Tilting mod
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,225
|
|
The silence is defining.
This thread is in need of highjack. I have not had a losing night since purchasing PT. What autorate do you use?How do you guys feel about PAHUD vs. Gametime+? Pokerstars now has resizable tables. And downloadable themes.
|
|
|
|
jackvance
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,825
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bode-ist
i think his suggestion #4 just backs up the fact that this is indeed the worst post ever
y/n?
|
y
|
|
"Regrets, I've had a few. Then again, too few to mention" - Frank Sinatra
|
|
swiggidy
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Heading to Nebraska...
Posts: 3,602
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bode-ist
i think his suggestion #4 just backs up the fact that this is indeed the worst post ever
y/n?
|
n
it's too funny
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mailman
so 1mo relationships are like play money?
|
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
|
|
jameseyb
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sapley, Cambs.
Posts: 170
|
|
I got my hopes up when I saw the possiblity of a straight v flush argument. Now I have to actually do some work! Damn you all!
|
|
|
|
BowlinPinTim
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: None
Posts: 51
|
|
i think this is clearly the best or the worst post ever (not that i've been here long enough for my opinion to mean much)
it's such a load of random bullshit but it made me laugh.
btw ru checkin out my kick ass avatar, ya u are
|
|
|
|
swiggidy
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Heading to Nebraska...
Posts: 3,602
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jameseyb
I got my hopes up when I saw the possiblity of a straight v flush argument.
|
This one is obvious. There are more outs for a flush than an OESD. You can't even argue against that.
That's why I only play suited cards, connected cards are -eV.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mailman
so 1mo relationships are like play money?
|
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
|
|
jackvance
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,825
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jameseyb
I got my hopes up when I saw the possiblity of a straight v flush argument. Now I have to actually do some work! Damn you all!
|
I wanted to post about that too.. because when I started playing poker I actually thought straight>flush.. and it cost me a rather big pot to figure out it was the other way around. But I let some program simulate 250k hands and this came out:
straight flush .05%
four of a kind .17%
full house 2.53%
Flush 3%
Straight 4.6%
Three of a kind 4.85%
2p 23.67%
Pair 43.73%
So I guess they're all adequately placed in order of likelyhood.
(except high card.. it happens 17.4% so it should beat 2p!!!!)
|
|
"Regrets, I've had a few. Then again, too few to mention" - Frank Sinatra
|
|
BowlinPinTim
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: None
Posts: 51
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Bode-ist
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jackvance
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by WhiteFingers
IMHO i think the OP is probably is serious.
|
I think it's abundantly clear that he isn't. If you aren't convinced by his "arguments", then read his suggestion #4..
|
i think his suggestion #4 just backs up the fact that this is indeed the worst post ever
y/n?
|
I've decided no. I thought it was funny. But if this was actually a legitimate post then no doubt it would be the worst post ever
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 7,991
|
|
i think folding should win, then lukie would be rich.
|
|
|
|
givememyleg
|
|
Administrator
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ISHPERMING MISHIGEN
Posts: 4,455
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
i think the merits of straights over flushes should be discussed
|
YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
swiggidy
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Heading to Nebraska...
Posts: 3,602
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BowlinPinTim
I've decided no. I thought it was funny. But if this was actually a legitimate post then no doubt it would be the worst post ever
|
Unintentional comedy is still comedy
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mailman
so 1mo relationships are like play money?
|
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
|
|
Bailey
|
|
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
i think the merits of straights over flushes should be discussed
|
Woooooooooooooow.... are you shitting me? straights aren't better then flushes? god.. I just found a leak in my game
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 360
Posts: 3,259
|
|
funny, I was just going to start a thread like this discussing why full houses should beat 4 of a kind. You even stole my reasoning!!!
GODAMNIT SON OF A BITCH ACHACHACHACHACHACH!!! (i pity anyone who understands this)
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 360
Posts: 3,259
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Trainer_jyms
People???? people???? get a sense of humor..... LOOK at the thread. you don't have to be brain surgeon to know when someone is fuckin wit' ya. here's the bets.
1) Lukie... a 2:1 favorite and quite funny in his own right. And loves to be an OP
2) Po$$e$$ed a 25:1 underdog, but possible because he can be funny even without sarcasm.
3) Midas06 a 4:1 possibility if he was drinking that night.
4) Muxy a 3:1 good bet. He gets bored easy and is Canadian. We love humour.
5) BigRed 8:1 a bit of a stretch because bigred's humour is mostly poking back, not the original zings. But some of the funniest one line posts on FTR.
This is your line up, place your bets.........................................
|
haha, classic
what's an OP (assuming that it isnt original poster, which wouldn't make sense in this ^^^ context.
|
|
|
|
Greedo017
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
|
|
why is an ace the highest card anyway? I've always hated that. fucking aces.
|
|
i betcha that i got something you ain't got, that's called courage, it don't come from no liquor bottle, it ain't scotch
|
|
midas06
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,196
|
|
I wouldn't type tha tmuch
|
|
|
|
givememyleg
|
|
Administrator
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ISHPERMING MISHIGEN
Posts: 4,455
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Greedo017
why is an ace the highest card anyway? I've always hated that. fucking aces.
|
Pocket 1's ftw.
|
|
|
|
Greedo017
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
|
|
oh, and his location reminds me, south dakota is the worst state ever. and its not even close. make places to eat along your highways goddamnit! minnesota also! your states are gay!
|
|
i betcha that i got something you ain't got, that's called courage, it don't come from no liquor bottle, it ain't scotch
|
|
jameseyb
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sapley, Cambs.
Posts: 170
|
|
Nothing like a bit of xenophobia to make the day go faster! I dislike people for things a bit more complex than just the lack of eating establishments on their road networks.
That said, i've also hated peopel for far less, and those do seem like legitimate reasons!
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
INVALID DATA ENTRY
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,180
|
|
Lipkin [ 16 Posts ] Search
Ugly Ed [ 7 Posts ] Search
Monty9 [ 5 Posts ] Search
SteveO [ 3 Posts ] Search
BowlinPinTim [ 3 Posts ] Search
ActionDavidK [ 2 Posts ] Search
John Galt 15 [ 2 Posts ] Search
RoyalStraight [ 2 Posts ] Search
Demiparadigm [ 1 Post ] Search
playin247 [ 1 Post ] Search
BILLABONG [ 1 Post ] Search
trips1123 [ 1 Post ] Search
zook [ 1 Post ] Search
Strawberry93 [ 1 Post ]
Posters who have posted under RoyalStraights current IP.
I have no idea why so freaking many have posted under this IP, it's the first time I've ever seen this.
|

Yes, I brought a knife to this gunfight,
just the other day I mugged a mountain.
So bring that shit, I've had practice.
|
|
jyms
|
|
Tilting mod
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,225
|
|
Somebody is either a clever soul or there is a glitch. My money is on the glitch. But I've been wrong before. Is this a situation with providers flipping IP's to different customers, if it isw it's still freaky that this many would get the same IP at one forum. same state, city, house, room???
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
INVALID DATA ENTRY
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,180
|
|
it's a .proxy.aol.com ip address.
|

Yes, I brought a knife to this gunfight,
just the other day I mugged a mountain.
So bring that shit, I've had practice.
|
|
swiggidy
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Heading to Nebraska...
Posts: 3,602
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jameseyb
Nothing like a bit of xenophobia to make the day go faster! I dislike people for things a bit more complex than just the lack of eating establishments on their road networks.
That said, i've also hated peopel for far less, and those do seem like legitimate reasons!
|
{EDIT: I made a list, then decided it needed it's own thread}
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mailman
so 1mo relationships are like play money?
|
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
|
|
jyms
|
|
Tilting mod
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,225
|
|
A O L IS THE DEBBLE
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 360
Posts: 3,259
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Lipkin [ 16 Posts ] Search
Ugly Ed [ 7 Posts ] Search
Monty9 [ 5 Posts ] Search
SteveO [ 3 Posts ] Search
BowlinPinTim [ 3 Posts ] Search
ActionDavidK [ 2 Posts ] Search
John Galt 15 [ 2 Posts ] Search
RoyalStraight [ 2 Posts ] Search
Demiparadigm [ 1 Post ] Search
playin247 [ 1 Post ] Search
BILLABONG [ 1 Post ] Search
trips1123 [ 1 Post ] Search
zook [ 1 Post ] Search
Strawberry93 [ 1 Post ]
Posters who have posted under RoyalStraights current IP.
I have no idea why so freaking many have posted under this IP, it's the first time I've ever seen this.
|
how do u do this sir
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
INVALID DATA ENTRY
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,180
|
|
top right corner of each post
|

Yes, I brought a knife to this gunfight,
just the other day I mugged a mountain.
So bring that shit, I've had practice.
|
|
Grasshopper
|
07-12-2006, 08:25 PM
Post subject: Re: Reasons why 2pair should beat 3 of a kind.
|
#49 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 13
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RoyalStraight
2. The win rate of 2pair over any given 20,000 hands is nearly 16.5% higher than the win rate of 3 of a kind. Far more hands are won with 2 pair than are won with 3 of a kind. If over a 200 hand session you are dealt two pair 3% of the hands and we divide this by its wins rate over 3 of a kind(16.5), we get 0.18181818>. And for the 3 of a kinds we divide the aproximately 1.5% of the time we get 3 of a kind by the same 16.5 difference we get 0.090909>. As you can clearly see, the long run overall worth of 2 pair is more than double that of 3 of a kind! We have been accepting the mathematical error of 3 of a kind beating 2pair for all these years and i am the first to discover it and do the math for myself. If this does not convince you that 2pair should beat 3 of a kind then continue reading my other reasons below.
|
I bet that more money is won with 2 pair than with 4 of a kind.
Therefore the logic flows:
More Money Won = Higher Ranked Poker Hand
2 Pair Money Won > 4 Of a Kind Money Won
2 Pair Ranked as Higher Poker Hand!
Based on the above logic are the New Rankings?
2 Pair
3 of a kind
Straight
Flush
Full House
Four of a Kind
Straight Flush
Pair
High Card
Damn, my head is hurting again.
|
|
|
|
dwags222
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gaylord, MI
Posts: 151
|
|
i think straights should beat flushes, cause a flush draw gives ya 9 outs...but a straight draw only 8, and sometimes even 4. i think straights should beat royal flushes too. i mean sure, a royal flush is a straight...but come on, screw that. i think the straight and the flush in a royal flush should cancel each other out and so the hand would become worthless.
|
|
|