Poker Forum

Over 971,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember Me         Forgot Password
  >    >    > 

Reasons why 2pair should beat 3 of a kind.

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
RoyalStraight
Old 07-10-2006, 10:25 PM     Post subject: Reasons why 2pair should beat 3 of a kind. #1 (permalink)  

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East Rocksbury, South Dakota
Posts: 3
Throughout my poker career i have often been reminded that three of a kind beats 2pair. But why i ask you? Listed below are the reasons that i believe the rules of the game we love, and the one that i dominate at, poker, should be altered to allow 2pair to beat 3 of a kind.

1. The first and most obvious of reasons is that any given 2 pair is composed of 4 cards where the 3 of a kind is composed of only 3 cards. Therefore if we take that as 3/4=75% which we subtract from 100% and get 25%. Simply put, 2 pair is worth an average of 25% more than 3 of a kind. Therefore it should be ranked higher.

2. The win rate of 2pair over any given 20,000 hands is nearly 16.5% higher than the win rate of 3 of a kind. Far more hands are won with 2 pair than are won with 3 of a kind. If over a 200 hand session you are dealt two pair 3% of the hands and we divide this by its wins rate over 3 of a kind(16.5), we get 0.18181818>. And for the 3 of a kinds we divide the aproximately 1.5% of the time we get 3 of a kind by the same 16.5 difference we get 0.090909>. As you can clearly see, the long run overall worth of 2 pair is more than double that of 3 of a kind! We have been accepting the mathematical error of 3 of a kind beating 2pair for all these years and i am the first to discover it and do the math for myself. If this does not convince you that 2pair should beat 3 of a kind then continue reading my other reasons below.

3. If we were to play every hand to the river, (which I do not recommend but can be used as a profitable strategy in higher stakes games) we would see that we get 2pair nearly 16.5 percent more than 3 of a kind making it that much more valuable and clearly showing why it should be ranked higher than 3 of a kind.

4. This is not as much of a reason as it is making my point. Think of how much we value 3 of a kind. We like it so much we give it additional nick-names such as "trips" or "a set". Now that we all understand why 2pair should beat 3 of a kind, i would like to propose that we hand over those nick-names to 2pair. From now on when we flop 2pair we will say "o good, i flopped a set" and when you river your high-ranked 2pair you can shout out that your "trips" again denied someone with 3 of a kind of a pot.

Any comments or thoughts on my discovery or congradulatory messages are welcomed. I would like to hear your thoughts.


-RoyalStraight

-The highest hand i poker!
Reply With Quote
mb2447
Old 07-10-2006, 10:29 PM #2 (permalink)  
mb2447's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 122
are you high? no, seriously, are you?
AWOL.
 
Reply With Quote
LimpinAintEZ
Old 07-10-2006, 10:39 PM #3 (permalink)  
LimpinAintEZ's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: working myself up to FTR fullhouse status while not giving 1 solid piece of advice
Posts: 592
thats pretty funny - i have to disagree, but you make some interesting arguments...not good, but interesting
this space intentionally left blank
 
Reply With Quote
BowlinPinTim
Old 07-10-2006, 10:44 PM #4 (permalink)  
BowlinPinTim's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: None
Posts: 51
wtf?
Reply With Quote
Reidak
Old 07-10-2006, 10:57 PM #5 (permalink)  
Reidak's Avatar

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 564
I think he didnt pass the blunt at lunch, FIEND.
 
Reply With Quote
a500lbgorilla
Old 07-10-2006, 11:08 PM #6 (permalink)  
a500lbgorilla's Avatar
INVALID DATA ENTRY

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,180
Send a message via AIM to a500lbgorilla
i think the merits of straights over flushes should be discussed


Yes, I brought a knife to this gunfight,
just the other day I mugged a mountain.
So bring that shit, I've had practice.
 
Reply With Quote
Warpe
Old 07-10-2006, 11:25 PM #7 (permalink)  
Warpe's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,753
We should have a contest to identify the jokester. My money's on Lukie.

"We are gods, 'tis our purpose to set aright the path
of lesser beings."
 
Reply With Quote
Waterdick
Old 07-10-2006, 11:30 PM #8 (permalink)  
Waterdick's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 124
LOL r u an idiot?
Reply With Quote
johnnyBuz
Old 07-11-2006, 12:38 AM #9 (permalink)  
johnnyBuz's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Philly, Pa
Posts: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
i think the merits of straights over flushes should be discussed
i agree.
Whip it real hard, whip it, whip it real hard. - Rick Ross
 
Reply With Quote
IowaSkinsFan
Old 07-11-2006, 12:48 AM #10 (permalink)  
IowaSkinsFan's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,773
the reason three of a kind is better than two pair: It's less probable. Nuff said.
Check out the new blog!!!
 
Reply With Quote
Vrax
Old 07-11-2006, 02:32 AM #11 (permalink)  
Vrax's Avatar

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Poland
Posts: 612
Queen high should be the best hand.
"How could I call that bet? How could you MAKE that bet? It's poker not solitaire. " - that Gus Bronson guy
 
Reply With Quote
swiggidy
Old 07-11-2006, 02:54 AM #12 (permalink)  
swiggidy's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Heading to Nebraska...
Posts: 3,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
the reason three of a kind is better than two pair: It's less probable. Nuff said.
I don't know, his math is pretty convincing...
Quote:
Originally Posted by mailman
so 1mo relationships are like play money?
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
 
Reply With Quote
jyms
Old 07-11-2006, 02:59 AM #13 (permalink)  
jyms's Avatar
Tilting mod

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,225
Warpe has the smartest response to this I think. it's a rofliculous statement at the least but the OP could be a friggin genius.
 
Reply With Quote
BowlinPinTim
Old 07-11-2006, 03:16 AM #14 (permalink)  
BowlinPinTim's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: None
Posts: 51
a bit off topic but did anyone read his other post where he says, and i quote

"I chose RoyalStraoght for my name becaue it is the highest hand ranking in poker"
Reply With Quote
jyms
Old 07-11-2006, 03:51 AM #15 (permalink)  
jyms's Avatar
Tilting mod

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,225
People???? people???? get a sense of humor..... LOOK at the thread. you don't have to be brain surgeon to know when someone is fuckin wit' ya. here's the bets.

1) Lukie... a 2:1 favorite and quite funny in his own right. And loves to be an OP
2) Po$$e$$ed a 25:1 underdog, but possible because he can be funny even without sarcasm.
3) Midas06 a 4:1 possibility if he was drinking that night.
4) Muxy a 3:1 good bet. He gets bored easy and is Canadian. We love humour.
5) BigRed 8:1 a bit of a stretch because bigred's humour is mostly poking back, not the original zings. But some of the funniest one line posts on FTR.


This is your line up, place your bets.........................................
 
Reply With Quote
BowlinPinTim
Old 07-11-2006, 04:07 AM #16 (permalink)  
BowlinPinTim's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: None
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainer_jyms
People???? people???? get a sense of humor..... LOOK at the thread. you don't have to be brain surgeon to know when someone is fuckin wit' ya. here's the bets.

1) Lukie... a 2:1 favorite and quite funny in his own right.
2) Po$$e$$ed a 25:1 underdog, but possible because he can be funny without sarcasm.
3) Midas06 a 4:1 possibility if he was drinking.
4) Muxy a 3:1 good bet. He gets board easy and is canadian. We love humour.
5) BigRed 8:1 a bit of a stretch because bigred's humour is mostly poking back, not the original zings. But some of the funniest one line posts on FTR.


This is your line up, place your bets.........................................
Possesed, dont even know who he is but that 25 to 1 pay off would sure boost the bankroll if it was him
Reply With Quote
swiggidy
Old 07-11-2006, 12:54 PM #17 (permalink)  
swiggidy's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Heading to Nebraska...
Posts: 3,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainer_jyms
People???? people???? get a sense of humor..... LOOK at the thread. you don't have to be brain surgeon to know when someone is fuckin wit' ya. here's the bets.

1) Lukie... a 2:1 favorite and quite funny in his own right. And loves to be an OP
2) Po$$e$$ed a 25:1 underdog, but possible because he can be funny even without sarcasm.
3) Midas06 a 4:1 possibility if he was drinking that night.
4) Muxy a 3:1 good bet. He gets bored easy and is Canadian. We love humour.
5) BigRed 8:1 a bit of a stretch because bigred's humour is mostly poking back, not the original zings. But some of the funniest one line posts on FTR.


This is your line up, place your bets.........................................
1) Lukie - would be risking mod status, even if he did it I don't think we'll find out
2) Po$$e$$ed - I would easily take 25:1 odds. He's random as hell and likes to finger the system from behind. My pick
3) Midas06 - see #1
4) Muxy - Hasn't been making crazy long posts for a long time, long shot
5) BigRed - I agree
Quote:
Originally Posted by mailman
so 1mo relationships are like play money?
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
 
Reply With Quote
jackvance
Old 07-11-2006, 03:01 PM     Post subject: Re: Reasons why 2pair should beat 3 of a kind. #18 (permalink)  
jackvance's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyalStraight
1. The first and most obvious of reasons is that any given 2 pair is composed of 4 cards where the 3 of a kind is composed of only 3 cards. Therefore if we take that as 3/4=75% which we subtract from 100% and get 25%. Simply put, 2 pair is worth an average of 25% more than 3 of a kind. Therefore it should be ranked higher.
Yes, but 4/3=133% and if we subtract 100% from that we get 33%. It is clear that this hints that 3 of a kind should be higher.

Quote:
2. The win rate of 2pair over any given 20,000 hands is nearly 16.5% higher than the win rate of 3 of a kind. Far more hands are won with 2 pair than are won with 3 of a kind. If over a 200 hand session you are dealt two pair 3% of the hands and we divide this by its wins rate over 3 of a kind(16.5), we get 0.18181818>. And for the 3 of a kinds we divide the aproximately 1.5% of the time we get 3 of a kind by the same 16.5 difference we get 0.090909>. As you can clearly see, the long run overall worth of 2 pair is more than double that of 3 of a kind! We have been accepting the mathematical error of 3 of a kind beating 2pair for all these years and i am the first to discover it and do the math for myself. If this does not convince you that 2pair should beat 3 of a kind then continue reading my other reasons below.
The 1.5% and 3% numbers are made up, making any and all conclusions futile.

Quote:
3. If we were to play every hand to the river, (which I do not recommend but can be used as a profitable strategy in higher stakes games) we would see that we get 2pair nearly 16.5 percent more than 3 of a kind making it that much more valuable and clearly showing why it should be ranked higher than 3 of a kind.
We get 1pair even more.. so 1pair should be the highest paying hand evah?
"Regrets, I've had a few. Then again, too few to mention" - Frank Sinatra
 
Reply With Quote
WhiteFingers
Old 07-11-2006, 03:08 PM #19 (permalink)  
WhiteFingers's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 44
Stupid post.

I dont think it is anyone like Muxy, Po$$ or Lukie. IMHO i think the OP is probably is serious.
The strong point in poker is never to lose your temper, either with those you are playing with or, more particularly, with the cards. There is no sympathy in poker. Always keep cool. If you lose your head you will lose all your chips.
 
Reply With Quote
jackvance
Old 07-11-2006, 03:14 PM #20 (permalink)  
jackvance's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteFingers
IMHO i think the OP is probably is serious.
I think it's abundantly clear that he isn't. If you aren't convinced by his "arguments", then read his suggestion #4..
"Regrets, I've had a few. Then again, too few to mention" - Frank Sinatra
 
Reply With Quote
bode
Old 07-11-2006, 03:19 PM #21 (permalink)  
bode's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: May 2006
Location: slow motion
Posts: 4,257
Send a message via Skype™ to bode
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackvance
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteFingers
IMHO i think the OP is probably is serious.
I think it's abundantly clear that he isn't. If you aren't convinced by his "arguments", then read his suggestion #4..
i think his suggestion #4 just backs up the fact that this is indeed the worst post ever

y/n?
Quote:
eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
 
Reply With Quote
bigred
Old 07-11-2006, 03:26 PM #22 (permalink)  
bigred's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nest of Douchebags
Posts: 1,729
Posting under alternate accounts isn't really my style. More like 1000 to 1 for me. I'd just post this under my name with a LOLOL!!!! at the end.

Good post though, I got a good laugh.

Another reason is that it's in the beginner's circle. I rarely venture out of my community forum and only do when the community forum is low on activity.
LOL OPERATIONS
 
Reply With Quote
jyms
Old 07-11-2006, 03:27 PM #23 (permalink)  
jyms's Avatar
Tilting mod

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,225
The silence is defining.

This thread is in need of highjack. I have not had a losing night since purchasing PT. What autorate do you use?How do you guys feel about PAHUD vs. Gametime+? Pokerstars now has resizable tables. And downloadable themes.
 
Reply With Quote
jackvance
Old 07-11-2006, 03:50 PM #24 (permalink)  
jackvance's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bode-ist

i think his suggestion #4 just backs up the fact that this is indeed the worst post ever

y/n?
y
"Regrets, I've had a few. Then again, too few to mention" - Frank Sinatra
 
Reply With Quote
swiggidy
Old 07-11-2006, 04:17 PM #25 (permalink)  
swiggidy's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Heading to Nebraska...
Posts: 3,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bode-ist
i think his suggestion #4 just backs up the fact that this is indeed the worst post ever

y/n?
n

it's too funny
Quote:
Originally Posted by mailman
so 1mo relationships are like play money?
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
 
Reply With Quote
jameseyb
Old 07-11-2006, 04:21 PM #26 (permalink)  
jameseyb's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sapley, Cambs.
Posts: 170
I got my hopes up when I saw the possiblity of a straight v flush argument. Now I have to actually do some work! Damn you all!

***************************************
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jameseyb
http://gunsonfilm.blogspot.com/
***************************************
 
Reply With Quote
BowlinPinTim
Old 07-11-2006, 04:24 PM #27 (permalink)  
BowlinPinTim's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: None
Posts: 51
i think this is clearly the best or the worst post ever (not that i've been here long enough for my opinion to mean much)
it's such a load of random bullshit but it made me laugh.

btw ru checkin out my kick ass avatar, ya u are
Reply With Quote
swiggidy
Old 07-11-2006, 04:55 PM #28 (permalink)  
swiggidy's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Heading to Nebraska...
Posts: 3,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by jameseyb
I got my hopes up when I saw the possiblity of a straight v flush argument.
This one is obvious. There are more outs for a flush than an OESD. You can't even argue against that.

That's why I only play suited cards, connected cards are -eV.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mailman
so 1mo relationships are like play money?
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
 
Reply With Quote
jackvance
Old 07-11-2006, 04:58 PM #29 (permalink)  
jackvance's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by jameseyb
I got my hopes up when I saw the possiblity of a straight v flush argument. Now I have to actually do some work! Damn you all!
I wanted to post about that too.. because when I started playing poker I actually thought straight>flush.. and it cost me a rather big pot to figure out it was the other way around. But I let some program simulate 250k hands and this came out:

straight flush .05%
four of a kind .17%
full house 2.53%
Flush 3%
Straight 4.6%

Three of a kind 4.85%
2p 23.67%
Pair 43.73%

So I guess they're all adequately placed in order of likelyhood.

(except high card.. it happens 17.4% so it should beat 2p!!!!)
"Regrets, I've had a few. Then again, too few to mention" - Frank Sinatra
 
Reply With Quote
BowlinPinTim
Old 07-11-2006, 11:09 PM #30 (permalink)  
BowlinPinTim's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: None
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bode-ist
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackvance
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteFingers
IMHO i think the OP is probably is serious.
I think it's abundantly clear that he isn't. If you aren't convinced by his "arguments", then read his suggestion #4..
i think his suggestion #4 just backs up the fact that this is indeed the worst post ever

y/n?

I've decided no. I thought it was funny. But if this was actually a legitimate post then no doubt it would be the worst post ever
Reply With Quote
Miffed22001
Old 07-11-2006, 11:41 PM #31 (permalink)  
Miffed22001's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 7,991
i think folding should win, then lukie would be rich.
 
Reply With Quote
givememyleg
Old 07-12-2006, 12:57 AM #32 (permalink)  
givememyleg's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ISHPERMING MISHIGEN
Posts: 4,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
i think the merits of straights over flushes should be discussed
YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Reply With Quote
swiggidy
Old 07-12-2006, 02:11 AM #33 (permalink)  
swiggidy's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Heading to Nebraska...
Posts: 3,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowlinPinTim
I've decided no. I thought it was funny. But if this was actually a legitimate post then no doubt it would be the worst post ever
Unintentional comedy is still comedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by mailman
so 1mo relationships are like play money?
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
 
Reply With Quote
Bailey
Old 07-12-2006, 04:04 AM #34 (permalink)  
Guest

Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
i think the merits of straights over flushes should be discussed
Woooooooooooooow.... are you shitting me? straights aren't better then flushes? god.. I just found a leak in my game
Reply With Quote
Lukie
Old 07-12-2006, 07:06 AM #35 (permalink)  
Lukie's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 360
Posts: 3,259
funny, I was just going to start a thread like this discussing why full houses should beat 4 of a kind. You even stole my reasoning!!!

GODAMNIT SON OF A BITCH ACHACHACHACHACHACH!!! (i pity anyone who understands this)
Reply With Quote
Lukie
Old 07-12-2006, 08:03 AM #36 (permalink)  
Lukie's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 360
Posts: 3,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trainer_jyms
People???? people???? get a sense of humor..... LOOK at the thread. you don't have to be brain surgeon to know when someone is fuckin wit' ya. here's the bets.

1) Lukie... a 2:1 favorite and quite funny in his own right. And loves to be an OP
2) Po$$e$$ed a 25:1 underdog, but possible because he can be funny even without sarcasm.
3) Midas06 a 4:1 possibility if he was drinking that night.
4) Muxy a 3:1 good bet. He gets bored easy and is Canadian. We love humour.
5) BigRed 8:1 a bit of a stretch because bigred's humour is mostly poking back, not the original zings. But some of the funniest one line posts on FTR.


This is your line up, place your bets.........................................
haha, classic

what's an OP (assuming that it isnt original poster, which wouldn't make sense in this ^^^ context.
Reply With Quote
Greedo017
Old 07-12-2006, 09:04 AM #37 (permalink)  
Greedo017's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
why is an ace the highest card anyway? I've always hated that. fucking aces.
i betcha that i got something you ain't got, that's called courage, it don't come from no liquor bottle, it ain't scotch
 
Reply With Quote
midas06
Old 07-12-2006, 09:07 AM #38 (permalink)  
midas06's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,196
I wouldn't type tha tmuch
Reply With Quote
givememyleg
Old 07-12-2006, 10:00 AM #39 (permalink)  
givememyleg's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ISHPERMING MISHIGEN
Posts: 4,455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedo017
why is an ace the highest card anyway? I've always hated that. fucking aces.
Pocket 1's ftw.
 
Reply With Quote
Greedo017
Old 07-12-2006, 10:44 AM #40 (permalink)  
Greedo017's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
oh, and his location reminds me, south dakota is the worst state ever. and its not even close. make places to eat along your highways goddamnit! minnesota also! your states are gay!
i betcha that i got something you ain't got, that's called courage, it don't come from no liquor bottle, it ain't scotch
 
Reply With Quote
jameseyb
Old 07-12-2006, 12:31 PM #41 (permalink)  
jameseyb's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sapley, Cambs.
Posts: 170
Nothing like a bit of xenophobia to make the day go faster! I dislike people for things a bit more complex than just the lack of eating establishments on their road networks.

That said, i've also hated peopel for far less, and those do seem like legitimate reasons!

***************************************
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jameseyb
http://gunsonfilm.blogspot.com/
***************************************
 
Reply With Quote
a500lbgorilla
Old 07-12-2006, 01:14 PM #42 (permalink)  
a500lbgorilla's Avatar
INVALID DATA ENTRY

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,180
Send a message via AIM to a500lbgorilla
Lipkin [ 16 Posts ] Search
Ugly Ed [ 7 Posts ] Search
Monty9 [ 5 Posts ] Search
SteveO [ 3 Posts ] Search
BowlinPinTim [ 3 Posts ] Search
ActionDavidK [ 2 Posts ] Search
John Galt 15 [ 2 Posts ] Search
RoyalStraight [ 2 Posts ] Search
Demiparadigm [ 1 Post ] Search
playin247 [ 1 Post ] Search
BILLABONG [ 1 Post ] Search
trips1123 [ 1 Post ] Search
zook [ 1 Post ] Search
Strawberry93 [ 1 Post ]

Posters who have posted under RoyalStraights current IP.

I have no idea why so freaking many have posted under this IP, it's the first time I've ever seen this.


Yes, I brought a knife to this gunfight,
just the other day I mugged a mountain.
So bring that shit, I've had practice.
 
Reply With Quote
jyms
Old 07-12-2006, 02:06 PM #43 (permalink)  
jyms's Avatar
Tilting mod

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,225
Somebody is either a clever soul or there is a glitch. My money is on the glitch. But I've been wrong before. Is this a situation with providers flipping IP's to different customers, if it isw it's still freaky that this many would get the same IP at one forum. same state, city, house, room???
 
Reply With Quote
a500lbgorilla
Old 07-12-2006, 02:13 PM #44 (permalink)  
a500lbgorilla's Avatar
INVALID DATA ENTRY

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,180
Send a message via AIM to a500lbgorilla
it's a .proxy.aol.com ip address.


Yes, I brought a knife to this gunfight,
just the other day I mugged a mountain.
So bring that shit, I've had practice.
 
Reply With Quote
swiggidy
Old 07-12-2006, 02:13 PM #45 (permalink)  
swiggidy's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Heading to Nebraska...
Posts: 3,602
Quote:
Originally Posted by jameseyb
Nothing like a bit of xenophobia to make the day go faster! I dislike people for things a bit more complex than just the lack of eating establishments on their road networks.

That said, i've also hated peopel for far less, and those do seem like legitimate reasons!
{EDIT: I made a list, then decided it needed it's own thread}
Quote:
Originally Posted by mailman
so 1mo relationships are like play money?
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
 
Reply With Quote
jyms
Old 07-12-2006, 02:17 PM #46 (permalink)  
jyms's Avatar
Tilting mod

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,225
A O L IS THE DEBBLE


 
Reply With Quote
Lukie
Old 07-12-2006, 06:15 PM #47 (permalink)  
Lukie's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: 360
Posts: 3,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Lipkin [ 16 Posts ] Search
Ugly Ed [ 7 Posts ] Search
Monty9 [ 5 Posts ] Search
SteveO [ 3 Posts ] Search
BowlinPinTim [ 3 Posts ] Search
ActionDavidK [ 2 Posts ] Search
John Galt 15 [ 2 Posts ] Search
RoyalStraight [ 2 Posts ] Search
Demiparadigm [ 1 Post ] Search
playin247 [ 1 Post ] Search
BILLABONG [ 1 Post ] Search
trips1123 [ 1 Post ] Search
zook [ 1 Post ] Search
Strawberry93 [ 1 Post ]

Posters who have posted under RoyalStraights current IP.

I have no idea why so freaking many have posted under this IP, it's the first time I've ever seen this.
how do u do this sir
Reply With Quote
a500lbgorilla
Old 07-12-2006, 07:27 PM #48 (permalink)  
a500lbgorilla's Avatar
INVALID DATA ENTRY

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,180
Send a message via AIM to a500lbgorilla
top right corner of each post


Yes, I brought a knife to this gunfight,
just the other day I mugged a mountain.
So bring that shit, I've had practice.
 
Reply With Quote
Grasshopper
Old 07-12-2006, 08:25 PM     Post subject: Re: Reasons why 2pair should beat 3 of a kind. #49 (permalink)  

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 13
Quote:
Originally Posted by RoyalStraight
2. The win rate of 2pair over any given 20,000 hands is nearly 16.5% higher than the win rate of 3 of a kind. Far more hands are won with 2 pair than are won with 3 of a kind. If over a 200 hand session you are dealt two pair 3% of the hands and we divide this by its wins rate over 3 of a kind(16.5), we get 0.18181818>. And for the 3 of a kinds we divide the aproximately 1.5% of the time we get 3 of a kind by the same 16.5 difference we get 0.090909>. As you can clearly see, the long run overall worth of 2 pair is more than double that of 3 of a kind! We have been accepting the mathematical error of 3 of a kind beating 2pair for all these years and i am the first to discover it and do the math for myself. If this does not convince you that 2pair should beat 3 of a kind then continue reading my other reasons below.
I bet that more money is won with 2 pair than with 4 of a kind.

Therefore the logic flows:

More Money Won = Higher Ranked Poker Hand
2 Pair Money Won > 4 Of a Kind Money Won
2 Pair Ranked as Higher Poker Hand!

Based on the above logic are the New Rankings?

2 Pair
3 of a kind
Straight
Flush
Full House
Four of a Kind
Straight Flush
Pair
High Card

Damn, my head is hurting again.
Reply With Quote
dwags222
Old 07-12-2006, 08:38 PM #50 (permalink)  

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Gaylord, MI
Posts: 151
Send a message via AIM to dwags222 Send a message via MSN to dwags222
i think straights should beat flushes, cause a flush draw gives ya 9 outs...but a straight draw only 8, and sometimes even 4. i think straights should beat royal flushes too. i mean sure, a royal flush is a straight...but come on, screw that. i think the straight and the flush in a royal flush should cancel each other out and so the hand would become worthless.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
lolzzz_321 Old 03-16-2010, 08:26 PM    What's New at PokerStars - Americas Cup Edition
PokerStars is giving you the chance to represent your country and claim your share of $150,000! The PokerStars Americas Cup of Poker begins with online qualifiers and ends with a live final to be play ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:45 AM.



All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This is not a gambling website.