|
bjsaust
|
01-30-2009, 02:37 AM
Post subject: A random thought
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Posts: 5,842
|
|
Sometimes I like to ask myself "what range of hands would go all in on this flop?" and if I'm getting ready to go all in with the weakest of those hands I stop and ask myself if thats such a good idea then.
|
|
Just playing to improve.
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
dranger7070
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wake up in the mornin feelin' like P. Diddy
Posts: 2,524
|
|
wow... so basic, yet fucking genius lmao. definitely something people (newbies like myself) need to take into consideration...
hell of a random thought imo
|
|
|
|
Micro2Macro
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: http://three-pair.com/
Posts: 4,463
|
|
Nice. You should add to this thread whenever you come up with another random thought.
|
"Once we reach a certain level of mastery, we see there are higher levels and challenges. If we are disciplined and patient, we proceed. At each higher level, new pleasures and insights await us--ones not even suspected when we started out. We can take this as far as we want--in any human activity there is always a higher level to which we can aspire."
Check out my blog here!
"You are a degenerate Gaam-balur"
http://www.philgalfond.com/lets-make-some-changes/
|
|
hangchiong
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 359
|
|
bjsaust,your thoughts on the micros from last year has helped me a lot in my progress in 25NL.
1.Value bet a lot
2.Dont bluff
3.Now that you post in this thread,i would believe,why all in?
So this question comes up!
1.Why should i call this re-raise or min raise?
a.What does he have?(Range of hands)
2.Why am i going AI on the flop or turn with TPTK?
a.What does he have?(Range of hands)
I would defitnely need to improve my skill on the 3rd question.
|
|
|
|
Erpel
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 605
|
|
Good thought provoker, thanks mate.
When I read this first I thought - I'll open shove the flop with just about no range of hands. Then I thought about it and figured that that's not really what this is about.
I think this relates closely to what is called flop texture analysis, knowing the nuts and determining the relative as opposed to absolute strength of your hand.
The principle extends to any street, but the difference is most stark on the flop where theoretically you can make a decision for all of your stack before you are strictly speaking required to.
What isn't said is that if I'm at the very bottom of hands that I think should be willing to go all in my opponent should be really bad for me to think he has something worse often enough that it's profitable for me to proceed to go all-in.
It kind of relates to some basic thought exercises I try to go through when in a hand - like I try to determine what my opponent wants me to do and unless the cards clearly dictate a correct move one way or another I tend to go out of my way to disappoint my opponent. You want me to put money in? Ok, I'll fold my overpair. You want a free/cheap card? Ok, here's your massive bet/raise.
When we're at the strongest end of our range we can proceed with no fear and no deep contemplation. But when we're at the weakest, our reasoning needs to be at its strongest.
It's important to give opponents credit - especially when they are weak and passive and betting big.
|
|
|
|
bjsaust
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Posts: 5,842
|
|
Somewhat Hangchiong. This is really more spot specific. The place it mainly applies is where you have a hand that you normally think is a very strong hand and you'd be happy to get all in, but if you stop and look at the board, maybe in this case that hand isnt really as strong as you'd think. I guess its an extension of 1st level thinking really.
Erpel, spot on. Its not only our range we're looking at, its his range. If we're at the bottom of our range, but we think he'll get in with a lot worse then getting all in isnt so bad, but we need to be thinking about both ranges. It especially applies when we're the one pushing. People think "I have x hand, I want to get all in!" without thinking "hang on, what hands will call me if I push?" Sometimes you wont like the answer. Thats where range manipulation comes into it. Perhaps by calling we allow a villain to make mistakes with a wider range, whereas if we push we let him play correctly by folding or calling depending on his actual hand?
|
|
Just playing to improve.
|