Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Raisers stack or effective stack?

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
wellrounded08
Old 08-23-2008, 02:02 AM     Post subject: Raisers stack or effective stack? #1 (permalink)  
wellrounded08's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ...Good Question........Where am I?
Posts: 366
wellrounded08
When calculating odds for set hunting, do you use the Original raisers stack, (assuming you have that much or more.) or do you only use the effective stack?

Example:
UTG-9.00$
MP1-2.00
Hero(BTN)-11.50

Hero Holds 99

UTG Raises .15$ to .20$
MP1 calls .20$
Hero: ???

I use MP1's stack right? and that only give's me 10:1.(I DON'T go by the 10:1 rule BTW.) As a second question, what if it's two big stacks calling + 1 short stack. Do you make the call then?
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
Robb
Old 08-23-2008, 03:10 AM #2 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,072
Robb is an unknown quantity at this point
This is difficult - MP1 is in the way. We'd like to play an UTG TAGG for set value. If MP1 is passive, we can get away with calling here. If he's aggressive, he's likely to kill our set value.

BTW, 99 is a decent hand here, at least at 10nl. So this depends a lot on villain reads. But yes, you're right, I would probably fold hands like 22 - 44 here. I'm more likely to 3bet w/ 99 than flat call (again, read dependent). But short stacks are bad for the set hunting business. It's even worse if the short stack is in the BB where TAGG UTG is likely to get squeezed on the flop.

Good question. I'll be interested to hear what others think.
 
Reply With Quote
BankItDrew
Old 08-23-2008, 04:09 AM #3 (permalink)  
BankItDrew's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Losing Prop Bets
Posts: 2,789
BankItDrew will become famous soon enough
I always lean towards the initial raiser... MP1 could be set hunting with a hand we have dominated.

There are situations though where you can consider the sizes of both stacks when you're in this situation. First of all, always consider the initial raisers. Secondly, you can take into consideration the second or third stacks when any of the following apply: calling stations, very shortstacked ie. they are already pot commited preflop and simply suck at push/fold strat preflop, or if they are extremely tight players who tend to slowplay in this spot with big hands.


Girlfriend:
Why are the werewolves more important than living life?!

Girlfriend:
Are you on the forums doing the werewolves again?

Girlfriend:
Soo... you forgot to run that errand, but you had time to werewolf? Wtf?
 
Reply With Quote
wellrounded08
Old 08-23-2008, 04:26 AM #4 (permalink)  
wellrounded08's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ...Good Question........Where am I?
Posts: 366
wellrounded08
Ok, I've run the situation several times in my head and here's what I came up with. If I 3bet, I don't much care what shortstack does. Here's why:
-UTG folds- I'm more than happy to stack of with Mr. Shortstack
-UTG 4bets- I don't care cuz I'm outta the hand.(no odds if UTG raised appropriately)
-UTG Calls- Short stack can call/fold/shove.
----call-fine, he's probably dead money anyway(since he's obviously a donk if he's short stack and calling in this situation.)
----fold-fine
----shove-fine I'm probably shoving right back since UTG has already said he doesn't have stack-off material.

So All I'm really worried about is UTG. So why am I 3betting my B range here? AGAIN:

UTG Folds-Great
UTG Calls-not so great, now I'm still set hunting, but at a higher price. and can still be drawn out on.
UTG Raises-I'm done.

So I'm probably just cold calling this situation and doing a regular old Set hunt. Besides I've got position so I should be in good shape if I hit.

NOW! Tell me where I'm wrong.(Not being sarcastic.)
Reply With Quote
Robb
Old 08-23-2008, 11:25 AM #5 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,072
Robb is an unknown quantity at this point
The problem here is that the short-stack keeps UTG from stacking off as often - MP1 cuts down on your implied odds. UTG knows as soon as $2 go in that he has to have the best hand to win - there will be a showdown. So he's not floating or bluffing. Also if the short stack is agro, then this "gotta show it to win it" problem scares off the deep stack.

I like to the see the short stack with more like 10 to 1 effective stack before I'm comfortable attacking UTG with 22 - 44 in this situation.
 
Reply With Quote
oskar
Old 08-23-2008, 12:46 PM #6 (permalink)  
oskar's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
oskar has a spectacular aura aboutoskar has a spectacular aura aboutoskar has a spectacular aura about
99 is not just for set value. You very likely have the best hand here. If just one over comes on the flop, you're probably good.
The strengh of a hero is defined by the weakness of his villains.
 
Reply With Quote
wellrounded08
Old 08-23-2008, 02:17 PM #7 (permalink)  
wellrounded08's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ...Good Question........Where am I?
Posts: 366
wellrounded08
Quote:
Originally Posted by oskar
99 is not just for set value. You very likely have the best hand here. If just one over comes on the flop, you're probably good.
(This is all assuming MP shoves.)-
UTG maye easily have QQ,JJ, TT here as well.(think about the line, raise/call in UTG Pos.) So like Robb just said, we are going to see a showdown. That's why I shove against UTG after MP shoves. I don't want him in the hand. I want to go Heads up with MP with my 99 since I"ve probably go thte best hand. Unless I have UTG as a preflop station/donk. I'm making this move to get him out of the hand. He's not going to play for his whole stack vs my line.(Reraise into a UTG raiser/Shove.)

BTW, If MP doesn't shove, and we see a flop, I'm well aware that my nines are probably good. Which is generally why I'm flatting this bet preflop.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robb
The problem here is that the short-stack keeps UTG from stacking off as often - MP1 cuts down on your implied odds. UTG knows as soon as $2 go in that he has to have the best hand to win - there will be a showdown. So he's not floating or bluffing. Also if the short stack is agro, then this "gotta show it to win it" problem scares off the deep stack.

I like to the see the short stack with more like 10 to 1 effective stack before I'm comfortable attacking UTG with 22 - 44 in this situation.
I'm deff. not attacking UTG with 22-44. I'm flatting the bet. If the only person in the hand besides me was the shortstack, and he seemed to be pretty loose, then I'll stack off with 22-44 sometimes.

You said that MP keeps UTG from stacking off, but That's fine to me. 99 isn't stack off material with deepstacks. I don't think UTG is calling my shove be cause he only called my reraise. If he had been ready to stack off, we would have seen him reraise. If I stack off with the shortstack only, I don't care about my odds to hit a set. I'm looking purely at the fact that my hand is a favorite against his range.
Reply With Quote
spoonitnow
Old 08-23-2008, 04:19 PM #8 (permalink)  
spoonitnow's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
spoonitnow is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to spoonitnow Send a message via MSN to spoonitnow Send a message via Yahoo to spoonitnow Send a message via Skype™ to spoonitnow
In general, the aggressor's stack size is the more important consideration.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.

Rule # 1: don't ask questions

Rule # 2: don't ask questions

I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
 
Reply With Quote
wellrounded08
Old 08-23-2008, 04:27 PM #9 (permalink)  
wellrounded08's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ...Good Question........Where am I?
Posts: 366
wellrounded08
Thank you. I kinda took this thread elsewhere, but that was in fact my original question.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.