|
FATSHARK
|
07-28-2007, 05:19 PM
Post subject: Question re: NL Short Raises
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2
|
|
I was at a underground game last night, and a situation occured in a 1-2NL game, and I just wanted to get some clarification.
After the flop Stacks ~apprx
Player A - 60
Player B - 100
Player C - 150
Player A goes all in.
Player B wants to go all in, but is prevented from the dealer.
Rationale, is that if he goes all in, it's a short raise, so he can only call the Player A's 60.
Player C then proceedes to go all-in.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
Dealer should be shot in the kneecap.
|
|
|
|
bode
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2006
Location: slow motion
Posts: 4,270
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by euphoricism
Dealer should be shot in the kneecap.
|
|
Quote:
|
eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
|
|
|
Pythonic
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In S-mart Swallowing Your Soul!
Posts: 586
|
|
Ghetto rules?
|
|
|
|
Trashcona
|
|
Straight
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 147
|
|
I hope you don't plan on playing in this game ever again if these are the kind of dealers working the tables.
|
|
|
|
sejje
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 883
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by euphoricism
Dealer should be shot in the kneecap.
|
And kicked in the balls.
That's the stupidest ruling I've ever heard. I have an eight year old nephew who could make the proper ruling there.
|
|
|