|
koolmoe
|
09-08-2006, 01:00 PM
Post subject: Question for Fnord
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Drowning in prosperity
Posts: 1,279
|
|
In High Stakes limit, you posted:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
Will the last person to switch from Online LHE to Online NLHE (barring a rake structure change) turn off the lights?
|
Got any links that discuss this? After reading NLHT&P and experimenting a little, I am strongly considering a switch.
There are usually 3x as many NL tables as limit at some of the sparsely populated sites I play (where my highest rakeback deals are), which implies that there are more recreational players in those games.
|
|
Poker is freedom
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
BankItDrew
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Losing Prop Bets
Posts: 2,789
|
|
RaIsE !!!
|
Girlfriend: Why are the werewolves more important than living life?!
Girlfriend: Are you on the forums doing the werewolves again?
Girlfriend: Soo... you forgot to run that errand, but you had time to werewolf? Wtf?
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
I have a question for Fnord:
Why do you choose to put one sentence posts and not explain yourself? Is it because you believe the explanation will come from others?
|
|
|
|
DaNutsInYoEye
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,921
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
I have a question for Fnord:
Why do you choose to put one sentence posts and not explain yourself? Is it because you believe the explanation will come from others?
|
Ever heard of discussion? It's an archaic term. In the dark ages before Google and text messaging people use to do it all the time.
|
|
TheXianti: (Triptanes) why are you not a thinking person?
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
This statement stands on it's own.
Although your edge in short-handed LHE goes up a lot with a good rakeback deal.
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
This statement stands on it's own.
Although your edge in short-handed LHE goes up a lot with a good rakeback deal. |
i remember you posting somewhere that for the best players NL gave the biggest edge.
Is that still true? I learnt limit to improve my overall undersatnding of the game but ive moved back to NL because i feel it lets me earn more $per hour.
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DaNutsInYoEye
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
I have a question for Fnord:
Why do you choose to put one sentence posts and not explain yourself? Is it because you believe the explanation will come from others?
|
Ever heard of discussion? It's an archaic term. In the dark ages before Google and text messaging people use to do it all the time. |
This doesn't answer my question. Normally when someone discusses something they give their reasoning so people can see their point.
However Fnord doesn't give reasoning, he gives the answer. Sometimes, his wording and answer could spawn disagreement but there's no way to argue against his points because he has none.
I don't really have a problem with this, I was just wondering if Fnord decides not to waste his time explaining things because he feels others will explain?
|
|
|
|
pantherhound
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Love me for a season
Posts: 492
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DaNutsInYoEye
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
I have a question for Fnord:
Why do you choose to put one sentence posts and not explain yourself? Is it because you believe the explanation will come from others?
|
Ever heard of discussion? It's an archaic term. In the dark ages before Google and text messaging people use to do it all the time. |
This doesn't answer my question. Normally when someone discusses something they give their reasoning so people can see their point.
However Fnord doesn't give reasoning, he gives the answer. Sometimes, his wording and answer could spawn disagreement but there's no way to argue against his points because he has none.
I don't really have a problem with this, I was just wondering if Fnord decides not to waste his time explaining things because he feels others will explain? |
Fnord is the most useful poster on FTR because he knows how to shape debates about important concepts in poker. Find his 'implied threat' thread and you'll see what I mean.
|
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
Linear Mode
