|
Pyroxene
|
05-02-2005, 12:31 AM
Post subject: Pyroxene's Stupid Poker Challenge
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 236
|
|
The challenge:
Create a Texas Hold'em hand deal such that if all the players go to the river there is one hand that can neither win nor tie any boards.
I fooled around with it a few minutes and I have a 9 way deal where one hand has 0 wins and 0 ties. Doing it with fewer players would be a bonus.
EDIT: And it has to be only one hand that has no possible EV. Having two hands where neither has any EV does not satisfy the challenge.
|
|
Pyroxene
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
FishMagician
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 206
|
|
Hand 1 - 2s 2h
Hand 2 - 4h 3s
Hand 3 - 6c 5d
Hand 4 - 8h 7s
Hand 5 - Tc 9d
Hand 6 - Qh Js
Hand 7 - Ac Kd
Hand 8 - 2c 3h
Hand 9 - 2d 3d
Doesn't matter what the last 2 hands are as long as they each have a 2.
Hand 1 can't win or tie.
|
|
|
|
Greedo017
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
|
|
that board can tie, any straight 10-a ties
|
|
|
|
face
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 187
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FishMagician
Hand 1 - 2s 2h
Hand 2 - 4h 3s
Hand 3 - 6c 5d
Hand 4 - 8h 7s
Hand 5 - Tc 9d
Hand 6 - Qh Js
Hand 7 - Ac Kd
Hand 8 - 2c 3h
Hand 9 - 2d 3d
Doesn't matter what the last 2 hands are as long as they each have a 2.
Hand 1 can't win or tie.
|
Ad 3s 4c 5h 10d -- Hands 1 8 and 9 tie.
|
|
|
|
FishMagician
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 206
|
|
hmmmm......pokerstove had 0% 0%
you guys are both right though. I will try again.
|
|
|
|
FishMagician
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 206
|
|
Ok pretty sure I really got it this time
Hand 1 - 2d 2c
Hand 2 - 3d 2h
Hand 3 - 4c 2s
Hand 4 - Ts Th
Hand 5 - Td Tc
Hand 6 - 7h 6s
Hand 7 - 9c 8d
Hand 8 - Ad Ac
Hand 9 - As Ah
Hand 1 no wins no ties.
|
|
|
|
Greedo017
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
|
|
your new one works fishmagician. can you find one with 8 hands? this is tough, i couldn't even come up with that one.
|
|
|
|
Greedo017
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
|
|
1 2d 2h
2 2c 3s
3 2s 4d
4 Ts Th
5 Td Tc
6 5h 5s
7 5c 5d
8 Ad Ac
9 Ah As
|
|
|
|
ekillian
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 235
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FishMagician
Ok pretty sure I really got it this time
Hand 1 - 2d 2c
Hand 2 - 3d 2h
Hand 3 - 4c 2s
Hand 4 - Ts Th
Hand 5 - Td Tc
Hand 6 - 7h 6s
Hand 7 - 9c 8d
Hand 8 - Ad Ac
Hand 9 - As Ah
Hand 1 no wins no ties.
|
BOARD: 3h-4h-5d-6c-7c
Board ties. Does that count?
|
|
|
|
Greedo017
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
|
|
no, 89 wins
|
|
|
|
ekillian
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 235
|
|
ahhh [dumb]didn't think about that. [/dumb]
|
|
|
|
Pyroxene
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 236
|
|
FishMagician and Greddo017 met the challenge! My answer was similar to Greedo's; while FishMagician used a different method of accounting for board straights.
Bonus points to anyone that can do it in less than 9 hands.
|
|
Pyroxene
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
Here's a similar dilemma: can anyone think of a group of starting hands at a full ring (10 handed) where a player with pocket aces couldn't possibly win? (He is however allowed to tie.) I cheated a little bit to make this happen, but I'm curious if anyone else can come up with a better solution.
|
|
|
|
mattperkins26
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 15
|
|
I think I have it. *crosses fingers* 2d Kc never wins.
Hand 1 - 2d Kc
Hand 2 - 2h 6d
Hand 3 - 2c Ah
Hand 4 - 7s 8c
Hand 5 - 9d Tc
Hand 6 - Jh Qs
Hand 7 - Kd Ad
Hand 8 - As Ac
|
|
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mattperkins26
I think I have it. *crosses fingers* 2d Kc never wins.
Hand 1 - 2d Kc
Hand 2 - 2h 6d
Hand 3 - 2s 7c
Hand 4 - 2h Ah
Hand 5 - 9d Tc
Hand 6 - Jh Qs
Hand 7 - Kc Ad
Hand 8 - As Ac
|
You've got two repeat cards there (Kc and 2h)...
|
|
|
|
mattperkins26
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 15
|
|
Edited above, but here it is again
Hand 1 - 2d Kc
Hand 2 - 2h 6d
Hand 3 - 2c Ah
Hand 4 - 7s 8c
Hand 5 - 9d Tc
Hand 6 - Jh Qs
Hand 7 - Kd Ad
Hand 8 - As Ac
|
|
|
|
Pyroxene
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 236
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mattperkins26
I think I have it. *crosses fingers* 2d Kc never wins.
Hand 1 - 2d Kc
Hand 2 - 2h 6d
Hand 3 - 2c Ah
Hand 4 - 7s 8c
Hand 5 - 9d Tc
Hand 6 - Jh Qs
Hand 7 - Kd Ad
Hand 8 - As Ac
|
Matt,
The 2d Kc hand can win with a K2 on the board for two pair. Running it through one of the calculators on the net, Hand 1 can win 6949 ways and tie 1206 ways. I think most of the ties are places where the other two Kings fall and then the boar pairs up for a Kings over X full house.
|
|
Pyroxene
|
|
Pyroxene
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 236
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dalecooper
Here's a similar dilemma: can anyone think of a group of starting hands at a full ring (10 handed) where a player with pocket aces couldn't possibly win? (He is however allowed to tie.) I cheated a little bit to make this happen, but I'm curious if anyone else can come up with a better solution.
|
Ah Ad
Ac As
Kh Qh
Jh Th
9h 8h
7h 6h
Kd Qd
Jd Td
9d 8d
7d 6d
|
|
Pyroxene
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
Ah Ad
Ac As
Kh Qh
Jh Th
9h 8h
7h 6h
Kd Qd
Jd Td
9d 8d
7d 6d[/quote]
Excellent. Mine was similar but involved a lot of pocket pairs using up the hearts and diamonds. Same effect I guess.
|
|
|
|
bigg_nate
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 157
|
|
I'm probably missing something, but does this do it with 7 hands?
2c 2s (dead)
2d 2h
Ac As
Ad Ah
8d 8h
7c 8s
7s 8c
- Nate
|
|
|
|
Greedo017
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
|
|
hmm, i wonder if that one counts. Original rules said you can't have two of the same hand, but only one of the pairs of two's is dead, the other wins sometimes
|
|
i betcha that i got something you ain't got, that's called courage, it don't come from no liquor bottle, it ain't scotch
|
|
bigg_nate
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 157
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Greedo017
hmm, i wonder if that one counts. Original rules said you can't have two of the same hand, but only one of the pairs of two's is dead, the other wins sometimes
|
In that case, how about
2c 2s
Ac As
Ad Ah
8c 8s
8d 8h
2d 7c
2h 7s
More evidence that you should never go all-in against the almighty 27o! 
- Nate
|
|
|
|
bigg_nate
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 157
|
|
Or, if you insist on NO two hands being the same:
2s 2c
As Ac
8s 8c
Ad 8h
Ah 7s
2h 8d
2d 7c
- Nate
|
|
|