Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Preflop raise sizing

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
AFchung
Old 11-30-2008, 02:27 PM     Post subject: Preflop raise sizing #1 (permalink)  
AFchung's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UCLA
Posts: 1,179
AFchung
Send a message via AIM to AFchung
A lot of people have been telling me different things, but generally they gravitate towards about the same size PFR.

3x + 1 per limper
3.5x + 1 per limper
4x + 1 per limper

Some people even told me that I can vary my raises between 3x and 4x depending on my position.

Anyone have any thoughts on an ideal bet size? I'm pretty sure you can't really go wrong with either of them, but i've been using the 4x+1 to maximize value from taking pots down with a cbet
 
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
Old 12-01-2008, 12:37 AM #2 (permalink)  
Guest

Posts: n/a
ideal bet size is however much the people at your table will call with worse
Reply With Quote
Stacks
Old 12-01-2008, 01:55 AM #3 (permalink)  
Stacks's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
Posts: 2,605
Stacks will become famous soon enoughStacks will become famous soon enough
I would suggest 4x+1bb at the micros, and maybe even higher as there are an overwhelming number of high vpip fish, and you want to cut down on multiway pots with most hands. I would say no lower than 4x+1bb, and maybe 5x or 6x + 1bb is ideal.
Reply With Quote
MuddyWicket
Old 12-01-2008, 06:30 AM #4 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: UK, Brighton
Posts: 368
MuddyWicket
table dependant imo. Try 3x in late position and see if they fold just as much.
Reply With Quote
Erpel
Old 12-01-2008, 09:09 AM #5 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 605
Erpel
3-4bb + 1bb per limper is a great starting point and something you can do without really understanding why and still not make too big a mistake.

I will now in brief explore some of the ways you can choose to vary PFR size and what some strengths and weaknesses are.

PFR size varying by hand strength:
Pro: You get more money in with good hands - if opponents are particularly unobservant and will call a 10bb raise with as weak hands as they will call 3bb raises with this is just free money.
You risk less money on weak starting hands - and if you flop big you can always start building a pot after the flop.
Con: You very easily become transparent. AA loses a lot of value if all of your opponents know that you are holding exactly AA and no other hand. They can play perfectly against you.

PFR size varying by position 1:
This version is raising small out of position and big in position
Pro: Since you are generally more likely to win any hands in which you have position you here build big pots while in position that you stand to win, and smaller pots out of position that you are more at risk of losing. This is particularly true against unobservant opponents who don't look at the raise size before deciding whether to call.
Con: You manipulate the opponents range so you end up playing less hands post-flop in position and more hands post-flop out of position.

PFR size varying by position 2:
This version is raising big out of position and small in position
Pro: You play more hands post-flop in position and fewer out of position. This is particularly true against observant opponents who look at the raise size before deciding whether to call.
Con: You play smaller pots in position and bigger pots out of position.

PFR size varying by stack sizes (intro to SPR):
SPR = Stack to Pot Ratio. While such a ratio can be calculated on every street the coverage of SPRs in PNL focuses on it's application between pre-flop and flop. The basic formula is effective stack size divided by pot when the flop hits.
In the below examples I will assume and calculate for one caller.
I can't do an easy pro/con analysis so I'll explain by example.

Let's say you are BTN and your blinds are semi-loose and aggressive - blind stealing is not profitable with any two cards.
The action is folded to you and you have 22
Example 1: The blinds have 100bb and so do you - just do a normal 4bb raise. If you get a caller you are mainly playing for set value and with 24-1 stack odds you are safe to do so.
Example 2: The blinds have 75bb each and you have more - do a 3bb raise. If you get a caller you are mainly playing for set value and with 24-1 stack odds you are safe to do so.

In SPR terminology you are trying to set up an SPR of 13 because your hand plays well with that size SPR.

Same table as above. This time you have AQo
Example 1: 50bb effective stack size. Raise to 6bb - if called you have an SPR of a little less than 4. The hand you are hoping to hit and play post-flop is a TPTK type hand - that hand plays best with an SPR of 4 or a bit less.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2008, 10:27 AM #6 (permalink)  
Guest

Posts: n/a
I'd rather play big pots with big hands OOP and small pots with small hands IP

I mean, when you have great implied odds a hand like 87s is great, but if you raise 4x from BU you're making your own implied odds worse
I vary my raise sizing depending on the opponents in LP and I raise high from the EP regardless

why not minraise from the button when both of the blinds are playing 8/6 and will fold 80% of the time? Why risk the extra BB when they do pick up a hand?
Reply With Quote
nutsinho
Old 12-01-2008, 11:53 AM #7 (permalink)  
nutsinho's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: flattin ur 4bets, makin u tilt
Posts: 3,280
nutsinho will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by iopq
ideal bet size is however much the people at your table will call with worse
....or the least amount to which they will fold w/ better.
My bankroll is the amount of money I would spend or lose before I got a job. It is calculated by adding my net worth to whatever I can borrow.
 
Reply With Quote
dranger7070
Old 12-01-2008, 04:30 PM #8 (permalink)  
dranger7070's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wake up in the mornin feelin' like P. Diddy
Posts: 2,524
dranger7070 has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Send a message via AIM to dranger7070 Send a message via MSN to dranger7070
I ALWAYS do 4x+1bb no matter what position im in. This disguises your hand strength just for the simple fact that your bets are the same whether you are raising with 72o (not recommended of course lol) or AA. People will never know exactly what you have. I've found that playing against players who bet like this are a LOT more frustrating than the guy who bets differently with every hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14 AM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.