Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Playing the button and Small Blind

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
joshuadzl
Old 11-27-2005, 10:35 AM     Post subject: Playing the button and Small Blind #1 (permalink)  
joshuadzl's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 287
joshuadzl
Send a message via AIM to joshuadzl Send a message via MSN to joshuadzl
Preface: I'm working on indentifying leaks in my game. My sample size is very small, around 5k. I just started using PT so bare with me here. I know my sample size is far from ideal, but its all I got to work with. Don't hate. Rilla got buttrabies.

Some overall statistics concerning me:
VP$IP: 24.71%
PFR: 6.23%
Aggression Factor: 2.45

Button statistics:
VP$IP: 38.27%
CCPF%: 2.47%
PFR%: 6.91%

SB Statistics:
VP$IP: 49.17%
CCPF%: 0%
PFR%: 6.41%

To the meat of it - playing the button and small blind, I've heard many pros state that they'll often limp in if the pot goes unraised with any two cards on the button and in the SB. I've heard some even say (jokingly) they don't even need to look at the cards. 72o, they're in, no problem. I've also heard others say they play the game strictly by the saying that Fnord says, "Pump it or dump it". Also, when I've heard this strategy said to be used is when you're holding a garbage hand, not a premium obvisouly.

Well, I've been doing the limping. Has it been working? So far, it doesn't seem so and what is really disturbing to me is the button is a LOSING position for me. Only by $4 bucks, so obviously one hand can change this position into a minor winning one, but being "even" on the button is pretty screwed up. On the flip side, the SB is acctually profitable for me using this method.

Three top losing hands for me on the button: QJ, QT, 22.
Three top losing hands for me in the SB: AQ, A5, KQ

I haven't reviewed the hand histories of why I lost these hands, but one thing is obvious. I'm getting attached to *mediorce* hands when limping. That I've identified and can deal with. Oh, and also, as I'm going throw my stats, most of those I did pump preflop it looks like so they may be moot points in this post.

I guess my main question here is this limp strategy a poor way to play? I mean, if I have just two limpers before me I'm getting over 3:1 on my money to see a flop. That rare occasion the flop comes 727 with my 72 in the pocket, is that gonna pay off for all the failed limps? Do I need to drop this strategy all together?
 
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
DoGGz
Old 11-27-2005, 10:48 AM #2 (permalink)  
Guest

Posts: n/a
If i'm on the Button or the CO and I'm coming in I'm putting out a raise. The only hands I limp AS first into the pot are 99-22 (but will raise from the CO and Button). Be willing to raise a wider range of hands from the CO and the Button.

The SB you have to think about what type of hand you have. K5 is a crappy hand, but plays well in a blind battle. 76s is a good multiway hand but plays crappy in a blind battle. K5 is a crappy hand and plays like trash in multiway pots. You get my point.


Most importantly, it depends on your table, and how they are playing.
Reply With Quote
johnny_fish
Old 11-27-2005, 11:19 AM #3 (permalink)  
johnny_fish's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: donkaments weeeeeeeeeeee
Posts: 2,186
johnny_fish
14K hands 50NL

position/VP$P/PFR

All/14/6
CO/16/10
BN/19/11
SB/20/8
BB/9/5
Reply With Quote
finky
Old 11-27-2005, 02:13 PM #4 (permalink)  
finky's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 270
finky
Definatly think you need to be more position sensative with you PFRs. Do you raise the same hands from all positions? Some hands (high SC, mid PP) play much better with position and initiative. If you see people limping, their not sure of their hands and would like to see a flop, tell them they have to outflop you.

Here's my stats though theres quite a bit of 6-max in there
http://snipurl.com/k9m0
Reply With Quote
r8ed
Old 11-28-2005, 03:15 PM #5 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,524
r8ed
I wouldn't worry about the hands you posted above. Those are find to play in those positions. Just think to yourself before you play that you are more than willing to fold them if you don't hit a very favorable flop. Don't chase that 3rd two if you face a raise on the flop when you miss. Just lay them down.

I would raise AQ and KQ in the SB if there is no raise before you. Yes you are out of position, but you most likely have the best starting hand. C-bet the flop. Your stats will turn positive.
Reply With Quote
pgil
Old 11-28-2005, 04:01 PM #6 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,103
pgil
im not sure, but i would think you would need better than 3:1 to make 72 a callable hand, even from the SB. That is if you are only going to play it for the miracle flop. However, if you have one of those lovely tables that limp-fold all day long, then your cards dont really matter so much.
"If you can't say f*ck, you can't say f*ck the government" - Lenny Bruce
 
Reply With Quote
EricE
Old 11-28-2005, 04:31 PM #7 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 894
EricE
What I limp with on the button is directly related to how many callers there have been, to a lesser degree, how aggressive the table is preflop. If the table is rarely limped preflop then you might expect a raise from the SB or BB. If that’s the case then limping junk on the button is not profitable when I have to drop it to a raise. That is rare though; for my tables anyway.

Mostly, I evaluate my cards and say something like “for this hand I need 4 limpers to come in”. I value my junk hands by how many I think I need in the flop to make it profitable. I often find myself saying things like, “ok, 2 limpers (plus the blinds which I expect one limper there)…if these last two before me call then I’ll limp in”. For something like 72o you need pretty much everyone to limp in (IMO).
Stakes: Playing $0.10/$0.25 NL
 
Reply With Quote
Lukie
Old 11-29-2005, 02:28 PM #8 (permalink)  
Lukie's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
Lukie is on a distinguished road
Unless you are a very skilled player and you plan on taking the pot with skill and without showdown, just muck the worthless hands like 27o in a full ring game in all situations. I don't see the point in playing it even after the whole table limps. What kind of flop are you expecting to see? Maybe a hand like 45o or something that has potential, but hands like T4o, J2o, 38o, etc. need not be played from any position, even if you are getting 20:1 odds from the SB.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:52 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.