Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

REGISTER
Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password

Poker Forum

  > 

Beginners Circle

  > 

Pacific poker vs Party...

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
trev
Old 07-13-2006, 11:54 PM     Post subject: Pacific poker vs Party... #1 (permalink)  
trev's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: manchester
Posts: 13
trev
Specificaly, which is the best place for $50NL? Up to now i've mainly been playing $25NL on pacific, which I find even fishier than party (believe it or not). Anyway, Im looking to move up stakes soon, is there anyone who plays both sites who can compare the standard of play?
Reply With Quote

Play for FREE and practice your game at...

Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
mulhollanddrive
Old 07-14-2006, 01:40 PM #2 (permalink)  
mulhollanddrive's Avatar

Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 47
mulhollanddrive
ive found that at:

10NL Pacific is probably 25-30% more fishier at the times I play (non peak) but at peak hour they are about the same.

25NL about the same, Pacific slightly fishier.

Unfortunately couldnt say on 50NL. The reason why Pacific is fishier imo is that it doesnt allow multi-table unless you want to overlap all the tables.

If you want to do a quick check, I'd check pot size averages on both sites at the same time.
Reply With Quote
aokrongly
Old 07-14-2006, 02:30 PM #3 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 863
aokrongly
Quote:
Originally Posted by mulhollanddrive
If you want to do a quick check, I'd check pot size averages on both sites at the same time.
I think this is where you'll see the greatest difference, if there is one. You may also want to check fortune.
Reply With Quote
trev
Old 07-14-2006, 03:18 PM #4 (permalink)  
trev's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: manchester
Posts: 13
trev
Ok thanks for the advice guys. At a quick glance, pacific looks better with $10-20 av pot (highest on party about $12) with 45-50% of players to a flop...hadn't considered fortune so I'll give to a look later. Given the quality of play, should a 1K roll be enough to take a shot, assuming I don't mind moving down if I it goes bad? Or wait for 25 buy-ins?
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:06 PM.

Contact Us - Archive - Top

FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com 		Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.