|
T.M
|
01-03-2006, 06:11 AM
Post subject: limit= super awesome
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 31
|
|
due to my poor progress in NL holdem, too many horrible hands that made me lose too much at once, so i decide to give limit a try. The result. Awesome. There are suckouts still but it doesnt cost me as much, so im still winning the same number of hands in NL Holdem, just not losing as much when i get screwed. If NL is stressing you out like it did me, give limit a try, worked for me. I think making $100 a night for a week is some good evidence to give it a shot. 
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
sandstorm
|
|
Flush
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 573
|
|
Limit actually has more variance than NL. (If you compare levels by bankroll management). How many hands have you played and at what limit? It's great to run good, but make sure to be mentally prepared for the swings. 
|
|
>3
this is my favourite part of the post
it looks like angry boobs
|
|
Jiggus
|
|
|
|
Oh, yeah. Sandstorm is oh so right. I played limit for a long time before seeing the light and going to NL. If you play within your bankroll, either game is fine, just that limit sucks.
|
|
|
|
Hate
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 322
|
|
You're absolutely right, except for the last 4 words
|
|
|
|
midas06
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,196
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jiggus
Oh, yeah. Sandstorm is oh so right. I played limit for a long time before seeing the light and going to NL. If you play within your bankroll, either game is fine, just that limit is better.
|
FYP
|
|
|
|
Jiggus
|
|
|
|
Thanks, mate, but you've missed a bit. I've corrected your omissions, below, however.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by midas06
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jiggus
Oh, yeah. Sandstorm is oh so right. I played limit for a long time before seeing the light and going to NL. If you play within your bankroll, either game is fine, just that limit is better than, say, chess by carrier pigeon as far as excitement goes, and has more profit potential than organic tapir meat farming.
|
FYP |
|
|
|
|
bigredhoss
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 127
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jiggus
Thanks, mate, but you've missed a bit. I've corrected your omissions, below, however.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by midas06
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jiggus
Oh, yeah. Sandstorm is oh so right. I played limit for a long time before seeing the light and going to NL. If you play within your bankroll, either game is fine, just that limit is better than, say, chess by carrier pigeon as far as excitement goes, and has more profit potential than organic tapir meat farming.
|
FYP |
|
haha
|
|
|
|
WhooFleuryScores
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 918
|
|
Being that I have seen both sides-first NL/PL then Limit then a brieft couple nights at NL I will say both have some serious variance but it does seem that Limit does have slightly higher.Of course this depends on how often you are winning your share of large pots in NL as well as avoiding situations where you get destacked.
|
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
Linear Mode
