|
wellrounded08
|
08-23-2008, 09:59 PM
Post subject: Lay down AK pre. Hand Advice*
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ...Good Question........Where am I?
Posts: 366
|
|
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.05 BB (9 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
MP1 ($5.11)
MP2 ($3.73)
MP3 ($3.67)
CO ($5.60)
Hero (Button) ($6.15)
SB ($9.21)
BB ($5.84)
UTG ($12.80)
UTG+1 ($8.25)
Preflop: Hero is Button with K A
1 fold, UTG+1 calls $0.05, 2 folds, MP3 calls $0.05, 1 fold, Hero raises to $0.25, 2 folds, UTG+1 calls $0.20, MP3 raises to $1.55, 2 folds
Total pot: $0.82 | Rake: $0.00
I rarely see that move outside of shortstackers. Doesn't it almost always mean AA, maybe KK at these stakes(When it's not a shortstacker obviously)?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
daven
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,805
|
|
folding is at worst a small mistake here. ..
|
|
|
|
thizzSantaCruz
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 894
|
|
Theres so much money in the pot that you should push here. AFter he limps pf behind another limper he very rarely ever has you dominated. Most likely your flipping with him and with all the money all ready in the pot this is +EV. Shove it in.
|
|
Flopping quads and boats like its my job
|
|
wellrounded08
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ...Good Question........Where am I?
Posts: 366
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thizzSantaCruz
Theres so much money in the pot that you should push here. AFter he limps pf behind another limper he very rarely ever has you dominated. Most likely your flipping with him and with all the money all ready in the pot this is +EV. Shove it in.
|
I don't understand that. (~NOT~ saying it's incorrect, just saying I dont' understand)
I don't think I've ever seen this move outside of AA or KK But just in case I pokerstove'd it here's what I've got:
Him:Any PP-54%
ME:AKo -45%
Him: JJ+-61%
MeAKo-38%
Him: QQ+, AKs/o -58%
Me: AKo - 41%
Him: KK+ -76%
Me: AKo+ -23%
And I've got next to nothing in the line of FE. He's commited at this point. I dunno, I feel like dumping 5xBB is as stated: "at worst a small mistake here.."
(I'm ok w/ being wrong, that's why I'm asking.)
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
I've seen people do that with A4 and 33. I've seen people go all-in for 30$ with small PP on 5NL tables. This is were you should know how long this guy has been sitting there. There are 75c in the pot, so the odds are not staggering considering that you have to put him all-in here. I don't think you can call, he'll just have a PSB left, but this forum got me confused. If you can't raise trash UTG then I don't understand the world anymore.
Without a read it's tough. But I think I push here more often than not... No idea if it's good or not.
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $0.04 BB (4 handed) - Party Poker Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
UTG ($10.59)
Button ($9.87)
SB ($2.32)
Hero (BB) ($5)
Preflop: Hero is BB with A K
UTG calls $0.04, 1 fold, SB raises to $2.32 (All-In), Hero calls $2.28, UTG calls $2.28
Flop: ($6.96) 10 9 A (3 players, 1 all-in)
Hero raises to $2.68 (All-In), 1 fold
Turn: ($6.96) 10 (2 players, 2 all-in)
River: ($6.96) 10 (2 players, 2 all-in)
Total pot: $6.96
Villain had Q3.
I looked at my biggest wins and losses with AK, but most of them aren't preflop AI calls... I know I ran into QQ a couple of times. Don't think I stacked off with AK while being dominated lately.
|
|
|
|
Jack Sawyer
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Old School
Posts: 2,535
|
|
MP3 has less than 100BB left.
Barring reads, you should push over him here.
Dead money in the pot more than makes this push worthwile.
|
My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...

Quote:
|
VHS is like a book and a book is like a stack of kindles.
|
Hey, I'm in a movie!
http://youtu.be/lGdnIrRKDTI
|
|
sarbox68
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: wondering where the 3 extra chairs at my 6max table came from
Posts: 871
|
|
Unless you got a read that he is an insurmountable nit, his range is def wider than AA-KK. I've seen people with 3bet ranges from junk through Ax, connected paint, any pp. And you've got dead money in the pot that, against a wider range, likely gives you equity to shove. Also, I'd bet there's a % that this guy folds to the shove (even if it's small) that you can add in...
That being said, I agree with Daven in that you've only got 5bb in right now -- not wanting to play for stacks with AKo is "at worst a small mistake"...
|
|
|
|
wellrounded08
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ...Good Question........Where am I?
Posts: 366
|
|
Ok. I'm getting that now. Effective stack here IS 180xBB so, I personally won't feel comfortable stacking off with:
Unknown
nit
I guess I do have to factor in some FE since i've seen these villains fold w/ .30$ behind in a 4 dollar pot...
|
|
|
|
Jack Sawyer
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Old School
Posts: 2,535
|
|
oh LOL, i didnt see the call/raise line, i misread the hand
nah, his range is skewed a lot more towards AA, some KK, and very few QQs
The fact that you have AK minimizes this though, but this line is still so fucked up
clear fold, or blindly apply concept 22
|
My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...

Quote:
|
VHS is like a book and a book is like a stack of kindles.
|
Hey, I'm in a movie!
http://youtu.be/lGdnIrRKDTI
|
|
wellrounded08
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ...Good Question........Where am I?
Posts: 366
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
oh LOL, i didnt see the call/raise line, i misread the hand
nah, his range is skewed a lot more towards AA, some KK, and very few QQs
The fact that you have AK minimizes this though, but this line is still so fucked up
clear fold, or blindly apply concept 22 
|
lol. Thank you! It was limp/raise folks! I'm folding this to everyone but maniacs. (@ 5NL)
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wellrounded08
lol. Thank you! It was limp/raise folks! I'm folding this to everyone but maniacs. (@ 5NL)
|
http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...63-t75178.html
I still think that most of the time when you call there it's good... and he has about 70bb, I don't know where you went wrong there.
|
|
|
|
wellrounded08
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ...Good Question........Where am I?
Posts: 366
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by oskar
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wellrounded08
lol. Thank you! It was limp/raise folks! I'm folding this to everyone but maniacs. (@ 5NL)
|
http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...63-t75178.html
I still think that most of the time when you call there it's good... and he has about 70bb, I don't know where you went wrong there.
|
Don't act like you can add... That's for high class folk. My bad.
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
Just played this.
I rest my case.
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $0.04 BB (5 handed) - Party Poker Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
UTG ($1.98)
MP ($1.76)
Button ($4.35)
Hero (SB) ($5)
BB ($2.04)
Preflop: Hero is SB with A K
2 folds, Button raises to $4.35 (All-In), Hero calls $4.33, 1 fold
Flop: ($8.74) 8 6 9 (2 players, 1 all-in)
Turn: ($8.74) 6 (2 players, 1 all-in)
River: ($8.74) 7 (2 players, 1 all-in)
Total pot: $8.74
Results in white below:
Button had 3 4 (one pair, sixes).
Hero had A K (one pair, sixes).
Outcome: Button won $4.37, Hero won $8.31
|
|
|
|
wellrounded08
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ...Good Question........Where am I?
Posts: 366
|
|
that's a little different, your villain didn't limp/raise very different.
|
|
|
|
daven
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,805
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
oh LOL, i didnt see the call/raise line, i misread the hand
nah, his range is skewed a lot more towards AA, some KK, and very few QQs
|
see, he agrees with me....
now fold, folding here isn't the reason you aren't beating micros...
|
|
|
|
wellrounded08
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ...Good Question........Where am I?
Posts: 366
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by daven
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
oh LOL, i didnt see the call/raise line, i misread the hand
nah, his range is skewed a lot more towards AA, some KK, and very few QQs
|
see, he agrees with me....
now fold, folding here isn't the reason you aren't beating micros...
|
HEY, I COMPLETELY agree. MY OP said it had to be AA or KK. I hate to call this, probably never would call this. BTW: I'm currently beating 5NL, not crushing yet, but beating.
|
|
|
|
daven
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,805
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wellrounded08
BTW: I'm currently beating 5NL, not crushing yet, but beating.
|
nice work! now crush it and move up
|
|
|
|
yourfather
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In your fridge
Posts: 603
|
|
At micros barring reads that say he's a huge nit I would get it in here every time. At 25nl and a little 50nl I've see shortstackers shove (and sometimes limp/shove) with like 66+ A10+, KJ+ alot.
They want to see a cheap flop and then when you raise them they shove because they don't want to play postflop.
Especially since you are raising from the button and he thinks he has a lot of FE.
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
Quote:
|
that's a little different, your villain didn't limp/raise very different.
|
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $0.04 BB (4 handed)
SB ($8.73)
Hero (BB) ($5)
UTG ($6.64)
Button ($3.60)
Preflop: Hero is BB with 10 K
UTG calls $0.04, Button calls $0.04, SB calls $0.04 Hero raises $0.16, Button calls $0.16, UTG calls $0.14, SB raises to $8.73 (All-In), 3 folds
Total pot: $0.64
Results in black below:
SB had 2 2 (one pair, twos).
Outcome: SB won $9.21[/color]
|
|
|
|
wellrounded08
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ...Good Question........Where am I?
Posts: 366
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by oskar
Quote:
|
that's a little different, your villain didn't limp/raise very different.
|
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $0.04 BB (4 handed)
SB ($8.73)
Hero (BB) ($5)
UTG ($6.64)
Button ($3.60)
Preflop: Hero is BB with 10  K 
UTG calls $0.04, Button calls $0.04, SB calls $0.04 Hero raises $0.16, Button calls $0.16, UTG calls $0.14, SB raises to $8.73 (All-In), 3 folds
Total pot: $0.64
Results in black below:
SB had 2  2  (one pair, twos).
Outcome: SB won $9.21[/color]
|
REALLY, Are you serious with me right now? I'm not sure what you're trying to prove. You show me a case, and say "see, you should call everytime." If you want, I'll go through my HH's and find Every example of when my AA got cracked. And by your logic, we can decide to fold them Preflop, since in the example, they lost. Anyway, the point is, a majority of the time I'm an underdog here. Therefore -EV against the avg. player. This shortstack was no "shorstacker" So it wasn't a strategic shove FWIW.
BTW:
I always welcome being wrong when against a solid Argument, one in which is not random facts or obscure examples.
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
I just played this hand the next day and thought of this thread and posted it.
If you know it's -EV, why do you even bother posting this thread?
I call there every time, and I'm rarely an underdog. Take it for what it's worth.
The only reason for me not to call there was if I knew the player. Without any read, I don't see how you can fold.
The last two hands I posted - I posted them immediately after I played them, I didn't look them up.
I think you're giving away a lot of value, but I DONT MIND you giving away alot of value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now is it different if the villian four-bets us? Can we say we're behind that range even in the microes?
|
|
|
|
wellrounded08
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: ...Good Question........Where am I?
Posts: 366
|
|
At best, I'm usually 2:1 to win
Worst I'm dominated.
Usually a slight underdog however to PP's.
So I don't mind folding. All the good players I've talked to agree. Without a Read that villain is a straight up maniac, I'm folding all day everyday, and it's AT WORST A minor mistake.
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,545
|
|
3:1, not 2:1 if you're talking about AK
|
|
|
|
jyms
|
|
Tilting Mod
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,836
|
|
the limp/RR is almost always a monster. I fold this almost everytime
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by iopq
Now is it different if the villian four-bets us? Can we say we're behind that range even in the microes?
|
I can't imagine. It just happens much too often that somebody thinks you're stealing from him, he doesn't want to play post-flop because he folded to c-bets 5 times in a row with something like AJ when they didn't hit, and just decide to remove all the post flop decisions and move it in right there.
Just an hour ago I played a hand against a guy I play against regularly, and he plays somewhat solid poker... doesn't take many risks. I have a lot of player notes, none suggest that he's a maniac. I raised UTG with QQ, he called, the bb min-raised to 32c, I 4-bet to 1,2 and he pushed all-in for 12$ (I had 16). At this point I'm hoping he has JJ or AK, but he turned over KJ. When I post that situation here and suggest that it would even be possible that KJ could be in his range, everybody would call me crazy.
I know many people here have more experience than me. And at 25NL this is a whole different situation. But at 5NL... I don't know. Maybe it's different at PokerStars... looks like everybody here plays at stars, so maybe the players are better there, I wouldn't know.
|
|
|
|
jyms
|
|
Tilting Mod
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,836
|
|
your not following along.
IT was a limp/RR!!!!
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
Is that you're screen name? If it is, I'll put a post-it note next to my screen to limp-raise your ass should we ever meet. Players who do not understand the concept of pre-flop raises often get frustrated when they wanted to play a hand and they constantly get raised... They realize they're probably not going to hit the flop AGAIN, and push.
I genuinely would not be surprised to see someone turn over 55 here. I wouldn't be surprised to see KK either, but in the long run, I think you're ahead here most of the time - at 5NL.
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
Just paused four tables to post this. I hope I'm not getting flamed, I'm trying to make a point here.
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $0.04 BB (9 handed) - Party-Poker Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
SB ($3.29)
BB ($2.31)
UTG+1 ($4.96)
Hero (MP1) ($5)
MP2 ($6.10)
MP3 ($5)
CO ($1.90)
Button ($5)
Preflop: Hero is MP1 with K , A
1 fold, SB calls $0.04, 1 fold, BB calls $0.04, 2 folds, CO calls $0.02, Hero raises $0.20, 1 fold, BB raises $0.40, 1 fold, Hero raises $2.76, BB calls $1.87 (All-In)
Flop: ($4.70) 5 , 4 , J (2 players, 1 all-in)
Turn: ($4.70) 6 (2 players, 1 all-in)
River: ($4.70) 10 (2 players, 1 all-in)
Total pot: $4.70
Results in white below:
BB had 10 , A (one pair, tens).
Hero had K , A (high card, Ace).
Outcome: BB won $4.47
|
|
|
|
daven
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,805
|
|
again, a very different example - for starters you are the person raising all-in... It's hard to interpret the rest of the action as there is something wrong with the hand posted...
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
The guy in his example didn't raise AI either. He basically raised AI... but I doubt that he knew that.
I know the card converter keeps putting people in the wrong position, messes up bet sizes, makes it 0NL... I don't know how it does it.
He limped in EP- he then min-raised to my raise instead of going apeshit and raising 6 times the initial raise, but what his motivation was - only god knows. The point is he limp-raised with Ax and was willing to get his money in with it. And it happens all the time. If I keep watching out for it I can probably post 5 more hands like that in the next week. I'll spare you, but I would bet money on at least one limp-raise resulting in an all-in with even less than AT.
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,545
|
|
Everyone just need to understand 2 things:
1. Pot Odds
2. Hand combinations
2 is more likely a much newer concept to you. In poker there are X number of possible hands that can be dealt, not 221 or whatever different hands, but 1326 different combinations of hands that you can be dealt.
Let's look at AKo for example, this is not 1 hand, because the frequency you are dealt it is different than say, AA. There are 12 different card-combination that can make AKo (AhKs is different than AsKh).
Offsuit hands have 12 combos, suited hands have 4, and paired hands have 6. When you are dealt AKo, it also affects other possible starting hand frequencies.
Let's look at the 6 combos for AA:
AdAc
AhAc
AsAc
AhAd
AsAd
AsAh
Now, let's say we were dealt AhKs, what does this do to the frequency or chance that someone else was dealt AA.
AdAc
AhAc
AsAc
AhAd
AsAd
AsAh
You can see half of the combinations are no longer available. Therefore, the chances that someone was dealt AA is greatly reduced due to us holding AhKs, the exact same can be said for KK. Because of this we do not have to worry as much about running into AA/KK here and can go ahead and stack off with AKo/AKs PF. Of course, factors like player types, stack sizes, and pot odds all play a vital role as well.
|
|
|
|
Stacks
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
Posts: 2,605
|
|
Okay, so I understand this is a limp/re-raise (flat/re-raise if you must) and there is a caller caught in between. And while we do have an Ace and a King blocker cutting the chances they have AA/KK in half, I don't think we should be stacking off here.
For one, if you notice villians stack size he has raised to 31bb leaving himself with only 41bb. And we must put in another 26bb to call. That would make the pot >60bb, leaving the villian with less than a PSB on the flop and us in position, which sets him up for a flop shove in most cases. And since we miss the flop 2/3rd of the time, and he is shoving the flop the majority of the time, then I think I'm sure we can agree we can't just call preflop.
So that leaves either a 4b or a fold. Well what do you think villian is stacking off here with that we beat? I mean he has pretty much already committed himself, but "unless" he is doing this as a bluff our hand isn't going to fair well against a 4bAI calling range, which is gonna be mainly big pocketpairs, some of which crush us, and others we are a slight dog to. And in the fact that the limp/reraise is weighted heavily towards AA/KK (he CAN still have it), and I think this is a fold. I'm pretty sure I would fold this a majority of the time against an unknown at 50nl/100nl. If I knew the player or had significant stats, or seen him do this, then obviously the chances of me stacking off here increase. But against an unknown, in what is probably a marginal situation, I would fold and save the variance for another time. I think if folding is a mistake here (not convinced yet. Haven't seen the math), then it's a small mistake at worst.
Just my little take on the situation. I'll probably be back later and run some math on this to see how it fairs, and post that up if I get a solid answer.
Also oskar, I know you are convinced you should stack off here (and I'm unsure, but looking for the answer), but posting other hands doesn't really help here. For one a few of the hands you have posted are worthless (hint....You had a 6 and a 3). And just because one player is willing to make this player with a worse hand doesn't show anything and we must realize that (1) this is a different villain, so he has different tendencies. Not all villains are the same. And (2) You saw a worst hand THIS time. His range was still comprised of a lot of hands you didn't want to see. Maybe he lost focus at the time and made this play, maybe he was tilted, or maybe he thought you were making a move. Doesn't mean you are always ahead here. I've stacked off pre-flop with some pretty weird shit at times, but only against specific villains.
And no I'm not advocating to always fold AK preflop when faced with an all-in. But reads, history, stats, help determine whether you do felt or not.
|
|
|
|
MehFU
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 101
|
|
stack off for meta game value. but dont do it a different player does it to you, they will think they have u dominated with AA/KK and do it to meta u.
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MehFU
stack off for meta game value. but dont do it a different player does it to you, they will think they have u dominated with AA/KK and do it to meta u.
|
come again?
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
MehFU
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 101
|
|
riiiight. a short stack limp raises u. its an auto shove.
u have predefined your preflop limp raise shove back "range". because if it comes to showdown everyone on the table will think ur range here is AA/KK/AQ+/QQ ish.
there is the setup for the meta game (a game within a game where prior history has set up the play that the thinking player (your opponenet) is waiting to set up with a limp reraise (hoping you will shove)
10 hands later u get AK in late and 2 limpers. effective stacks are 30 bbs deep.
u raise the limpers 4bbs and the first limper reraises u 15 bbs. heres the science bit:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 36.429% 34.71% 01.72% 367279164 18216528.00 { QQ+, AQs+, AQo+ }
Hand 1: 63.571% 61.85% 01.72% 654491652 18216528.00 { QQ+ }
your range is the top one (u happen to have AK in this case)
so GIVEN the fact that you have reraised AK and SHOVED over the top before. the limp reraise here is +ev because opponents range is ahead of you.
that is an example of meta game is.
the way to combat this is to only raise 4x 2 limpers and shove back with KK+ next time.
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 64.650% 60.76% 03.89% 162302088 10389714.00 { KK+ }
Hand 1: 35.350% 31.46% 03.89% 84037908 10389714.00 { QQ+ }
and there u have it.
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
One more time please.
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
bode
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2006
Location: slow motion
Posts: 4,270
|
|
the level of retardation is off the charts ITT. this is a shove all day. As spenda illustrated, with card removal there are only 3 combo's each of AA/KK and were talking about a 1/2 stacker at 5nl. you are flipping here alot, but your also dominating him a good portion of the time.
|
Quote:
|
eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
|
|
|
MehFU
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 101
|
|
can i just say that card removal theory is total bullshit. relying on the probabilty that a player doesnt have AA or KK just because you have AK has NO BASIS IN REAL WORLD SITUATIONS AT ALL.
im not denying that this is a limp raise reraise is a shove all day against a shorty and its benefits are clear because it sets you up for meta game later. this is the only real use of this move, u dont do it because you think u are best. u do it because it allows players to get it into their head that you over play AK when all you are doing is taking a calculated risk with a short stack in the hope that u can get it in 5-1 favorite later with AA or KK against a big stack. i would say more often than not this shove back move is ev neutral.
|
|
|
|
bode
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2006
Location: slow motion
Posts: 4,270
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MehFU
can i just say that card removal theory is total bullshit. relying on the probabilty that a player doesnt have AA or KK just because you have AK has NO BASIS IN REAL WORLD SITUATIONS AT ALL.
|
you can say that as long as i can say that you have no fucking clue what you're talking about
|
Quote:
|
eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MehFU
can i just say that card removal theory is total bullshit. relying on the probabilty that a player doesnt have AA or KK just because you have AK has NO BASIS IN REAL WORLD SITUATIONS AT ALL.
|
You should consider card removal theory for meta.
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
MehFU
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 101
|
|
just because you have AK it does not follow that a player is less likely to have AA or KK in a PARTICULAR hand.
over all if you were to take a random sample over thousands of hands this would be probabilistically true it does not apply to the real world because the player in the receiving end of a shove has a CHOICE.
if you do not understand this then clearly u play AK like its the nuts.
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MehFU
it does not apply to the real world because the player in the receiving end of a shove has a CHOICE.
|

Let's see how deep the meta-hole goes.
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
MehFU
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 101
|
|
well put.
|
|
|
|
Gefunkt
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MehFU
just because you have AK it does not follow that a player is less likely to have AA or KK in a PARTICULAR hand.
|
Help me out here. I'm new, but this is, after all, the Beginners Circle.
There are 52 cards in the deck. I have two of them. The two cards I have are an ace and a king. So I know for damn sure that of the 50 cards that I do not have, there are three aces and three kings.
Let's say the two cards I have are not an ace and a king. I then know with absolute certainty than there are FOUR aces and FOUR kings in the 50 cards that I cannot see.
I should put some statistics equations right here, but what it boils down to is that 3 < 4, so for a PARTICULAR hand, my knowledge that there are fewer aces and kings available for the other guy to draw means that the probability of him having aces or kings is lower. Right?
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
Xxstacks - I think it's pretty obvious that you have to raise him all-in here. You can't just call and hope to hit the flop.
MeFuh, you are wrong because while he does have a choice - if his range is let's say TT+ then then he is less likely to have AA or KK and more likely to have any of the other hands. He does have a choice, but the pool he's drawing his cards from is different.
|
|
The strengh of a hero is defined by the weakness of his villains.
|
|
MehFU
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 101
|
|
gefunkt. your statement is correct in the long term. and this is why you raise preflop with ace king.
however getting reraised limits the range of hands that a player has. hand runs like this:
u raise AKs late. BB reraises u 12 bbs from ur original 3BB raise.
u have 47 bbs behind. pot is 18 bbs.
u shove.
the BB now has a choice.
if you allow the player to have a choice for a whole stack preflop the player can wait until he has you beat if you respond by shoving AK all day.
this is exactly why you reraise AK because its so +EV however shoving 50ish bbs is -EV because only hands that are better are calling you.
probability goes straight out of the window when a player has the cards in his hand at that moment.
|
|
|
|
MehFU
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 101
|
|
oskar
HES NOT DRAWING CARDS HE HAS THEM IN HIS HAND AND HE DREW THE CARDS BEFORE YOU.
do dumb.
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 37.815% 37.53% 00.29% 246749928 1891224.00 { AKs, AKo }
Hand 1: 62.185% 61.90% 00.29% 406992360 1891224.00 { TT+ }
........ if his range is TT+ then he is winning your money.
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
Gefunkt, the odds of drawing Aces OR Kings if we have none of them are 8/50 x 3/49. With us having AK the odds are 6/50 x 2/49
Or pretty exactly half as likely.
|
|
The strengh of a hero is defined by the weakness of his villains.
|