Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

KQ - a tricky starting hand?

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
biondino
Old 03-13-2006, 02:53 PM     Post subject: KQ - a tricky starting hand? #1 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
Posts: 3,170
biondino
Send a message via AIM to biondino Send a message via MSN to biondino
I know it's hard to define value of a pre-flop hand, but I'm struggling at the moment to know how to play KQ, KJ and QJ, especially the former (the latter two I will lay down out of position or facing a raise, unless they are suited and I have good reason for wanting to see a flop).

KQ is dominated by AK and AQ, so does this mean it's as strong as AJ? or is it weaker as it doesn't have the high card potential, or is it stronger because the straight potential is higher? In what circumstances would people fold KQ? What difference does it being suited make?

Contriubtions gratefully received!
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
Renton
Old 03-13-2006, 02:59 PM #2 (permalink)  
Renton's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
Renton will become famous soon enough
I love KQ.

It never gives me any trouble. You just have to play it carefully. With KQo, I fold in EP (I open call with KQs, it's just me), and in any other position, I fold if there's a raise before me, and I raise if it's folded around to me. From there on I play it exactly as I would AK.

In poker tracker KQ is one of my most profitable hands, and I generally can sense when I am being dominated by AQ and AK, so I very rarely lose big pots with this hand (I rarely win big pots either. It's just not that kinda hand).
Reply With Quote
Pelion
Old 03-13-2006, 03:46 PM #3 (permalink)  
Pelion's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,206
Pelion
"KQ Rules in the land of the unraised pot" - some guy.

I play it exactly like renton and it doesnt seem to be causing too many problems.
gabe: Ive dropped almost 100k in the past 35 days.

bigspenda73: But how much did you win?
 
Reply With Quote
r8ed
Old 03-13-2006, 04:03 PM #4 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,524
r8ed
KQ is a strong hand. At a minimum call in EP. As you move up in limits you should probably play it more aggressively. I raise it up in any position, same with AJ on most tables. Coherent opponents will be able to put you on a hand easier if you play it too passively pre and post flop.
Reply With Quote
Renton
Old 03-13-2006, 04:05 PM #5 (permalink)  
Renton's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
Renton will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by r8ed
KQ is a strong hand. At a minimum call in EP. As you move up in limits you should probably play it more aggressively. I raise it up in any position, same with AJ on most tables. Coherent opponents will be able to put you on a hand easier if you play it too passively pre and post flop.
ya I probably shoulda mentioned that I play 25nl where its ok to play so few hands.
Reply With Quote
BankItDrew
Old 03-13-2006, 05:26 PM #6 (permalink)  
BankItDrew's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Losing Prop Bets
Posts: 2,789
BankItDrew will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renton
You just have to play it carefully. With KQo, I fold in EP (I open call with KQs, it's just me), and in any other position, I fold if there's a raise before me, and I raise if it's folded around to me. From there on I play it exactly as I would AK.
I play it the same way. I figure if I hit a K or Q high flop, I'm winning. If not, I'm not. Who doesn't love KQsuited? It's so beautiful. Like the so so girl at the bar that looks great through your beer goggles, just don't go too far with her (time).


Girlfriend:
Why are the werewolves more important than living life?!

Girlfriend:
Are you on the forums doing the werewolves again?

Girlfriend:
Soo... you forgot to run that errand, but you had time to werewolf? Wtf?
 
Reply With Quote
Miffed22001
Old 03-13-2006, 05:43 PM #7 (permalink)  
Miffed22001's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
Miffed22001 is on a distinguished road
raise it first up provided your position isnt awful
dump if its raised, unless raiser is horrible
Reply With Quote
dpe8598
Old 03-14-2006, 03:04 PM     Post subject: raising w/ KQ #8 (permalink)  
dpe8598's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 261
dpe8598
Personally, I never raise w/ KQ suited. I would rather raise w/ 89 suited than KQ suited for obvious reasons. Then again, at 25 you might actually get some callers w/ Kj or K10, so its a bit more viable, but no better than just calling in my opinion.
Reply With Quote
Renton
Old 03-14-2006, 03:08 PM     Post subject: Re: raising w/ KQ #9 (permalink)  
Renton's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
Renton will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpe8598
Personally, I never raise w/ KQ suited. I would rather raise w/ 89 suited than KQ suited for obvious reasons. Then again, at 25 you might actually get some callers w/ Kj or K10, so its a bit more viable, but no better than just calling in my opinion.
Raising with KQs commonly gets called by AJ+, KQ, any pair, and occasional suited connectors.

You are only dominated by four of these hands. You have the better end of a coinflip against pairs (remember suited/connecting overs are a favorite to pairs). On top of that, a strong c-bet usually knocks out most of the pairs.

If you aren't raising with KQs then you have a leak, IMO. Just don't expect to call any raises and you should be fine with it.
Reply With Quote
dpe8598
Old 03-14-2006, 03:23 PM #10 (permalink)  
dpe8598's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 261
dpe8598
I disagree completely, of course it depends 100% on the tables you are playing. I play relatively tight tables and a raise and C-bet w/ a couple of big cards like KQ is extremely transparent and a -ev play. W/ KQ you are either taking down a small pot w/ top pair or w/ a c-bet. You are also losing big pots against 2 pair or better or AQ or AK.

But you might ask, what about when you hit a big hand like a flush or straight w/ this hand? Well, in this case why do you want to raise preflop and thin the field? I play KQ like it is, a drawing hand. Limp in and hope for a big hand. If you hit top pair, bet small and hope to take down a moderate pot, if someone comes at you hard get out. Personally, I think this is the best way to play KW. At lower limits you can play this like a big hand and get paid off against people that call freely preflop but fold easy post flop. But you could have pulled this move w/ any 2 cards!

There are always exceptions though, I personally like to raise w/ this hand when the entire table folds to me and I'm up against 1 or 2 players.
Reply With Quote
Renton
Old 03-14-2006, 03:45 PM #11 (permalink)  
Renton's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
Renton will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpe8598
I disagree completely, of course it depends 100% on the tables you are playing. I play relatively tight tables and a raise and C-bet w/ a couple of big cards like KQ is extremely transparent and a -ev play. W/ KQ you are either taking down a small pot w/ top pair or w/ a c-bet. You are also losing big pots against 2 pair or better or AQ or AK.

But you might ask, what about when you hit a big hand like a flush or straight w/ this hand? Well, in this case why do you want to raise preflop and thin the field? I play KQ like it is, a drawing hand. Limp in and hope for a big hand. If you hit top pair, bet small and hope to take down a moderate pot, if someone comes at you hard get out. Personally, I think this is the best way to play KW. At lower limits you can play this like a big hand and get paid off against people that call freely preflop but fold easy post flop. But you could have pulled this move w/ any 2 cards!

There are always exceptions though, I personally like to raise w/ this hand when the entire table folds to me and I'm up against 1 or 2 players.
I suppose it depends on what you mean by lower limits.

I play 25nl and 50nl, and over 20k hands KQ is just as profitable as AK for me. If you have the postflop sense to know when you are dominated, then you can do some real damage with this hand. You just have to understand that you are a 40/60 underdog to any Ace and you're dominated by AK/AQ/AA/KK. Once you get over that its smooth sailing.

You must only raise with QQ+ AQ+, I am attempting to deduce from what you have wrote. This is a safe strategy, but if you're playing against me, and PAHud tells me you're PFR% is 3.5, and you raise preflop, I am folding just about anything other than AK and KK+. Raising with hands like KQs allow you to smear that tight image a little bit, so you don't get all folds when you catch a great hand.
Reply With Quote
dpe8598
Old 03-14-2006, 04:00 PM #12 (permalink)  
dpe8598's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 261
dpe8598
Those are precisely the blinds im talking about. There you can raise w/ KQ and it is profitable. At 50/1 to 2/4 it is an entirely diff story.

With respect to what I raise with, I will raise w/ anything. I raise w/ AQ pretty frequently, but not always. I will also occasionally limp w/ AK. On the other hand, I will raise w/ a variety of other hands like 66 - AA and a lot of suited connectors. You can build a loose image faster by raising w 24os and then buying a pot and showing than by raising w/ a variety of face cards, trust me.

Overall, I have found it tremendously more profitable to play aggressive post flop as compared to preflop. If you are thinking about moving up levels, take this advice! Usually, when you raise preflop and then c-bet, players are just thinking about ways that that hand DIDNT hit your hand and they are trying to put you on a c-bet. On the contrary, when you call a bet and then bluff, players are trying to see how the hand did hit you. This wasnt true about a year and a half ago and still isnt true at some of the lower levels, but is becoming more prevalent. Players are just wising up to the raise and c-bet (which actually helps when you do hit your hand and makes it more profitable to avoid slow playing and represent a buy).

I've actually found it to be more profitable to raise. Check and then raise huge on the turn representing a slow play. This is the "new" c-bet. Sure you are vulnerable to the extra card, but you are representing a tremendously stronger hand than the regular c-bet.
Reply With Quote
Miffed22001
Old 03-14-2006, 04:05 PM #13 (permalink)  
Miffed22001's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
Miffed22001 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
I disagree completely, of course it depends 100% on the tables you are playing. I play relatively tight tables and a raise and C-bet w/ a couple of big cards like KQ is extremely transparent and a -ev play. W/ KQ you are either taking down a small pot w/ top pair or w/ a c-bet. You are also losing big pots against 2 pair or better or AQ or AK.

But you might ask, what about when you hit a big hand like a flush or straight w/ this hand? Well, in this case why do you want to raise preflop and thin the field? I play KQ like it is, a drawing hand. Limp in and hope for a big hand. If you hit top pair, bet small and hope to take down a moderate pot, if someone comes at you hard get out. Personally, I think this is the best way to play KW. At lower limits you can play this like a big hand and get paid off against people that call freely preflop but fold easy post flop. But you could have pulled this move w/ any 2 cards!

There are always exceptions though, I personally like to raise w/ this hand when the entire table folds to me and I'm up against 1 or 2 players.
1. KQ/KQs isnt a drawing hand. In position it is a strong hand. Out of position it is a dangerous hand if not played properly.
2. If you play tight tables then why arent you raising KQ? you should effectivly be raising both 89s and KQs and c-betting to take take down a number of small pots repetitivly. On a tight table your raisng rnge should be wider as opps will not call beyond the flop even preflop at times without a hand. Thus your fold quity with any two is so much higher. You arent trying to out camp a camping table. Your trying to pray on their weaknesses.
3. C-beting forces opps into a decision, no matter what they have. Checking does not force them into decisions or makes their decision far easier. Put pressure on opps to play poker.
4.Ifyou are scared of AQ/AK then you arent noticing the sign of being beat or arent controlling you pot very well. Top pair isnt a license to print money but if you are raising KQ in position then if a player behind you has a better hand thats tough luck! It happens. Utilise position more than thinking about 'what if'
5. If you arent getting paid with top pair by more moderate hands then you arent playing enough hands imo to encourage action
6. You need to understand the dynamics of a tight table and c-betting.
A tight table wont like someone who raises every third hand, they WILL get pissed eventually and you start getting policed. Also, c-betting when your range is wide forces opps to start playing their hands. Show them your hand range is wide and dont check when you OBVIOUSLY hit nothing BET! Then if you raised 89s and not KQs and hit trip nines on the flop but bet anyway opp has to decipher the strength of your hand. If you dont ever ask opponents to make decisions, they wont make BAD ones when you put pressure on them.
Reply With Quote
Renton
Old 03-14-2006, 04:09 PM #14 (permalink)  
Renton's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
Renton will become famous soon enough
the only time I play KQs as a drawing hand is when a player who always habitually minbets preflop with AA does his thing. Then I will call his bet a hope to flop trips, twopair, straight or flush. But people at the limits you guys play probably aren't dumb enough to minbet AA preflop.
Reply With Quote
Miffed22001
Old 03-14-2006, 04:12 PM #15 (permalink)  
Miffed22001's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
Miffed22001 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renton
the only time I play KQs as a drawing hand is when a player who always habitually minbets preflop with AA does his thing. Then I will call his bet a hope to flop trips, twopair, straight or flush. But people at the limits you guys play probably aren't dumb enough to minbet AA preflop.
now there you would be very much mistaken
Reply With Quote
Renton
Old 03-14-2006, 04:14 PM #16 (permalink)  
Renton's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
Renton will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renton
the only time I play KQs as a drawing hand is when a player who always habitually minbets preflop with AA does his thing. Then I will call his bet a hope to flop trips, twopair, straight or flush. But people at the limits you guys play probably aren't dumb enough to minbet AA preflop.
now there you would be very much mistaken
mistaken for making this play against minbetters?

or mistaken that there aren't people that play that dumb @ 2/4?
Reply With Quote
Miffed22001
Old 03-14-2006, 04:39 PM #17 (permalink)  
Miffed22001's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
Miffed22001 is on a distinguished road
the second option
the first isnt that bad...
Reply With Quote
dpe8598
Old 03-14-2006, 04:52 PM #18 (permalink)  
dpe8598's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 261
dpe8598
Hi Miffen, very good post w/ 6 important points. These are good points for someone who is looking to play good solid poker. However, this style of play is not the MOST successful for me at the tables I play.

First, understand that when I say the tables I play are tight, I don't mean the players are pushovers. I mean they are playing near the exact brand of poker you are playing. Of course, there is a lot of variation, but they are trying to play solid poker. This is because these are players that have beat the 25 and 50 tables and are looking to keep this up.

Because of this, the typical preflop raise w/ big cards and c-bet, even in position, is a very transparent play. This is why for this particular hand I'm looking to take down moderate pots w/ top pair and draw to big pots, against more players, with straight or flush.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 03-14-2006, 05:41 PM #19 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
The trick with KQ is understanding that it's a 3-card hand.

It gets me in trouble in limit because there are times where I can check behind Ax and be good, but KQ forces me to fire the last barrel. Not so much of an issue in NLHE.

As far as pre-flop goes, my starting hands look something like this:

AA
KK
QQ
JJ-66
55-22
AK
Other stuff I'll play sometimes.
 
Reply With Quote
Renton
Old 03-14-2006, 05:45 PM #20 (permalink)  
Renton's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
Renton will become famous soon enough
Fnord I thought you had a fairly loose game, a la 20-22 vpip. Not true?
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 03-14-2006, 05:50 PM #21 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renton
Fnord I thought you had a fairly loose game, a la 20-22 vpip. Not true?
That has less to do with my previous post than you probably think.
 
Reply With Quote
dpe8598
Old 03-14-2006, 05:50 PM #22 (permalink)  
dpe8598's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 261
dpe8598
Fnord, my starting raising hands are pretty much just like yours. Of course throw in that I will also limp and limp raise with any of those hands. Finally, I will also raise w/ any other 2 cards on rare occasions, but I only do this to build image or against specific players.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 03-14-2006, 05:52 PM #23 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpe8598
Finally, I will also raise w/ any other 2 cards on rare occasions.
I like to play hands that might flop something worth playing. Kinda hurts your chances when you start with air and are slim to none to get much better.
 
Reply With Quote
dpe8598
Old 03-14-2006, 06:03 PM #24 (permalink)  
dpe8598's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 261
dpe8598
Agreed, which is why those are rare occasions eg., an unusual table with push overs post flop or I'm sure that a loose image will pay me off at that table.

Then again, you can always go to another table.
Reply With Quote
r8ed
Old 03-14-2006, 08:37 PM #25 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,524
r8ed
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
The trick with KQ is understanding that it's a 3-card hand.

It gets me in trouble in limit because there are times where I can check behind Ax and be good, but KQ forces me to fire the last barrel. Not so much of an issue in NLHE.

As far as pre-flop goes, my starting hands look something like this:

AA
KK
QQ
JJ-66
55-22
AK
Other stuff I'll play often when in position and/or in isolation against a poor player
FYP
Reply With Quote
Lukie
Old 03-14-2006, 09:07 PM #26 (permalink)  
Lukie's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
Lukie is on a distinguished road
My thoughts on KQo:

easily dominated
worse then AJo
often unplayable
automuck to a preflop raise

but

often good enough to play, particularly opening from MP on. My tight image helps tremendously. I don't like getting action with this hand.

vpip over last 30k+ hands with KQo is under 50%

KQs:

severely overrated by many, but definately more playable then KQo under many situations. Suitedness doesn't help as much as the AJs/AQs type hands. I certainly think Fnord overvalues this hand.

I dunno, but saying KQ plays like AK is just absurd. It doesn't.
Reply With Quote
Lukie
Old 03-14-2006, 09:12 PM #27 (permalink)  
Lukie's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
Lukie is on a distinguished road
KJo and QJo are generally just useless trash. What are you looking to hit with these hands? Can they withstand any pressure postflop, even when they hit??
Reply With Quote
Lukie
Old 03-14-2006, 09:14 PM #28 (permalink)  
Lukie's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
Lukie is on a distinguished road
Fnord,

you're right. I most certainly am a nit.
Reply With Quote
Lukie
Old 03-14-2006, 09:15 PM #29 (permalink)  
Lukie's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
Lukie is on a distinguished road
For the record, all written above is assuming full ring games.
Reply With Quote
Miffed22001
Old 03-14-2006, 11:24 PM #30 (permalink)  
Miffed22001's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
Miffed22001 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by lukie
For the record, all written above is assuming full ring games.


[/quote='lukie']

good job u stated this.

Quote:
KJo and QJo are generally just useless trash. What are you looking to hit with these hands? Can they withstand any pressure postflop, even when they hit??
Isnt this why we raise in poition when the texture of the specific hand suggests so?

Quote:
I certainly think Fnord overvalues this hand.
Im not going to agree to this either....
i think thats multitabling fever though...
Reply With Quote
Renton
Old 03-15-2006, 12:15 AM #31 (permalink)  
Renton's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
Renton will become famous soon enough
I didn't say it plays exactly like AK

I said it plays exactly like AK postflop. Obviously KQ can't stand any pressure preflop. Obviously you can't call a shorty's all-in with KQ. Obviously you shouldn't raise with KQ UTG. But once you get past preflop, it generally plays similarly.
Reply With Quote
Lukie
Old 03-15-2006, 04:14 AM #32 (permalink)  
Lukie's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
Lukie is on a distinguished road
I really disagree.
Reply With Quote
dpe8598
Old 03-15-2006, 07:50 PM #33 (permalink)  
dpe8598's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 261
dpe8598
The primary problem w/ raising w/ KQ is that you are narrowing the field to a few choice hands that either have you beaten or dominated. Even the other newby donk hand to over play (AJ) has KQ beaten preflop. That doesnt mean you can't play it or throw in a raise w/ top pair, but you most certainly have to play this top pair differently post flop than top pair w/ AK. AK cannot be outkicked, period. Big difference.
Reply With Quote
jackvance
Old 03-16-2006, 11:54 AM #34 (permalink)  
jackvance's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,910
jackvance is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
1. KQ/KQs isnt a drawing hand. In position it is a strong hand. Out of position it is a dangerous hand if not played properly.
2. If you play tight tables then why arent you raising KQ? you should effectivly be raising both 89s and KQs and c-betting to take take down a number of small pots repetitivly. On a tight table your raisng rnge should be wider as opps will not call beyond the flop even preflop at times without a hand. Thus your fold quity with any two is so much higher. You arent trying to out camp a camping table. Your trying to pray on their weaknesses.
3. C-beting forces opps into a decision, no matter what they have. Checking does not force them into decisions or makes their decision far easier. Put pressure on opps to play poker.
4.Ifyou are scared of AQ/AK then you arent noticing the sign of being beat or arent controlling you pot very well. Top pair isnt a license to print money but if you are raising KQ in position then if a player behind you has a better hand thats tough luck! It happens. Utilise position more than thinking about 'what if'
5. If you arent getting paid with top pair by more moderate hands then you arent playing enough hands imo to encourage action
6. You need to understand the dynamics of a tight table and c-betting.
A tight table wont like someone who raises every third hand, they WILL get pissed eventually and you start getting policed. Also, c-betting when your range is wide forces opps to start playing their hands. Show them your hand range is wide and dont check when you OBVIOUSLY hit nothing BET! Then if you raised 89s and not KQs and hit trip nines on the flop but bet anyway opp has to decipher the strength of your hand. If you dont ever ask opponents to make decisions, they wont make BAD ones when you put pressure on them.
Thanks man, this is a very helpful post for me.

I'm still in the process of trying to figure out how to wait for my good hands, but at the same time not appear too tight, because then when they come everyone will fold.

Just one question, if I may: calling with something like 89s.. most of the time you will get nothing, so is it profitable in the long run to autobet this one postflop? What I mean is.. are you going to lose money on this hand to appear 'loose' to get money off of good hands.. or can you actually make money off of this hand alone, because opps will drop out if they have nothing (pot steal)?
Reply With Quote
Pelion
Old 03-16-2006, 12:04 PM #35 (permalink)  
Pelion's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,206
Pelion
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackvance
I'm still in the process of trying to figure out how to wait for my good hands, but at the same time not appear too tight, because then when they come everyone will fold.
What stakes are you playing? If you are a t reasonably low stakes then dont worry about it. Sure the good players will notice you are tight, but you arent generally going to be taking alot of money from them anyway. Poor players dont seem to notice anyway. If you find yourself playing on tables where everyone folds then change tables (or just start stealing every other hand until they are forced to l0osen up).
gabe: Ive dropped almost 100k in the past 35 days.

bigspenda73: But how much did you win?
 
Reply With Quote
jackvance
Old 03-16-2006, 02:05 PM #36 (permalink)  
jackvance's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,910
jackvance is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pelion
What stakes are you playing? If you are a t reasonably low stakes then dont worry about it. Sure the good players will notice you are tight, but you arent generally going to be taking alot of money from them anyway. Poor players dont seem to notice anyway. If you find yourself playing on tables where everyone folds then change tables (or just start stealing every other hand until they are forced to l0osen up).
I played at lowest stakes ($0.05/0.10). Tripled my money up to $30 pretty quickly. Then I really should have left, cashed in my money and started again at $10 another table. But I got this thing over me like "what a bunch of idiots".. so I stuck around and somehow this "overconfidence" stooped me down to their level and I started playing the crappiest hands possible "because maybe I get lucky". Then I proceeded to lose all my winnings in betting against a reraise of a passive player.. yeah, really stupid.

So I collected my wits, and slowly crept up again, stealing pots etc, up to $18. Then the same thing happened again and I started to play like a complete idiot again. Kept playing and ended the night with like a $4 net loss.

Damn I have some major leak in my game, in the psychology department.. so now I made a checklist of common "thoughts" (like "I got gotta get THIS GUY's money") and play-styles (calling a lot) that signify I'm losing it and should refocus. Hope this'll help me in the future.
Reply With Quote
dpe8598
Old 03-16-2006, 04:15 PM #37 (permalink)  
dpe8598's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 261
dpe8598
Jack, you are also much too concerned about specific sessions, like "I went up so I must have been playing well" and then, I lose money so "I must have been playing badly". At your level, just play good solid poker with ZERO exceptions. Then, don't worry about the wins and losses for particular sessions. Keep telling yourself, "I am playing solid poker, I WILL win money in the long run".
Reply With Quote
jackvance
Old 03-16-2006, 04:39 PM #38 (permalink)  
jackvance's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,910
jackvance is an unknown quantity at this point
Well, you are right ofcourse, but I'm too new to be able to convincingly tell myself I have to play "my game".. 8 days ago I played my first NLHE game ever, so I don't have much to go on yet. Yesterday played my first session for real money, $5 loss. Today again, $5 loss. But the previous MTT where I landed just outside ITM had really worn me out.. probably shoulda rested before going at it again, but it's so much fun you know

I put $60 (now $50 left) in my account and am totally willing to let this all go in the sense to learn the game.

In MTT I have already a slight bit of an idea of what my game is.. in ring games not yet. Takes time I guess..
Reply With Quote
Renton
Old 03-16-2006, 04:46 PM #39 (permalink)  
Renton's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
Renton will become famous soon enough
Playing massive amounts of full ring hands will fine tune your ABC poker ability, that is, how to play under optimal conditions:

1. Fairly equal and deep effective stacks (100bb)
2. Full tables (9-10 players)
3. Predictable play.
4. Tight play reigns.

It will also boost your bankroll in a much less swingy way as opposed to MTT's. Once you master the low level ring games, you should have no problem excelling in the first levels of tourney play. After that, however, is when loosening up and being aggressive needs to happen.
Reply With Quote
jackvance
Old 03-16-2006, 04:53 PM #40 (permalink)  
jackvance's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,910
jackvance is an unknown quantity at this point
I've been playing ring games at the 6-tables max now. (there a lot more of them where I play, as opposed to only a handful of 10-seaters if I recall correctly)

Problem with this tight play is.. however bad these players might be, they do know the basics of keeping track.. if I play very little hands, they seem to fold whenever I do make a stand. Even a small raise. So yeah, then I can steal a pot with a bit of aggression, but then I'm not playing tight anymore you know.

But I really shouldn't jump to conclusion, I was too out of it, couldn't focus anymore after the MTT. I think I'm gonna do something else now and call it a day.
Reply With Quote
Renton
Old 03-16-2006, 04:54 PM #41 (permalink)  
Renton's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
Renton will become famous soon enough
do NOT play 6-max, until you get better.

Play full ring. You can't play tight in 6-max. Its much more difficult for a tight player to excel in 6-max IMO.
Reply With Quote
siknd
Old 03-16-2006, 11:26 PM #42 (permalink)  
siknd's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 359
siknd
heres a KQ played oop, that i treated like AK once i saw the pf action. thots?

i wanted him to bluff at the end, i was certain i was holding the best hand.

#Game No : 3757530990
***** Hand History for Game 3757530990 *****
$100 NL Texas Hold'em - Thursday, March 16, 19:15:55 ET 2006
Table Carpe Diem (No DP) (Real Money)
Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: roybo680 ( $122.65 )
Seat 3: Marmitekite ( $125 )
Seat 4: cityfox ( $121.44 )
Seat 5: bmb013 ( $94.25 )
Seat 7: torpeda ( $97.55 )
Seat 8: TonsKGB ( $79.75 )
Seat 6: siknd ( $135.13 )
Seat 10: takechan ( $79 )
Seat 9: luckychuck21 ( $34.06 )
cityfox posts small blind [$0.50].
bmb013 posts big blind [$1].
TonsKGB posts big blind + dead [$1.50].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to siknd [ Ks Qd ]
siknd calls [$1].
torpeda folds.
TonsKGB folds.
luckychuck21 calls [$1].
takechan folds.
Marmitekite folds.
cityfox calls [$0.50].
bmb013 checks.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 6s, 7c, Kc ]
cityfox checks.
bmb013 checks.
>You have options at Table 96972 Table!.
siknd bets [$5].
>You have options at Table 97503 (No DP) Table!.
luckychuck21 calls [$5].
cityfox folds.
bmb013 folds.
** Dealing Turn ** [ 7h ]
siknd bets [$7].
luckychuck21 calls [$7].
** Dealing River ** [ 5h ]
siknd checks.
luckychuck21 bets [$17].
joeleves has joined the table.
siknd calls [$17].
luckychuck21 shows [ Kh, Jd ] two pairs, kings and sevens.
siknd shows [ Ks, Qd ] two pairs, kings and sevens.
siknd wins $60.50 from the main pot with two pairs, kings and sevens with queen kicker.
'If you think a weakness can be turned into a strength, I hate to tell you this, but that's another weakness. '
 
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 03-16-2006, 11:30 PM #43 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
For what it's worth,

I fold pf, sometimes check the flop but often pot it, $10 on the turn, river plays the same.
 
Reply With Quote
Lukie
Old 03-16-2006, 11:34 PM #44 (permalink)  
Lukie's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
Lukie is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renton
do NOT play 6-max, until you get better.

Play full ring. You can't play tight in 6-max. Its much more difficult for a tight player to excel in 6-max IMO.
I tend to think that new players should play both full and short-handed games to

a) get better at both, what happens when a few people leave your full-ring table? It effectively becomes a 6-max game...
b) figure out what you like most

I am also of the opinion that tight play can be extremely effective at 6-max. I think lagg/maniac play is severely overrated by many (most?) players in shorthanded games. I understand that you can't play as tight as full ring and still be profitable in short-handed games.
Reply With Quote
Lukie
Old 03-16-2006, 11:36 PM #45 (permalink)  
Lukie's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
Lukie is on a distinguished road
Miffed,

KQ isn't a drawing hand? If it isn't a drawing hand, isn't it a made hand? Does king-high win a lot of pots at showdown?
Reply With Quote
siknd
Old 03-16-2006, 11:42 PM #46 (permalink)  
siknd's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 359
siknd
but then, heres another where i couldnt take advantage of a small edge. i was pretty certain that there was a good chance opp only held the ace of clubs, but it wasnt worth it to me to find out. considering small pot, i wanted a bigger edge.

#Game No : 3757548558
***** Hand History for Game 3757548558 *****
$100 NL Texas Hold'em - Thursday, March 16, 19:18:09 ET 2006
Table Table 97503 (No DP) (Real Money)
Seat 9 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: siknd ( $99.60 )
Seat 5: naylor09 ( $45.58 )
Seat 3: racecarralf ( $82.79 )
Seat 6: nitro17 ( $31.82 )
Seat 7: SP_73 ( $43.20 )
Seat 10: ptcruze ( $100.95 )
Seat 9: Eagle7_9 ( $97 )
Seat 2: bubba0077 ( $96.30 )
Seat 4: ButlersPimp ( $42.30 )
Seat 8: GAMBLEON13 ( $22.20 )
ptcruze posts small blind [$0.50].
siknd posts big blind [$1].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to siknd [ Qd Ks ]
bubba0077 folds.
racecarralf folds.
ButlersPimp raises [$4].
nitro17 folds.
SP_73 calls [$4].
GAMBLEON13 folds.
Eagle7_9 folds.
ptcruze folds.
siknd calls [$3].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 3c, 5c, Kc ]
siknd checks.
ButlersPimp is all-In [$38.30]
SP_73 folds.
siknd folds.
ButlersPimp shows [ Qc, Ad ] high card ace.
ButlersPimp wins $50.20 from the main pot with high card ace.
>You have options at Carpe Diem (No DP) Table!.
Game #3757557390 starts.

anyhow, ill stop cluttering up this thread
'If you think a weakness can be turned into a strength, I hate to tell you this, but that's another weakness. '
 
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 03-16-2006, 11:47 PM #47 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Given the effective stack size, I don't like the fold.
 
Reply With Quote
Miffed22001
Old 03-17-2006, 01:18 AM #48 (permalink)  
Miffed22001's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
Miffed22001 is on a distinguished road
ok
Kq doesnt play like AK preflop. AK has a lot of fold equity preflop, or at least against reasonable players if we decide to reraise it.
Post flop KQ plays similar to AK, it makes tpgk.
Lets be honest, you shouldnt be going bust on tpgk (KQ) so why the heck are we bothered about being dominated by AK or AQ? If KQ gets raised when we have a good hand then its pretty much as useless as AK/AQ is on tpgk. We dont want pot escalation with tp at any point, so why is KQ different from AK or AQ post flop?
I dont see the arguement that OMG we might be dominated.
If you are raising in position *repeat* in position then if someone behind holds AK/AQ then were going to lose money. Its that simple. We wont be playing huge pots with tp/gk anyway, so why are we bothered about about being outkicked when in position? Thats almost the same as saying why are we raising with AQ and then betting top pair when someone might catch two pair on us?
Allowing a lot of limpers onto a tpgk type hand isnt great imo. We want to play short small pots where we raise preflop and rep the flop, no matter what cards flop.
AK also normally reraises preflop giving us a clear indication KQ is useless preflop (again, there is temptation to call a reraise perhaps with KQs, but im not convinced as im not in the same circumstance with AQs etc)
In 6 max if someone limps utg or utg+1 are they really limping AQ/AK? For a limp reraise perhaps? thats play that will get you burnt when late position players raise pps and start attacking you post flop when they dont buy it.

so, if were playing KQ its for a raise. We arent getting involved in someone elses raised pot. THEN we would face domination problems and the arguement about KQ as trash is acceptable. Instead, We want KQ up against a small field post flop after a preflop raise to thin the field. We also look to c-bet where applicable. ok checking at times is fine too but not every time. Afterall were looking for confusion on opps part. Are we checking AA or missed overs? At 200nl the same aplies as at 100nl and 50nl. C-betting is effective when used as a tactic, not as an automatic reaction.
So why are we making an exception of KQ? if we do then I'll make the same arguement for AQ. I dont reraise AK always preflop bcoz i dont like too. therefore AQ is in the smae boat as KQ isnt it?
This arguement makes little sense to me because we arent considering the position aspect of this hand. We dont raise utg with KQ, its debateable if we even call. Thus only in position do we raise and then we should be quite clear that were acting on everybody else information, they dont want to raise their hand preflop.
we just seem to be forgetting that in position we can raise a wide range of hands because our hand is much stronger thus. If people are limping AQ/AK in 6max or full ring then wtf. I want to play against such players coz my sooted trash and pps are getting such cheap outdraw odds its dumb.
Reply With Quote
Renton
Old 03-17-2006, 02:44 AM #49 (permalink)  
Renton's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
Renton will become famous soon enough
Hehe I love how biondino started this thread and hasn't posted anything on here since. He probably didn't expect it to be the State v. KQ trial.
Reply With Quote
Genitruc
Old 03-17-2006, 03:27 AM #50 (permalink)  
Genitruc's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,463
Genitruc is an unknown quantity at this point
lol Renton (State vs. KQ).

IMO a great, great thread. I'm still pretty new to the forum but I think that players who are new to the game and easily frustrated by the answer "it depends" should check out this thread.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:31 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.