|
mieczkowusc
|
11-27-2008, 03:04 PM
Post subject: KK's versus unknown villain on a bad board
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lurking in BC or IRC
Posts: 225
|
|
Villain hadn't been involved in a hand in two orbits. Was this a smart move, or did he get the best of me?
Looking back at it, I don't like the call. If I would have done anything differently, I probably would have shoved over the raise, but something didn't feel right. An UTG limp felt like a pocket pair and for a player who hadn't seen a flop in a while, to come out betting was a red flag.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.02 BB (7 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
Button ($3.13)
Hero (SB) ($3.32)
BB ($5.59)
UTG ($2.01)
MP1 ($7.52)
MP2 ($2.86)
CO ($3.10)
Preflop: Hero is SB with K , K
UTG calls $0.02, 4 folds, Hero raises to $0.10, 1 fold, UTG calls $0.08
Flop: ($0.22) 4 , 7 , 6 (2 players)
Hero bets $0.20, UTG raises to $0.44, Hero calls $0.24
Turn: ($1.10) 9 (2 players)
Hero checks, UTG bets $1.05, Hero ?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
He might as well have TT,QQ, JJ.
I'm not thrilled with the hand, but I go broke on the flop.
Board: 4d 7d 6s
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 55.112% 53.60% 01.52% 17510 495.00 { KcKd }
Hand 1: 44.888% 43.37% 01.52% 14170 495.00 { AA, QQ-TT, 77-66, 44 }
And his range is likely to be wider than that.
Without reads - even if you had any significant stats - you don't know things like: can he get away from AK high? Does he defend c-bets? Does he raise on flush draws? Does he limp-call sc's?
|
|
|
|
mieczkowusc
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lurking in BC or IRC
Posts: 225
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by oskar
He might as well have TT,QQ, JJ.
I'm not thrilled with the hand, but I go broke on the flop.
Board: 4d 7d 6s
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 55.112% 53.60% 01.52% 17510 495.00 { KcKd }
Hand 1: 44.888% 43.37% 01.52% 14170 495.00 { AA, QQ-TT, 77-66, 44 }
And his range is likely to be wider than that.
Without reads - even if you had any significant stats - you don't know things like: can he get away from AK high? Does he defend c-bets? Does he raise on flush draws? Does he limp-call sc's?
|
I figured that the shove over on the flop was probably the best play. I really need to start using PokerStove, but I am limited by having an older mac that can't run windows.
Looks like a missed opportunity then. Thanks for the stove numbers
|
|
|
|
HarleyGuy13
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,226
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by oskar
He might as well have TT,QQ, JJ.
I'm not thrilled with the hand, but I go broke on the flop.
|
Pretty much same. I would lean to think he may be with one of the three and impatient wanting to play a hand.
|
|
|
|
AFchung
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UCLA
Posts: 1,179
|
|
i go broke on this flop too. looks like a set though
Quote:
|
He might as well have TT,QQ, JJ.
|
do those hands open limp-call ? probably not
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
Absolutely they do.

Of course, he could have a couple of connectors with pair+draw too.
|
|
The strengh of a hero is defined by the weakness of his villains.
|
|
sarbox68
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: wondering where the 3 extra chairs at my 6max table came from
Posts: 871
|
|
Yeah... you're going broke on this one, as there's a string of overpairs that he could play the same way. I would prolly 3-bet or push over the flop, esp with the draw on the board at these levels. If it's a set or some kinda flopped two pair (altho connectors might be a bit less likely for a maybe tight player opening under the gun...) then meh... nh and move on to the next. You can't run the risk of seeing sets everywhere when you get played back at at these levels. People will get aggressive with a lot worse hands than that.
|
|
|
|
Robb
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,072
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sarbox68
Yeah... you're going broke on this one, as there's a string of overpairs that he could play the same way. I would prolly 3-bet or push over the flop, esp with the draw on the board at these levels. If it's a set or some kinda flopped two pair (altho connectors might be a bit less likely for a maybe tight player opening under the gun...) then meh... nh and move on to the next. You can't run the risk of seeing sets everywhere when you get played back at at these levels. People will get aggressive with a lot worse hands than that.
|
^^^this
I'll just add that you're typical TAGG can't lay down QQ or JJ type hands here, and a lot of folks will play like this with small pp's + SD (55 is OESD, 88 is gutshot). Sure, it's a set sometimes, but what Sarbox said is true on that score.
Step 1: Shove
Step 2: Reload
Step 3: Make note
Step 4: Stack him later
|
|
|
|
mieczkowusc
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lurking in BC or IRC
Posts: 225
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Robb
Step 1: Shove
Step 2: Reload
Step 3: Make note
Step 4: Stack him later
|
Done and done, my note taking has helped tremendously with focus and giving me a leg up when I sit down at a table. I'm working towards Step 4.
|
|
|
|
speedcake
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tampa
Posts: 434
|
|
ya, he has way too wide a range here to slow play this IMO. Without a note on his limp/calling, I think you have to stack off. Any pair 88+, any pair that makes him a straight draw, flush draws, Top pair. You will see far worse than that as well. Only 3 hands you dont want to see other than AA.
|
|
|
|
triumphant cracker
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER!!!!
Posts: 184
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Robb
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sarbox68
Yeah... you're going broke on this one, as there's a string of overpairs that he could play the same way. I would prolly 3-bet or push over the flop, esp with the draw on the board at these levels. If it's a set or some kinda flopped two pair (altho connectors might be a bit less likely for a maybe tight player opening under the gun...) then meh... nh and move on to the next. You can't run the risk of seeing sets everywhere when you get played back at at these levels. People will get aggressive with a lot worse hands than that.
|
^^^this
I'll just add that you're typical TAGG can't lay down QQ or JJ type hands here, and a lot of folks will play like this with small pp's + SD (55 is OESD, 88 is gutshot). Sure, it's a set sometimes, but what Sarbox said is true on that score.
Step 1: Shove
Step 2: Reload
Step 3: Make note
Step 4: Stack him later
|
thanx for the post..i had a simmilar situation last week...
and i am makin notes..
|
|
|
|
NewbieNoOne
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 23
|
|
I'm not sure what you mean about the "make note" part, but I would shove.
I'd guess since he's playing tight that he's playing some overpair or flush draw with AK AQ AJ.
Probably an Overpair like TT JJ or QQ cuz he might think you hit top pair only.
Shove to the max baby
|
|
|
|
Robb
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,072
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NewbieNoOne
I'm not sure what you mean about the "make note" part
|
The question is what his near min-raise on the flop means. If he uses this line for flopped sets, we want a note.
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
I think it's actually a really good board. Lots of pair+gut shots, flush draws and other worse hands than KK that'll put their stack in.
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|