|
Pelion
|
12-30-2006, 05:45 PM
Post subject: Interesting no content semantics post. (<LC)
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,206
|
|
"A bluff is a bet you make when you dont want a caller".
You are playing NLHE and have somehow misjudged your preflop raise, perhaps with a misclick.
You hold AK and the flop comes Kxx 2 hearts. Your single opponent turns his cards over and shows you a flush draw. He doesnt particularly understand the odds and after the flop, he will call when ahead and fold when behind. You turn your cards over and move allin for 1/10 of the pot.
Is this a bluff?
|
|
gabe: Ive dropped almost 100k in the past 35 days.
bigspenda73: But how much did you win?
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
koolmoe
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Drowning in prosperity
Posts: 1,279
|
|
It may be a bluff by the definition that you posted, but that just reveals the inadequacy of the definition.
Not wanting a call is a necessary condition of a bluff, but it is not a sufficient condition.
|
|
Poker is freedom
|
|
Galapogos
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Loser's Lounge
Posts: 2,322
|
|
Your definition of a bluff is more the strategy of a bluff than it's actual definition. Your example is not a bluff.
|

Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sauce123
I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
|
|
|
2_Thumbs_Up
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sweden
Posts: 271
|
|
I think "A bluff is a bet made to push someone of a better hand" would be a better definition, no?
|
|
|