|
Wilco
|
03-16-2005, 05:00 PM
Post subject: How many flops seen at a shorthanded game?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8
|
|
I play home games NL low stakes tourney style quite a bit. Anywhere from 4-6 players. The starting chip count is a little low, but workable. And the blinds go up very slow (everytime one man goes out the blind doubles). Most are pretty good poker players. I make money, but not as much as i want, of course. Id say i win 50% of the time.
Heres the thing: Im seeing about 75-80% of the flops. Maybe higher. But so is everyone else.
Is this optimal? How many flops do you or would you be seeing at a table like this?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
ensign_lee
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: The University of TEXAS at Austin
Posts: 2,237
|
|
If you're going to play a loose aggressive game, that's fine. Shorhanded is about the only time that I try that style. Usually, i log about 50-70% of the flops.
Jus tmake sure you drop 'em when you're sure you're losing. It shouldn't be a problem otherwise.
|
|
|
|
joslin
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 52
|
|
errr am I a complete moron
since after reading all the tips on this site I only see about 15-25% of flops, thats when I get cards like AA, KK, AK ......... QQ, QJflush and such, am I missing a lot of possible payout hands ? (and of course limp in on BB, and maybe like 77 on SB)
But it feels like a 'secure' way for me as a newbie to at least try to play solid.
please tell me if I am doing something wrong, I really would like to improve my game.
EDIT: but I play limit micro of course... many ppl at the table 7-10
|
|
20€, 39€, 40€, 34€, 27€, 40€, 46€, 66€, 61€, 51€, 52€, 61€, 22€, 14€
|
|
journey075
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 725
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by joslin
errr  am I a complete moron
since after reading all the tips on this site I only see about 15-25% of flops, thats when I get cards like AA, KK, AK ......... QQ, QJflush and such, am I missing a lot of possible payout hands ? (and of course limp in on BB, and maybe like 77 on SB)
But it feels like a 'secure' way for me as a newbie to at least try to play solid.
please tell me if I am doing something wrong, I really would like to improve my game.
EDIT: but I play limit micro of course... many ppl at the table 7-10
|
youre lucky if you get aa-qq 25% of the time . look at the hand rankings on the main part of this site (www.flopturnriver.com). the author grouped generally playable hands in seven groups. you should raise/call with 0-2, and generally just try and limp with the rest. he goes into more detail, but thats a great starting point on what hands you can play.
just remember to not play passively: ie dont just call with top hands and chase/fold if you dont hit the flop. show strength.
|
|
|
|
Wilco
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8
|
|
At micro play everything without a preflop raise. With good cards raise or call raises.
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by joslin
errr  am I a complete moron
since after reading all the tips on this site I only see about 15-25% of flops, thats when I get cards like AA, KK, AK ......... QQ, QJflush and such, am I missing a lot of possible payout hands ? (and of course limp in on BB, and maybe like 77 on SB)
But it feels like a 'secure' way for me as a newbie to at least try to play solid.
please tell me if I am doing something wrong, I really would like to improve my game.
EDIT: but I play limit micro of course... many ppl at the table 7-10
|
This thread is about shorthanded play and you're talking about full table.
You're fine.
-'rilla
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
03-16-2005, 07:11 PM
Post subject: Re: How many flops seen at a shorthanded game?
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Wilco
I play home games NL low stakes tourney style quite a bit. Anywhere from 4-6 players. The starting chip count is a little low, but workable. And the blinds go up very slow (everytime one man goes out the blind doubles). Most are pretty good poker players. I make money, but not as much as i want, of course. Id say i win 50% of the time.
Heres the thing: Im seeing about 75-80% of the flops. Maybe higher. But so is everyone else.
Is this optimal? How many flops do you or would you be seeing at a table like this?
|
Unless you can read your opponents like a book, you are seeing far too many flops. That's basically sitting out one hand per orbit. You need to bump that down to 35-50.
-'rilla
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
SmackinYaUp
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B N L
Posts: 1,725
|
|
And make sure to raise with face cards!
See, we need a shorthanded forum.
|
|
|
|
storm75m
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 6MAX-NL - Houston
Posts: 401
|
|
i agree on the shorthanded forum, playing a 6 max game is so totally different from playing in a full ring... the action is fast and furious and your post flop play has to be much better, your starting hand requirements loosen, you can bluff more, etc. etc. I was strictly playing 6 max for a while, consistently winning... then switched to full tables and lost 1/3 of my BR. It is definitely a whole different animal. There is even this "maniac" style that is pretty profitable that is starting to catch on a lot, and people are running over the 6 max tables like madmen. I would definetly be interested in learning more...
|
|
Lack of Discipline and Over-Confidence... The root of all poker evil.
|
|
thestrokes
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 119
|
|
I play a shorthanded homegame all the time. I typically dont bother limping much and raise most playable hands. I typically like to see 66% with around 6 people and probobly about 75% with 4. Raise any playable hand. Big cards, high pocket pairs, low pocket pairs, J/To, anything... but thats just how i like to play.
around 66% is probobly best
|
|
"Confidence not overconfidence"
-radashack
|
|
thestrokes
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 119
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SmackinYaUp
And make sure to raise with face cards!
See, we need a shorthanded forum.
|
I would LOVE a shorthanded forum, lets get some support for this idea so they will start one up...
|
|
"Confidence not overconfidence"
-radashack
|
|
jmontis
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,296
|
|
If im going to play cash games i prefer 8-9 handed, or 2-3 handed. It just seems easier that way.
|
|
take your ego out of the equation and judge the situation dispassionately
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thestrokes
I play a shorthanded homegame all the time. I typically dont bother limping much and raise most playable hands. I typically like to see 66% with around 6 people and probobly about 75% with 4. Raise any playable hand. Big cards, high pocket pairs, low pocket pairs, J/To, anything... but thats just how i like to play.
around 66% is probobly best
|
Don't raise with low pocket pairs if your opponents easily fall in love with any pair (and they do.)
2/3rds of all flops at a 6 person table is a bit much. I don't think high card hands a better even represent 2/3rds of all hands dealt.
35-50 is more like it.
-'rilla
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
thestrokes
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 119
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thestrokes
I play a shorthanded homegame all the time. I typically dont bother limping much and raise most playable hands. I typically like to see 66% with around 6 people and probobly about 75% with 4. Raise any playable hand. Big cards, high pocket pairs, low pocket pairs, J/To, anything... but thats just how i like to play.
around 66% is probobly best
|
Don't raise with low pocket pairs if your opponents easily fall in love with any pair (and they do.)
2/3rds of all flops at a 6 person table is a bit much. I don't think high card hands a better even represent 2/3rds of all hands dealt.
35-50 is more like it.
-'rilla
|
I like to try to play as maniac as possible at a short table, and i raise so often preflop because i find it easy to bluff my opponents out post flop when i do this, i can almost always isolate myself, and 2/3 of the time they check to me i bet and i take it down.
The table is pretty stupid, but once they catch on ill be in for a shock. I am capable of tightening up, but i dotn see any reason to when the table is so weak-tight. I have been making good profits, but next time we play i will try 35-50 and see how it works out.
|
|
"Confidence not overconfidence"
-radashack
|
|
twosevoff
|
|
Flush
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 526
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by storm75m
i agree on the shorthanded forum, playing a 6 max game is so totally different from playing in a full ring... the action is fast and furious and your post flop play has to be much better, your starting hand requirements loosen, you can bluff more, etc. etc. I was strictly playing 6 max for a while, consistently winning... then switched to full tables and lost 1/3 of my BR. It is definitely a whole different animal. There is even this "maniac" style that is pretty profitable that is starting to catch on a lot, and people are running over the 6 max tables like madmen. I would definetly be interested in learning more...
|
Definitely. I was crushing 6-max games with around a 50% VPIP, but when I started playing ring games again I was getting killed trying to run over the table like I did at 6-max. Since then, I've reverted to my old tight aggressive ring game strategy, and now I'm consistently winning again when I play full tables. Shorthanded games are all about aggression and outplaying postflop, whereas ring games are more about camping for big hands
|
|
|
|
Wilco
|
03-17-2005, 08:17 PM
Post subject: Re: How many flops seen at a shorthanded game?
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Unless you can read your opponents like a book, you are seeing far too many flops. That's basically sitting out one hand per orbit. You need to bump that down to 35-50.
-'rilla
|
Im pretty good at reading the players since i play with them often. I think you are right IF the big blind is 1% of your chip stack. But the game i play the big blind is like 4% of your chip stack. I feel you have to make moves when chip stack is that low, ie. loose-agressive. Otherwise someone is going to get a nice chip lead and bully you around. I find myself playing any face card unless its J-low card. I play any connectors, anything suited, and any pair.
Comments?
OT- I also think there should be a shorthanded forum. Its such a great game. I find 10 handed games to be somewhat boring if the cards arent falling for you. And when you get bored you tend to make bad calls/plays trying to make something happen.
|
|
|
|
Wilco
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8
|
|
How about a new short-handed forum AND a heads up forum??
Please?
|
|
|
|
thestrokes
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 119
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Wilco
How about a new short-handed forum AND a heads up forum??
Please?
|
Agreed, i think both area neccesity. Evryong voice your opinion.
PS Wilco rules
|
|
"Confidence not overconfidence"
-radashack
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
If only there was a thread somewhere for you all to voice said opinion.
-'rilla
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
Demiparadigm
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Party 6 max
Posts: 1,602
|
|
I am going to throw in my rule of thumb:
You should play less than 200% divided by the number of players.
for example in a 4 player game, play< 200/4 = 50% of hands dealt. I think 40% is a good number.
|
|
|
|
joslin
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 52
|
|
Thank GOD I read this thread, I have played limit longhand but am trying to go into NL since I am winning at the tables and it is getting a bit boring, and also my bankroll has gone up some ... I'd like to evolve...
At the place I am playing (Unibet) the majority of the small blind NL games are max 6players (is that 6max?) and I got so confused trying to play as tight as possible, (and I mean tight) ... people played craporama, loose and agressive as never seen before - and won - had big stacks. So, again, Thank GOD for this thread, it explains alot...
Maybe I should try the LongHand games instead
|
|
20€, 39€, 40€, 34€, 27€, 40€, 46€, 66€, 61€, 51€, 52€, 61€, 22€, 14€
|
|
DogOnMySide
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 458
|
|
I agree about the shorthanded table forum (and have voted in it)
I'm currently trying to avoid shorthanded, because i want to get better at playing tight. Even playing as tight as i can (at the moment) i still can't get below about 30-33% VP$IP.
When you play with 5 others, you get dealt A8 (for example) and raise early, getting 2 callers... the chances of them having something sick like a high pair are much much lower... it's a pretty good hand.
Whereas raising early on a table of 10 with A8 is just asking to get spanked, really.
i find playing 10 handed is about patience and discipline, whereas playing 5/6 handed is about aggression and dominance.
|
|
|