|
ProZachNation
|
12-22-2005, 02:17 AM
Post subject: How do you figure BB/100
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Over there!
Posts: 801
|
|
God my mind is fucked up I can pass calc but Im not sure on this.
So I was playing 10NL(.1BB) and I made $18.20 in 192 hands.
so BB=.2
so 190/100= 1.90
18.20/2=9.1
1.90X9.1= 17.29BB/100
That seems totally wrong lol
ohh god I think I am retarted.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mrhappy333
I didn't think its Bold to bang some chick with my bro. but i guess so... thats +EV in my book.
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
missmisery
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 31
|
|
You won $18.20
If a BB is 0.2, then you won 91 BB ($18.20 / 0.2)
You won 91BB in 192 hands, so 0.47BB/hand (91 /192)
You want to know your BB/100, so 0.47 * 100 = 47BB/100
Pretty elementary maths... This was a very good session for you but don't expect to make to sustain such a winrate... Only the very best players can maintain a winrate near 10bb/100
|
|
|
|
ProZachNation
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Over there!
Posts: 801
|
|
yeah that was a damn good session my first time playing 10NL on party I was 4 tabling(trying to clear a small bonus) I didnt get bad beated and folded when I was ahead bet/pushed when I was ahead. I didnt even egt that great of hands AK twice AA once JJ twice.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mrhappy333
I didn't think its Bold to bang some chick with my bro. but i guess so... thats +EV in my book.
|
|
|
Age of Reason
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 20
|
|
Yes its hard to make such a winrate consistently. Looking back at my records, I had a decent amount of +$30 sessions playing $10 NL.
The best session I ever had was +$77 in roughly 3 hours, two tableing. I have no idea how many hands it was but I would estimate somewhere between 400-500.
|
All of our knowledge begins with the senses, proceeds then to the understanding, and ends with reason. There is nothing higher than reason.
From the Edge of Reason - My Poker Blog
|
|
satan1974
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 147
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ProZachNation
...folded when I was ahead...
|
You should think about fixing that leak in your game...!
|
|
|
|
DaHorror
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 616
|
|
I get confused about something here with regard to BB/100.
Why is a BB in this case .2?
I thought that the BB meant Big Bet - as in Fixed Limit Big Bet - at a 5c-10c limit table, the BB is still 10c, right?
At $10 NL, the big blind is generally 10c...so why would you double that to figure a Big Bet for NL?
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
At limit a $.05/$.10 table has a big blind of $.05
The "big bet" is the $.10 where the bet doubles on the turn and river.
|
|
|
|
The K1ngpin
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 68
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by missmisery
You won $18.20
If a BB is 0.2, then you won 91 BB ($18.20 / 0.2)
You won 91BB in 192 hands, so 0.47BB/hand (91 /192)
You want to know your BB/100, so 0.47 * 100 = 47BB/100
Pretty elementary maths... This was a very good session for you but don't expect to make to sustain such a winrate... Only the very best players can maintain a winrate near 10bb/100
|
Nicely explained. Just a quick question; what exactly is the .47/100 saying? The .47 means he won .47 per BB?
|
|
|
|
euphoricism
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
No its saying he won .47 bets per hand, so 47 bets per 100 hands.
|
|
|
|
JonnyRockets
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4
|
|
Wow -
My brain was not working. I was looking at these fractions in front of me, trying to remember math classes from years ago. finally started just randomly guessing percentages to make things equal out.
I did get the right answer - just took me a little. When I could have just did BBs/Hands Played x 100.
Great post - thx!
|
|
|