Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

how do i factor in fold equity?

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
littleogre
Old 05-28-2010, 07:03 PM     Post subject: how do i factor in fold equity? #1 (permalink)  

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
littleogre has a little shameless behaviour in the past
say villan bets turn and from studying his habits in hem we guesstimate that he will fold 38 percent of the time if we raise and 3-bet shove 12 percent of the time and call the other 50% of the time what kinda equity do we need in our hand to make betting profitable.? Also i would like to know the math for figuring it out. As in i need help.
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
dneureiter
Old 05-28-2010, 07:17 PM #2 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 545
dneureiter will become famous soon enough
Going to simplify a bit.

#1: we need to know pot size/betsize. I'll make these up.

Say the pot is 1.00 on the turn, your opp leads for 0.40

You are debating to raise pot to 1.40.

#2 [I assume you instafold here when 3bet?]


so:

.38 (percentage of folds) * 1.40 (amount in pot) = +.53
.50 (called) pot is 3.80 * your equity (x) =
.12 (you are 3-bet) you lose the 1.40 you raise = -.17


This means you need to make up are .53-.17= +.36
you raise costs you 1.40 - .36= 1.04
you need to make up this $1.04 in showdown equity.

.50 (P of seeing river) * 3.80= 1.90. you need 1.04/1.90= 55% equity

Did I fail the maths? Anyone? Just thought I'd try.

If you raise smaller on turn but can get equal fold equity you obviously will need less showdown equity.
Reply With Quote
littleogre
Old 05-28-2010, 07:58 PM #3 (permalink)  

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
littleogre has a little shameless behaviour in the past
i think i get the math but shouldn't fold equity make it profitable to vet hands with less then 50% equity? I'm a little confused as to why we need better then 50% EQ
Reply With Quote
spoonitnow
Old 05-28-2010, 08:00 PM #4 (permalink)  
spoonitnow's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
spoonitnow is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to spoonitnow Send a message via MSN to spoonitnow Send a message via Yahoo to spoonitnow Send a message via Skype™ to spoonitnow
Quote:
Originally Posted by littleogre View Post
i think i get the math but shouldn't fold equity make it profitable to vet hands with less then 50% equity? I'm a little confused as to why we need better then 50% EQ
Yes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.

Rule # 1: don't ask questions

Rule # 2: don't ask questions

I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
 
Reply With Quote
NightGizmo
Old 05-28-2010, 08:13 PM #5 (permalink)  
NightGizmo's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 268
NightGizmo is on a distinguished road
I get a different answer:

EV(folds) = +.53
EV(3bets) = -.17

If he calls, the amount you are trying to win is the pot + the money he puts in, not including your raise. So, for the EV calculations of a call/win the pot is 1.40 + 1 = 2.40.
For the EV calcs of a call/fold, the amount you lose is 1.40. I'm using "x" as our equity percentage.

EV(calls and win) = 50% * 2.40 * x = 1.2x
EV(calls and loses) = 50% * -1.40 * (1 - x) = .7x - .7

.53 - .17 + 1.2x + .7x - .7 > 0
1.9x > .34
x > 17.9%

So you need to have 17.9% equity.
Reply With Quote
JKDS
Old 05-28-2010, 08:26 PM #6 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,024
JKDS is on a distinguished road
spoonitnow's Mathematics of EV Thread

Set up an equation for EV, solve for x. Done.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
But no, jkds is lolvillager and anyone who wants to string him up is sighbad.
 
Reply With Quote
Micro2Macro
Old 05-28-2010, 09:29 PM #7 (permalink)  
Micro2Macro's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: http://three-pair.com/
Posts: 4,463
Micro2Macro is a jewel in the roughMicro2Macro is a jewel in the roughMicro2Macro is a jewel in the rough
man i don't even do this shit and im playing 200nl and not busto yet. ur making 2nl wayyyyy harder than it needs to be.
"Once we reach a certain level of mastery, we see there are higher levels and challenges. If we are disciplined and patient, we proceed. At each higher level, new pleasures and insights await us--ones not even suspected when we started out. We can take this as far as we want--in any human activity there is always a higher level to which we can aspire."

Check out my blog here!

"You are a degenerate Gaam-balur"

http://www.philgalfond.com/lets-make-some-changes/
 
Reply With Quote
philly and the phanatics
Old 05-28-2010, 09:49 PM #8 (permalink)  
philly and the phanatics's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,109
philly and the phanatics is a jewel in the roughphilly and the phanatics is a jewel in the roughphilly and the phanatics is a jewel in the roughphilly and the phanatics is a jewel in the rough
i thought you never needed over 50% equity.....correct me if im wrong?
Reply With Quote
supa
Old 05-28-2010, 10:08 PM #9 (permalink)  
supa's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 985
supa is a glorious beacon of lightsupa is a glorious beacon of lightsupa is a glorious beacon of lightsupa is a glorious beacon of lightsupa is a glorious beacon of lightsupa is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micro2Macro View Post
man i don't even do this shit and im playing 200nl and not busto yet. ur making 2nl wayyyyy harder than it needs to be.
Watch out when all us micromicro grinders make it up to the big show.We're gonna be killin' it.You can just start depositing into my account now.
Reply With Quote
spoonitnow
Old 05-28-2010, 10:26 PM #10 (permalink)  
spoonitnow's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
spoonitnow is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to spoonitnow Send a message via MSN to spoonitnow Send a message via Yahoo to spoonitnow Send a message via Skype™ to spoonitnow
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micro2Macro View Post
man i don't even do this shit and im playing 200nl and not busto yet. ur making 2nl wayyyyy harder than it needs to be.
Yeah this too
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.

Rule # 1: don't ask questions

Rule # 2: don't ask questions

I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
 
Reply With Quote
jyms
Old 05-28-2010, 10:38 PM #11 (permalink)  
jyms's Avatar
Tilting Mod

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,836
jyms has a spectacular aura aboutjyms has a spectacular aura aboutjyms has a spectacular aura about
Percentage Villain has to fold for the play to be break-even
 
Reply With Quote
littleogre
Old 05-29-2010, 08:11 PM #12 (permalink)  

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
littleogre has a little shameless behaviour in the past
A helpful link but i'm looking for how often villain needs to fold if we already know our estimated equity. for example this. We are on the turn.
villain leads out for 50 cents
effective stacks= 5.0
total pot before we bet= 1.5
our raise size= 1.5
our estimated equity= 32 percent
villains estimated fold percentage=22%
estimated call%=50%
estimated raise%=28 percent
pot size after we raise=3
villains 3-bet size= shove.

Is it +ev to bluff? I mean there are all sorts of programs that tell you how often villain needs to fold if our equity is say 45% so why are there no programs that tell you what our EQ needs to be if we know how often they fold/call/raise?

in the above example i know we win 1.5$ 22 percent of the time or 33 cents on average from him folding. we loose 42 cents on average from him raising. Where it gets really confusing to me is when they call. Because then we need to add in our hands eq versus their river betting range.
Reply With Quote
jyms
Old 05-29-2010, 08:16 PM #13 (permalink)  
jyms's Avatar
Tilting Mod

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,836
jyms has a spectacular aura aboutjyms has a spectacular aura aboutjyms has a spectacular aura about
Wow, your really over thinking this. First of all, under $25NL means don't account for FE ever. Second, stop thinking about anything other than equity if he folds or calls/raises together. Him raising is a whole new calculation.

Just use pot size, bet size and how often he needs to fold vs your equity if he doesn't
 
Reply With Quote
littleogre
Old 05-29-2010, 08:22 PM #14 (permalink)  

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
littleogre has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Quote:
Originally Posted by jyms View Post
Wow, your really over thinking this.
Perhaps but i want to build charts so that i can play perfectly versus robotic players which is most every player at 2nl. Or atleast a big chunk of them.
Reply With Quote
jyms
Old 05-29-2010, 08:26 PM #15 (permalink)  
jyms's Avatar
Tilting Mod

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,836
jyms has a spectacular aura aboutjyms has a spectacular aura aboutjyms has a spectacular aura about
you do know a chart will make you robotic?
 
Reply With Quote
JKDS
Old 05-29-2010, 09:39 PM #16 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,024
JKDS is on a distinguished road
=spoonitnow's Mathematics of EV Thread

Set up an equation for EV, solve for x. Done.

At least try it yourself. Spoon made this one big ass post that basically tells you exactly how to set something like this up...yet i dont even see that you've made an attempt at an equation. Cmon now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
But no, jkds is lolvillager and anyone who wants to string him up is sighbad.
 
Reply With Quote
littleogre
Old 05-30-2010, 05:20 AM #17 (permalink)  

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
littleogre has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Quote:
Originally Posted by JKDS View Post
=spoonitnow's Mathematics of EV Thread

Set up an equation for EV, solve for x. Done.

At least try it yourself. Spoon made this one big ass post that basically tells you exactly how to set something like this up...yet i dont even see that you've made an attempt at an equation. Cmon now.
ok i'll try but i suck at algebra just give me some time to study that thread.
Reply With Quote
littleogre
Old 05-30-2010, 10:05 AM #18 (permalink)  

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
littleogre has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Quote:
Originally Posted by jyms View Post
you do know a chart will make you robotic?
I don't exactly mean a chart that tells me how to play. Just my ev in different situations.
Reply With Quote
littleogre
Old 05-30-2010, 10:47 AM #19 (permalink)  

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
littleogre has a little shameless behaviour in the past
ok gonna start small and to keep things simple i'm gonna assume that our bet will be a shove.
pot =2
bet=2
P+B=4
eq=27
vill fold=40%
pf=.8

been reading that thread so i will try to solve for how much we win if he calls and we win but i'm not even sure if i remember the order of operation.

e(1-f)
e(.5)
.27(.5)=.14
Is that correct?
villain calls and he wins.

(1-.5)(1-.27)
(.5)(.73) =.37
is that correct?
trying to put it all together
EV = PF + E(1-F)(P+B) + (1-F)(1-E)(-B)
EV = .8 + .27(.5)(4) + (.5)(.73)(-2)
2.14+-.74
=
Is this correct-1.4
Reply With Quote
littleogre
Old 05-30-2010, 11:13 AM #20 (permalink)  

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
littleogre has a little shameless behaviour in the past
sorry made a typo i put vill fold= .40 but used .5 in the equation
Reply With Quote
littleogre
Old 05-30-2010, 11:23 AM #21 (permalink)  

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
littleogre has a little shameless behaviour in the past
ok when i enter .8 + .27(.5)(4) + (.5)(.73)(-2) into MyAlgebra - Solve Your Algebra Problems Online it gives me .61 so why is my answer so far off?
Reply With Quote
oskar
Old 05-30-2010, 03:09 PM #22 (permalink)  
oskar's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
oskar has a spectacular aura aboutoskar has a spectacular aura aboutoskar has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by jyms View Post
Wow, your really over thinking this. First of all, under $25NL means don't account for FE ever. Second, stop thinking about anything other than equity if he folds or calls/raises together. Him raising is a whole new calculation.

Just use pot size, bet size and how often he needs to fold vs your equity if he doesn't
that

I don't think it's bad at all to do all this crap so you understand it, but watch out when you try to apply it because the tendency is to expect waaaay too much fold equity.

I shot myself in the foot a couple of times the last couple of days when I played some 50NL after 20000 hands of 200NL. People don't fold. Even the winningest regs are huge stations. - More so on stars than on Tilt cuz the general tendency there seems to be to supergaybet when you have the nuts and shovel in money when you have air.
The strengh of a hero is defined by the weakness of his villains.
 
Reply With Quote
littleogre
Old 05-30-2010, 03:11 PM #23 (permalink)  

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
littleogre has a little shameless behaviour in the past
sorry my answer in the aboe eq is 1.4 not -1.4
Reply With Quote
JKDS
Old 05-30-2010, 07:59 PM #24 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,024
JKDS is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by littleogre View Post
ok when i enter .8 + .27(.5)(4) + (.5)(.73)(-2) into MyAlgebra - Solve Your Algebra Problems Online it gives me .61 so why is my answer so far off?
dunno

.27*.5*4 = .54
.5*.73*-2 = -.73

.8 + .54 -.73 = .61

Using fold% as .5, your equation for the expectation of a shove is right. Looks like you just made a silly mistake at the end there.

Ok, now we have the ev of a shove. But you didnt want that. We want to know our equity given that villain folds F% of the time. So, this is a little trickier.

EV = PF + .... blah blah blah. Make ev 0, and keep E as E. Now rearrange the equation so we get E = ...., which will give you what you wanted to know.

Even better, keep F as F, and still solve for E, then you can get E as a function of F, meaning we can plug in different Fs and get what E we need.

Even better, rearrange that last equation so that F is a function of E instead, as we'll generally know E more often than F.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
But no, jkds is lolvillager and anyone who wants to string him up is sighbad.
 
Reply With Quote
littleogre
Old 05-30-2010, 09:34 PM #25 (permalink)  

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
littleogre has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Quote:
Originally Posted by JKDS View Post
dunno

.27*.5*4 = .54
.5*.73*-2 = -.73

.8 + .54 -.73 = .61

Using fold% as .5, your equation for the expectation of a shove is right. Looks like you just made a silly mistake at the end there.

Ok, now we have the ev of a shove. But you didnt want that. We want to know our equity given that villain folds F% of the time. So, this is a little trickier.

EV = PF + .... blah blah blah. Make ev 0, and keep E as E. Now rearrange the equation so we get E = ...., which will give you what you wanted to know.

Even better, keep F as F, and still solve for E, then you can get E as a function of F, meaning we can plug in different Fs and get what E we need.

Even better, rearrange that last equation so that F is a function of E instead, as we'll generally know E more often than F.
Yea i think i mucked the order of operation. I'm starting simple i haven't done algebra in years.
Reply With Quote
littleogre
Old 05-31-2010, 08:44 PM #26 (permalink)  

Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,344
littleogre has a little shameless behaviour in the past
ok if i do a basic shove equation to get my ev of when he folds or calls and checks the river. ten a separate eq for when he raises and i fold then subtract the money l loose from folding from the money i win from him folding / me calling and winning will that work? Example lets say i just raised 5 into a 5 pot and have determined that this move wins 3 dollars from him folding/ calling and me winning. I've also determined that he will raise 20 percent of the time so i lose 1 buck from when he raises .20(5)=1
so my over all ev of bluffing is 2 bucks. This can never be exact though because it doesn't account for the times that i improve my hand and get his entire stack or when i improve and he gets my entire stack. I think the shove formula is likely good for deciding whether or not to bluff shove the turn or river. The more i think about it the more i think it becomes to complicated when money is left behind. Atleast for me it does. You would need a formula that thinks about all the following
pot size after vills bet
pot size after our raise
our raise size
vills call%
vills fold%
how often dos he check the river after calling a turn raise
how often does he shove the river after calling a turn raise
how often does he call a river shove from us .
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:36 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.