|
grnydrowave2
|
09-12-2007, 08:35 PM
Post subject: HH Bias
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Showin' mah Pokemans
Posts: 651
|
|
A few questions for those of you that post and comment on Hand Histories.
1) Of the HHs you post, what % of them are losers?
2) When reading a HH, how often (if ever) do you assume that it's a losing hand?
3) Do you think that beginners or new posters are more likely to post losing hands than winning ones? If so, how does this effect your judgement of his/her decisions, particularly when the EV is marginal?
This of course pertains to HHs in which the results are in white or omitted. I know that some of you are going to say that one shouldn't be results oriented, and that it doesn't affect your judgment when reviewing a HH, but I still wonder how one maintains objectivity.
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Warpe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
It used to be that there was a "since you posted it you must have lost the hand" assumption, but that's not true anymore, at least not from the regulars. I don't assume a hand is either a loser or a winner (unless the OP gives it away of course).
Yes, beginners usually post losing hands, to see if there's a way they could have gotten away from it.
|
|
|
|
bode
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2006
Location: slow motion
Posts: 4,270
|
|
i probably post more winning hands that i do losing. I usually know where i screwed up a hand and lost it whereas hands ive won i want to know how i can play it better, i.e. extract more value.
|
Quote:
|
eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
one of the bets things that happened was somebody posted themselves as villain which makes a difference to how you perceive a hand especially in shnl forum.
Normally i look at the hand in a volume and try not to make an assumption, we should be gauging ranges of hands anyway.
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
We always assume that we played losing hands worse the winning hands, and a lot of the time it's the exact opposite.
|
|
|
|
Jack Sawyer
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Old School
Posts: 2,535
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Warpe
It used to be that there was a "since you posted it you must have lost the hand" assumption, but that's not true anymore, at least not from the regulars.
|
QFT
|
My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...

Quote:
|
VHS is like a book and a book is like a stack of kindles.
|
Hey, I'm in a movie!
http://youtu.be/lGdnIrRKDTI
|
|
daven
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,805
|
|
I sometimes post big winning hands that I may have played badly. I don't want to let the results reinforce bad play, and having my decisions slammed by the forum balances things out for me!!!
|
|
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
almost all my hh's are winners
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|