|
Soldat
|
03-01-2005, 09:12 PM
Post subject: Fold Rate
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Richmond Va.
Posts: 3
|
|
Sometimes it is just hard to let them go before the flop isn't it?
So I have a question, percentage wise over a long haul session. How often should you be folding?
Lets narrow it, over a hundred hands, how many would you say you should call on?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
cartilago77
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Tijuana Donkey Show
Posts: 180
|
|
Depends.....
Are you playing tournament poker or ring games?
If a ring game, how many players are on the table?
Limit or NL?
Table texture will also factor in once you have been sitting for 100 hands too.
|
|
|
|
Spook
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 388
|
|
I'll say you should see 15-20% of the flops if your playing fairly tight. Which is considered smart poker in most good player's book.
|
|
|
|
AllinLife
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 530
|
|
you should play 1/6 of your hands
|
|
"Is there any chance I'm going to lay this 9-high baby down? That's really not my style."
- Gus Hansen
|
|
Demiparadigm
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Party 6 max
Posts: 1,602
|
|
I am going with 200% divided by the number of players, as a rough estimate.
Raise about as often as you call.
Raise more in tight games, and call less.
See more flops in passive games, with not much raising.
|
|
|
|
johnnyawe
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,064
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Demiparadigm
I am going with 200% divided by the number of players, as a rough estimate.
|
Did you get that from somewhere, or come up with it yourself?
|
|
|
|
Molinero
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In The General Vicinity of Dallas
Posts: 230
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AllinLife
you should play 1/6 of your hands
|
I found myself chuckling when I read this post -- which is followed by the Gus Hansen quote in your signature. Seemed a bit ironic.
|
|
"We thought you was a toad!"
-- O Brother Where Art Thou?
|
|
Demiparadigm
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Party 6 max
Posts: 1,602
|
|
Quote:
|
Did you get that from somewhere, or come up with it yourself?
|
I made it up. I think it is pretty accurate though.
It is probably more like 180% but the math is easier at 200
|
|
|
|
jmontis
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,296
|
|
in really tight games, which you shouldnt be playing in the first place, you're going to need premium hands
in passive games, limp when the hand is worth it.
|
|
take your ego out of the equation and judge the situation dispassionately
|
|
BeeJall
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 81
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Demiparadigm
I am going with 200% divided by the number of players, as a rough estimate.
|
Heh.. I've never thought of it that way.. I like it.
|
|
|
|
jmontis
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,296
|
|
the biggest hand i've ever had was me limping with 7,4 spades on the button in a family pot, flopped a straight flush.
can't complain about a $90 pot in a .25/.50 NL game.
I'll limp with just about any reasonable hand on the button if it's a family pot.
|
|
take your ego out of the equation and judge the situation dispassionately
|