Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Exploiting Deepstack Play #1: Charging for draws

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
ZwiFT
Old 02-22-2009, 11:22 AM     Post subject: Exploiting Deepstack Play #1: Charging for draws #1 (permalink)  
ZwiFT's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Valuebet/fold
Posts: 778
ZwiFT is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to ZwiFT Send a message via AIM to ZwiFT Send a message via MSN to ZwiFT
Credit to bigspenda73 making the post "Exploiting Fish Mistake #1: Continuing With a Marginal Hand"
Which got me thinking.

We all know a lot about exploiting fish, but if there is a catagory most of us don't know much about, it's playing deep. So ill start:

#1:

When playing deep, you should charge way more for people drawing to the best hand on the flop or turn. This is because people think they have implied odds to call and will therefor call you way lighter than they would 100bb deep[/list]
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
Carroters
Old 02-22-2009, 01:32 PM #2 (permalink)  
Carroters's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Da Amberlamps
Posts: 2,216
Carroters has a spectacular aura aboutCarroters has a spectacular aura about
2. It becomes more importnt to protect our stack on dangerous boards.

eg. Say we have the lead and position with AQ in a 3 bet pot on Q, J, 10 r. In this case protecting our stack becomes more important than protecting our hand so we may elect to check behind this flop even though it is really drawy.
 
Reply With Quote
XTR1000
Old 02-22-2009, 03:28 PM #3 (permalink)  
XTR1000's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: May 2006
Location: surfing in a room
Posts: 2,188
XTR1000 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to XTR1000
#3 in order to deny implied odds, you have to make laydowns on the river

#4 positional (dis-)advantage grows with stack sizes
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigred View Post
xtr stand for exotic tranny retards
yo
 
Reply With Quote
LawDude
Old 02-22-2009, 05:48 PM #4 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
LawDude
#5 You should be aware of which players at the table with smaller stacks tend to play weak on later streets, and use your reads to identify situations where you can force them to fold better hands.
Reply With Quote
oskar
Old 02-22-2009, 08:21 PM #5 (permalink)  
oskar's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
oskar has a spectacular aura aboutoskar has a spectacular aura aboutoskar has a spectacular aura about
But how much more would you bet?
I think the more important part is to be able to b/f or c/f when a draw completes and you get raised. It's not very common at microstakes that someone will turn a made hand into a bluff
Reply With Quote
Robb
Old 02-22-2009, 08:40 PM #6 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,072
Robb is an unknown quantity at this point
Good thread. BTW, there's an interesting phenomenon at Full Tilt. There are "deep stack" regs, but only about 20 deep FR tables at 50nl. So you can build a up a data base on the regs tons faster deep. Also, there's better, looser action on them, right now.

Nice thread idea.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZwiFT
#1:

When playing deep, you should charge way more for people drawing to the best hand on the flop or turn. This is because people think they have implied odds to call and will therefor call you way lighter than they would 100bb deep
I'll just reiterate. This IS an extremely happy turn of events for us when they'll chase lighter and pay more. Weeeeeeeeeeeee!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by XTR1000
#4 positional (dis-)advantage grows with stack sizes
This is important for table selection. If you're gonna play deep, you really need the biggest stacks to your right, or at least most of them there.
 
Reply With Quote
bigspenda73
Old 02-22-2009, 09:03 PM #7 (permalink)  
bigspenda73's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,545
bigspenda73 will become famous soon enoughbigspenda73 will become famous soon enough
This thread could be interesting, I'll give my thoughts

When playing deeper bet-sizes do not have to be altered as long as our range is expanded. Having a wider range decreases our opponent's implied odds thus making many seemingly correct PF/Flop calls actually incorrect.
Reply With Quote
HarleyGuy13
Old 02-22-2009, 09:36 PM #8 (permalink)  
HarleyGuy13's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,226
HarleyGuy13 is on a distinguished road
I really like this thread idea. I currently avoid playing very deep because I lack the skills/knowledge of how to do so properly. Keep it coming!!!
"You start the game with a full pot o’ luck and an empty pot o’ experience...
The object is to fill the pot of experience before you empty the pot of luck."

Quote:
Originally Posted by XxStacksxX View Post
Do you have testicles? If so, learn to bet like it
 
Reply With Quote
dranger7070
Old 02-05-2010, 12:42 AM #9 (permalink)  
dranger7070's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wake up in the mornin feelin' like P. Diddy
Posts: 2,524
dranger7070 has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Send a message via AIM to dranger7070 Send a message via MSN to dranger7070
Bummp cuz i suck at playing deep and hopefully there's more interest this time around.
Reply With Quote
surviva316
Old 02-05-2010, 12:56 AM #10 (permalink)  
surviva316's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Confusing people with my liberal biblicisms
Posts: 1,625
surviva316 will become famous soon enough
lol funny how this thread died right after two posts that were like "this thread has potential"

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
When playing deeper bet-sizes do not have to be altered as long as our range is expanded. Having a wider range decreases our opponent's implied odds thus making many seemingly correct PF/Flop calls actually incorrect.
by this, do you mean if we widen our garbagy range, then that lessens their implied odds because they'll be c/f'ing to air a lot when they miss?

i've started to think about this a lot lately with PF 3b'ing/4b'ing sizes. it seems like we should want to bet bigger as a bluff to assure that they fold, and we're screwed when they call a 4b when we hold A7o even if we are IP. at the same time, though, they have ZERO implied odds against us, so they're actually making an even bigger mistake set-mining only to c/f on 8/9th's of boards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BooG690 View Post
I just wanted to share singing vaginas.
 
Reply With Quote
bigspenda73
Old 02-05-2010, 01:52 AM #11 (permalink)  
bigspenda73's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,545
bigspenda73 will become famous soon enoughbigspenda73 will become famous soon enough
I read OP, didn't read the date, and typed in almost exactly what I posted last year....so I guess my thoughts on this have not changed much.

Let's say our opponent is going to play 100% straightfoward and we'll use set-mining b/c it's the easiest example of a "draw" . Like surviva said, if our opponent is going to play fit/fold then we either need to re-raise to an amount that makes it mathematically incorrect to do so or to play a range that

1. Has more equity against sets when the money goes in postflop
2. Gives us the ability to play aggressively postflop
3. Allows us to fold easily postflop when facing resistance

The problem becomes with playing against people who don't play fit/fold. Against those we'd adjust by either stacking off lighter or tightening/strengthening this range to avoid marginal situations.

(I may not be thinking 100% clearly so if anything doesn't make sense call me out and I'll revisit it when I'm not popping pain meds).
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:31 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.