|
BankItDrew
|
04-06-2006, 06:43 PM
Post subject: Is this an example of correct implied odds?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Losing Prop Bets
Posts: 2,789
|
|
I am dealt T8 in the bb and check in a multiway pot.
Flop comes 79A.
Checks to Button who bets pot, I call, everyone folds.
Turn is a blank, Button overbets pot.
Here's where I think I might be a donk:
Pot is $20. He bets $25. My % of hitting nuts are 16%. Assuming I hit my straight, would this be a justified call if my $25 is less than or equal to 16% of the final pot?
Thanks, just wanted to clear up the implied odds definition.
I did this lastnight and felt dirty after I stacked Button. I didn't check his hand... doh
|

Girlfriend: Why are the werewolves more important than living life?!
Girlfriend: Are you on the forums doing the werewolves again?
Girlfriend: Soo... you forgot to run that errand, but you had time to werewolf? Wtf?
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
With only 8 outs, how do you figure you have implied odds agaisnt his hand facing a pot sized bet on the turn? What where the stacks sizes? How'd you get it all-in on the river?
People gave me crap for making this call with like 15 outs....
Oh, and I often bet this flop.
|
|
|
|
dpe8598
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 261
|
|
It would be an extremely rare situation where this would be a good call. In fact, I think reraising him all in here is a better move (depending on chance you think he'll call). At least then you are taking down this pot with a higher percentage.
Either way, looks like to me, he knows you are chasing and is making you pay. You should fold here virtually every single time.
One final thing, you were out of position here. Did you check after hitting your hand? Otherwise did you push all in there. Being out of position also greatly decreased your odds. If you checked, he may very well check. If you bet hard, he may see the texture and fold. You have to consider all of this.
Anyway, your instinct is right. That was donk.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dpe8598
In fact, I think reraising him all in here is a better move (depending on chance you think he'll call).
|
People say stuff like this and I used to even try it. Chances are that when a typical 100NL or lower player plays a hand fast, you have very little fold equity and are better off playing it straight up because he won't be able to laydown when you hit.
|
|
|
|
DonCoryon
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 27
|
|
Pot=$65, Your Call=$25
Pot Odds=2.6/1
Your odds of hitting your straight with one card is 4.6/1.
So yes you didn't have odds to draw to your straight. In order to use implied odds you have to be sure you are going to bet at least $50 (total of $115) on the river when you make your straight and he will pay it off. and that is just a break even proposition. It's stretching the implied odds theory but it could work.
|
|
|
|
dpe8598
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 261
|
|
Fnord, nah, calling 25 on a 20 board is definitely worse than just pushing. JMHO. Anyway, I wouldn't do either, I would just fold. I just think one is the lesser of 2 evils, but they are both evil, I think we agree on that.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dpe8598
Fnord, nah, calling 25 on a 20 board is definitely worse than just pushing.
|
Umm... no... how often does he fold? I'm going with about 10%. Do the math, pushing is worse.
|
|
|
|
dpe8598
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 261
|
|
With 10% fold rate you are definitely losing money here. Thats why I said it depends on your read. Some quick calculations in my head tell me you'd probably have to be about 40% sure he'd fold to make this move (depending on stack sizes).
So I agree, that would be a rare situation. Either way it really doesnt matter, the best move here is to fold.
|
|
|
|
Rondavu
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,053
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dpe8598
In fact, I think reraising him all in here is a better move (depending on chance you think he'll call).
|
People say stuff like this and I used to even try it. Chances are that when a typical 100NL or lower player plays a hand fast, you have very little fold equity and are better off playing it straight up because he won't be able to laydown when you hit.
|
I've never been an advocate of doyle donking my draws at the levels we generally discuss. Less fold equity all around. In the MTT's I play, I make a lot of chips off people wearing their cowboy hat backwards, pushing all in on an 8/9 out draw when I'm sitting on top pair. It's gotten to the point of misguided hysteria.
|
|
It's not what's inside that counts. Have you seen what's inside?
Internal organs. And they're getting uglier by the minute.
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rondavu
I've never been an advocate of doyle donking my draws at the levels we generally discuss.
|
Doyle Donking haha - I LOVE it. Did you coin that? Sorry if I'm an idiot and it has been around for awhile, but I like that term alot. I just made a post about his extreme over-bets.
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
Rondavu
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,053
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by martindcx1e
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rondavu
I've never been an advocate of doyle donking my draws at the levels we generally discuss.
|
Doyle Donking haha - I LOVE it. Did you coin that? Sorry if I'm an idiot and it has been around for awhile, but I like that term alot. I just made a post about his extreme over-bets.
|
Ya I just made it up. Seemed fitting for the moment I guess.
|
|
It's not what's inside that counts. Have you seen what's inside?
Internal organs. And they're getting uglier by the minute.
|
|
SonOfAkira
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 147
|
|
"_________________
ONLINE RISK MANAGEMENT
Initial Deposit: $50 @ 10NL (December 29 2005)
Current Bankroll: $3,029 @ 50NL (April 8 2006)
Limit Jumping Goal: $5,000 @ 100NL"
Wow, way to go. I thought you were plateauing or even downswinging for a second there, for some reason. This is an awesome progression. How is 50 compared to 25 for you? Have you taken a shot at 100 yet, to break monotony? I really like the ultra-conservative 50 buyin jump, excellent patience.
[/i]
|
|
|
|
BankItDrew
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Losing Prop Bets
Posts: 2,789
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SonOfAkira
I thought you were plateauing or even downswinging for a second there,
|
I DID have a downswing! Thursday and Friday I lost a combined 8 buy-ins. Thanks for the kind words again Akira. You are my favorite FTR member!
I'm having a lot harder time with 50NL compared to 25NL. @ 25NL, There seems to be a lot more people willing to pratically give you free money. 50NL is better postflop and tighter pre-flop.
I made about $500 or so on 50 since changing here 2 or 3 weeks ago. @ 25NL, I could have made that same amount in less time... so it's very frustrating. I feel comfortable, I'm just not yet dominating it. I think it's just the learning curve of moving up from micro to low limits.
Akira, please tell me how your progress has gone.
|

Girlfriend: Why are the werewolves more important than living life?!
Girlfriend: Are you on the forums doing the werewolves again?
Girlfriend: Soo... you forgot to run that errand, but you had time to werewolf? Wtf?
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
LMAO, I'm up like $30 over my last 5k hands of 100NL.
Although, I've been playing in some tougher games recently and just plain running bad.
|
|
|