|
BankItDrew
|
11-24-2005, 05:37 PM
Post subject: Differences between limits
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Losing Prop Bets
Posts: 2,789
|
|
5NL is the only table that I've played more than a few hours on. I would like to know how each of the levels differ from your own experiences.
fish %
flop %
showdown %
does each simply decrease as the levels increase?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
mouteut
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 152
|
|
5NL:
10% major donator
60% big fish
20% half decent
10% decent
flop %: easily 60-70%, no respect for raise at all
10NL:
5% major donator
55% big fish
25% half decent
15% decent
flop %: easily 60-70% BUT they respect raise a little
25 NL:
20% big fish
40% half decent
30% decent
10% sharks
flop %: they respect raise A LOT more. only 2-3 caller if you raise.
50 NL:
5% big fish
20% half decent
60% decent(mainly rocks)
15% sharks
flop %: this is rock garden 20-35% They surely respect your raise
100 NL:
10% big fish
20% half decent
50% decent
20% sharks
flop %: 20-35% again. They respect raise even more. However they are tougher post flop(less rocks more sharks).
Thats from my experience...
big donators means people who got no clue how to play and could very well call/go all in pre flop with anything. They trow money away.
big fish is people who limp in every hands and go crazy with top pair or overpairs. They loose lot of money.
half decent is people who have some sort of starting hand requirement and somewhat respect raise but they still suck post flop. They loose some money.
decent have good starting hand requirement and decent post flop play but generally either too loose or too rockish. They make some money.
sharks are good all around players who makes the big money.
Note that also by going up in levels, the level also increase(decent players of 5 NL are less skilled than decent players of 100 NL). Another difference is that even thought there are still bad players at 50-100 NL, they are less likely to call your big bets with nothing since they actually care about 100 bucks.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
100NL is SOFT.
A wonderful mixture of too tight and too loose that plays very well into the my favorite style of play.
|
|
|
|
DBL0SVN
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 230
|
|
Depends on the site. Pacific 50NL is a whole different game from the Stars 50NL .
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DBL0SVN
Depends on the site. Pacific 50NL is a whole different game from the Stars 50NL .
|
....and the Pacific 200 game is a LOT harder than it looks. Easily could be murder to a semi-tight, under-bankrolled player who folds too much.
|
|
|
|
DBL0SVN
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 230
|
|
So are you talking Pacific 100NL when you say it's soft or elsewhere? I've heard people say it was no different to the 50NL. If so, I need to move up and double my profits.
|
|
|
|
sejje
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 883
|
|
I've played almost exclusively at party and found that the standard of play is about the same throughout all levels up to 100NL except for starting requirements and to some degree aggression.
25NL is horrible, I'm sure most of us have played there. Poor preflop selection, calling it off with draws, overvalue hands, weak betting.
50NL is about the same play, just tighter and weaker. They lay down too many hands. Lots of set campers.
100NL is more like 25NL, except they do more raising. Lots of calling pot-sized bets with draws, paying off overpairs, and my AA/KK gets paid by AK all-in preflop ALL THE TIME, even on LRRes.
That's my personal opinion, and I don't have a wealth of experience at 100NL, just about 10K hands.
|
|
|