|
Vinland
|
05-07-2009, 01:53 PM
Post subject: Did the implied odds make this a call?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Between a couple of points.
Posts: 610
|
|
Villain was pretty conservative for 2nl. No stats worthwhile noting yet. I'll post thoughts on the hand after.
No-Limit Hold'em, $0.02 BB (8 handed) - Hold'em Manager Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
SB ($4.98)
BB ($3)
UTG ($0.70)
UTG+1 ($6.11)
MP1 ($7.15)
Villain (MP2) ($6.55)
Hero (CO) ($4.16)
Button ($0.95)
Preflop: Hero is CO with J , J
2 folds, MP1 calls $0.02, Villain calls $0.02, Hero bets $0.10, 4 folds, Villain calls $0.08
Flop: ($0.25) 5 , Q , 10 (2 players)
Villain checks, Hero bets $0.20, Villain calls $0.20
Turn: ($0.65) J (2 players)
Villain checks, Hero bets $0.42, Villain raises $0.84, Hero calls $0.42
O.K. here are my thoughts.
I had JJ so I raised it up, pretty straight forward.
A player who has been fairly conservative has just limp called a raise so I figure mid PP and high cards are in his range.
On the flop I hit the set and there is a possible flush draw on board so I attempt to charge for it. He calls, he has been pretty straight forward at the table thusfar so I am thinking he has a flush draw (probably K or A high) or he has paired a Q or T and has a decent kicker.
Turn gives 3rd spade and he min raises me. He just turned his cards over IMO given his playing style.
So, I have 10 outs. I called immediately, knowing that my expressed odds were probably not there but I didnt think he would have a low flush and be worried about losing to a higher one. In other words, if I pair the board I am 99% confident I am getting his stack.
Would you agree with my call?
Feel free to discuss anything else about the hand as well.
|
|
I confess in quicksand
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Lucothefish
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cretaceous Park
Posts: 701
|
|
Someone will correct me if I'm wrong but you're getting almost exact direct pot odds to call the minraise. 21% chance, 21% of pot. So with implied odds as well this is an easy call as played.
|
|
<@d0zer> how will you learn if I don't berate you harshly?
|
|
Vinland
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Between a couple of points.
Posts: 610
|
|
I think I am doing this right...
Pot was $1.49 and I had to cal $.42
21% of $1.49 is $.31 so I had to call for more than the expressed odds allowed?
|
|
I confess in quicksand
|
|
Lucothefish
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cretaceous Park
Posts: 701
|
|
Pot was $1.91, you include your turn bet.
|
|
<@d0zer> how will you learn if I don't berate you harshly?
|
|
settecba
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: stealing blinds from UTG
Posts: 326
|
|
pot isnt 1.49
think of the following: you make a ps bet, opp minraises you, what are your inmediate pot odds?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ISF
Getting good at poker is like that scene in the matrix where Neo suddenly sees that everyone is just a bunch of structured numbers and then he starts bending those numbers in really weird ways.
|
|
|
Vinland
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Between a couple of points.
Posts: 610
|
|
Oh snap! yeah duh!
I had the odds to call anyway....
Thats minraises for you...
Alright,we can put this one to bed. thx
|
|
I confess in quicksand
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,545
|
|
INFINITY IMPLIED ODDSZZZZZZ
i'd say go for it
|
|
|
|
Lucothefish
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cretaceous Park
Posts: 701
|
|
So how much does our villain need to raise to here before we no longer have implied odds? It's somewhere near the $1.60 mark isn't it? Assuming he stacks off every time of course.
|
|
<@d0zer> how will you learn if I don't berate you harshly?
|
|
Vinland
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Between a couple of points.
Posts: 610
|
|
I dont really know where to draw the line on implied odds. If he made it a 3X bet on the turn I would have called but not 3.5X or 4X. Not sure what the answer is. I just think once we get to 3.5X, its a large enough amount of my stack that I would let it go.
|
|
I confess in quicksand
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,545
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vinland
I dont really know where to draw the line on implied odds. If he made it a 3X bet on the turn I would have called but not 3.5X or 4X. Not sure what the answer is. I just think once we get to 3.5X, its a large enough amount of my stack that I would let it go.
|
it's simple math, why do you assume you know the correct answer if you haven't taken the 2 minutes to run the break-even equation?
|
|
|
|
Vinland
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Between a couple of points.
Posts: 610
|
|
Quote:
|
why do you assume you know the correct answer
|
Vinland humbly said:
Quote:
|
Not sure what the answer is
|
I'm sure it is...I've just never seen how to do it yet.
I'll take a shot using Lucothefishs' example.
I bet $.42 and villain raises it to $1.60. I have to call $1.18 into a pot that is $2.67
My stack after my turn bet is $3.44 and I have to call $1.18
So I am calling $1.18 to win pot ($2.67) + my leftover stack x2 minus my turn call? ($4.52)? I am assuming for this example that my expectation is 100% that he will go all in.
I am a 4:1 dog but I have to call 1.18 to win $7.19 or 6:1 implied odds....
Am i somewhat close here?
|
|
I confess in quicksand
|
|
Ragnar4
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Billings, Montana
Posts: 1,284
|
|
Is it possible you don't know the diff between implied and immediate odds?
Could you define for me Immediate odds first, implied odds second?
Because by your responses, I think you have them confuzzled.
|
The older I get, the more I start wondering; Just what in the hell is going on here?
|
|
Vinland
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Between a couple of points.
Posts: 610
|
|
Using Lucothefishs' example of villain raising to $1.60:
Immediate Odds: I call $1.18 to win pot of $2.67 or 2.3:1
I am a 4:1 underdog so the immediate odds do not allow me to call on that alone.
Implied Odds: "Immediate odds plus any money I may make on future streets" I call $1.18 to win $2.67 plus the rest of the effective stack. (not sure if its my whole remaining stack or my remaining stack - $1.18 (what it takes to call the turn raise). I'll assume the later. So I call $1.18 to win $2.67+$2.26 = $4.93 which is 4.1:1
I think I added too much into my first try.....
But still even in this scenarion I think the implied odds are still there. I am a 4:1 dog but implied odds are approx 4.1:1.
I hope I am getting this.
|
|
I confess in quicksand
|
|
JuiceyJ
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 12
|
|
Well played.. I woulda done the same thing.
|
|
|
|
Kijjo
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 554
|
|
Side note since this thread has turned down this odds lesson road (which is ofcourse a necessary lesson) - at 2NL you have to also consider that this guy has no piece of a flush. I used to watch guys beat the crap out of each other betting their whole stacks with 4 to a flush on the board and neither one has a flush, they got top pair or two pair, etc. Once you factor that in, you have all the odds in the world to play this hand. Sure once in a while they guy actually does have the flush or at least the draw, but you'll get paid for your set in this place SO MANY TIMES, you gotta play this against NEARLY every opponent in 2NL and 5NL.
|
|
Donk Skills:
#1 The bluff call
#2 The Drawing-Dead Value Bet
__________________________________________________ _____________
"What we do in life echoes in eternity."
Maximus Decimus Meridius - Gladiator
|
|
Monsieur_chat
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London
Posts: 254
|
|
One of my favorite situations in poker - when the board pairs on the river, you hollywood for ages then throw out something weak looking and he shoves over you
|
|
|