|
OhBollocks
|
11-03-2008, 02:07 PM
Post subject: Big Pot 20NL
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Dublin
Posts: 240
|
|
Villain is 30/16/114(hands)
Microgaming, $0.10/0.20 Hold'em Cash Games, 9 Players
Hand Converter by Pokerhand.org
Board:
D1reStra1ghts (UTG): $18.15
HERO (UTG+1): $31.67
padico (MP1): $7.60
jifeng2008 (MP2): $3.80
Dying123 (MP3): $5.28
ConQU (CO): $36.45
chikurinka (Button): $2.50
Altistblin (SB): $8.28
JMGutiH (BB): $21.19
Dealt to HERO Q Q
Pre-flop:
(1 folds), HERO raises to $.80, (1 folds), jifeng2008 calls $.80, (1 folds), ConQU calls $.80, (3 folds)
Flop: ($2.70) 5 J T (3 Players)
HERO bets $2.20, jifeng2008 raises to $3, ConQU calls $3, HERO calls $.80
Turn: ($8.70) 5 (3 Players)
HERO bets $7, ConQU calls $7
River: ($22.70) 9 (3 Players)
HERO checks, ConQU bets $12.85, HERO ?
Comments?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ISF
Nothing actually changes in a poker game besides equity....
When we can maximize our equity, we will make lots and lots of money.
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
kb coolman
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 596
|
|
I'm laying this down. I try not to go all in with top/over pair, especially when that river would complete the flush and straight draws. Given your opponent's stats, this board will fit his hand range perfectly. Plus, you're still in a three way pot. You're QQ is no good here.
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
reads? ranges? Why do you bet the turn?
|
|
The strengh of a hero is defined by the weakness of his villains.
|
|
al yell
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 515
|
|
i call this all day. You're a 60% favorite over the following range: TT,KQs,J9s+,KQo,J9o+
|
|
|
|
kb coolman
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 596
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by al yell
i call this all day. You're a 60% favorite over the following range: TT,KQs,J9s+,KQo,J9o+
|
IMHO, 60% is too marginal to stack off, and I think you're way too limited in the ranges this op is likely to play. If he's showing too much aggression, there will be a better opportunity to take his stack.
|
|
|
|
al yell
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 515
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kb coolman
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by al yell
i call this all day. You're a 60% favorite over the following range: TT,KQs,J9s+,KQo,J9o+
|
IMHO, 60% is too marginal to stack off, and I think you're way too limited in the ranges this op is likely to play. If he's showing too much aggression, there will be a better opportunity to take his stack.
|
first off, you're not 'stacking off. It's only 2/3 of your stack. Also consider your odds; you're calling $12 to win $30 (3:1). His aggression is another incentive to call, whereas if he was passive (i.e. only betting the nuts) I may be more reluctant to, but would still call.
btw, what range do you put him on?
|
|
|
|
kmind
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Not Giving In
Posts: 4,240
|
|
you forgot them hearts in your range
|
|
|
|
al yell
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 515
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kmind
you forgot them hearts in your range
|
right! except i'm at a bit of a loss as to how to work them in (to pokerstove for instance)
|
|
|
|
kb coolman
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 596
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by al yell
btw, what range do you put him on?
|
I easily put this guy on ALL broadways, SCs, and connected Jacks or better. Like I said...not a good board against this guy with QQ.
|
|
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
KQ and heart draws both got there. I don't see him betting anything that you beat here.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|
|
al yell
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 515
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by al yell
i call this all day.
|
obv a spew monkey
|
|
|
|
d0zer
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,518
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kb coolman
IMHO, 60% is too marginal to stack off
|
wat? WAT?
so if someone said a coin landed heads 60% of the time...and they offered you even monies....
...
...
.
...
WAT?
|
|
|
|
kb coolman
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 596
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by d0zer
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kb coolman
IMHO, 60% is too marginal to stack off
|
wat? WAT?
so if someone said a coin landed heads 60% of the time...and they offered you even monies....
|
Pre-flop, of course I call it against this guy. Against a 12/7? No.
There is information presented to you during the course of a poker hand that is not available in a coin flip. Board texture, opponent ranges, betting patterns, etc.
Playing hand percentages with no regard to opponent ranges will not win you any money. Against a decent player, you will get stacked time and time again, especially with the % is marginal. Trust me, I know from experience.
If you were AI with QQ against a random opponent pre-flop against this board, then yes, you will win 60% of the time. That does not take into consideration information given during the course of the hand.
Let's look at it another way. You have AcAh pre-flop, the board presents 4 spades and you're faced with an AI call decision on the river. Technically, you would win this hand 55% of the time. That's better than 50/50, so it's a long term +EV play, right? But it makes a big difference if you're checking the river as opposed to calling the AI bet. Calling when you know you're beat is -EV, I don't care what the odds are.
|
|
|