|
sejje
|
03-07-2005, 03:52 AM
Post subject: Am I a Loser?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 883
|
|
How many hands would you guys say it takes before you can decide if you're a winning player as opposed to running hot?
I've got 36K hands in PT in the four months I've been playing and I'm ahead roughly 1,000 playing .5/1 NL tables.
Can I safely say that I play to a profit at that limit in the long run?
Also, what does a good player expect to make an hour four-tabling .5/1 NL?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
RiverMonkey
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 446
|
|
Well, that's 2.777... BB/100 hands. I think that's on the low side for NL isn't it?
|
|
|
|
koolmoe
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Drowning in prosperity
Posts: 1,279
|
|
Depends on your variance. What is it, BTW?
|
|
|
|
JeffreyGB
|
03-07-2005, 05:58 AM
Post subject: Re: Am I a Loser?
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Jenks, OK
Posts: 3,477
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sejmeister
Also, what does a good player expect to make an hour four-tabling .5/1 NL?
|
Assuming 60 hands an hour (for no good reason): $6 per hour.
5BB/100 hands = $10 / 100 hands -> $6 / 60 hands.
- Jeffrey
|
|
|
|
LeFou
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,361
|
|
2.7 BB/100 is fine for NL. You should move up stakes.
Jeff, I think your math's off?
Fourtabling, you should get at least 40 hands per hour, PER TABLE, so 160/hr. And 5BB at .5/1 is $5/100
160/100 1.6
1.6 X 5 = $8/hr
Assuming one can play four 5BB/100 NL games at once.
3 is probably more reliable
1.6 X 3 = $4.80/hr
|
|
|
|
rob6597
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 110
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RiverMonkey
Well, that's 2.777... BB/100 hands. I think that's on the low side for NL isn't it?
|
Since this is .5/1 NL, the Big Blind is $1.
But, the BB/100 stat is calculated using Big Bets, (for NL, 2x the big blind), or $2. So, wouldn't it be 1.4BB/100?
|
|
|
|
JeffreyGB
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Jenks, OK
Posts: 3,477
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LeFou
2.7 BB/100 is fine for NL. You should move up stakes.
Jeff, I think your math's off?
Fourtabling, you should get at least 40 hands per hour, PER TABLE, so 160/hr. And 5BB at .5/1 is $5/100
160/100 1.6
1.6 X 5 = $8/hr
Assuming one can play four 5BB/100 NL games at once.
3 is probably more reliable
1.6 X 3 = $4.80/hr
|
You're right, my math was off in that I only considered one table that plays 60 hands per hour. Forgot to factor in the multi-table aspect.
Aren't your calculations off by the fact that in NL, BB/100 is defined as 2xbig blind / 100? 5BB/100 does equal $10 according to the way BB/100 is defined in PokerTracker, which is what the stats he quotes refer to. So my estimate of a 60 hand/hour table, taken at four tables, yields $24/hour. Drop to a 40 hand/hour table and you're at $16/hour.
|
|
|
|
JeffreyGB
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Jenks, OK
Posts: 3,477
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by JeffreyGB
So yeah...this is underperforming by most accounts in NL. I'd say you [original poster] should start looking for leaks in your game to see where you're dropping at.
|
I should note here too that while you're not making as much as you could be, or as much as "good" players are, you're still turning a profit. That's a good thing and you're still a winning player. If you have Poker Tracker, start looking at how various hands you play pay out relative to what you'd expect. Then adjust your play for those results.
|
|
|
|
Waggho
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 260
|
|
Jeff, is that avatar you?
|
|
|
|
JeffreyGB
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Jenks, OK
Posts: 3,477
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Waggho
Jeff, is that avatar you?
|
I far prefer to be referred to by my full name (Jeffrey).
That said, yes, it is.
- Jeffrey
|
|
|
|
RiverMonkey
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 446
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rob6597
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RiverMonkey
Well, that's 2.777... BB/100 hands. I think that's on the low side for NL isn't it?
|
Since this is .5/1 NL, the Big Blind is $1.
But, the BB/100 stat is calculated using Big Bets, (for NL, 2x the big blind), or $2. So, wouldn't it be 1.4BB/100?
|
Ok, I play limit, so I had assumed that since there is no "big bet" for NL you use the big blind amount for BB/100.
Now that I actually think about it, it makes complete sense to use 2xbig-blind amount to remain consistent between LHE, and NL.
I stand corrected.
|
|
|
|
giantdogs92
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 52
|
|
i hate math
|
"If you even dream of beating me you'd better wake up and apoligize" -Muhammed Ali

|