Poker Forum
|
Over 1,246,000 Posts!
|
|
|
>
>
AK gets 4-bet by squeeze-ee
|
|
|
ARK
|
02-15-2010, 03:45 PM
Post subject: AK gets 4-bet by squeeze-ee
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 16
|
|
Have not been at the table long so no reads. I definitely was not expecting CO to be the one to 4-bet me. Do you call here?
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (8 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
BB ($5.65)
UTG ($10)
UTG+1 ($15.20)
MP1 ($17.95)
MP2 ($27.25)
CO ($32.10)
Button ($12.55)
Hero (SB) ($24.20)
Preflop: Hero is SB with K , A
UTG (poster) checks, 1 fold, MP1 bets $0.75, 1 fold, CO calls $0.75, 1 fold, Hero raises to $3.50, 2 folds, MP1 calls $2.75, CO raises to $32.10 (All-In), Hero ???
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
AdamThePirate
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Manchester
Posts: 142
|
|
People who limp re-raise are generally terrible players who have QQ+.
At best you're flipping, I would lay it down.
Edits: Then again, just as Muzz sez, there's a lot of dead money in the pots.
|
|
|
|
Muzzard
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 1,843
|
|
Yes I would call.
There is alot of dead money in the pot already and I think it's going to be a flip a lot of the time, so with the dead money its fine to call. I highly doubt this is AA/KK, more likely to be a chop or flip.
|
|
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
Read and learn how to do this:
http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...in-t87954.html
Do your best with putting him on a range and decide what to do from there.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|
|
ARK
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 16
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
|
My biggest question here spoon is trying to put him on a reasonable range of hands.
Against QQ+ only, I've got 30% equity. Add in AK and that goes up to 38%
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
35,958,384 games 0.072 secs 499,421,999 games/sec
Board:
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 38.824% 18.14% 20.68% 6524615 7436014.00 { AsKc }
Hand 1: 61.176% 40.50% 20.68% 14561741 7436014.00 { QQ+, AKs, AKo }
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
35,958,384 games 0.071 secs 506,456,112 games/sec
Board:
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 38.824% 18.14% 20.68% 6524615 7436014.00 { AsKc }
Hand 1: 61.176% 40.50% 20.68% 14561741 7436014.00 { QQ+, AKs, AKo }
I folded in the moment but I think I need to call bc of the dead money. With the dead money, I have to call 20.70 to win 31.45 ~35%. The only way I can fold here is if I know Villain is only doing this with QQ+, which seems to tight to assign an unknown right?
Without the dead money, I have to call 20.70 to win 28.70 ~ 72%. This makes me lean toward a fold unless we think AQ is in the range (seems unlikely).
All thoughts on my thought process are appreciated!
|
|
|
|
Muzzard
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 1,843
|
|
It coudl quite easy be lots of pairs like 77+ too, do you not think he'd 3b QQ+ most the time pre and 4b you instead to like 8 rather than just jamming?
|
|
|
|
Roller
|
|
Straight
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 168
|
|
In this spot given what we have.
I would Call.
If your read tells you different (Range).
Fold
|
|
|
|
daviddem
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Philippines/Saudi Arabia
Posts: 983
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ARK
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
|
My biggest question here spoon is trying to put him on a reasonable range of hands.
Against QQ+ only, I've got 30% equity. Add in AK and that goes up to 38%
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
35,958,384 games 0.072 secs 499,421,999 games/sec
Board:
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 38.824% 18.14% 20.68% 6524615 7436014.00 { AsKc }
Hand 1: 61.176% 40.50% 20.68% 14561741 7436014.00 { QQ+, AKs, AKo }
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
35,958,384 games 0.071 secs 506,456,112 games/sec
Board:
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 38.824% 18.14% 20.68% 6524615 7436014.00 { AsKc }
Hand 1: 61.176% 40.50% 20.68% 14561741 7436014.00 { QQ+, AKs, AKo }
I folded in the moment but I think I need to call bc of the dead money. With the dead money, I have to call 20.70 to win 31.45 ~35%. The only way I can fold here is if I know Villain is only doing this with QQ+, which seems to tight to assign an unknown right?
Without the dead money, I have to call 20.70 to win 28.70 ~ 72%. This makes me lean toward a fold unless we think AQ is in the range (seems unlikely).
All thoughts on my thought process are appreciated!
|
EDIT: THE ANALYSIS BELOW IS WRONG. SEE SUBSEQUENT POSTS FOR CORRECTION
OK. Let's assume QQ+, AK as your opp's range. As per Pokerstove, you win 38.8% of the time, but don't forget that you also tie 20.7% of the time!
Now, pot odds. When it is your turn to talk, there is 0.60(blinds and poster)+3.50(your bet)+3.50(MP1 call)+3.50(CO call)+20.7(CO raise for the rest of your stack)=31.80. You have 20.70 left to call so the pot odds are 20.70 to 31.80, which is 39.4%. However, you should count the rake. Let's say the rake is 6%. 6% of the total pot after you call (52.50) is 3.15, but the rake is probably topped at $3 so your actual pot odds after rake are 20.70 to 28.80, which is 41.8% pot odds
So if you did compare your win equity of 38.8% to the pot odds of 41.8%, you might think you should fold. However you tie a significant portion of the time, so:
- 38.8% of the time, your profit on the call is 28.80
- 20.7% of the time, you tie and you "loose" 20.70, but you win back half the pot minus rake, which is (52.50-3)/2=24.75. So that is a profit of 4.05
- 40.5% of the time, you loose 20.70
EV = 0.388*28.80 + 0.207*4.05 - 0.405*20.70 = 3.63 > 0 so clearly you should call.
To directly compare your equity including the tie with the pot odds, take half the tie % and add it to your win %. Your equity becomes about 49%, which compares favorably with the 41.8% pot odds. The EV equation would become:
EV = 0.4915*28.8 - 0.5085*20.7 = 3.63
I don't play 25NL, but at 2NL, that kind of line is more often than not a medium/small pocket pair that the guy initially wanted to play for set value or a "trappy chappy" who likes to trap with his AA or KK or a tilting donk doing that with crap like KJ, who thinks it's unfair to get raised out of his limps preflop , and who does that to "teach them".
The question remains: which one is it?
|
|
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by daviddem
OK. Let's assume QQ+, AK as your opp's range. As per Pokerstove, you win 38.8% of the time, but don't forget that you also tie 20.7% of the time!
|
You've made a easy-to-make mistake at the beginning of your analysis that has thrown off most of your reply. You don't win 38.8% of the time, you have 38.8% equity. Take a closer look at the output from PokerStove:
Code:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 38.824% 18.14% 20.68% 78295380 89232168.00 { AKo }
Hand 1: 61.176% 40.50% 20.68% 174740892 89232168.00 { QQ+, AKs, AKo }
I've added italics and bold to help you see it better. Also, the post I linked to above very much simplifies the analysis you were doing. Best of luck!
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|
|
daviddem
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Philippines/Saudi Arabia
Posts: 983
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
You've made a easy-to-make mistake at the beginning of your analysis that has thrown off most of your reply. You don't win 38.8% of the time, you have 38.8% equity. Take a closer look at the output from PokerStove:
Code:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 38.824% 18.14% 20.68% 78295380 89232168.00 { AKo }
Hand 1: 61.176% 40.50% 20.68% 174740892 89232168.00 { QQ+, AKs, AKo }
I've added italics and bold to help you see it better. Also, the post I linked to above very much simplifies the analysis you were doing. Best of luck!
|
Ah sh...!
Thanks for pointing this out though, I'll be wary of this next time.
This is very well explained here: http://www.pokerstove.com/pokerstove/faq.php
|
|
|
|
daviddem
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Philippines/Saudi Arabia
Posts: 983
|
|
Let me correct this:
OK. Let's assume QQ+, AK as your opp's range. As per Pokerstove, you equity in the pot is 38.8%. 18.1% of your equity is coming from the times you win and 20.7% is coming from the times you tie.*
Now, pot odds. When it is your turn to talk, there is 0.60(blinds and poster)+3.50(your bet)+3.50(MP1 call)+3.50(CO call)+20.7(CO raise for the rest of your stack)=31.80. You have 20.70 left to call so the pot odds are 20.70 to 31.80, which is 39.4% ( =20.7/(31.8+20.7) ). However, you should count the rake. Let's say the rake is 6%. 6% of the total pot after you call (52.50) is 3.15, but the rake is probably topped at $3 so your actual pot odds after rake are 20.70 to 28.80, which is 41.8% pot odds
You then compare your 38.8% equity to the pot odds of 41.8%, and since 38.8% < 41.8%, it's a fold.
EV calculation from your equity:
- 38.8% of the time, your profit on the call is 28.80
- 61.2% of the time, your loss is 20.70
EV = 0.388*28.80 - 0.612*20.70 = -1.494 < 0 so clearly you should fold.
I don't play 25NL, but at 2NL, that kind of line is more often than not a medium/small pocket pair that the guy initially wanted to play for set value or a "trappy chappy" who likes to trap with his AA or KK or a tilting donk doing that with crap like KJ, who thinks it's unfair to get raised out of his limps preflop , and who does that to "teach them".
The question remains: which one is it?
* This does not mean that you tie 20.7% of the time though! This means that your equity in the pot from the times you tie is 20.7%. In a heads up pot, that means that the % of times you tie will be double your tie equity. In this case, you can figure that there are 3+3+6+9=21 combos in villain's range, and 9 of these are AK. 9/21=0.43=43%, so 43% of the time, it will be AK vs AK, which ties most of the time.
|
|
|
|
hhsale
|
|
One Pair
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Russia
Posts: 19
|
|
I think call
|
|
|
|
Latest Poker News
|
|
KoRnholio
|
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
|
|
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:07 PM.
|