Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

The 7 deadly forms of rank domination?

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Fnord
Old 02-23-2004, 06:57 PM     Post subject: The 7 deadly forms of rank domination? #1 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
I'm putting together a computer program to deal out a large sample of hands and figure out the odds of given hands being dominated for various numbers of players. To do this I need to enumerate all of the forms of domination.

Any errors in this list?

Code:
1. Upper Pair Match AA vs AK (2 cards behind)
2. Over Pair        AA vs KQ (2 cards behind)
3. Better Pair      AA vs KK (2 outs)
4. Lower Pair Match KK vs AK (3 outs)
5. Kicked Upper     AK vs AJ (3 outs)
6. Kicked Lower     AQ vs KQ (3 outs)
7. Pair in Between  KK vs AQ (3 outs)
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
Fnord
Old 02-23-2004, 06:57 PM     Post subject: The 7 deadly forms of rank domination? #2 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
I'm putting together a computer program to deal out a large sample of hands and figure out the odds of given hands being dominated for various numbers of players. To do this I need to enumerate all of the forms of domination.

Any errors in this list?

Code:
1. Upper Pair Match AA vs AK (2 cards behind)
2. Over Pair        AA vs KQ (2 cards behind)
3. Better Pair      AA vs KK (2 outs)
4. Lower Pair Match KK vs AK (3 outs)
5. Kicked Upper     AK vs AJ (3 outs)
6. Kicked Lower     AQ vs KQ (3 outs)
7. Pair in Between  KK vs AQ (3 outs)
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-23-2004, 06:57 PM     Post subject: The 7 deadly forms of rank domination? #3 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
I'm putting together a computer program to deal out a large sample of hands and figure out the odds of given hands being dominated for various numbers of players. To do this I need to enumerate all of the forms of domination.

Any errors in this list?

Code:
1. Upper Pair Match AA vs AK (2 cards behind)
2. Over Pair        AA vs KQ (2 cards behind)
3. Better Pair      AA vs KK (2 outs)
4. Lower Pair Match KK vs AK (3 outs)
5. Kicked Upper     AK vs AJ (3 outs)
6. Kicked Lower     AQ vs KQ (3 outs)
7. Pair in Between  KK vs AQ (3 outs)
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-23-2004, 06:57 PM     Post subject: The 7 deadly forms of rank domination? #4 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
I'm putting together a computer program to deal out a large sample of hands and figure out the odds of given hands being dominated for various numbers of players. To do this I need to enumerate all of the forms of domination.

Any errors in this list?

Code:
1. Upper Pair Match AA vs AK (2 cards behind)
2. Over Pair        AA vs KQ (2 cards behind)
3. Better Pair      AA vs KK (2 outs)
4. Lower Pair Match KK vs AK (3 outs)
5. Kicked Upper     AK vs AJ (3 outs)
6. Kicked Lower     AQ vs KQ (3 outs)
7. Pair in Between  KK vs AQ (3 outs)
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-23-2004, 06:57 PM     Post subject: The 7 deadly forms of rank domination? #5 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
I'm putting together a computer program to deal out a large sample of hands and figure out the odds of given hands being dominated for various numbers of players. To do this I need to enumerate all of the forms of domination.

Any errors in this list?

Code:
1. Upper Pair Match AA vs AK (2 cards behind)
2. Over Pair        AA vs KQ (2 cards behind)
3. Better Pair      AA vs KK (2 outs)
4. Lower Pair Match KK vs AK (3 outs)
5. Kicked Upper     AK vs AJ (3 outs)
6. Kicked Lower     AQ vs KQ (3 outs)
7. Pair in Between  KK vs AQ (3 outs)
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-23-2004, 06:57 PM     Post subject: The 7 deadly forms of rank domination? #6 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
I'm putting together a computer program to deal out a large sample of hands and figure out the odds of given hands being dominated for various numbers of players. To do this I need to enumerate all of the forms of domination.

Any errors in this list?

Code:
1. Upper Pair Match AA vs AK (2 cards behind)
2. Over Pair        AA vs KQ (2 cards behind)
3. Better Pair      AA vs KK (2 outs)
4. Lower Pair Match KK vs AK (3 outs)
5. Kicked Upper     AK vs AJ (3 outs)
6. Kicked Lower     AQ vs KQ (3 outs)
7. Pair in Between  KK vs AQ (3 outs)
Reply With Quote
!Luck
Old 02-23-2004, 10:57 PM #7 (permalink)  
!Luck's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
!Luck is on a distinguished road
If you are two cards behind what is your chance of catching them? I know it has to be some conditional probability, but I lack the math skills to do that.
Reply With Quote
!Luck
Old 02-23-2004, 10:57 PM #8 (permalink)  
!Luck's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
!Luck is on a distinguished road
If you are two cards behind what is your chance of catching them? I know it has to be some conditional probability, but I lack the math skills to do that.
Reply With Quote
!Luck
Old 02-23-2004, 10:57 PM #9 (permalink)  
!Luck's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
!Luck is on a distinguished road
If you are two cards behind what is your chance of catching them? I know it has to be some conditional probability, but I lack the math skills to do that.
Reply With Quote
!Luck
Old 02-23-2004, 10:57 PM #10 (permalink)  
!Luck's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
!Luck is on a distinguished road
If you are two cards behind what is your chance of catching them? I know it has to be some conditional probability, but I lack the math skills to do that.
Reply With Quote
!Luck
Old 02-23-2004, 10:57 PM #11 (permalink)  
!Luck's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
!Luck is on a distinguished road
If you are two cards behind what is your chance of catching them? I know it has to be some conditional probability, but I lack the math skills to do that.
Reply With Quote
!Luck
Old 02-23-2004, 10:57 PM #12 (permalink)  
!Luck's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
!Luck is on a distinguished road
If you are two cards behind what is your chance of catching them? I know it has to be some conditional probability, but I lack the math skills to do that.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-23-2004, 11:26 PM #13 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by !Luck
If you are two cards behind what is your chance of catching them? I know it has to be some conditional probability, but I lack the math skills to do that.
Slim. With type 1 and 2 domination you're screwed up the arse. Only a matter of if they are using astro-glide, sand or just plain going in raw.

Also, remember that these are only pre-flop outs based on ranks. No straights or flushes are considered. AK has 6 outs pre-flop against 22, however it's a near coin flip as to which hand comes out ahead (with a slight edge to 22.)
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-23-2004, 11:26 PM #14 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by !Luck
If you are two cards behind what is your chance of catching them? I know it has to be some conditional probability, but I lack the math skills to do that.
Slim. With type 1 and 2 domination you're screwed up the arse. Only a matter of if they are using astro-glide, sand or just plain going in raw.

Also, remember that these are only pre-flop outs based on ranks. No straights or flushes are considered. AK has 6 outs pre-flop against 22, however it's a near coin flip as to which hand comes out ahead (with a slight edge to 22.)
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-23-2004, 11:26 PM #15 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by !Luck
If you are two cards behind what is your chance of catching them? I know it has to be some conditional probability, but I lack the math skills to do that.
Slim. With type 1 and 2 domination you're screwed up the arse. Only a matter of if they are using astro-glide, sand or just plain going in raw.

Also, remember that these are only pre-flop outs based on ranks. No straights or flushes are considered. AK has 6 outs pre-flop against 22, however it's a near coin flip as to which hand comes out ahead (with a slight edge to 22.)
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-23-2004, 11:26 PM #16 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by !Luck
If you are two cards behind what is your chance of catching them? I know it has to be some conditional probability, but I lack the math skills to do that.
Slim. With type 1 and 2 domination you're screwed up the arse. Only a matter of if they are using astro-glide, sand or just plain going in raw.

Also, remember that these are only pre-flop outs based on ranks. No straights or flushes are considered. AK has 6 outs pre-flop against 22, however it's a near coin flip as to which hand comes out ahead (with a slight edge to 22.)
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-23-2004, 11:26 PM #17 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by !Luck
If you are two cards behind what is your chance of catching them? I know it has to be some conditional probability, but I lack the math skills to do that.
Slim. With type 1 and 2 domination you're screwed up the arse. Only a matter of if they are using astro-glide, sand or just plain going in raw.

Also, remember that these are only pre-flop outs based on ranks. No straights or flushes are considered. AK has 6 outs pre-flop against 22, however it's a near coin flip as to which hand comes out ahead (with a slight edge to 22.)
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-23-2004, 11:26 PM #18 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by !Luck
If you are two cards behind what is your chance of catching them? I know it has to be some conditional probability, but I lack the math skills to do that.
Slim. With type 1 and 2 domination you're screwed up the arse. Only a matter of if they are using astro-glide, sand or just plain going in raw.

Also, remember that these are only pre-flop outs based on ranks. No straights or flushes are considered. AK has 6 outs pre-flop against 22, however it's a near coin flip as to which hand comes out ahead (with a slight edge to 22.)
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-24-2004, 01:52 AM #19 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Preliminary results...

Interesting that according to this KJo is better than ATo and QJo isn't far behind.

Edit: re-ran with a better random number generator
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-24-2004, 01:52 AM #20 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Preliminary results...

Interesting that according to this KJo is better than ATo and QJo isn't far behind.

Edit: re-ran with a better random number generator
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-24-2004, 01:52 AM #21 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Preliminary results...

Interesting that according to this KJo is better than ATo and QJo isn't far behind.

Edit: re-ran with a better random number generator
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-24-2004, 01:52 AM #22 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Preliminary results...

Interesting that according to this KJo is better than ATo and QJo isn't far behind.

Edit: re-ran with a better random number generator
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-24-2004, 01:52 AM #23 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Preliminary results...

Interesting that according to this KJo is better than ATo and QJo isn't far behind.

Edit: re-ran with a better random number generator
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-24-2004, 01:52 AM #24 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Preliminary results...

Interesting that according to this KJo is better than ATo and QJo isn't far behind.

Edit: re-ran with a better random number generator
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 03-08-2004, 07:43 PM #25 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Some different table sizes

Code:
10 players 1000000 hands
   A     K     Q     J     T     9     8     7     6     5     4     3     2
A  0.0%  5.7% 15.3% 23.7% 31.8% 38.7% 45.4% 51.1% 56.6% 61.1% 65.6% 69.4% 72.7%
K  5.7%  5.7% 19.3% 27.6% 35.0% 41.9% 47.9% 53.5% 58.5% 63.0% 66.9% 70.8% 74.4%
Q 15.3% 19.3% 11.3% 31.0% 38.3% 44.6% 50.6% 55.6% 60.9% 64.8% 68.9% 72.1% 75.4%
J 23.7% 27.6% 31.0% 16.1% 41.2% 47.5% 53.1% 57.9% 62.3% 66.7% 70.4% 73.7% 76.7%
T 31.8% 35.0% 38.3% 41.2% 21.5% 50.0% 55.3% 60.2% 64.3% 68.4% 71.8% 75.1% 78.0%
9 38.7% 41.9% 44.6% 47.5% 50.0% 25.7% 57.8% 62.2% 66.0% 70.1% 73.2% 76.2% 78.9%
8 45.4% 47.9% 50.6% 53.1% 55.3% 57.8% 29.9% 64.2% 68.3% 71.5% 75.0% 77.7% 80.1%
7 51.1% 53.5% 55.6% 57.9% 60.2% 62.2% 64.2% 33.8% 69.7% 73.2% 76.1% 78.9% 81.4%
6 56.6% 58.5% 60.9% 62.3% 64.3% 66.0% 68.3% 69.7% 37.8% 74.7% 77.4% 80.0% 82.2%
5 61.1% 63.0% 64.8% 66.7% 68.4% 70.1% 71.5% 73.2% 74.7% 41.0% 78.8% 81.2% 83.4%
4 65.6% 66.9% 68.9% 70.4% 71.8% 73.2% 75.0% 76.1% 77.4% 78.8% 44.5% 82.3% 84.2%
3 69.4% 70.8% 72.1% 73.7% 75.1% 76.2% 77.7% 78.9% 80.0% 81.2% 82.3% 47.9% 85.3%
2 72.7% 74.4% 75.4% 76.7% 78.0% 78.9% 80.1% 81.4% 82.2% 83.4% 84.2% 85.3% 51.0%

9 players 250000 hands
   A     K     Q     J     T     9     8     7     6     5     4     3     2
A  0.0%  4.9% 11.8% 19.3% 25.7% 31.3% 37.3% 41.6% 46.9% 50.7% 54.9% 59.4% 63.1%
K  4.9%  5.1% 14.9% 21.2% 27.6% 33.1% 38.3% 43.6% 48.5% 52.4% 56.9% 60.5% 63.7%
Q 11.8% 14.9% 10.1% 23.4% 29.0% 35.1% 40.0% 45.5% 49.0% 54.1% 58.5% 62.2% 65.9%
J 19.3% 21.2% 23.4% 14.2% 31.7% 37.1% 42.3% 46.6% 51.1% 55.7% 59.1% 62.7% 66.3%
T 25.7% 27.6% 29.0% 31.7% 18.8% 38.4% 44.3% 48.4% 52.7% 56.5% 60.8% 64.5% 67.2%
9 31.3% 33.1% 35.1% 37.1% 38.4% 23.4% 45.3% 49.8% 53.7% 58.4% 62.1% 65.2% 68.6%
8 37.3% 38.3% 40.0% 42.3% 44.3% 45.3% 27.9% 51.5% 56.0% 59.7% 63.2% 66.3% 69.6%
7 41.6% 43.6% 45.5% 46.6% 48.4% 49.8% 51.5% 31.3% 57.7% 61.0% 64.0% 67.5% 70.1%
6 46.9% 48.5% 49.0% 51.1% 52.7% 53.7% 56.0% 57.7% 34.6% 62.2% 65.3% 68.9% 71.4%
5 50.7% 52.4% 54.1% 55.7% 56.5% 58.4% 59.7% 61.0% 62.2% 38.2% 67.3% 69.4% 72.7%
4 54.9% 56.9% 58.5% 59.1% 60.8% 62.1% 63.2% 64.0% 65.3% 67.3% 40.7% 71.2% 73.2%
3 59.4% 60.5% 62.2% 62.7% 64.5% 65.2% 66.3% 67.5% 68.9% 69.4% 71.2% 43.8% 74.3%
2 63.1% 63.7% 65.9% 66.3% 67.2% 68.6% 69.6% 70.1% 71.4% 72.7% 73.2% 74.3% 47.5%

8 players 250000 hands
   A     K     Q     J     T     9     8     7     6     5     4     3     2
A  0.0%  4.8% 10.7% 17.7% 23.6% 27.8% 33.7% 39.1% 43.5% 47.6% 51.3% 55.0% 59.0%
K  4.8%  4.2% 13.5% 19.4% 25.0% 30.0% 35.4% 39.9% 44.6% 48.7% 53.1% 56.0% 60.0%
Q 10.7% 13.5%  8.7% 21.3% 26.8% 31.9% 36.7% 41.7% 46.4% 50.0% 53.9% 57.4% 61.3%
J 17.7% 19.4% 21.3% 13.0% 28.4% 34.1% 38.5% 43.1% 47.5% 52.3% 54.7% 58.8% 61.6%
T 23.6% 25.0% 26.8% 28.4% 16.6% 35.9% 40.2% 44.5% 49.1% 53.0% 56.7% 59.4% 62.3%
9 27.8% 30.0% 31.9% 34.1% 35.9% 20.3% 42.1% 46.3% 50.3% 54.5% 57.6% 61.1% 64.7%
8 33.7% 35.4% 36.7% 38.5% 40.2% 42.1% 24.0% 48.0% 51.6% 55.5% 58.6% 61.4% 65.2%
7 39.1% 39.9% 41.7% 43.1% 44.5% 46.3% 48.0% 26.9% 53.3% 56.4% 60.4% 63.3% 66.6%
6 43.5% 44.6% 46.4% 47.5% 49.1% 50.3% 51.6% 53.3% 30.8% 58.0% 61.0% 63.9% 67.1%
5 47.6% 48.7% 50.0% 52.3% 53.0% 54.5% 55.5% 56.4% 58.0% 33.8% 62.1% 65.3% 68.4%
4 51.3% 53.1% 53.9% 54.7% 56.7% 57.6% 58.6% 60.4% 61.0% 62.1% 37.5% 66.9% 69.0%
3 55.0% 56.0% 57.4% 58.8% 59.4% 61.1% 61.4% 63.3% 63.9% 65.3% 66.9% 39.7% 70.1%
2 59.0% 60.0% 61.3% 61.6% 62.3% 64.7% 65.2% 66.6% 67.1% 68.4% 69.0% 70.1% 42.1%

7 players 250000 hands
   A     K     Q     J     T     9     8     7     6     5     4     3     2
A  0.0%  3.1%  8.6% 13.7% 19.1% 23.9% 28.7% 32.9% 36.4% 41.1% 45.1% 48.3% 51.6%
K  3.1%  3.0% 11.2% 16.6% 21.3% 26.1% 31.0% 35.3% 38.8% 42.1% 46.5% 50.6% 53.2%
Q  8.6% 11.2%  5.0% 19.1% 24.1% 28.6% 32.6% 36.5% 41.8% 44.0% 48.2% 51.4% 55.3%
J 13.7% 16.6% 19.1%  8.7% 26.5% 30.5% 35.4% 39.2% 42.2% 46.4% 50.1% 53.1% 56.4%
T 19.1% 21.3% 24.1% 26.5% 10.8% 33.2% 37.3% 41.7% 44.7% 47.9% 52.1% 55.7% 57.3%
9 23.9% 26.1% 28.6% 30.5% 33.2% 14.3% 39.8% 42.4% 47.3% 50.0% 53.2% 57.0% 59.0%
8 28.7% 31.0% 32.6% 35.4% 37.3% 39.8% 16.5% 45.1% 48.5% 52.2% 55.3% 57.7% 60.9%
7 32.9% 35.3% 36.5% 39.2% 41.7% 42.4% 45.1% 19.5% 50.2% 54.3% 56.0% 59.8% 62.4%
6 36.4% 38.8% 41.8% 42.2% 44.7% 47.3% 48.5% 50.2% 21.3% 54.7% 58.5% 60.3% 63.2%
5 41.1% 42.1% 44.0% 46.4% 47.9% 50.0% 52.2% 54.3% 54.7% 23.5% 59.9% 61.9% 64.6%
4 45.1% 46.5% 48.2% 50.1% 52.1% 53.2% 55.3% 56.0% 58.5% 59.9% 25.8% 62.8% 65.7%
3 48.3% 50.6% 51.4% 53.1% 55.7% 57.0% 57.7% 59.8% 60.3% 61.9% 62.8% 27.8% 67.2%
2 51.6% 53.2% 55.3% 56.4% 57.3% 59.0% 60.9% 62.4% 63.2% 64.6% 65.7% 67.2% 30.0%

6 players 250000 hands
   A     K     Q     J     T     9     8     7     6     5     4     3     2
A  0.0%  3.3%  7.9% 12.7% 16.9% 20.9% 25.4% 29.3% 33.1% 36.7% 40.3% 44.0% 46.9%
K  3.3%  3.7%  9.8% 14.3% 19.0% 22.1% 26.4% 30.4% 34.6% 37.9% 41.1% 44.7% 48.1%
Q  7.9%  9.8%  6.0% 15.6% 20.0% 24.4% 28.5% 31.9% 35.1% 39.2% 42.3% 46.1% 48.6%
J 12.7% 14.3% 15.6%  9.1% 21.4% 25.3% 29.6% 33.7% 36.7% 40.3% 43.1% 47.5% 50.3%
T 16.9% 19.0% 20.0% 21.4% 12.2% 26.9% 30.9% 34.9% 38.2% 41.2% 44.8% 47.2% 50.9%
9 20.9% 22.1% 24.4% 25.3% 26.9% 15.3% 31.6% 36.0% 39.2% 41.9% 45.8% 48.7% 51.5%
8 25.4% 26.4% 28.5% 29.6% 30.9% 31.6% 17.3% 37.2% 40.6% 43.9% 46.3% 49.6% 52.7%
7 29.3% 30.4% 31.9% 33.7% 34.9% 36.0% 37.2% 20.3% 41.9% 44.4% 48.8% 51.0% 53.8%
6 33.1% 34.6% 35.1% 36.7% 38.2% 39.2% 40.6% 41.9% 23.0% 46.0% 49.1% 51.3% 54.7%
5 36.7% 37.9% 39.2% 40.3% 41.2% 41.9% 43.9% 44.4% 46.0% 26.7% 49.9% 52.5% 56.6%
4 40.3% 41.1% 42.3% 43.1% 44.8% 45.8% 46.3% 48.8% 49.1% 49.9% 28.0% 54.0% 56.8%
3 44.0% 44.7% 46.1% 47.5% 47.2% 48.7% 49.6% 51.0% 51.3% 52.5% 54.0% 30.0% 57.6%
2 46.9% 48.1% 48.6% 50.3% 50.9% 51.5% 52.7% 53.8% 54.7% 56.6% 56.8% 57.6% 32.2%

5 players 250000 hands
   A     K     Q     J     T     9     8     7     6     5     4     3     2
A  0.0%  1.8%  5.6%  9.8% 12.9% 16.6% 20.3% 23.5% 26.9% 29.6% 32.8% 35.4% 38.6%
K  1.8%  1.8%  7.4% 11.6% 14.9% 18.3% 21.9% 24.5% 27.9% 30.3% 34.0% 37.4% 39.5%
Q  5.6%  7.4%  3.6% 13.3% 16.3% 20.2% 23.9% 26.5% 29.8% 32.8% 35.7% 37.5% 40.9%
J  9.8% 11.6% 13.3%  6.2% 18.3% 21.4% 24.5% 27.9% 31.0% 34.7% 37.1% 38.6% 42.2%
T 12.9% 14.9% 16.3% 18.3%  7.6% 23.0% 26.2% 30.5% 32.4% 35.3% 38.2% 41.4% 44.4%
9 16.6% 18.3% 20.2% 21.4% 23.0%  9.5% 28.5% 31.6% 34.5% 36.6% 39.6% 42.2% 45.5%
8 20.3% 21.9% 23.9% 24.5% 26.2% 28.5% 11.4% 32.4% 35.5% 38.8% 40.7% 43.5% 46.0%
7 23.5% 24.5% 26.5% 27.9% 30.5% 31.6% 32.4% 14.0% 37.0% 40.0% 42.6% 45.1% 47.6%
6 26.9% 27.9% 29.8% 31.0% 32.4% 34.5% 35.5% 37.0% 14.1% 41.0% 43.9% 46.4% 48.4%
5 29.6% 30.3% 32.8% 34.7% 35.3% 36.6% 38.8% 40.0% 41.0% 15.5% 44.5% 48.1% 50.4%
4 32.8% 34.0% 35.7% 37.1% 38.2% 39.6% 40.7% 42.6% 43.9% 44.5% 18.3% 48.4% 51.9%
3 35.4% 37.4% 37.5% 38.6% 41.4% 42.2% 43.5% 45.1% 46.4% 48.1% 48.4% 20.9% 52.2%
2 38.6% 39.5% 40.9% 42.2% 44.4% 45.5% 46.0% 47.6% 48.4% 50.4% 51.9% 52.2% 21.3%

4 players 250000 hands
   A     K     Q     J     T     9     8     7     6     5     4     3     2
A  0.0%  1.9%  5.5%  9.3% 12.3% 15.1% 18.2% 21.5% 24.1% 27.3% 29.8% 33.5% 35.6%
K  1.9%  1.7%  7.0% 10.6% 13.9% 16.4% 19.2% 22.1% 25.6% 27.9% 31.2% 33.8% 36.4%
Q  5.5%  7.0%  4.1% 11.5% 14.7% 17.6% 20.7% 24.0% 26.9% 29.4% 32.7% 34.8% 37.6%
J  9.3% 10.6% 11.5%  5.7% 16.3% 18.8% 22.4% 24.4% 27.5% 31.2% 34.5% 36.5% 38.6%
T 12.3% 13.9% 14.7% 16.3%  7.9% 20.9% 23.5% 27.6% 30.3% 32.4% 34.6% 38.0% 39.8%
9 15.1% 16.4% 17.6% 18.8% 20.9%  9.5% 24.7% 28.1% 30.7% 33.2% 36.1% 38.9% 41.6%
8 18.2% 19.2% 20.7% 22.4% 23.5% 24.7% 10.7% 28.5% 31.6% 34.8% 37.7% 39.9% 42.3%
7 21.5% 22.1% 24.0% 24.4% 27.6% 28.1% 28.5% 13.2% 32.9% 36.4% 38.9% 40.7% 42.8%
6 24.1% 25.6% 26.9% 27.5% 30.3% 30.7% 31.6% 32.9% 14.1% 37.0% 40.3% 41.9% 44.4%
5 27.3% 27.9% 29.4% 31.2% 32.4% 33.2% 34.8% 36.4% 37.0% 15.5% 40.2% 43.5% 46.3%
4 29.8% 31.2% 32.7% 34.5% 34.6% 36.1% 37.7% 38.9% 40.3% 40.2% 17.7% 43.8% 47.3%
3 33.5% 33.8% 34.8% 36.5% 38.0% 38.9% 39.9% 40.7% 41.9% 43.5% 43.8% 20.2% 47.4%
2 35.6% 36.4% 37.6% 38.6% 39.8% 41.6% 42.3% 42.8% 44.4% 46.3% 47.3% 47.4% 21.3%

3 players 250000 hands
   A     K     Q     J     T     9     8     7     6     5     4     3     2
A  0.0%  1.3%  3.0%  5.2%  7.2%  8.8% 10.9% 12.2% 14.7% 15.9% 18.6% 19.0% 21.5%
K  1.3%  1.1%  3.9%  5.8%  7.3%  9.5% 11.3% 12.7% 13.9% 17.0% 18.0% 20.0% 21.8%
Q  3.0%  3.9%  2.5%  6.3%  8.7% 10.4% 11.3% 13.1% 15.3% 17.7% 18.9% 20.8% 22.2%
J  5.2%  5.8%  6.3%  3.6%  8.2% 10.4% 12.0% 14.0% 15.3% 18.0% 19.5% 20.9% 23.1%
T  7.2%  7.3%  8.7%  8.2%  5.0% 11.2% 13.5% 14.9% 16.9% 18.7% 19.8% 22.1% 23.2%
9  8.8%  9.5% 10.4% 10.4% 11.2%  6.5% 14.0% 16.2% 16.8% 19.1% 20.5% 22.2% 24.1%
8 10.9% 11.3% 11.3% 12.0% 13.5% 14.0%  7.6% 16.0% 17.9% 18.7% 20.8% 23.3% 24.2%
7 12.2% 12.7% 13.1% 14.0% 14.9% 16.2% 16.0%  8.5% 18.3% 20.1% 22.1% 22.8% 25.0%
6 14.7% 13.9% 15.3% 15.3% 16.9% 16.8% 17.9% 18.3%  9.6% 21.1% 22.5% 23.3% 26.2%
5 15.9% 17.0% 17.7% 18.0% 18.7% 19.1% 18.7% 20.1% 21.1% 10.8% 22.9% 24.1% 27.2%
4 18.6% 18.0% 18.9% 19.5% 19.8% 20.5% 20.8% 22.1% 22.5% 22.9% 11.9% 25.7% 26.7%
3 19.0% 20.0% 20.8% 20.9% 22.1% 22.2% 23.3% 22.8% 23.3% 24.1% 25.7% 13.6% 27.1%
2 21.5% 21.8% 22.2% 23.1% 23.2% 24.1% 24.2% 25.0% 26.2% 27.2% 26.7% 27.1% 14.4%

2 players 250000 hands
   A     K     Q     J     T     9     8     7     6     5     4     3     2
A  0.0%  1.0%  1.9%  2.7%  4.0%  5.0%  6.2%  7.1%  8.0% 10.3% 10.8% 12.0% 12.5%
K  1.0%  0.5%  2.3%  3.4%  4.9%  5.9%  7.1%  7.8%  8.7%  9.9% 11.3% 12.4% 13.3%
Q  1.9%  2.3%  1.3%  3.7%  4.9%  6.0%  6.9%  8.8%  9.5% 10.4% 12.2% 13.0% 13.9%
J  2.7%  3.4%  3.7%  1.6%  5.7%  6.6%  8.1%  9.3%  9.8% 10.5% 11.2% 13.6% 13.5%
T  4.0%  4.9%  4.9%  5.7%  2.3%  7.1%  8.1%  8.7% 10.7% 10.9% 12.6% 13.8% 14.5%
9  5.0%  5.9%  6.0%  6.6%  7.1%  3.5%  8.9%  9.7% 10.5% 12.0% 12.5% 14.4% 14.9%
8  6.2%  7.1%  6.9%  8.1%  8.1%  8.9%  4.1% 10.2% 10.9% 12.7% 13.4% 14.4% 15.6%
7  7.1%  7.8%  8.8%  9.3%  8.7%  9.7% 10.2%  4.2% 11.9% 13.1% 13.5% 15.0% 16.5%
6  8.0%  8.7%  9.5%  9.8% 10.7% 10.5% 10.9% 11.9%  5.7% 13.4% 15.1% 15.1% 16.4%
5 10.3%  9.9% 10.4% 10.5% 10.9% 12.0% 12.7% 13.1% 13.4%  5.2% 15.1% 15.8% 16.7%
4 10.8% 11.3% 12.2% 11.2% 12.6% 12.5% 13.4% 13.5% 15.1% 15.1%  6.3% 16.1% 16.1%
3 12.0% 12.4% 13.0% 13.6% 13.8% 14.4% 14.4% 15.0% 15.1% 15.8% 16.1%  7.4% 17.7%
2 12.5% 13.3% 13.9% 13.5% 14.5% 14.9% 15.6% 16.5% 16.4% 16.7% 16.1% 17.7%  6.9%
Edit: did a larger run for 10 players
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 03-08-2004, 08:10 PM #26 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Source code

Code:
// Domination.cpp : Defines the entry point for the console application.
//

#include "stdafx.h"


DWORD dwSeed;

DWORD PsudoRand()
{
    return dwSeed = 1664525L * dwSeed + 1013904223L;
}

enum Rank 
{
    RANK_A = 12,
    RANK_K = 11,
    RANK_Q = 10,
    RANK_J =  9,
    RANK_T =  8,
    RANK_9 =  7,
    RANK_8 =  6,
    RANK_7 =  5,
    RANK_6 =  4,
    RANK_5 =  3,
    RANK_4 =  2,
    RANK_3 =  1,
    RANK_2 =  0
};

enum Suit 
{
    SUIT_C = 0,
    SUIT_D = 1,
    SUIT_H = 2,
    SUIT_S = 3
};

class CCard 
{
public:
    CCard() {}
    CCard(int suit, int rank) { m_iValue = rank + (suit * 16); }
    CCard(CCard &card) { m_iValue = card.m_iValue; }

    void Set(int suit, int rank) { m_iValue = rank + (suit * 16); }

    int GetRank() { return m_iValue % 16; }
    int GetSuit() { return m_iValue / 16; }

protected:
    int m_iValue;
};

class CHand
{
public:
    BOOL IsPair() { return m_rgCCard[0].GetRank() == m_rgCCard[1].GetRank(); }
    BOOL IsDominated(CHand &hand);

    int GetLeftRank() { return m_rgCCard[0].GetRank(); }
    int GetLeftSuit() { return m_rgCCard[0].GetSuit(); }
    int GetRightRank() { return m_rgCCard[1].GetRank(); }
    int GetRightSuit() { return m_rgCCard[1].GetSuit(); }

protected:
    CCard m_rgCCard[2];
};

void InitDeck(CCard rgcardDeck[52])
{
    int i, j;

    for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
    {
        for (j = 0; j < 13; j++)
        {
            rgcardDeck[j + (i * 13)].Set(i, j);
        }
    }
}

void ShuffleDeck(CCard rgcardDeck[52], int iTableSize)
{
    int i;
    DWORD rand;
    CCard cardTemp;

    for (i = 0; i < (iTableSize * 2); i++)
    {
        rand = PsudoRand() % 52;
        cardTemp = rgcardDeck[i];
        rgcardDeck[i] = rgcardDeck[rand];
        rgcardDeck[rand] = cardTemp;
    }
}

BOOL CHand::IsDominated(CHand &hand)
{
    // Are we a pair?
    if (IsPair())
    {
        // Only dominated by another pair
        if (hand.IsPair() &&
            (hand.m_rgCCard[0].GetRank() > (m_rgCCard[0].GetRank())))
        {
            // Bigger pair
            return TRUE;
        }
    }
    else
    {
        // Is the other hand a pair?
        if (hand.IsPair())
        {
            if ((hand.m_rgCCard[0].GetRank() >= m_rgCCard[0].GetRank()) ||
                (hand.m_rgCCard[0].GetRank() >= m_rgCCard[1].GetRank()))
            {
                // Bigger or equal to either card
                return TRUE;
            }
        }
        else
        {
            if ((hand.m_rgCCard[0].GetRank() == m_rgCCard[0].GetRank()) &&
                (hand.m_rgCCard[1].GetRank() > m_rgCCard[1].GetRank()))
            {
                return TRUE;
            }
            else if ((hand.m_rgCCard[1].GetRank() == m_rgCCard[1].GetRank()) &&
                (hand.m_rgCCard[0].GetRank() > m_rgCCard[0].GetRank()))
            {
                return TRUE;
            }
        }
    }

    return FALSE;
}

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
    int i, j, k;
    CCard rgcardDeck[52];
    CHand *pCHandLeft;
    CHand *pCHandRight;
    int rgrgrgiDomination[13][13];
    int rgrgrgiOccurances[13][13];
    int iTableSize = 7;
    int iSampleSize = 250000;

    dwSeed = GetTickCount();

    InitDeck(rgcardDeck);

    memset(rgrgrgiDomination, 0,  sizeof(int) * 13 * 13);
    memset(rgrgrgiOccurances, 0,  sizeof(int) * 13 * 13);

    for (i=0; i< iSampleSize; i++)
    {
        // Shuffle
        ShuffleDeck(rgcardDeck, iTableSize);

        // Check for domination
        for (j=0; j< iTableSize; j++)
        {
            pCHandLeft = (CHand *) (rgcardDeck + (j * 2));

            if (pCHandLeft->GetLeftRank() < pCHandLeft->GetRightRank())
            {
                rgrgrgiOccurances[pCHandLeft->GetLeftRank()][pCHandLeft->GetRightRank()]++;
            }
            else
            {
                rgrgrgiOccurances[pCHandLeft->GetRightRank()][pCHandLeft->GetLeftRank()]++;
            }

            for (k=0; k < iTableSize; k++)
            {
                if (j == k) continue;
                pCHandRight = (CHand *) (rgcardDeck + (k * 2));

                if (pCHandLeft->GetLeftRank() < pCHandLeft->GetRightRank())
                {
                    if (pCHandLeft->IsDominated(*pCHandRight))
                    {
                        rgrgrgiDomination[pCHandLeft->GetLeftRank()][pCHandLeft->GetRightRank()]++;
                        break;
                    }
                    
                }
                else
                {
                    if (pCHandLeft->IsDominated(*pCHandRight))
                    {
                        rgrgrgiDomination[pCHandLeft->GetRightRank()][pCHandLeft->GetLeftRank()]++;
                        break;
                    }
                }
            }

        }
    }

    // Print the results
    char rgchRanks[13] = { '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', '9', 'T', 'J', 'Q', 'K', 'A' };
    int iPercent;
     
    printf("%i players %i hands\n", iTableSize, iSampleSize);
    printf("   A     K     Q     J     T     9     8     7     6     5     4     3     2\n");
    for (i = 12; i>= 0; i--)
    {
        printf("%c ", rgchRanks[i]);

        for (j = 12; j >= 0; j--)
        {
            
            if (i < j)
            {
                if (rgrgrgiOccurances[i][j] != 0)
                {   
                    iPercent = (rgrgrgiDomination[i][j] * 1000) / rgrgrgiOccurances[i][j];
                }
                else
                {
                    iPercent = 0;
                }
            }
            else
            {
                if (rgrgrgiOccurances[j][i] != 0)
                {   
                    iPercent = (rgrgrgiDomination[j][i] * 1000) / rgrgrgiOccurances[j][i];
                }
                else
                {
                    iPercent = 0;
                }
            }
            
            printf("%2d%c%.1d%c ", iPercent / 10, '.', iPercent % 10, '%');
        }

        printf("\n");
    }

    return 0;
}
Reply With Quote
ttanaka
Old 03-14-2004, 02:27 PM #27 (permalink)  
ttanaka's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,184
ttanaka has disabled reputation
Wow, this is awesome...
Reply With Quote
!Luck
Old 04-26-2004, 01:43 AM #28 (permalink)  
!Luck's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
!Luck is on a distinguished road
I am little confused on what each of these number mean, i re read it several times and i am still not sure.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 04-26-2004, 06:52 AM #29 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by !Luck
I am little confused on what each of these number mean, i re read it several times and i am still not sure.
Odds someone at the table has you rank dominated.
Reply With Quote
doubleup
Old 05-15-2004, 10:35 PM #30 (permalink)  
doubleup's Avatar
3-of-a-Kind

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 109
doubleup
Send a message via Yahoo to doubleup
Just wanted to know if you ever completed this program? How helpful would this program be?
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 05-17-2004, 07:42 PM #31 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleup
Just wanted to know if you ever completed this program? How helpful would this program be?
No, I'm such a slacker...

Hey, wait! It's already in the thread with source code. Wow! How did that happen?
 
Reply With Quote
doubleup
Old 05-18-2004, 10:34 PM #32 (permalink)  
doubleup's Avatar
3-of-a-Kind

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 109
doubleup
Send a message via Yahoo to doubleup
LOL, ok for us non computer programmers. What do we do with the source code?
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 05-18-2004, 11:27 PM #33 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleup
LOL, ok for us non computer programmers. What do we do with the source code?
Print it and hang it up on your wall marveling at it's sheer genius?
 
Reply With Quote
Xianti
Old 05-19-2004, 01:10 AM #34 (permalink)  
Xianti's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: facebook.com/xianti
Posts: 5,289
Xianti has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleup
LOL, ok for us non computer programmers. What do we do with the source code?
Print it and hang it up on your wall marveling at it's sheer genius?
<chortle>
Reply With Quote
fishstick
Old 05-19-2004, 04:40 PM #35 (permalink)  
fishstick's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 1,405
fishstick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xianti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleup
LOL, ok for us non computer programmers. What do we do with the source code?
Print it and hang it up on your wall marveling at it's sheer genius?
<chortle>
between fnord's sparkling wit, and xianti's robust cleavage, i just can't concentrate on poker today! :P
Reply With Quote
AvatarKava
Old 05-28-2004, 07:41 AM #36 (permalink)  
AvatarKava's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 464
AvatarKava
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pokersource/

Might also be of some interest for you guys, if you're into the whole sim thing.
Reply With Quote
allLiving
Old 05-28-2004, 07:44 PM #37 (permalink)  
allLiving's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 799
allLiving
Send a message via AIM to allLiving
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishstick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xianti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleup
LOL, ok for us non computer programmers. What do we do with the source code?
Print it and hang it up on your wall marveling at it's sheer genius?
<chortle>
between fnord's sparkling wit, and xianti's robust cleavage, i just can't concentrate on poker today! :P
This post has no informative value, I just wanted to see what it looked like when I quote someone who is quoting someone who is quoting someone who is quoting someone else! Oooo!

PocketFives - allLiving
Pokerstars - [595-ESCAPE]
 
Reply With Quote
SpecOps
Old 05-28-2004, 09:03 PM #38 (permalink)  

Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sactown, CA
Posts: 57
SpecOps
Send a message via ICQ to SpecOps Send a message via MSN to SpecOps Send a message via Yahoo to SpecOps
Quote:
Originally Posted by allLiving
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishstick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xianti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleup
LOL, ok for us non computer programmers. What do we do with the source code?
Print it and hang it up on your wall marveling at it's sheer genius?
<chortle>
between fnord's sparkling wit, and xianti's robust cleavage, i just can't concentrate on poker today! :P
This post has no informative value, I just wanted to see what it looked like when I quote someone who is quoting someone who is quoting someone who is quoting someone else! Oooo!

Wow...and I though I was bored at work today.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 05-28-2004, 09:21 PM #39 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpecOps
Quote:
Originally Posted by allLiving
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishstick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xianti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleup
LOL, ok for us non computer programmers. What do we do with the source code?
Print it and hang it up on your wall marveling at it's sheer genius?
<chortle>
between fnord's sparkling wit, and xianti's robust cleavage, i just can't concentrate on poker today! :P
This post has no informative value, I just wanted to see what it looked like when I quote someone who is quoting someone who is quoting someone who is quoting someone else! Oooo!

Wow...and I though I was bored at work today.
Party on!
 
Reply With Quote
fishstick
Old 05-28-2004, 09:37 PM #40 (permalink)  
fishstick's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 1,405
fishstick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpecOps
Quote:
Originally Posted by allLiving
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishstick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xianti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleup
LOL, ok for us non computer programmers. What do we do with the source code?
Print it and hang it up on your wall marveling at it's sheer genius?
<chortle>
between fnord's sparkling wit, and xianti's robust cleavage, i just can't concentrate on poker today! :P
This post has no informative value, I just wanted to see what it looked like when I quote someone who is quoting someone who is quoting someone who is quoting someone else! Oooo!

Wow...and I though I was bored at work today.
Party on!
a fishstick post with "no informative value"??? i think not!
Reply With Quote
fishstick
Old 05-28-2004, 09:39 PM #41 (permalink)  
fishstick's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 1,405
fishstick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpecOps
Quote:
Originally Posted by allLiving
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishstick
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xianti
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by doubleup
LOL, ok for us non computer programmers. What do we do with the source code?
Print it and hang it up on your wall marveling at it's sheer genius?
<chortle>
between fnord's sparkling wit, and xianti's robust cleavage, i just can't concentrate on poker today! :P
This post has no informative value, I just wanted to see what it looked like when I quote someone who is quoting someone who is quoting someone who is quoting someone else! Oooo!

Wow...and I though I was bored at work today.
Party on!
a fishstick post with "no informative value"??? i think not!
Reply With Quote
jmrogers7
Old 06-01-2004, 01:58 PM #42 (permalink)  
jmrogers7's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
jmrogers7
Send a message via AIM to jmrogers7
There's that double-post thing again, fishstick. Did you forget to take your medicine again?
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
 
Reply With Quote
fishstick
Old 06-01-2004, 04:59 PM #43 (permalink)  
fishstick's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 1,405
fishstick
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmrogers7
There's that double-post thing again, fishstick. Did you forget to take your medicine again?
you know - oddly, that only seems to happen when i post from home???

think of it as fishstick doublemint!

can i have my medication now?
Reply With Quote
jmrogers7
Old 06-01-2004, 05:12 PM #44 (permalink)  
jmrogers7's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
jmrogers7
Send a message via AIM to jmrogers7
Quote:
you know - oddly, that only seems to happen when i post from home???
Well, those nursing "home" technical support people probably suffer from a bit of dimentia from time to time so I would expect that in your environment! 8)
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
 
Reply With Quote
fishstick
Old 06-01-2004, 05:33 PM #45 (permalink)  
fishstick's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 1,405
fishstick
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmrogers7
Well, those nursing "home" technical support people probably suffer from a bit of dimentia from time to time so I would expect that in your environment! 8)
you know, jm, i'm already irritated to be back at work and you're working my one good nerve!

don't make me come to ohio to kick your ass, 'cause i will! (especially if it gets me out of work! )
Reply With Quote
jmrogers7
Old 06-01-2004, 05:40 PM #46 (permalink)  
jmrogers7's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
jmrogers7
Send a message via AIM to jmrogers7
Haha! I'm in a good mood today. I got to see my 2 sons over the weekend! The downside is that they live in Charleston, SC so it isn't exactly as frequent an event as I wish it could be.

BTW.... I wasn't all that impressed with Charleston. Not really my type of city I guess. Just my humble opinion.

But, It was great to see them over the long weekend and now I'm back and feeling salty! So, don't hold any of my comments against me, OK?
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
 
Reply With Quote
fishstick
Old 06-01-2004, 06:03 PM #47 (permalink)  
fishstick's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 1,405
fishstick
glad you had a good weekend and got some time with your sons. never been to charlston or south carolina, but i like the raliegh/durham area of north carolina. i've even thought of moving there, but my wife is japanese and i'm a white guy, so not to sure how that would be received in the south.

i can't really complain (although, i probably will ) - had an incredible surf session sunday morning, and hit second in two $20 SNG's over the weekend.

so, i'll let you slide this one time!

what was this thread anyway - rank domination or something???

hey jm, look at my posted hand history on the small end of a full house and give me your thoughts - after my blistering FTR tourney play, no one will give me advice any more. :P
Reply With Quote
jmrogers7
Old 06-01-2004, 06:29 PM #48 (permalink)  
jmrogers7's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
jmrogers7
Send a message via AIM to jmrogers7
I saw that hand history a little earlier. Looks like maybe you did a "search and replace" on your screenname and missed a couple of them because when I tried to copy and paste it into the hand history replayer it crapped out. After looking back at it it looked like your "fishstick" name and your Party Poker name (at least I assume that it's you) were both in the hand history.

Anyway, after it crapped out on the replayer, i lost interest.

I'll take another look (the loooong way, ugh....... just kiddin') and, as I always do, I'll tell you what I think!
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
 
Reply With Quote
fishstick
Old 06-01-2004, 06:48 PM #49 (permalink)  
fishstick's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 1,405
fishstick
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmrogers7
I saw that hand history a little earlier. Looks like maybe you did a "search and replace" on your screenname and missed a couple of them because when I tried to copy and paste it into the hand history replayer it crapped out. After looking back at it it looked like your "fishstick" name and your Party Poker name (at least I assume that it's you) were both in the hand history.

Anyway, after it crapped out on the replayer, i lost interest.

I'll take another look (the loooong way, ugh....... just kiddin') and, as I always do, I'll tell you what I think!
it's fixed - thanks!
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.