|
lolzzz_321
|
10-15-2004, 12:37 AM
Post subject: 6 Max or 10 player ring games?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
NO YOU
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: My ice is polarized
Posts: 2,797
|
|
I play @ Empire Poker and was wondering in your opinion which is more profitable: the 10 max or the 6 max tables playing 25NL.
-Thanks
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Humphrind
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,887
|
|
{moved from Beginner's Circle}
|
|
I don't know what they have to say
It makes no difference anyway.
Whatever it is...
I'm against it.
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,333
|
|
If you're good and not interested in playing 4 tables at once, 6max is the way to go.
|
|
|
|
DavSimon
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Mount Holly, NC
Posts: 813
|
|
I have tried the 6max table and do very well when there are 5-6 people playing....however when it drops to 4 and occasionally 3 for short periods I have a lot of difficulty. The easy answer is to work on my short-handed game (part of the reson I have difficulty w/ tournaments) but I just feel more comfortable playing NL at 8,9,10 person tables. Try both...play nothing but 6max for a day or two then go back to the 10 person tables - keep track to see which is more profitable to you.
|
|
|
|
SteveO
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 755
|
|
I always stuck to 10max tables. I think it was safer to clear the bonus and made an OK profit. Recently, I have played 6 max and find them to be much more fun.
10 max is easier to play super tight and get your feet wet.
6 max has a lot more action because you have to play more hands.
I have been crushing 6max so far over the short term compared to 10max. Things can go bad quickly shorthanded so make sure you have the funds to absorb the swings.
|
|
Send lawyers, guns and money - the sh*t has hit the fan!
|
|
lolzzz_321
|
|
NO YOU
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: My ice is polarized
Posts: 2,797
|
|
Hmmmm... I have been playing both the 6max and the regular (10max) $25NL tables, and have found that the 6max tables are more profitable to me. The only advantage of the 10max tables are the cool names that the tables have (i.e. Dances With Wolves and Hearty Ale...). Seems easier to bluff after the flop on 6 max probabaly because you have 4 or sometimes less people playing, thus making it more unlikely that someone got a piece of the flop. Also, if I was a n00b(no, I don't play Counter-strike...) I would go play the 6 handed games because there are less people, I'd be scared of a big table full of voracious vultures vying vehemently to tear my bankroll up. Just my superior logic... 
Thank You For The Replies
|
|
|
|
lonnie
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 923
|
|
I think you stand a better chance of falling victim to a shark attack at a 6 max table. It is much easier to isolate you that way. At a full ring, you can sit back and only wait for premium starting hands and great flops. If you are a really good player, I think 6 max is the way to go. I'm not good enough for it yet myself, although I do fairly well in SNG's once they get down to 6 and less.
Lots more bluffing and mediocre hands are betting at you in 6 max.
|
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
Linear Mode
