|
Off5th
|
02-07-2006, 09:17 AM
Post subject: 3-tabling $50 n/l
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ewa Beach
Posts: 180
|
|
Just an odd question to the players that play $50 n/l who multitable. I'm just wondering how big of a bankroll do you need to multitable $50 n/l. I got up there once then hit a major downswing so I'm just taking precautions before i move up again. I'm well aware of the 15 buy-in bankroll management rule but that applies only to 1 table.
|
|
"I want to win money so I play the worst. If I could find a group of 2nd graders with $200 bankrolls I would play them."
-Aokrangly
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
IOS
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 100NL 6max
Posts: 84
|
|
$1,500 minimum. That way you aren't risking more than 10% at a time. If you follow that rule and your bankroll is still taking major swings, you have some leaks you need to address.
|
|
|
|
Irisheyes
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: over there
Posts: 3,708
|
|
I like to have 2k behind me. Above that I just depends on your risk tolerance.
|
|
|
|
SinkRox
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 624
|
|
15 buy-ins is the minimum, I like 20-30 unless im at a level Im very comfortable at and have played at for ages. (I generally 4-7 table)
When multi-tabling, in theory you do not have to adjust your BR/Buyin rule - you're simply playing hands at a faster rate. however it may be a nice idea to stick to the rule where you're never playing/riskign more than 10% of your BR at once. The only way multi-tabling can increase risk is if you tilt, then you may spew more chips.
|
|
Experimenting - 200NL 5max.
"They say that dreams are real only as long as they last. Couldn't you say the same thing about life?" Waking life
|
|
Bo G
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 274
|
|
I thought your bank roll was suppose to be 15-20 buy ins for a level (i.e $1,000 is 20 buy ins at $50NL) without effect of multi tabling or not.
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
1000
|
|
|
|
Lodogg
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Stealing your C-bet
Posts: 199
|
|
I started 2 tabling NL 50 at $1000 (20 buy-ins). I believe this is okay because when multitabling you decrease the variance of bankroll swings. Double the hands=double the cashouts :0)
|
|
|
|
IOS
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 100NL 6max
Posts: 84
|
|
Oh yeah, I forgot you are probably talking about full ring. 6max generally requires more buyins.
|
|
|
|
Off5th
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ewa Beach
Posts: 180
|
|
Would you then play more hands 6-max compared to full ring????
|
|
"I want to win money so I play the worst. If I could find a group of 2nd graders with $200 bankrolls I would play them."
-Aokrangly
|
|
twosevoff
|
|
Flush
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 526
|
|
$1000
|
|
|
|
SinkRox
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 624
|
|
yeh at 6max u get thru hands alot quicker. there is also far more varience so you'll probly want 25+ buyins
|
|
Experimenting - 200NL 5max.
"They say that dreams are real only as long as they last. Couldn't you say the same thing about life?" Waking life
|
|
reap
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8
|
|
1000
20x the buy-in is a good rule of thumb, but more's not bad.
It doesn't matter how many tables you play at once, BR is always the same for a given limit.
Actually, multitabling should smooth out your hourly rate (because you're playing so many hands) a little bit, but that has nothing to do with your win/hand variation and win/hand rate.
|
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
Linear Mode
