Originally Posted by Parasurama

Well any set is possible. It doesn't have to be a wide value range that beats you, your opponent just isn't taking this line ever with a hand that you're ahead of.

Makes sense, like I said didn't think about it alot but yeah that makes sense, I think I overestimated in the moment the amount of draws on the turn. BTW, I have no way to convince you of this so I wont try, but, I c-bet this flop almost always, I don't recall why I decided not to.

EDIT: sig was conceived of while thinking about tennis, but I think it applies to a lot of games, poker being one of them. I never thought about chess but I wouldn't say the rules are logical. Not to say poker's rules (in terms of hand rankings) are incredibly logical but the rules regarding betting could not be any other way. And just from those rules we have so many options and variations that it's beautiful to think about. Chess is equal or greater in complexity, but not so beautiful in the simplicity of its rules.

Subjective. Either way, vn thought.