Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

22-77 UTG?

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Stripclubjunkie
Old 02-02-2006, 04:56 PM     Post subject: 22-77 UTG? #1 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Stripclubs
Posts: 1,293
Stripclubjunkie is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Stripclubjunkie
You get dealt a small pair, 22-77 UTG. What to do? Raise? Call? I will probably get spanked if I open limp UTG. What pot odds are good enough preflop to call with a small pp hoping to set it?

Strip
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
WildBobAA
Old 02-02-2006, 05:21 PM #2 (permalink)  
WildBobAA's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: lol i dunno
Posts: 1,811
WildBobAA can only hope to improve
Send a message via AIM to WildBobAA
Depends on the table. In a 6max game I always raise these but you're talking about full.

My standard play is to fold but if there's a lot of limping and I think I can see a cheap flop I'll limp. (assuming 100BB stacks)
 
Reply With Quote
Stripclubjunkie
Old 02-02-2006, 05:27 PM #3 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Stripclubs
Posts: 1,293
Stripclubjunkie is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Stripclubjunkie
Yes I'm talking about full ring. I used to just raise 3xbb, but I dont think thats the right play. Couldn't I just call, and call raises if pot odds justifies it?How big pot odds am I looking for?

If I holds 88 the chance of flopping trips or quads is 11.8 so am I looking for 8,5:1 potodds? That just seem wrong?

Strip
Reply With Quote
Stripclubjunkie
Old 02-02-2006, 06:08 PM #4 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Stripclubs
Posts: 1,293
Stripclubjunkie is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Stripclubjunkie
Lets say you get TJs in the SB and you got 4 callers of 1$=4$ and you need to call 0.5$. Thats 8:1 pot odds, this is a insta call isn't? How big pot odds do you need to make the call?
Reply With Quote
saywhat2
Old 02-02-2006, 06:52 PM #5 (permalink)  
Straight

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 113
saywhat2
Personally I like to play small pocket pairs with some money in the pot. If I am under the gun with 2-7 I don’t raise. Even when I am at a 6-player table. I limp in and I hope somebody raises behind me. As long as they have enough money left in their stack to cover 10 to 1 on the raise, (more or less the odds I am getting to hit my set) I am calling. I hope to hit my set and go from there. Now If I am in seat’s 6,7 or 8 and I have a pair of 7’s. I will throw a small raise in. I don’t like the idea of raising upfront with small pockets pairs. Lets say you raise 4x the BB with 44 UTG. Even if you get a good flop like 752 rainbow. Because you raised up front 4x the BB you have no idea of knowing where everybody else stands. They could easily have you beat with any pocket pair from 55 to AA. If I have 99 and somebody has raised 4x the BB up front I am just calling. Leaving you in a bad position. So I say play them soft, hope to hit your set and go from there.
Reply With Quote
siknd
Old 02-02-2006, 07:18 PM #6 (permalink)  
siknd's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 359
siknd
depends on table texture, but i generally toss them. almost every other playable hand has folding equity against you. limping UTG can encourage others to limp and eventually the CO-BB are coming in with any two cards. so even if you improve, this is often the spot youll see set-over-set flops.
'If you think a weakness can be turned into a strength, I hate to tell you this, but that's another weakness. '
 
Reply With Quote
r8ed
Old 02-02-2006, 08:22 PM #7 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,524
r8ed
What's wrong with limping these and calling a small raise? You are looking to hit a set. If you do, you almost always have the best hand. Set over set happens less than 8% of the time if memory serves me right. Pocket pairs are the best starting hands if you play them right. If you have PT, look at your most winning hands profit-wise. All pocket pairs besides AK and possibly AQ (that's if you play them right).
Reply With Quote
salsa4ever
Old 02-03-2006, 12:49 AM #8 (permalink)  
salsa4ever's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,073
salsa4ever
Send a message via MSN to salsa4ever
I toss 22-66 in EP full ring. I limp all other pairs.

the problem is that your limping in EP encourages more limping, and then if there is a strong hand in BB or button, they have to raise to like 7BB and that destroys your calling odds. With 77+ I have more chance to hit a 1 card straight, and some chance of having an overpair, and more (comparatively) chance of having a higher set rather than a lower one.

In a 6 max game, u can raise it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigred
Would you bone your cousins? Salsa would.
Quote:
Originally Posted by salsa4ever
well courtie, since we're both clear, would you accept an invitation for some unprotected sex?
 
Reply With Quote
Pelion
Old 02-03-2006, 02:30 AM #9 (permalink)  
Pelion's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,206
Pelion
I open limp at a table where i dont expect to be raised too much. If they are raising more than the 10:1 i need then ill wait for QQ+
gabe: Ive dropped almost 100k in the past 35 days.

bigspenda73: But how much did you win?
 
Reply With Quote
Chicago_Kid
Old 02-03-2006, 04:06 AM #10 (permalink)  
Chicago_Kid's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: People let me tell you about my best friends...
Posts: 1,132
Chicago_Kid
Send a message via AIM to Chicago_Kid
Quote:
Originally Posted by salsa4ever
I toss 22-66 in EP full ring. I limp all other pairs.

the problem is that your limping in EP encourages more limping, and then if there is a strong hand in BB or button, they have to raise to like 7BB and that destroys your calling odds.
I try limp all pairs 55 and up if the table is medium passive or better. If there are a couple bastard TAGs behind you, you might as well fold. IF raised behind, I might call a small raise based on the raiser. Against an "aware" player, you often should fold, because being out of position makes it difficult to get paid off it you hit. Sometimes, however you can score big here.
"Been gone so long, forgot how to poker"
 
Reply With Quote
saywhat2
Old 02-03-2006, 04:39 AM #11 (permalink)  
Straight

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 113
saywhat2
If you are playing you game afraid to hit a set of 2's because somebody may have hit a set of 4's. Than you are not playing your cards right. And there is no way you are getting the best value out of your pocket pairs. We are talking NL here not Fixed. There are sometimes you have to pay them off. Play aggresive not scared. Good players smell scared money.
Reply With Quote
Jimmy Mac
Old 02-03-2006, 07:55 AM #12 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Drinking your milkshake.
Posts: 950
Jimmy Mac
Are you guys seriously folding 22-77 UTG in low stakes NL? I thought I was tight

I'm happy to limp these, I dont mind calling a 4-5BB raise with them so long as the opp has a stack to pay off my set. Set over set is so rare i don't even worry about it.

Moving up in stakes I can see this would be a problem, as an aware player will punish you, but there 'aint too many of those at my level.

(edit - just had a look at my pokertracker. 22-77 UTG & UTG+1: 118 total hands, I am winning 2.4 PtBB per hand playing them like this. Sample size is much too small though. As I said, I can see this play would need adjustment at higher stakes. )
Reply With Quote
siknd
Old 02-03-2006, 12:46 PM #13 (permalink)  
siknd's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 359
siknd
what are the preflop percentages for say 33 against 3 random opponents? 4? theyre ALL going to have overcards, so unlike larger pocket pairs, you need to improve every time.

i dont really think that the implied odds are THAT juicy, considering the number of times youll be calling raises, trapped between raisers etc before even seeing a flop. and yes, just because its NL, doesnt mean that you can loosen up your game because of the elusive goal of destacking someone. devils advocate = that the positional factor is greater in NL, so theres a case for tossing even marginal hands UTG and EP.
'If you think a weakness can be turned into a strength, I hate to tell you this, but that's another weakness. '
 
Reply With Quote
Jimmy Mac
Old 02-03-2006, 01:06 PM #14 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Drinking your milkshake.
Posts: 950
Jimmy Mac
hmmm.. I only have to win about around 10x my call on average when I make a set like this, in order for this play to be profitable (assuming I check/fold with no set). In the loose games I play, I don't think this is too much to expect, even given my positional disadvantage. These guys will take their TPTK or overpair to the felt alot of the time. I've even been all in on the flop with a set vs AK unimproved lol. Just my opinion, but I would feel like I was throwing away value folding these.

Whats your range from UTG, open raise AQ+/99+ fold everthing else?
Reply With Quote
siknd
Old 02-03-2006, 03:58 PM #15 (permalink)  
siknd's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 359
siknd
actually, i usually unload AQ unsuited from utg. although there are times when ill raise KQ suited. depends on my image.

its not that i wont play the small pairs, but if the table is tight OR agressive i usually toss them. ill limp of course if most pots are unraised pf. im raising with 66-77 and above (minus some game-theory percentages)
'If you think a weakness can be turned into a strength, I hate to tell you this, but that's another weakness. '
 
Reply With Quote
Jimmy Mac
Old 02-03-2006, 04:10 PM #16 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: May 2005
Location: Drinking your milkshake.
Posts: 950
Jimmy Mac
heh, fair enough.

If my table is tight, or aggressive, I find another one
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 06:14 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.