|
bigstock2001
|
09-21-2008, 01:18 PM
Post subject: 2 or 3 betting
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: JESUP
Posts: 142
|
|
I am familiar with the term and have seen this term thrown all over the forem this week. So my question is this.
2 or 3 betting is when a raise comes in thats 2 bet correct and a reraise is 3 bet. even in Nl holdem not just limit holdem
If i am correct so far what is an example of when a correct 2 or 3 bet should be used. I know i not ready to use this method but i would like to be able to understand this fundemental.
Thanks
Don
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
3-bet means the third bet, or second raise. If there is a bet on the flop, then a raise, then the next raise is a 3-bet. Preflop the posting of the big blind counts as the first bet, so if there is a raise, the next raise is a 3-bet, the next raise is a 4-bet, and so on.
Also, we usually just refer to the second bet as a raise instead of a 2-bet.
Good luck.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|
|
bigstock2001
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: JESUP
Posts: 142
|
|
Thanks spoon for the insight i was pretty close than on the term, however can you give me an example on how to use a 3 bet correctly. I have been in hands where this happens however I would like to know the correct way to use this. What type of hands should you see a third bet be used with.
Thanks
Don
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-bet any hand in the top half of your opponent's opening range.
|
|
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
I just played this hand and thought it would be helpful since there is a 3-bet preflop and on the flop.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (7 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
BB ($56.15)
UTG ($49.25)
spoonitnow (MP1) ($49.60)
MP2 ($25.50)
CO ($53.70)
Button ($50.90)
SB ($57.65)
Preflop: spoonitnow is MP1 with 7 , 7
1 fold, spoonitnow raises to $2, 1 fold, CO raises to $5, 3 folds, spoonitnow calls $3
Flop: ($10.75) 4 , 6 , 7 (2 players)
spoonitnow checks, CO bets $6.60, spoonitnow raises to $18, CO raises to $48.70 (All-In), spoonitnow calls $26.60 (All-In)
Turn: ($99.95) K (2 players, 2 all-in)
River: ($99.95) 6 (2 players, 2 all-in)
Total pot: $99.95 | Rake: $3
Results in white below:
spoonitnow had 7 , 7 (full house, sevens over sixes).
CO mucked Q , J (flush, King high).
Outcome: spoonitnow won $96.95
Pre-flop, CO's raise to $5 was a 3-bet. The first bet was the big blind posting his blind, the second bet was my raise to $2, and the third bet was CO's raise to $5.
On the flop, CO's raise all-in was a 3-bet. The first bet was his bet of $6.60, the second bet was my raise to $18, and the third bet was his shove all-in.
If you need any further clarification, don't be afraid to ask.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mezza Morta
3-bet any hand in the top half of your opponent's opening range.
|
This usually isn't best. Refer to the discussion of 3-betting in terms of Renton's ABCD subrange concept in the FR forum for more information.
Edit: I decided to come back and give an example to get things started in the right direction a bit more smoothly for you.
1. A 3-bet bluff is not profitable against all Villains in all situations. In these spots, we should be 3-betting for value most, if not all, of the time.
2. Suppose a Villain opens with 99+ and continues against a 3-bet with QQ+, then a 3-bet bluff is not profitable (a quick calculation can confirm), and a 3-bet for value with QQ isn't profitable even though it's in the top half of Villain's open-raising range.
3. In situations where a 3-bet bluff is profitable but you decide to only do so with X% of hands, you should tend to form that X% from hands that aren't strong enough to flat call, but have some sort of post-flop playability for the times that you do see a flop. For example, 74s will perform better than 72o as a 3-bet bluff because it holds more equity in the times you are forced to see a flop.
4. The proportion of times you 3-bet for value to the times you 3-bet as a bluff will give an indication as to if you are vulnerable to 4-bet bluffs.
I hope this makes for a more complete response.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|