|
JD52
|
07-20-2005, 09:05 PM
Post subject: .05/.10 NL Table Cracking
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 11
|
|
Approximatly 2 weeks ago I began an experiment at some of the lower level tables. Namely the .05/.10 at Pstars. I have played approximatly 30 hours and have been able to turn a $2.45 per hour per table profit. This is approximatly 24 times the BB per hour. My question is how is this happening? 24X is much larger than the 1 BB an hour rule most pro's live by.
I believe the answer lies in the fact that the .5/.10 tables are just loaded with fish who consistantly bet hard with two pair. I always see $2 pots taken down by high card Ace and equally crappy hands. A set of anything regularly cleans house. Calling stations galore.
OK so I answered my own question. Please feel free to discuss.
|
|
|| The shows over. A lot of people look pissed. ||
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
1bb/100 is for limit.
5-10 big bets/100 or 10-20 big blinds/100 is sustainable for most at NL.
-'rilla
|
|
|
|
evman150
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Victoria BC
Posts: 269
|
|
20 odd big blinds/100 at the micros isn't that special. It's definitely solid but it's not OMG.
I don't have poker tracker but I figure I average about $3/table/hour which works out to 24 big blinds/100 at NL25 (assuming 50 hands/table/hour).
Now if you could sustain that at 1000NL I would be impressed.
|
|
Light years ahead of the competition.
|
|
Les_Worm
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,697
|
|
Also 30 hours isn't shit.
|
The artist formerly known as Knish
Only mediocre players are always at their best.
Phil Ivey Owns You
|
|
Silly String
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 1,434
|
|
All I got to say is:
"Keep doing it and move up, when your bankroll is extra thick."
|
|
Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.
|
|
Cocco_Bill
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,254
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
1bb/100 is for limit.
5-10 big bets/100 or 10-20 big blinds/100 is sustainable for most dedicated and experienced players at low stakes NL.
-'rilla
|
FYP
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cocco_Bill
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
1bb/100 is for limit.
5-10 big bets/100 or 10-20 big blinds/100 is sustainable for most dedicated and experienced players at low stakes NL.
-'rilla
|
FYP |
Was easy for me! 
-'rilla
|
|
|
|
Cocco_Bill
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,254
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cocco_Bill
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
1bb/100 is for limit.
5-10 big bets/100 or 10-20 big blinds/100 is sustainable for most dedicated and experienced players at low stakes NL.
-'rilla
|
FYP |
Was easy for me!
-'rilla |
Hey, me too. 
I've actually been running at ~~15BB/100 over my last 17k hands.
Although I must admit that I am unable to get anywhere near that winrate on the shark infested Party network!
|
|
|
|
biondino
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
Posts: 3,170
|
|
I am really sad as I have averaged 46BB/100 over my last thousand or so £0.15/£0.25 hands at William Hill and I know it's got to end soon 
(my overall BB/100 at this level is only about 11, fwiw, which I'm happy enough with at this early stage in my poker career)
|
|
|
|
Laeelin
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,137
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by biondino
I am really sad as I have averaged 46BB/100 over my last thousand or so £0.15/£0.25 hands at William Hill and I know it's got to end soon |
1000 hands is nothing, I wouldnt even worry about it at this point.
That isnt enough to even start seeing trends
|
|
|
|
ChezJ
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 1,456
|
|
the 1 bb/hr cited for limit hold 'em applies mainly to medium/high limit tables. i usually average 5+ bb/hr at very low limit tables, both online and offline. of course table selection is key.
|
|
|
|
WhooFleuryScores
|
|
07-25-2005, 08:25 PM
Post subject: I second that
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 918
|
|
Quote:
|
Although I must admit that I am unable to get anywhere near that winrate on the shark infested Party network!
|
That must be why I've hit a skid over at Empire.I went over to Bodog and saw fish galore wow.
-$400 doesn't happen out of nowhere.The sharks have taken over lol.
|
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
Linear Mode
